Chrysler sues former parent Daimler
August 26, 2009 by Matt Brogan
According to a report published in Autonews today, Chrysler has accused former parent Daimler of refusing to honour contracts to supply components thus threatening production at some Chrysler factories, a claim Daimler strongly rejects.
The allegations are contained in a lawsuit filed last Friday in US Bankruptcy Court, New York.
“Daimler’s conduct threatens to shut down Chrysler Group’s manufacture of key product lines,” said Chrysler spokesman Gualberto Ranieri.
The dispute stems from Daimler’s claim that Chrysler owes it 55 million euros (US$78.7 million) to compensate for reduced volume for the 2.2-litre diesel engine Daimler has supplied to Chrysler.
The diesel is used for European sales of such models as the PT Cruiser. Daimler says it owed this amount because Chrysler didn’t buy as many of the engines as it had said it would.
“We believe these claims are without merit, and we will defend ourselves vigorously,” said Daimler spokeswoman Julia Engelhardt.
In its complaint, Chrysler says “the volume shortfall payment issue was resolved in an April 17, 2009, pre-petition agreement that settled a number of disputes between Daimler and the old Chrysler.”
The complaint says Daimler is refusing to supply steering columns and torque converters in order to pressure Chrysler to make the volume-shortfall payment.
“Chrysler Group believes that Daimler’s misconduct is designed to extort a settlement by wrongfully withholding crucial parts that Daimler has contractually committed to supply to Chrysler Group,” Mr Ranieri said.
He also said that Grand Cherokee production at the Jefferson North assembly plant in Detroit is threatened, as well as production of the Dodge Charger and Challenger and Chrysler 300C in Brampton, Ontario.
Mr Ranieri called Daimler’s action a “direct violation” of the April 17 settlement agreement later approved by the Bankruptcy Court.
Chrysler filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on April 30 and emerged under the control of Italy’s Fiat on June 10.
No tags for this post.
I would have thought that to seek and get relief from creditors by going bankrupt, that various other contracts might also be voided.
so Chrysler wants to not pay Daimler, but then sue daimler for imagined non-supply.
I’d be very surprised if Daimler didn’t have a “if you are bankrupt or sell out to a rival all deals are off” clause.
But then, Daimler was silly enough to get into bed with Chrysler, a mistake now repeated by Fiat……
Any opinions on how the PT Cruiser diesel drives? I didn’t know it existed!
Daimler should remember that Chysler is now controlled by Fiat and when the worlds largest auto maker tried to stuff Fiat around just a few years ago they lost big time and it cost them in excess of 4 Billion US Dollars in compensation settlement.
Go on Daimler just try…I can see the Italians rubbing their hands together again. Ha Ha!!