Toyota TRD Aurion Finally Here
August 20, 2007 by George Skentzos
It was only yesterday we reported on glimpses of a second more luxurious TRD Aurion, and now only a day later Toyota have officially unveiled their TRD Aurion line up.
The TRD Aurion range comprises of two model grades – the 3500S (Sports) and 3500SL (Sports Luxury). Both come with a venomous supercharged 3.5L V6 engine producing 241kW and 400Nm at 4000rpm mated to a six-speed automatic transmission with sequential shift.
Power is controversially sent to the front wheels, although surprisingly it is only 0.3 seconds off the XR6T with the sprint from 0-100km/h taking just 6.1 seconds.
The 3500S is strategically priced just below the luxury-car tax threshold with a price tag of $56,990, whilst the higher spec 3500SL will set you back $61,500 placing it above the threshold.
Apart from the engine, both models have TRD unique sports suspension, TRD performance brakes, TRD unique 19-inch alloy wheels with 245/35ZR19 Dunlop Sport Maxx performance tyres, TRD unique engine cover and TRD sports exhaust system with integrated exhaust outlets.
TRD Aurion 3500SL has higher specifications, including dual-zone air conditioning with push-button heater and ventilation controls, six-way power-adjustable front passenger seat, Smart Entry and Push Start, and clearance and reversing sonar. Additional features over 3500S also include plum-coloured full leather seat trim, and colour-keyed (dark grey/plum) TRD leather-bound steering wheel and gearshift knob.
“We are targeting a sophisticated market with a high-quality product that balances performance, handling and technology,” David Buttner, senior executive director sales and marketing.
Later this year Toyota will introduce their second vehicle to their new performance range with the TRD HiLux. Based on a 4WD Double Cab, it will feature a supercharged 4.0-litre V6 engine that will lift power substantially over the standard engine’s 175kW.
Fans will also be pleased to hear a feasibility study is underway on a third model – no prizes if you can guess what it might be.
Expect a full review and road test of the TRD Aurion soon, but for now, check out the cars specifications:
|
2007 TRD Aurion major specifications |
||
|
3500S |
3500SL |
|
| Type |
Petrol |
|
| Capacity (cc) |
3456 |
|
| Code/name |
2GR-FE |
|
| Description |
Six cylinders, 60 degree V-formation, chain-driven DOHC with roller rockers, four valves per cylinder, all alloy, cross-flow heads, cast-iron cylinder liners |
|
| Bore x stroke (mm) |
94.0 x 83.0 |
|
| Compression ratio |
10.8:1 |
|
| Fuel system |
Sequential multi-point electronic port fuel injection with ACIS, hot-wire airflow meter |
|
| Fuel type |
98 RON PULP |
|
| Fuel tank capacity (L) |
70 |
|
| Fuel economy (L/100km)* |
10.9 |
|
| Carbon dioxide (g/km) |
257 |
|
| Emission rating |
Euro IV |
|
| Max. power |
241kW @ 6400rpm |
|
| Max. torque |
400Nm @ 4000rpm |
|
| 0-100km/h (sec) |
6.09 |
|
| Driven wheels |
Front |
|
| Transmission description |
Six-speed automatic, electronically controlled with lock-up torque converter and art ificial intelligence shift control |
|
| Transmission code |
U660E |
|
| Transmission control |
Electronic |
|
| Gear ratios – 1st |
3.300:1 |
|
| 2nd |
1.900:1 |
|
| 3rd |
1.420:1 |
|
| 4th |
1.000:1 |
|
| 5th |
0.713:1 |
|
| 6th |
0.608:1 |
|
| Reverse |
4.148:1 |
|
| Final drive ratio |
3.685:1 |
|
| Type |
Rack and pinion |
|
| Operation |
Power |
|
| Turns lock to lock |
3.2 |
|
| Front brakes |
Ventilated discs, 325mm x 32mm |
|
| Front calipers |
Dual-piston |
|
| Rear brakes |
Ventilated discs, 310mm x 18mm |
|
| Rear calipers |
Single piston |
|
| ABS anti-skid brakes with Electronic Brakeforce Distribution and Brake Assist |
Std. |
|
| Traction Control |
Std. |
|
| Vehicle Stability Control |
Std. |
|
| Front |
TRD unique sports suspension with increased coil spring rates and re-tuned shock absorbers, ball-joint-mounted anti-roll bar |
|
| Rear |
TRD unique sports suspension with increased coil spring rates and re-tuned shock absorbers incorporating internal rebound springs, ball-joint-mounted anti-roll bar |
|
| Rims |
19 x 8J alloys |
|
| Tyres |
245/35ZR19 93Y |
|
| Type |
Monocoque, four-door sedan |
|
| Length (mm) |
4890 |
|
| Width (mm) |
1820 |
|
| Height (mm) |
1460 |
|
| Wheelbase (mm) |
2775 |
|
| Front track (mm) |
1572 |
|
| Rear track (mm) |
1562 |
|
| Ground clearance (mm) |
104 |
|
| Towing capacity with trailer brakes (kg)** |
1600 |
|
| Towing capacity without trailer brakes (kg)** |
500 |
|
| Seating capacity (incl. driver) |
5 |
|
| Luggage capacity (L) |
504 |
|
Print it: 
0 
0 
Andrew – is that it, is that the best you got. Toyota is screwing Holden and Ford to wall and people like yourself hate it with a passion.
I enjoy the fact that i’m probably to raw for your pride of Holden and Ford. Did i cut to close to the bone !!
That 3.5 v6 i just mentioned is exactly what Ford Australia is getting for the Falcon in 2010 yet you so arrogantly accuse me of knowing nothing outside of Toyota. The fact is, i could probably tell Holden/Ford tribalist more about the direction thier supported automotive company is travelling in then they could tell me about Toyota yet the shear arrogance of some accuse Toyota loyalist of being blind.
And no i didn’t skip over the fact that the Ford 3.5 is a damn good engine. Infact, the same donk to power the Falcon will power the new Mazda CX-9… did you know that. ?? However, Toyota’s 3.5 engine is also one of the most highly regarded engines aswell.
Exactly to the point i made referance to earlier – many of those strenghts that Falcons and Commodores traded on for years have been slowly but surely erroding and now the RWD debate pretty nuch leaves one of the final cards left. Ford switching to the 3.5 is sure to bring greater refinement then the current L6 9and economy) but with it the Falcon will loose the capacity edge and torque advantage that they currently enjoy.
Limp wrist Roberto – That is ‘MR Dog Of a Man’ to you.
I guess i’m really getting on your nerves with some bluntant home truths about Holden/Ford, probably issues that you have never gave anythought towards. Isn’t it wonderful to have your thought process stretched beyond normal means. I guess Holden and Ford are not the so called Australian companies after all… are they !!
DON’T YOU JUST HATE ‘ME’ WITH A PASSION (especially when i screw you to the wall)
And don’t even get me started on Holdens failings because believe you me – it would be one very extended list. The Crewman, Adventra, Monaro, Zafira, Frontera, Jackaroo, Vectra and Cruze are all recent failings of Holden without going back to many years to list the abundance of others. What ever happened with the ‘ole 5.0 Aussie V8… it GOT passed over for that pig of a engine Gen3 instead. Yeah, real Australian of you Holden.
Future failings – Holdens Daewoo Outlet.
And don’t you hate it even more that the girly Aurion has more balls then a brute mans car like a Falcon or Commodore.
And more tacked on taillamps – now you realy have just proven how much of a hammer you are. Every second friggen Crapodore that i follow have those Supercheap Tack-ons while every 50th Hilux/Cruiser driver is just as silly to do the same.
ok roberto we get it….you dont like the car!
seriously, different people have different tastes with cars and what is good and what isnt, stop trying to force your ideas onto everyone that doesnt agree with you!
Looks great in my opinion. Though I’m not sure whether I’d get it over a Liberty GT, but I’ll reserve judgement until after test driving them both.
Nick… fact is I like the Aurion, but not the TRD closet wussy job which is bugger all above the Sportivo in terms of look! I would like to see Toyota tackle HRT & FPR direct (not with this TRD version).
Dingo is just chopping you guys!
Go run back to your caves and make subjective commentary because the cold hard facts tell us that the Ford and Holden job just doesn’t cut it any more.
Dingo,
mate all im doing is defending the way you try to say ford is such a piece of junk and point out to you that toyotas arent really that much better GET IT?????
of course i know the 3.5L is destined for more than the falcon why would you think i wouldnt know that. thats why they want to use it because it is basiclly more universal than the I6. (yep I6 stop calling it the L6)
with tail lights what does it matter? but i honestly can say that you must admit that these “low-lux’s” getting around also are some sort of a bogans car. i see more low-lux’s with clear lights than falcons or commys and more corollas with clear lights and no focus’s with them at all.
also i think you are totally taring ford with the same brush as holden when you crap on about how poor quality ford is. yep you arent bad at stating quality issues with commy’s and yep we know them all but how can all the quality issues with the commys translate into fords are shit too?? i dont get it
so do you want to talk about the camry quality issues yet? just let me know when you are ready.
all im saying is people in glass house shouldnt throw stones
QUOTE….
“i screw you to the wall”
gee get over yourself. i bet you sit there and read what you have typed fifty times and print it out and stick it on the fridge
Andrew – you are right. I shouldn’t tar Ford with the same brush as Holden. Infact, i actually don’t mind Ford at all and the Falcon certainly has demonstrated that it can age with far more grace and dignity then a Commodore.
To be honest, my dislike lies with Holden more so then Ford and i believe the new 3.5 v6 will be a very good engine. My favourite car of all time and still today is an original phase3 351 GT Falcon (top loader and a 9 inch diff were indestructable) while i also loved those Ford Sierra’s kicking arse on the mountain.
The fact is – Toyota, Ford and GM are all undergoing cultural changes of which is affecting each company differantly.
Holden and Ford have a history of producing a drivers car yet do not excel in the quality, reliability and dependability stakes. On the otherside of the coin, Toyota has a history of quality vehicles but not driver involved.
Now Holden and Ford are trying to improve their quality image while maintaining thier heritage while Toyota is striving to add driver appeal yet maintain thier heritage.
How this all evolves in the future is anyone’s guess. That said, Holden and Ford loyalist must accept the fact that thier long standing strangle hold on the market is no longer and probably never will be to the same extent. Now other manufactuers have evolved will strenghth and determination and Toyota is defantly a powerhouse to be reckoned with.
How many dingo’s are there again… Further to the point, the Dingo is an Australian animal, unlike the Lexus IS-F! That is the category here! AUSTRALIAN PERFORMANCE! But wait, you said it was a 300kw V8… Hmmm… Funny that, considering the FPV F6 Typhoon will have 300kw and it’s got an I6T engine… Hmmm, funny, i’m more then positive that a Typhoon would outdo a Lexus in performance. But hey, if you want to include good for nothing imports then put the IS-F up against something that is in it’s own “category”… The Shelby GT500… hmm, funny that, it’d wipe the floor with the crappy Lexus.
And I DON’T particularly care about Holden… But it is a fact that there was an Australian made Commodore… a good 30 years ago.
And the Falcon! The Falcon has more then proved itself to be a great, reliable and powerful car. Not to mention that most farmers over here where I live, they manage to have AU Falcon utes… What you don’t seem to understand is that Ford and Holden are both Australian bread companies, whereas you have Toyota that says, ‘hey, lets make a car exclusive to Australia, and we’ll say it was made there so they wanna buy it.’ But wait, I’m sure you’ll find a made in Japan sticker somewhere on it!
And for some reason your trying to make it seem that Mazda is a bad company… yet it is stated somewhere that Mazda are the top 3 in something… OH SHIT! FORD OWN MAZDA! DUH!!!!!
What was with Toyota’s great decision with the Lexcen, and the Apollo? Hmmm… Do you think that maybe, just maybe, Toyota wanted be fwends wif Holden..?
Aurion, more balls then a Falcon or Commodore! PAH! I’m sure a good 2,000,000+ people just roled over in their graves! That piss weak piece of crap couldn’t match up to the power that a Falcon or Commodore put out. Regardless of what some figures might say!
And the Falcon is an Australian designed, created and produced car, however the design is based on other cars like the Mondeo and the Focus. Back in the 70’s and 80’s it was based on the Mustang… Doesn’t mean it’s an American made car though.
Falcon and Commodore will always be known as the true blue Aussie built sedans and utes. And if anyone wants a Rice-burner, Toyota is your best choice, which is what it really comes down to.
Didn’t go through you Dingo’s, ripped through you.
yeah i forgot to touch on that aurion has more balls comment???????? what the??????
thanks azza i had already mentioned the typhoon in reply to dingos question to what will tackle the lexus IS-F but since he didnt connter reply i assume he acknowledges it.
yes dingo i also assume the new 3.5L will be a good engine but i acknowledge there was nothing wrong with the I6 and when you are into heritage it saddens that thanks to purely globalisation the falcon will lose that “good ol run a million miles heart” because it was a great motor. they dead set last forever.
yeah you touched on a couple of great fords demonstrating fords great heritage and that is something you will never destroy and the proof is in what people still pay for a phase 3, a siera, a cobra even the massive price a phase 4 will set you back (thats if someone will part with one) all of that is something that holden nor any other manufacturer can or never will match.
why i dont drive a toyota….
1. 2 camrys (in the family) bought at the same time as i bought my falcon ute have had more problems/recalls than my falcon so how am i meant to figure if i bought a toyota i would be in a better car? not that i have lost respect for toyotas i just think that fords have been very good to me so why should i change
2. toyota doesnt offer the power i need/want and in general dont make a vehicle to suit my needs
I love a car with a great motor that looks like Mr Bean designed it. Just love that is sits way different above the Sportivo with the tacked on Supercheap Autos front bottom air intake and same purchased grill. I cannot believe how much different it looks then a Sportivo now!
It is the other hammerheads who go on with silly thinking saying it is fine. It looks like crap. The purpose of a high powered motor is performance and you should expect a hot aggressive look to mirror that. This car is CRAP and it is the armchair wallies who try and defend these cars by saying it is fine. These type of people support hero cars designed by Mr Bean!
roberto if you don’t like the car thats fine, you are entitled to your opinion. However remember it is YOUR opinion. You not need to abuse others for having an opinion that is different to yours.
Discuss the car and the leave the immature personal attacks for somewhere else.
Just would love to see another car maker to take on HRT and FPR!
Roberto as said thats your opinion, one which is of a minority at that. The TRD imo looks way better then the Sportivo, this has been reflected by many of my friends who I have shown it to. And you keep going on about supercheap intake, this leads me to believe that you have no idea about this car… if you did, you’d know its had alot done to it, not just what you can physically see from the pics on the net. And ironically as one poster already highlighted you want to talk about supercheap parts, you go to the Ford and Holden camp when it comes to DIY of their base model Commodores and Falcon POS’
As for Azza… you really are lost:
* You state both Ford and Holden are both Australian companies, cut the crap, they are yanks… they are in real terms no more Australian then Toyota who these days are employing more and more Aussies while the “locals” are downsizing
* You state the Aurion cant match the Commodore and Falcon in terms of power. It is FACT it is faster then the Commodore by nearly 2 seconds and the Falcon by a smaller margin. This is FACT, its not figures on papers… its tried and tested in many reviews.
* Your last comment is similar to the first, showing your blind loyalty to a company that isnt true blue Aussie… its American. But dream on in your little fair world… one where Ford isnt sacking people by the hundreds.
Paul… mate who cares you argument is propped up by so called bumchums who like the TRD Aurion. It has lots done to it yes, I like the Aurion better then Commodore and Falcon. But as for looks of superhero TRD it is way too mediocre and Iam only stating the front looks crass with grille and front air intake only change visually over Sportivo (I do not care there are 12,822 odd changes under the skin NOT visible, I just look at the 2 front and 1 back changes that are too light on).
hmm, the main thing about the aurion in general, is its front wheel drive… shouldnt it be rear wheel drive like the Commodore and Falcon
Roberto : Theyve done as much as they can to it in terms of looks. It was always going to be based off the Aurion, just like FPVs and HSVs are based off regular vehicles. What else could they have possibly done!!! It looks more differentiated then the GT is from the Falcon imo
Martin : No, it should have been AWD… RWD has the same fundamental problems, only powering one set of wheels, which when it comes to huge amounts of power… means no traction.
paul you must admit that there is no more changes to the TRD than what changes FRV and HSV administer yet you critisize the other makes for not changing enough.
also your facts are all over the place with time trials. a while ago you had said that the falcon only just beat the aurion “in real world tests” and used that to say the falcons torque difference means nothing. now you say the falcon gets beat by 2 secs!! stop changing stuff to suit the situation.
also there is plenty of hilux’s and corollas getting around with “bolt on bling” aswell so dont go thinking that bogans only exist in the forms of driving fords or holdens.
oh yeah MY opinion on looks is i prefer the look of the sportivo variant as the TRD looks too over done
ANDREW M… agree>>>oh yeah MY opinion on looks is i prefer the look of the Sportivo variant as the TRD looks too over done.
PAUL… If you think that that is much that can be done to this TRD model you are a goose. It needs a better front end – as it is more full on then Sportivo, I would darken light black background with silver light / turn indicator highlights; replace bonnet so not as flat at top and redo grill lower and pointy to middle. The grill I would redo in horizontal grill type similar to Mazda 6 and the most important thing is air intake at bottom, as as it is it does not blend in with car’s look as looks too fussy and overdone wussily!
Who cares if the TRD aurion doesn’t look more “hot” or “sporty” over the other models? It performs a hell of a lot better. Not everyone wants to drive a car that screams out “boy racer”, this could not be more true for the target market that TRD are aiming at.
Look at the Audi S4. Visually it is not very different to the A4 but their performance are in totally different leagues (price tag too unfortunetly).
If you don’t like the look of this car, state your opinion but don’t try to impose your opinions on others. Especially on the internet as you won’t get ANYWHERE. If you don’t like the look of the car, don’t buy it. If you’re in the vast majority then perhaps the sales of the car will flop and TRD might rethink their strategy for their next variant.
And it’s early days yet, but I humbly predict that TRD might offer a range of enhancements or a “sports kit” or something for the TRD aurion, much like Toyota offered the “action package” for its Celica a couple of years ago.
Personally I don’t mind the look of the TRD aurion, although if I was in the market for a car of this calibre I would find it hard to justify the extra cost of the TRD over a lower model. Might depend on how loud the whine of the supercharger is :P
ANDREW… well you are entitled to your opinion, it is just that! Get off your Toyota soapbox. Boy racer motor and nerdish mish mash front end = and then you have the nerve to compare against an Audi. Mate your a wally
hey roberto dont forget the steering wheel needs work too. it is straight out of the camry. i love the feel/look of a momo wheel mounted like ford and holden offer it has contours/grips to make you feel like you are driving a sports car.
andrew i agree with your very last bit in reference to justifying the extra price and im sure many others will aswell. fair enough if it were a sports car with a bit of established heritage and street cred (like say a WRX, EVO etc etc) but for a new commer the price wont help to convince people to give it a go
OOOPS TYPO THIS IS FOR PAUL… well you are entitled to your opinion, it is just that! Get off your Toyota soapbox. Boy racer motor and nerdish mish mash front end = and then you have the nerve to compare against an Audi. Mate your a wally!
Sigh… Where was a comparison between audi and toyota made? I was making a point that certain models of audi cars appear similar yet totally different in performance. Thats a factual statement, not a comparison.
Roberto, your original post referred to what you perceived were style defects in this car. I’m just saying that looks aren’t everything for everyone. TRD would have perhaps purposefully kept this car visually neutral to appeal to a different market than FPV/HSV (wasn’t this stated in this article or another?).
Whether this strategy works or not? Well we just have to wait and see.
Limp Wrist Roberto – HSVs need decent brakes… full stop. No good with all that grunt and handling but no reliable stopping power. Stop stalling about getting into discussions about HSV problems. You love nick picking Toyota’s but you refuse to discuss those of Holdens. Have you any sensible reasons as why you won’t.
And going by the new topic about Local manufactuering… it doesn’t seem like Toyota will have to do to much after all if Holden and Ford keep heamoragging as much as they are.
Considering all the money that Holden and Ford has invested in Australian Motoring Racing and local HERO cars, it has actually done them very little favours at all. They enjoy weekend advertsing (Supercars) and WHEELS & MOTOR publications advertising HSV’s and FPV’s yet has it really improved thier image to the point that thier respective companies can actually have a heartbeat and return some viability…. NO IT HAS NOT !!
Toyota’s local expenditure on the TRD Aurion was relatively subdued (yet achieved a very commendable result)and probably for very sound economical reasons… obviously something that Holden and Ford don’t have any economical sensibility to under what excatly that is.
Any further image boost for Toyota (of which the TRD Aurion is sure to bring as with the other adventures when they arrive)calculates into more financial muscle for Toyota with inadvertanly turns up the pressure cooker on Holden and Ford and right now – that is the last bloody thing that need yet it is probably going to happen whether you like it or not.
Toyota soapbox is why Holden and Ford are so painfully getting screwed against the wall and you Limp Wrist Roberto (smoothie hair gel poof) so painfully will have to learn to life with it.
Now… has any one sighted last months sales yet !!
Ooooh…. that might be another painful screwing !!
SMUTTY DINGO…. or whatever you call yourself. Mate you have more name changes then is the norm. You sure you are one person as sounds like you might have few alter egos you poof? Mate I like the Aurion but not the TRD version. But as I said go look at votes whether you would buy one you goose as you are way way in the minority and the reason is looks. I base my comments on looks alone and do not need to talk about HSV or FPR or carry on about that! Mate get real and get a life!
Andrew.M…
No I never said the Aurion is slower then a Falcon and I havent said its 2 seconds faster, its like 0.2 seconds faster which is neglible. But it is faster then it and its a hell of alot faster then the Commodore.
Roberto…
Well I dont like many share your views, I like what theyve done and I cant say I would like what your suggesting. I think they have found a good balance between boy racer and luxury sedan.
Ummm PAUL… look at survey on who voted for buying / not buying / sitting on fence. THIS IS A SLAP IN THE FACE FOR YOUR STANCE ON CAR BEING FINE AS YOU ARE IN MINORITY. FACT! FACT! FACT! FACT! SO DEAL WITH IT. You have a engine and manufacture first rate with a wussy boring front / outside SIMPLE FACT. ANYTHING OTHER THEN THAT IS TOTALLY IRRELVANT RUBBISH! Survey speaks facts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lol mate you keep having a go at its looks, I havent seen one person yet from my experiences who has bagged it, in fact they are impressed. So end the looks argument, its your opinion, congrats, but most like how the TRD looks. As for survey, yes Im going to rely on an internet survey, which lol was done before the car was even out so they havent test driven it yet are making assumptions on whether theyd buy it or not. I havent driven it myself ether, but I know someone who has and they were pleasantly suprised.
Andrew M – what gen camry did you get, our family has owned 3 (current 2007 stivo, 2004 stivo, and 1993 camry (i think) and we only had a recall on the 04 stivo for something to do with the headlights.
paul, yes my mistake you didnt say 2 secs in reference to the falcon you did say it was the commy. (hear that!!! i can admit when i am wrong or misinterperit things).
but i am pretty damn sure you did say a “real world” test showed the falcon marginally beat the aurion. ill try to find it so i can show you the quote. (now where might that be hhmmmmmmm?)
also you say 2secs faster than the commy? thats still a lot. i find it hard to believe that the commy is that slow. are we talking 0-100k?
Hi swes,
yeah it was a 02 mod stivo (the first of that gen) and also a 03 (i think) altise.
1. the first recall came before 04 (when you obviously purchased) and it was for the fuel tank checking for reports of splits.
2. the second was for as you know the wiring harness replacement recall which not only affected headlights but also the radio (and i had heard of other little things that were affected by it aswell)
3. not a recall but but cars had to have the front window seals replaced as they easily stretched and broke
4. the altise now exhibits a constant squeeling/squeeking sound whenever the motor is running. (i liken it to the sound of buggered motor pulleys) dont know if the stivo has it as it has since passed on)
5. quality issue…… the cloth trim used seems to “pill” quite a bit and just doesnt have a feel of quality about it at all.
6. fit and finish issue…… the rear tail light (right hand side i think it is) pertrudes past the line of the boot like 10mm further than the other side
It is legtimately 2 seconds faster then the Commodore, Omega that is, SV6 is only alittle slower. Officially the Aurion does the 100 in 7.4seconds, I think the Falcon is marked as that as well while the base Commodore does it in 9 seconds… so MY BAD 2 seconds is abit over the top. But anyway the point is still clear, suggesting the competitors are more powerful is just a joke, at the very worst its equal to the Falcon and better then the Commodore.
paul the original “power comments” started when someone said the aurion has more balls, so dont shoot the people who defend those radical claims
Yes I know that I was referring to the original comment.
paul, so what are you saying?
i said people were correcting the ridiculous comment that “aurion has more balls”.
are you saying that the competitors have more balls is the joke?
Gee that Paul goes on with crap sometimes with his Toyota crap, self centred opinionated uni know it all (not all uni people are like that!!!!). This boy needs to get real and get accurate as everywhere he goes he goes on with inaccurate comments.
HAHAHAHAH yes get real and get accurate…. irony anyone? How about you get ‘real and accurate’ in your persona budy, and stop the charade with this Colonel Klink BS. Turning into abit of a joke
Paul. Gee I make $30K a year as a builder. You are so stupid and dumb it defies logic that you have no balls to tell what job you do? Nursing? Mate I think you stand on the street corner late at night you geeky git.
Yeah I remember this Klink guy saying he lives in Grafton… ummm not much building going on out that way, lucky to get $3 a year in that trade in the sticks.
Haha nah Builder Bob, I bet Klink is on $3mil a year… building is where the money is at, not university education, why would we need educated people for?
Hey Paul, you would not know what is in town as you silly git my occupation Homie Boy is not a trade and other areas to build where I do. Meet me wuss and we will sort it out as will not take long.
I didnt quite understand that last comment… your not in a trade now, geez your occupation changes like the wind. I know what happens in Grafton, Ive been through that way a number of times… has a Maccas on stilts. Id like to meet up and chat, but on your wage I dont think you could afford the trip let alone the medical bills afterwads.
Paul. Yeah Maccas is on stilts. No Iam coming to you as I kid you not I will only take 0.1 of a second to put you in your place as I have a real job you braincell and you are a nurse. I DARE YOU TO PUT YOUR CONTACT DETAILS UP if you have the gumption
Sooo because you have a ‘real job’… it means you can put me in my place, by attacking me physically, really quickly? Riiight… mate I kidded that you were trying to get onto disability pension, your not helping your cause with comments like that!