<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford Set to Announce Future of Geelong Engine Plant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-92979</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-92979</guid>
		<description>I maintain that this decision is the wrong one made by Ford Australia. The inline-6 is not a product of globalisation or &quot;economies of scale&quot; its a product of grass-roots automotive engineering, a product of spiritual familarity, a product of emotion-touching durability and smoothness, a product of the next best thing under v8 muscle. This philosophy that surely must of driven the i6&#039;s continuity through all these years apparently is being driven by the same thing that delivered us the EA as early as they did, corporate foolishness. I would like to see the straight-6 return one day not under the guise of a money-obsessed American corporation but under the guise of a small-scale Australian manufacturer in direct-injected all-alloy form ready to return from the dead and take on the global heaps of ****. I think this deserves a rebellion and surely a place on Australian story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I maintain that this decision is the wrong one made by Ford Australia. The inline-6 is not a product of globalisation or &#8220;economies of scale&#8221; its a product of grass-roots automotive engineering, a product of spiritual familarity, a product of emotion-touching durability and smoothness, a product of the next best thing under v8 muscle. This philosophy that surely must of driven the i6&#8242;s continuity through all these years apparently is being driven by the same thing that delivered us the EA as early as they did, corporate foolishness. I would like to see the straight-6 return one day not under the guise of a money-obsessed American corporation but under the guise of a small-scale Australian manufacturer in direct-injected all-alloy form ready to return from the dead and take on the global heaps of ****. I think this deserves a rebellion and surely a place on Australian story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Westy</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20465</link>
		<dc:creator>Westy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20465</guid>
		<description>Yes I can tell you are anti Ford. I get that. But to say there is more room in a Subaru is ridiculous. Deluded even. If you also need a car for towing loads the small cars won&#039;t do the job. So you are buying as a niche buyer and yes I agree a smaller car will do you good service. 

What do you mean by &quot;....fitting light truck engine configurations to passenger cars which is what Ford Australia has been doing to cut development costs...&quot; ?


Light truck ? The inline 6 motor has been in passenger cars for 50 years ? Obviously not a history buff when it comes to Ford and that&#039;s no drama but a silly off the cuff remark. 

Do you remember the ICC in the BA Falcon. It changed the game for the car interiors and certainly car makers around the world have now caught up but it revolutionised the car interior. This model is nearly 6 years old and so you would expect it to be dated. Comparing this model to newly released models is like comparing a new born baby to a 5 year old. There is a new release coming early 2008 so I would expect style improvements inside and out.

The 6 speed box is more than a &#039;bolt on enhancement&#039; and unless you have driven a car that has it, then that&#039;s another silly of the cuff remark. I have driven the old 4 speed Sequential, it was good, but I now own a Territory with the 6 speed box and they are light years apart. The best box of any locally built car and I would suspect one of the worlds best gearboxes. A good gearbox makes a world of difference to the way power is delivered and also the the way the economy can be utilised with premium gear selection for revs.

Yes the OZ $ is at historic highs but to think that will last is another regretful fallacy. Sure everything is bubbling along nicely &#039;at the moment&#039;. Jobs are great. Economy is strong. It won&#039;t last. While in a boom the lastest bust is just around the corner and I can&#039;t wait to hear all the bleating hearts when it does happen, and import costs go through the roof as will prices for cars. We will then see how GREAT a decision it is to import parts for our own locally made engines.

Globalisation means OZ$ heading overseas for services we can easily provide here. If more people supported local products then they would remain. That&#039;s the core problem. We lose too many industries overseas therefore losing our ability to control our destiny. Sure it mightn&#039;t affect us today but I can&#039;t wait for the day when I can say I told you so! Problem is I too will be affected by the decision makers mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I can tell you are anti Ford. I get that. But to say there is more room in a Subaru is ridiculous. Deluded even. If you also need a car for towing loads the small cars won&#8217;t do the job. So you are buying as a niche buyer and yes I agree a smaller car will do you good service. </p>
<p>What do you mean by &#8220;&#8230;.fitting light truck engine configurations to passenger cars which is what Ford Australia has been doing to cut development costs&#8230;&#8221; ?</p>
<p>Light truck ? The inline 6 motor has been in passenger cars for 50 years ? Obviously not a history buff when it comes to Ford and that&#8217;s no drama but a silly off the cuff remark. </p>
<p>Do you remember the ICC in the BA Falcon. It changed the game for the car interiors and certainly car makers around the world have now caught up but it revolutionised the car interior. This model is nearly 6 years old and so you would expect it to be dated. Comparing this model to newly released models is like comparing a new born baby to a 5 year old. There is a new release coming early 2008 so I would expect style improvements inside and out.</p>
<p>The 6 speed box is more than a &#8216;bolt on enhancement&#8217; and unless you have driven a car that has it, then that&#8217;s another silly of the cuff remark. I have driven the old 4 speed Sequential, it was good, but I now own a Territory with the 6 speed box and they are light years apart. The best box of any locally built car and I would suspect one of the worlds best gearboxes. A good gearbox makes a world of difference to the way power is delivered and also the the way the economy can be utilised with premium gear selection for revs.</p>
<p>Yes the OZ $ is at historic highs but to think that will last is another regretful fallacy. Sure everything is bubbling along nicely &#8216;at the moment&#8217;. Jobs are great. Economy is strong. It won&#8217;t last. While in a boom the lastest bust is just around the corner and I can&#8217;t wait to hear all the bleating hearts when it does happen, and import costs go through the roof as will prices for cars. We will then see how GREAT a decision it is to import parts for our own locally made engines.</p>
<p>Globalisation means OZ$ heading overseas for services we can easily provide here. If more people supported local products then they would remain. That&#8217;s the core problem. We lose too many industries overseas therefore losing our ability to control our destiny. Sure it mightn&#8217;t affect us today but I can&#8217;t wait for the day when I can say I told you so! Problem is I too will be affected by the decision makers mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVID</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20333</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20333</guid>
		<description>Westy,
The last Ford ridden in &amp; driven is the work LPG fuelled Sedan,a current model the other is the last Mitsubishi Magna 3.5 LPG fuelled again,as well as a current Ford Focus,nice except for the LHD controls,which is something no RHD market should have to tolerate.
No complaints about the engine performance of any but that is not where it ends.Falcon&#039;s packaging is old,Focus feels a generation apart.
I suspect Falcon is a car designed around this old engine.Was the AU just another reskin of the last body shape &amp; the one before that....?Ford &amp; their followers would never admit to this of course.The rest of the world moved on from fitting light truck engine configurations to passenger cars which is what Ford Australia has been doing to cut development costs but has been caught out with in the longer term.Basic body design has too many 90&#039;s Taurus elements,OK for Detroit but not here.Claustrophobic around the head for driver &amp; passenger.6 speed gear boxes?I can live without them.These are mere bolt on enhancements.I guess you can&#039;t compare what is a large cheap car with what is a smaller car made in much larger volumes.The Subaru was in the same price bracket as Falcon.But it fitted me &amp; many others as a private owner which could be where Ford&#039;s problem is.
Have yet to sample the new Commodore,it would need to be a major step forward.
Globalisation? Who is making the killing? Everyone has jobs,the Aussie $ is at an historic high but everything is costing more while wages are under downward pressure,something will give.
A high tech engine manufactured here should be possible? What is wrong? 
I would hope that all is not lost.The engine could be shipped here in a kit ready for local assembly with  some local electronic components &amp; local adaptations for use with LPG.Are Ford Australia EXECS batting for  the employees on this or are they looking after their bonuses.Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Westy,<br />
The last Ford ridden in &amp; driven is the work LPG fuelled Sedan,a current model the other is the last Mitsubishi Magna 3.5 LPG fuelled again,as well as a current Ford Focus,nice except for the LHD controls,which is something no RHD market should have to tolerate.<br />
No complaints about the engine performance of any but that is not where it ends.Falcon&#8217;s packaging is old,Focus feels a generation apart.<br />
I suspect Falcon is a car designed around this old engine.Was the AU just another reskin of the last body shape &amp; the one before that&#8230;.?Ford &amp; their followers would never admit to this of course.The rest of the world moved on from fitting light truck engine configurations to passenger cars which is what Ford Australia has been doing to cut development costs but has been caught out with in the longer term.Basic body design has too many 90&#8242;s Taurus elements,OK for Detroit but not here.Claustrophobic around the head for driver &amp; passenger.6 speed gear boxes?I can live without them.These are mere bolt on enhancements.I guess you can&#8217;t compare what is a large cheap car with what is a smaller car made in much larger volumes.The Subaru was in the same price bracket as Falcon.But it fitted me &amp; many others as a private owner which could be where Ford&#8217;s problem is.<br />
Have yet to sample the new Commodore,it would need to be a major step forward.<br />
Globalisation? Who is making the killing? Everyone has jobs,the Aussie $ is at an historic high but everything is costing more while wages are under downward pressure,something will give.<br />
A high tech engine manufactured here should be possible? What is wrong?<br />
I would hope that all is not lost.The engine could be shipped here in a kit ready for local assembly with  some local electronic components &amp; local adaptations for use with LPG.Are Ford Australia EXECS batting for  the employees on this or are they looking after their bonuses.Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Westy</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20313</link>
		<dc:creator>Westy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20313</guid>
		<description>David,

I am curious what year did you have a Falcon and/or a Holden ? Have you driven the latest variant with one of the slickest 6speed boxes ever in an Australian car let alone a car anywhere in the world ? A relic, please you really haven&#039;t been in a Falcon lately. You are still in the 80&#039;s. These days you can generally jump from Subaru to Holden to Ford to Volvo to Toyota to Mitsubishi etc and you couldn&#039;t pick the difference in refinement. I have driven all sorts of these cars due to being able to rent cars whilst travelling around Australia, and apart from the different internal layouts you wouldn&#039;t pick the difference riding along. Only that the Falcon blows the others away for standard performance. 

I said in another forum that one day when we lose control of our destiny this globalisation will hurt us and then we will all be complaining about the increased prices of things we import because we lose all control once we do. No use complaining as it must be what we all want. NOT ME!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I am curious what year did you have a Falcon and/or a Holden ? Have you driven the latest variant with one of the slickest 6speed boxes ever in an Australian car let alone a car anywhere in the world ? A relic, please you really haven&#8217;t been in a Falcon lately. You are still in the 80&#8242;s. These days you can generally jump from Subaru to Holden to Ford to Volvo to Toyota to Mitsubishi etc and you couldn&#8217;t pick the difference in refinement. I have driven all sorts of these cars due to being able to rent cars whilst travelling around Australia, and apart from the different internal layouts you wouldn&#8217;t pick the difference riding along. Only that the Falcon blows the others away for standard performance. </p>
<p>I said in another forum that one day when we lose control of our destiny this globalisation will hurt us and then we will all be complaining about the increased prices of things we import because we lose all control once we do. No use complaining as it must be what we all want. NOT ME!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20206</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20206</guid>
		<description>&quot;50 years young.&quot; Then it is overdue that an efficient compact all alloy 24valve twincam V6 of 3 litres able to run on LPG or 3.5litres for those who want &quot;peformance&quot; on speed monitored freeways.Won&#039;t suit the petrol heads of the Bathurst variety but they are a dying breed that will be killed off by the next petrol price shock.  
The Falcon is something out of the ark which has had its basic design dictated by this 50 year old engine for the last 40years.Holden was no better,the nasty 3.8V6 was ancient with that 4speed clunker,a legacy from another age.Tried both,I bought a Subaru wagon instead &amp; I am not alone.     
The local market is larger &amp; potentially more profitable for the right product today than ever before yet for decades this market has supported the production of these relics &amp; all have taken the profits without investing R&amp;D$$ so that a vesatile world class engine as described above can be produced right here in Australia.The enormous market that is now enjoyed by GM,Ford,Toyota &amp; Mitsubishi in Australia should be able to support the 100% local manufacture of a world class product.
Boardroom decisions overseas are ruthless,they seek to control costs above all else.I understand the engine plant is in LIMA.It is dangerous to have an enormous concentration of global production in one location.Australia is as stable politically as anywhere with a willing,healthy,skilled workforce.This has been exploited by other manufacturers for producing exports to other markets.What is wrong with the Austrlian Ford management? No capacity for thinking outside the confines of that boardroom in Detroit?Mr Howard has said the government can&#039;t do anything,wrong electorate I guess.The engine plant could be retooled well before his 70th birthday if there was a will to do something.Being part of the coalition of the willing should have pay offs &amp; this is an opportunity to show gratitude rather than the unbelievably weak &amp; flipant platitudes of AH WELL MARKET FORCES...oh they have a business to run etc etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;50 years young.&#8221; Then it is overdue that an efficient compact all alloy 24valve twincam V6 of 3 litres able to run on LPG or 3.5litres for those who want &#8220;peformance&#8221; on speed monitored freeways.Won&#8217;t suit the petrol heads of the Bathurst variety but they are a dying breed that will be killed off by the next petrol price shock.<br />
The Falcon is something out of the ark which has had its basic design dictated by this 50 year old engine for the last 40years.Holden was no better,the nasty 3.8V6 was ancient with that 4speed clunker,a legacy from another age.Tried both,I bought a Subaru wagon instead &amp; I am not alone.<br />
The local market is larger &amp; potentially more profitable for the right product today than ever before yet for decades this market has supported the production of these relics &amp; all have taken the profits without investing R&amp;D$$ so that a vesatile world class engine as described above can be produced right here in Australia.The enormous market that is now enjoyed by GM,Ford,Toyota &amp; Mitsubishi in Australia should be able to support the 100% local manufacture of a world class product.<br />
Boardroom decisions overseas are ruthless,they seek to control costs above all else.I understand the engine plant is in LIMA.It is dangerous to have an enormous concentration of global production in one location.Australia is as stable politically as anywhere with a willing,healthy,skilled workforce.This has been exploited by other manufacturers for producing exports to other markets.What is wrong with the Austrlian Ford management? No capacity for thinking outside the confines of that boardroom in Detroit?Mr Howard has said the government can&#8217;t do anything,wrong electorate I guess.The engine plant could be retooled well before his 70th birthday if there was a will to do something.Being part of the coalition of the willing should have pay offs &amp; this is an opportunity to show gratitude rather than the unbelievably weak &amp; flipant platitudes of AH WELL MARKET FORCES&#8230;oh they have a business to run etc etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20114</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20114</guid>
		<description>QUOTE= Please tell me where Toyotas V6 is made? or the fact its FWD, not RWD…
Toyota has NO affordable RWD platform that can match a VE or BF platform for handling dynamics, V8 performance, for the same price.
Lexus, yes, but nowhere near the same class or price point.
Also VE abd BF were wholey designed and developed here, not overseas then just assembled here.

Who friggin cares if its not made here (like the Commodores engine) or its FWD.... FWD vs RWD argument is bullshyte anyway, both are equal overall, they both only power one set of wheels!

QUOTE= Ford and Holden deserve credit for one thing, they never had their hands held by the parent company.
It’s only just now that Holden and Ford are being intergrated into the GM and Ford world.

Yeah cos the parent company wants to stay clear of its subsidiaries which are making losses lol

QUOTE= Also remember Fords ZF 6 speed auto beats Toyota 6 speed auto in the aurion, while only giving up .03 of a litre in fuel economy, while maintaining a big torque advantage, yes torque is a lot higher than Aurions 10 kw power advantage.

Hardly, the Aurion accelerates marginally faster then the Falcon, although yes it has less torque... torque is PULLING POWER, the Aurion weighs less, you dont need as much pulling power.

QUOTE=So far real world figures put the aurion on the same gas guzzler class as the VE and BF.
imagine if Holden and Ford produced a FWD car? Toyota is nowhere near perfect or any better than the american players. 

Ok for starters no real world the Aurion wins... the VE is WAY off the Falcon is closer, but every CREDIBAL report has the Aurion better. I also know a few Aurion owners and they have returned good fuel efficiency. As for no better then the Amercian players, you have to be kidding me mate, Toyota, the brand that sells the most cars IN THE WORLD, competes in many motorsport competitions (thnx advert lol) and on top of this returns survey after survey favourable results in terms of reliaiblity isnt any better? Where did the Holden and Co come in a recent survey on reliablity... I believe it was something like last and second last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUOTE= Please tell me where Toyotas V6 is made? or the fact its FWD, not RWD…<br />
Toyota has NO affordable RWD platform that can match a VE or BF platform for handling dynamics, V8 performance, for the same price.<br />
Lexus, yes, but nowhere near the same class or price point.<br />
Also VE abd BF were wholey designed and developed here, not overseas then just assembled here.</p>
<p>Who friggin cares if its not made here (like the Commodores engine) or its FWD&#8230;. FWD vs RWD argument is bullshyte anyway, both are equal overall, they both only power one set of wheels!</p>
<p>QUOTE= Ford and Holden deserve credit for one thing, they never had their hands held by the parent company.<br />
It’s only just now that Holden and Ford are being intergrated into the GM and Ford world.</p>
<p>Yeah cos the parent company wants to stay clear of its subsidiaries which are making losses lol</p>
<p>QUOTE= Also remember Fords ZF 6 speed auto beats Toyota 6 speed auto in the aurion, while only giving up .03 of a litre in fuel economy, while maintaining a big torque advantage, yes torque is a lot higher than Aurions 10 kw power advantage.</p>
<p>Hardly, the Aurion accelerates marginally faster then the Falcon, although yes it has less torque&#8230; torque is PULLING POWER, the Aurion weighs less, you dont need as much pulling power.</p>
<p>QUOTE=So far real world figures put the aurion on the same gas guzzler class as the VE and BF.<br />
imagine if Holden and Ford produced a FWD car? Toyota is nowhere near perfect or any better than the american players. </p>
<p>Ok for starters no real world the Aurion wins&#8230; the VE is WAY off the Falcon is closer, but every CREDIBAL report has the Aurion better. I also know a few Aurion owners and they have returned good fuel efficiency. As for no better then the Amercian players, you have to be kidding me mate, Toyota, the brand that sells the most cars IN THE WORLD, competes in many motorsport competitions (thnx advert lol) and on top of this returns survey after survey favourable results in terms of reliaiblity isnt any better? Where did the Holden and Co come in a recent survey on reliablity&#8230; I believe it was something like last and second last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20019</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20019</guid>
		<description>This whole bloody global warming thing is a load of crap!!!!!!!!!!! No one has yet proved to me that what is happening around the world with the weather is due to us driving big bloody cars.........I am with Jeremy Clarkson on this one. Its a load of shit........Talk to farmers ,similar climate changes have happened over 100s of years.Bloody emission levels,phoooo.

BMW M3 went to a V8  cause there was only so much grunt they could get out of the 3.2 litre. Remember they started with a 3 litre in E36 M3 in 1995 then up graded to 3.2 with 236 kw then increased the grunt to 253kw in 2000. They have only gone to V8 in the M3. The range from 323i-335i still have inline 6  . Ford have made the wrong move here ,no advantage for a V6  except for Fords pocket!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole bloody global warming thing is a load of crap!!!!!!!!!!! No one has yet proved to me that what is happening around the world with the weather is due to us driving big bloody cars&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;I am with Jeremy Clarkson on this one. Its a load of shit&#8230;&#8230;..Talk to farmers ,similar climate changes have happened over 100s of years.Bloody emission levels,phoooo.</p>
<p>BMW M3 went to a V8  cause there was only so much grunt they could get out of the 3.2 litre. Remember they started with a 3 litre in E36 M3 in 1995 then up graded to 3.2 with 236 kw then increased the grunt to 253kw in 2000. They have only gone to V8 in the M3. The range from 323i-335i still have inline 6  . Ford have made the wrong move here ,no advantage for a V6  except for Fords pocket!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew. M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20003</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew. M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-20003</guid>
		<description>people dont be so sure about the reduced fuel consumption. toyota and holden have proven you dont get better economy from a 3.5L or 3.6L. ford gets pretty much the same as a toyota 3.5L and better than a commy 3.6L.   and the I6 is a 4L!!

Paul no idea. i think you only like what you know (and it doesnt seem to be much) just because most manufacturers use V6&#039;s doesnt mean they are better. have a look i dont see many advantages with the V6&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people dont be so sure about the reduced fuel consumption. toyota and holden have proven you dont get better economy from a 3.5L or 3.6L. ford gets pretty much the same as a toyota 3.5L and better than a commy 3.6L.   and the I6 is a 4L!!</p>
<p>Paul no idea. i think you only like what you know (and it doesnt seem to be much) just because most manufacturers use V6&#8242;s doesnt mean they are better. have a look i dont see many advantages with the V6&#8242;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Westy</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-19999</link>
		<dc:creator>Westy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-19999</guid>
		<description>Bob,

And as I said they don&#039;t have a V6 and I also said BMW have taken on board a small capacity V8. So thanks for restating what I said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>And as I said they don&#8217;t have a V6 and I also said BMW have taken on board a small capacity V8. So thanks for restating what I said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-19964</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3934/ford-set-to-announce-future-of-geelong-engine-plant/#comment-19964</guid>
		<description>Porsche dont have a i6 they have a flat six theres a difference bmw have stopped making their i6 for a v8. i am excited of the fact that ford aust will get the twin force upgrade. thats an engine with twin turbos with better fuel consumption</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Porsche dont have a i6 they have a flat six theres a difference bmw have stopped making their i6 for a v8. i am excited of the fact that ford aust will get the twin force upgrade. thats an engine with twin turbos with better fuel consumption</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/300 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-12 05:43:26 -->
