<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Range Rover LRX confirmed for greener Land Rover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/42264/range-rover-lrx-confirmed-for-greener-land-rover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/42264/range-rover-lrx-confirmed-for-greener-land-rover/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neo Utopia</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/42264/range-rover-lrx-confirmed-for-greener-land-rover/#comment-156562</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo Utopia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=42264#comment-156562</guid>
		<description>Looks pretty darn fine to me, I was never a big admirer of the large Range Rovers which like the Landcruiser are just too big for the many small car parks. I aggree, it should have a diesel-electric drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks pretty darn fine to me, I was never a big admirer of the large Range Rovers which like the Landcruiser are just too big for the many small car parks. I aggree, it should have a diesel-electric drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZX10</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/42264/range-rover-lrx-confirmed-for-greener-land-rover/#comment-156533</link>
		<dc:creator>ZX10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 06:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=42264#comment-156533</guid>
		<description>Nice looks but not sure it will have a realistic price being built in the UK and exported. 
Not that I&#039;ll buy one, but it would be good to see them opt for a diesel hybrid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice looks but not sure it will have a realistic price being built in the UK and exported.<br />
Not that I&#8217;ll buy one, but it would be good to see them opt for a diesel hybrid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c3vzn</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/42264/range-rover-lrx-confirmed-for-greener-land-rover/#comment-156522</link>
		<dc:creator>c3vzn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=42264#comment-156522</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this will be toned down...the sketch/render is supposed to be of the real thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this will be toned down&#8230;the sketch/render is supposed to be of the real thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shak</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/42264/range-rover-lrx-confirmed-for-greener-land-rover/#comment-156405</link>
		<dc:creator>Shak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=42264#comment-156405</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think RR&#039;s will ever become down classed no matter how little they sell for. This is one of the more aggressive and stunning looking concepts from RR. Lets hope they mean it when they say the production model will remain true to the concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think RR&#8217;s will ever become down classed no matter how little they sell for. This is one of the more aggressive and stunning looking concepts from RR. Lets hope they mean it when they say the production model will remain true to the concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/42264/range-rover-lrx-confirmed-for-greener-land-rover/#comment-156391</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=42264#comment-156391</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure it will be a brilliant car, but is anybody else getting a bit sick of them throwing the Range Rover name plate around? Surely the Range Rover badge should aim to keep a shred of exclusivity? I could just about deal with Sport when it came out, in fact I ended up owning one for a while, but at least the Sport is still big and imposing. This may well be smaller than the Freelander. 
It does look imposing, but once they&#039;ve toned it down, which they inevitably will considering the rear window is smaller than one of the wheels, it may not be anymore. 
I suppose I&#039;m just not sure if Range Rovers are meant to be as agreeable and accessible as the LRX will be and the only thing making it a Range Rover will be the badge and they&#039;ve obviously only done that to chase sales. 
Still, I suppose anything to keep the Vogue in production. And at the end of the day, I was outraged when I heard they were building the Sport but as I previously wrote, I owned one for a while. I just hope that Range Rovers don&#039;t become down class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure it will be a brilliant car, but is anybody else getting a bit sick of them throwing the Range Rover name plate around? Surely the Range Rover badge should aim to keep a shred of exclusivity? I could just about deal with Sport when it came out, in fact I ended up owning one for a while, but at least the Sport is still big and imposing. This may well be smaller than the Freelander.<br />
It does look imposing, but once they&#8217;ve toned it down, which they inevitably will considering the rear window is smaller than one of the wheels, it may not be anymore.<br />
I suppose I&#8217;m just not sure if Range Rovers are meant to be as agreeable and accessible as the LRX will be and the only thing making it a Range Rover will be the badge and they&#8217;ve obviously only done that to chase sales.<br />
Still, I suppose anything to keep the Vogue in production. And at the end of the day, I was outraged when I heard they were building the Sport but as I previously wrote, I owned one for a while. I just hope that Range Rovers don&#8217;t become down class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devil666</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/42264/range-rover-lrx-confirmed-for-greener-land-rover/#comment-156383</link>
		<dc:creator>Devil666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=42264#comment-156383</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like Range Rovers.

I don&#039;t mind the Discovery 4.

But this, I like.

If they can fix the inherent genetic problems with RR DNA but maintain the usual high standard of off road gusto, I&#039;d buy one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like Range Rovers.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind the Discovery 4.</p>
<p>But this, I like.</p>
<p>If they can fix the inherent genetic problems with RR DNA but maintain the usual high standard of off road gusto, I&#8217;d buy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
