<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Record Month for BT-50</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-26380</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-26380</guid>
		<description>ford only owns 30% of mazda,mazda also had the major input into design</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ford only owns 30% of mazda,mazda also had the major input into design</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Axe</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21883</link>
		<dc:creator>The Axe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21883</guid>
		<description>Majority holder of Mazda...!!
------------------------------------------------------
Ford dont do deals, besides who wants to drive around in a “FORD”

F-O 
------------------------------------------------------

Plenty of people do.If you don&#039;t that&#039;s fine. 

And not to mention the fact that BT-50 (a great looking ute) is only 84 units better than Ranger, it&#039;s hardly a massive difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Majority holder of Mazda&#8230;!!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Ford dont do deals, besides who wants to drive around in a “FORD”</p>
<p>F-O<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Plenty of people do.If you don&#8217;t that&#8217;s fine. </p>
<p>And not to mention the fact that BT-50 (a great looking ute) is only 84 units better than Ranger, it&#8217;s hardly a massive difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dingo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21812</link>
		<dc:creator>Dingo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 22:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21812</guid>
		<description>Owns part of Mazda... !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owns part of Mazda&#8230; !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21799</link>
		<dc:creator>rick Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21799</guid>
		<description>do you all realise that Ford own Mazda? So in effect every Mazda sold is money for Ford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you all realise that Ford own Mazda? So in effect every Mazda sold is money for Ford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rome</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21776</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 04:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21776</guid>
		<description>The BT-50 is a better looking ute than its inferior cousin the Ranger and with a sharper pen the $$$&#039;s have shown that. Its great for Mazda as the old Bravo was getting long in the tooth but was a great workhorse (I have one 4x4) and its bulletproof. We all know that it would be hard to take the crown from the Lolux but the other manufactures are getting closer. Just think if there was no Ranger the sales would be even higher for the BT-50 and Mazda doesn&#039;t even play the Government circus.
Well done Mazda and keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BT-50 is a better looking ute than its inferior cousin the Ranger and with a sharper pen the $$$&#8217;s have shown that. Its great for Mazda as the old Bravo was getting long in the tooth but was a great workhorse (I have one 4&#215;4) and its bulletproof. We all know that it would be hard to take the crown from the Lolux but the other manufactures are getting closer. Just think if there was no Ranger the sales would be even higher for the BT-50 and Mazda doesn&#8217;t even play the Government circus.<br />
Well done Mazda and keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21770</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 02:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21770</guid>
		<description>the article explains it all, why so hard to understand?
It says nothing about being the top selling light commercial vehicle in it&#039;s class...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the article explains it all, why so hard to understand?<br />
It says nothing about being the top selling light commercial vehicle in it&#8217;s class&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21767</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 02:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21767</guid>
		<description>I would suggest that there is record sales for mazdas own B series vehicle, not top selling amongst it&#039;s competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest that there is record sales for mazdas own B series vehicle, not top selling amongst it&#8217;s competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frugal One</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21757</link>
		<dc:creator>Frugal One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21757</guid>
		<description>It’s funny how Mazda BT-50 gets more sales than the Ford Ranger, when they’re the EXACT SAME car!!!

Bad luck for the Ford brand! 

***********************************8

Ford dont do deals, besides who wants to drive around in a &quot;FORD&quot;

F-O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s funny how Mazda BT-50 gets more sales than the Ford Ranger, when they’re the EXACT SAME car!!!</p>
<p>Bad luck for the Ford brand! </p>
<p>***********************************8</p>
<p>Ford dont do deals, besides who wants to drive around in a &#8220;FORD&#8221;</p>
<p>F-O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21741</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21741</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how Mazda BT-50 gets more sales than the Ford Ranger, when they&#039;re the EXACT SAME car!!!

Bad luck for the Ford brand!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how Mazda BT-50 gets more sales than the Ford Ranger, when they&#8217;re the EXACT SAME car!!!</p>
<p>Bad luck for the Ford brand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21740</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/4380/record-month-for-bt-50/#comment-21740</guid>
		<description>I am bit confused about this article. Mazda BT50 has been having reasonable level of sales, but it doesn&#039;t dominate the segment. This segment has always been dominated by the Hilux.

June 2007 UTE Sales
Toyota Hilux	  4249
Mitsubishi Triton 2386
Nissan Navara     2084
Holden Rodeo      1917
Mazda BT-50	  1097
Ford Ranger       1013</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am bit confused about this article. Mazda BT50 has been having reasonable level of sales, but it doesn&#8217;t dominate the segment. This segment has always been dominated by the Hilux.</p>
<p>June 2007 UTE Sales<br />
Toyota Hilux	  4249<br />
Mitsubishi Triton 2386<br />
Nissan Navara     2084<br />
Holden Rodeo      1917<br />
Mazda BT-50	  1097<br />
Ford Ranger       1013</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/300 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-11 20:00:36 -->
