“and NO commodore has ever had a better finish to ANY falcon. LMFAO!!”

Even as a Ford fan, I dunno. There were times when GM-H had the goods in finish and fit (I’m thinking 1967 HR), but in the Commodore era, what about the VN when up against the unfortunate early EA? Both were nasty.

But certainly from 1993 onwards, when I got interested in all this, the Falcons the family owned were streets ahead of the Commodores in fit and finish, and reliability. Don’t even get me started on the VR-VS timing sender units failing in the heat, at 110km/h, and losing all power brakes, steering and motor! Falcon was better to drive on the open road to boot.

Our ownership experience has been without fault. What can you say, I researched before I bought…

Bwahahahaaha! Funniest thing I have read all day!

Completely agree. The Ford drivetrain is an absolute pleasure.

any company car manufacturer can crank up the RPM and make more power, but at the cost which is higher RPM and yet unusable for an ordinary librarian chick or a office clerk. Duh!

and how about torque, miserable 336Nm at sky high 4700rpm, a load of crap!

Get a Falcon, and you will see what the TORQUE is!!!! it is not about those miserable 200kW, its about what torque it makes and drive-ability of a car.

And not sitting at 60km/h at 30kW like in Aurion, try a BA-BF-FG and ride at 56-60kW at 60k per hour at around 1250-1500rpm. That is what you need!

Not some front wheel drive crap that warps and can flip on the road and under steer in wet!