Comments on: Cadillac Converj timing, specs still up in the air

By: Schah7

Schah7 — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:49:53 +0000

Shak the word “dirty” was refering to MONARO.! LOL.!

By: AAA

AAA — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:35:34 +0000

Converj?

By: Car Fanatic

Car Fanatic — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:53:12 +0000

Looks like a less aerodynamic version of the CIEN

By: Jeff

Jeff — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:45:13 +0000

That is awful!

By: Shak

Shak — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:13:02 +0000

Two tonne is way off, and what do you mean by dirty?

By: John

John — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:36:13 +0000

so your suggesting they make a 2 tonne dirty monaro instead?

By: Shak

Shak — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:11:59 +0000

Ok its good looking, but why dont GM sign off on a car that will sell many more and looks considerably better. teh Holden Coupe 60. Its already got an established name and it looks damned good. Plus the production costs and tooling costs will be miniscule as its just a tarted up commodore. Plz GM dont go back to ur stupid ways and make a two tonne enviro car. Make the new Monaro.

By: Yanzo

Yanzo — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:39:30 +0000

looks alright, back reminds me of the lfa

By: lazybones

lazybones — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:31:40 +0000

Yanks, big grilles and small lights. What is that all about? With the exception of the hideous face, the rest of the car is quite nice

By: Mitch

Mitch — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:59:15 +0000

Looks like an american lambo