2010 Jaguar XK & XKR released
September 1, 2009 by Matt Brogan
Jaguar has today released specification and images of its next generation XK coupe and convertible.
Featuring all-new engines, more dramatic looks, a new interior, an advanced lightweight aluminium body structure and a wider range of models, the new XK builds on 60 years of heritage to offer buyers a thoroughly modern car that still remaining true to its lineage.
“Built in the tradition of great grand tourers, with state-of-the-art engineering, aerospace-inspired construction and outstanding driving dynamics, the new XK is the latest in a long line of legendary performance Jaguars.” said Mr Mike O’Driscoll, Managing Director of Jaguar Cars.
Designated 2010 model year (or 10MY), with deliveries commencing in the first quarter of next year, the new XK range combines the efforts of Jaguar’s designers and engineers to deliver a car that benefits from more advanced technologies than have ever been offered previously by the brand.
The new XK is built on a lightweight but incredibly stiff and strong chassis to offer improved dynamic benefits while at the same time delivering an excellent rating and reduced weight.
The all-new AJ-V8 Gen III engines offered across the XK range are the most efficient Jaguar has ever produced. The engine line up will be as follows:
- XK: 5.0-litre V8 direct injection naturally aspirated (283kW/515Nm) 0-100km/h in 5.5 seconds
- XKR: 5.0-litre V8 direct injection & supercharged (375kW/625Nm) 0-100kmh in 4.8 seconds
Top speed on both models is limited to 250km/h.
“With an all-new, supercharged AJ-V8 engine and dramatic new looks, the new XKR has all the performance, power and panache that you expect in the ultimate sporting Jaguar.” says Mr O’Driscoll.
Both engines will be mated exclusively to an electronically controlled, six-speed ZF 6HP28 transmission. The transmission can be controlled by either steering wheel-mounted paddles or in fully automatic mode via the JaguarDrive Selector.
XKR models will also see the transmission paired to an advanced electronic differential to ensure faster acceleration and more precise handling.
“The new XK delivers more power, more performance and more technology – without compromise. It moves the Jaguar sports car experience on to a whole new level.” said Mr Mick Mohan, Director, Jaguar Programmes.
In addition to the many changes under the skin, the new XKs are visually different to the previous generation with all models, coupe and convertible, introducing a revised exterior styling that underlines Jaguar’s contemporary thinking on design.
Inside, quality levels are raised even further with new interior trim and finishes that demonstrate Jaguar’s renowned craftsmanship, plus even more comprehensive specification.
The driver is the centre of attention, with exciting new ideas, including the acclaimed JaguarDrive Selector, Adaptive Dynamics with Active Differential Control and comfort features such as heated and cooled seats.
Slated for delivery early next year the XK range will be priced as follows:
- XK Coupe: $224,200*
- XK Convertible: $247,500*
- XKR Coupe: $255,000*
- XKR Convertible: $278,300*
*Pricing is a guide as recommended to us by the manufacturer.
Print it: 
LOL ‘more dramatic looks’…it looks 95% the same. That 5% is a new bumper and new tail lights.
Sure does! Barely even a facelift…
“the new XK builds on 60 years of heritage to offer buyers a thoroughly modern car that still remaining true to its lineage”
lol, does that means it suffers a terminal electrical or mechanical problem every time you drive it?
That price is nudging into V8 Vantage territory. I know what my money’s on.
Why is Australia still getting the naturally aspirated 4.2? Is that a mistake CA because everywhere else is getting the new 5.0?
The XK is a brilliant car. I always find it funny that people think they are for people who can’t afford Aston Martins because the new XKR is far better than the DB9. I think it looked better before though.
Toxic_Horse, the XK and XJ are very reliable. Jaguar still has a slightly iffy reputation mainly because of the S Type. I doubt you’d get many if any electrical and mechanical problems here.
“The new XKR is better than a DB-9″
Thanks Alex…. after the day I’ve had today; I needed a laugh!
Unlike the Jag; there isn’t that much in an Aston Martin which looks like it’s come from a Ford Mondeo.
Wheelnut, have you driven either car? Because something tells me you probably haven’t and if you haven’t, you’re in no place to comment. Just because it’s an Aston Martin doesn’t automatically make it a better car.
I’m not trying to say that the DB9 isn’t an excellent car, but it’s a bit front heavy because of the V12 which affects the handling and makes it feel far more GTish than super-carish. There’s no problem with GTs, but the Jaguar manages to combine the two in a far more convincing package for far less money and still brilliant good looks (to me anyway).
Finally, it’s quite funny that you think that the Jaguar looks like it has Ford Mondeo bits because the XK has a completely unique interior while the DB9 does share some rather obvious interior bits with the previous Mondeo. I’ve never noticed them myself, but I only drove the last Mondeo once so I suppose I wouldn’t. But they are there.
Whether or not I have or I haven’t driven an Aston Martin or a Jag or even one of your beloved Maseratis – doesn’t mean that I am not entitled to have an opinion or make a comment.
Afterall; there are those on here who criticise Commodores and Falcons even though a number of them haven’t driven either of them in the past 5 years.. but somehow their comments are somewhat justified…
Why? because they think the same way as you?
Let’s face it a number of the people who make such comments couldn’t bring themselves to walking into a Holden or Ford dealership because of their personal prejudice that they are going to be crap regardless of how good the car is.
I just think that for $220-240K [when compared to it s rivals] the interior of the Jag looks a bit budget that is all.
Jag Mechanical & Electrical (Lucas) problems ALL fixed under Ford’s ownership.
was only kidding, I just remember the days of old.
Has no one realised the new CA site format and colour. Or maybe its just my comp.
Ugly interior. Everything else in that price range is a cut above.
Why would you take this over a 911?
Its cramped, over priced and too heavy
You are joking? The 911 is far more cramped than the XK and the 911 isn’t that cramped at all. Besides, the revised XKR has actually been called better than the current 911 by many different motoring magazines, though I think that’s more a reflection on the fact that the new 911 isn’t as good as the last.
Weight only matters if it actually effects the car. The XK handles beautifully so why does it matter?
Finally, how exactly is it over priced?
no car magazine, even those biased pommie mags ,have ever put a jaguar in front of a porsche. Yes the xk may have more space than a 911 because it is a larger car but the fact is for its size it is still rather tight inside
You would take it cause it’s gorgeous.
Something a Porsche will never be.
Porsches are like an ugly woman, Jaguars are like a beautiful woman!