Comments on: Land Rover announce MY10 Range Rover Sport pricing

By: okeyboi

okeyboi — Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:08:13 +0000

am a big fan of Ranger Rover Sport,it is my dream car, but is very expensive here in nigeria, but X5 or ML, is cheap.

By: peter pearman

peter pearman — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:15:51 +0000

I think to sum up the range rover sport looks on road in a different class to
the x5 merc or audi the interior is also the best by far

By: Steve

Steve — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:42:01 +0000

Its good that they now come more fully optioned…having waited 6 months for my RRS to be built twice, now being able to buy one form their delivey list is better…

And i found the RRS to be slightly smaller than the X5 dispite being onth same platform as the disco, it is like the reverse tardus effect, smaller on the inside…

By: Alan

Alan — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:42:08 +0000

I still struggle to understand the point of RRS, if you want sporty handling, why not get a X5? Can even get 7 seat options with X5 with better handling. I personally love the full fat Range Rover, but struggle to get the point of a smaller and less luxurious Range Rover with some sporting pretension.

By: George

George — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:28:17 +0000

I have to agree with Alex. There is nothing better than the Rangie. I’ve had 3 Discoveries, and they’ve been absolutely brilliant! Now I’m stepping-up even further for the ultimate on-road/off-road vehicle and buying an MY10 Rangie Sport. Toyotas just aren’t in the race.
What’s a mere $15k when you’re looking at this level of quality?

By: nobody

nobody — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:37:57 +0000

Is the V6 Diesel the same as the one in the Jaguar Diesel S?

By: Alex

Alex — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:39:48 +0000

figjam, they’re in completely different leagues. This is an X5/ML/Q7 competitor and as of now, it’s better than all of them. The 200 Series is only good at one thing and that’s going off road and even then some people are having problems with them. The Range Rover Sport is excellent quality, excellent on road and surprisingly excellent off road (though I’m sure the 200 Series would win in a contest off road).
Plus, the RRS has world class engines that Toyota can’t even begin to approach and something called driving dynamics that Land Cruisers just don’t have.
It may seem expensive, but when you add up how much better the Range Rover is over an LC, the LC just doesn’t seem to be very good value anymore.
If anything was a competitor in the Land Rover range for the 200 Series, it would either be the Discovery 4 (though I’d have said that was more a Prado competitor) or the Vogue and the new Vogue will probably cost more than two 200 Series’ would so that cancels that out. Incidentally, the extra cost of a Range Rover Vogue over a 200 Series would be worth every penny and much, much more mainly due the fact that the Vogue is just as good if not better off road but also manages to be a major player in the S Class and 7 Series markets. It really is an amazing car and Toyota have yet to approach them. Though I wish they would; current Land Cruisers are pitiful.

By: figjam

figjam — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:22:20 +0000

They have to be joking! makes the 200 series landcruiser BLOODY good value!

By: Mark Greenburg

Mark Greenburg — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:41:59 +0000

If you’ve saved up for a long time and are paying with cash, then yes, another 15 grand up front is a big jump. The reason the BMW & Merc are cheaper is because they come from the USA , and hence, no import duty.

By: Shak

Shak — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:37:36 +0000

Yeah your right. And also because RR’s have much more street cred and can actually handle something more than a dirt road or a bit of mud(jeremy clarkson proved that)