Jaguar XF Review & Road Test | Car Advice

Car Advice

Jaguar XF Review & Road Test

By Karl Peskett |

It’s the torque of the town

Model Tested:

  • 2009 Jaguar XF S, diesel V6, six-speed automatic – $116,250*

Options:

  • Portable Music Interface $1380; Metallic paint $2650

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF

Words: Karl Peskett Photography: www.ozcarsightings.com

Welcome to the 600 Newton-metre club, let me thumb through the members – Audi RS6, Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG, Porsche 911 Turbo, Lamborghini Murciélago LP640.

Yes, we’re talking torque, that glorious face-stretching, organ-squashing, blood-compressing feeling as it swells from underneath the bonnet.

Jaguar-XF-(11)

Few cars under $120,000 can lay claim to having 600Nm, especially from only 3.0-litres in capacity, but your eyes are looking at one right now.

Yes, the latest Jaguar XF makes that voluptuous figure, and all at the astonishingly low rev count of 2000rpm. In fact, the torque figure is more than double that of the 3.0-litre V6 petrol available in the same car. Ahem, I did say double!

You have to ask why you’d even consider the petrol car, now that the MY10 update has brought this magnificent diesel engine to the party. In fact, as they are nearly identical in price, there’s no thought necessary on the matter – the diesel is it.

Jaguar-XF-(8)

It’s quicker, more fuel efficient, and has more power, 202kW puts the 175kW from the petrol in the shade, wouldn’t you agree?

Yet it’s no louder, and no more difficult to live with. If you like that part throttle rush you get from low down torque surge, you’re going to love this car.

However, it’s not just about the engine with the XF. Everything about it has been set in place to make it a memorable experience.

It’s also very different, which is something to be said with the usual bland approach luxury cars take these days.

I mean, if you’ve got woodgrain, leather and some brushed aluminium in there, you’ve automatically got a luxury car. Gimme a break – the XF has all those, but it doesn’t just rely on them.

Jaguar-XF-(10)

Surprise and delight is alive and well. You’ve probably read about the “handshake” that the car gives you every time you enter the car.

The pulsing heartbeat start button, the rising gear selector, the slow reveal of the air vents – it’s pretty impressive stuff, and it doesn’t get old each time you hop in. It’s not cliched or cheesy in its approach, and for that Jaguar ought to be proud.

What makes it even more inviting, is the blend of aforementioned materials. The wood isn’t overly polished, i.e. there’s just a satin look that lets you “see into” the grain.

The aluminium used is textured to be tactile, but not rely on a brushed look, like so many others. The leather is hardy, without feeling like pigskin, and the carpet is soft, but hard wearing. If you wanted a book on “good looking and practical”, Jaguar has written it.

Jaguar-XF-(14)

It’s no use, though, if no-one can fit in to enjoy all this, and thankfully, the XF is a full sized car, with enough room for five adults.

The middle seat, as ever, is still a tight fit for the larger ones among us, but the rest of the seating is just as spacious, if not larger, than BMW’s 5 Series. That’s despite the sloping rear glass, which would normally eat into headroom in the back. What that sloping does do, is contribute to the gorgeous styling.

With the exception of the front headlights, I have to say this is an absolutely stunning car to behold. The proportions are perfect from every perspective. Yes, it’s derivative, but I reckon if you’re onto a good thing, stick to your guns.

Why do I mention the headlights? Well, the C-XF concept car’s front spotters were just spectacularly shapely, yet the production version didn’t quite live up to expectation we all had, with its sudden arc placed halfway through the top.

No, those C-XF lights are now found on the new XJ, which is also a beautiful piece of art.

Jaguar-XF-(7)

It’s a shame, because had the headlights been worthwhile, I could understand the weird shape, but as it stands, the low beam is rather weak, and the high beam is just woeful, especially from a car that’s supposed to be able to lope across the countryside. It may suffice for Europe, but in Australia, we need big beams, specifically for dawn and dusk.

I’m going to go on record now, and claim that I have influenced the Australian specification on the latest XF update, well, kind of.

You may remember the video review of the XF we did last year. In it, I criticised the lack of auto-dimming mirrors, especially on something that costs over $100,000. Out comes the MY10 update, and lo and behold, we have auto-dimming mirrors. Excuse me while I take a bow.

Jaguar-XF-(5)

Seriously, though, it’s nice to see a manufacturer listening, and taking notice. The other thing which I have to mention, is the glovebox, which now works.

On our previous test car, no matter how I tried, the touch-sensitive button for the glovebox would not activate, soft, hard, gliding, tapping – none of it worked. On this car, it opened first time, every time.

The touchscreen menu in the centre console is still very intuitive, reasonably fast, and easier to use than most interfaces, for those who’d rather use their fingers than use voice control, a la i-Drive.

The cupholders will also appeal to the American market, with two large, and one jumbo sized cavities hiding under the woodgrain next to the gear selector.

Jaguar-XF-(2)

It’s behind the wheel that the XF makes even more sense. The smoothness of the gear shift is replaced by a sharper kick into each gear when using the paddles.

The steering is light, but still communicative. Turn in is quick and crisp, with the artificial weighting you get mid corner in some other cars.

Braking is very good too, with pedal progression nice and even and none of the over assistance that plagues some German cars.

The ride is firm, but the compression and rebound is pliant enough to stop it being too brittle. Combine that with the steering, and you’re getting the picture that it’s an enjoyable car to drive.

Jaguar-XF-(1)

It starts to come into its own above 7/10ths, whereas some Teutonic cars are already wearing you down by then with their heavy steering, or even with the complete lack of feedback.

The XF is a relaxed cruiser, but it comes alive with urgency when pushed harder – the perfect compromise.

When you consider how much diesel it sips, 6.8 litres per 100 kilometres, you really have to ask if you need to look any further. Plus, while you’re only emitting 179g/km you are going from 0-100km/h in 6.4 seconds – amazing.

The 600 Newton-metre executive express is alive and well, and with the list at the beginning of the page, it certainly has good company.

Photography by www.ozcarsightings.com

Ratings:

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF



 
  • riceboy

    love the overall look and the drivetrain… wonder what’s gonna happen to future lineup now it’s indian owned…

  • Jonathan

    Why is the rating for CA reviews always “rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif”???

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au Karl Peskett

      Hi Jonathan. An anomaly in the new site design causes the rating GIFs to not carry over from the usual template we have. We’ve rectified that.

      Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated.

  • Deco

    If Jaguar have fixed their reliability issues, it would be hard to go past an XF and buy an E-merc or 5 series BMW..

  • Frenchie

    My grandfather had a Jag, and although this looks good, it still looks like an older persons car.

  • Simon

    Damn! And imagine if they could shed more Kgs off this lard retaining beast!

  • Andrew Juma

    Pardon me, I drive a Jaaaag.

    • Carfanatic

      with age comes wisdom Andrew, take what he said as a compliment.

  • Alex

    Well I think the fact that all that’s wrong with this car is apparently the headlights is a pretty massive triumph. Even at this price the German competitors can have way more niggly things than that to annoy you. The XF is a brilliant car and I don’t know what people find so disagreeable about the headlight design. I actually think it’s a bit boring if anything.
    But the car is great, the engine is wonderful, the quality is top and it looks way more special than an E Class or a 5 Series. With looks like that, just don’t drive at night.

  • Steve-Poyza

    I would love this car
    :(

  • Deco

    Alex I have to agree with nearly everything you said except that it looks better then the E-class. I think the new E-class is the looker of this segment.

    Also, why does this car weight 300kg more then a 5-series?

    • Alex

      I think the E Class is a dreadfully boring looking car. It’s like they designed the same car again but with corners instead of curves.

      • Shak

        I agree with Alex. I think that the XF has retained the top spot as best looker in this class. And the new E-class is just a C-class with a few more corners and a bigger body. merc have started doing what Audi do with their cars and just make each new car longer and retain the same beautiful design. mercs have been and will always be for the wiser(older) folk among us. jag have move on from their pipe and slipper designs.

  • The Realist

    If I paid that much for a car I would want something a little nicer than that 70s interior.

    Next year’s 5 series will blow this away. And the new M5 will set the benchamrk once again. Tata sorry Jaguar’s best just won’t be good enough.

    • Alex

      Realist, I struggle to think of any 70′s car interior that looked anything like that.

      Why do people have so much trouble with the Tata ownership? OK, if they were actually building the cars in India or using parts that came from Tatas or anything like that, I’d understand, but as of now they are built in Britain from better parts than ever and there is absolutely nothing to worry about. Tata doesn’t even have any say over design. What’s your problem?
      This is a Jaguar, not a rebadged Tata in the same way that a Bugatti Veyron is not a rebadged Golf despite the fact Volkswagen owns them.

      • The Realist

        Alex, perhaps my dig at the interior was an exaggeration – but it is still quite poor for such an expensive car. Compare this to the new 5 Series GT, which will be a precursor to the 5 series sedan.

        When you purchase in this price range you expect a certain amount of prestige – and unfortunately Indian ownership just doesn’t convey that – regardless of how good the cars are. Imagine if BMW suddenly came under Indian or Chinese ownership – it would affect the brand value considerably. I have no doubt this will change over time however.

        • Maneesh

          Yeah it will change when India and China become developed nations like Japan and South Korea did over the last 50 years. :-p

    • Carfanatic

      Come on Alex, you must remember the cars of the seventies? They all had wood grain, brushed aluminium, leather seats and climate control.

      600NM? I’d definitely buy one of these.

  • http://Caradvice.com.au Baddass

    If you actually take a look at the CXF concept the headlights look out of place, with strangely large gaps between the bonnet and the light. I prefer these.

    • Alex

      I agree. I think the the production XF looks far better than the concept.

      • rym

        I would dig the Xj lights on this XF.

        It’s THE car of the moment, styled right, wonderful drive train and refinement with the right amount of Eco credential, exquisitely understated but yet classy interior.

        I have to hand it to Jaguar, class act through and through.

        The “Realist” is speaking through ignorance to suggest that Tata ownership somehow devalues or reduce the credibility of this cat. Grow up!

        I agree with CA, the headlights has to go. A nip and tuck job for a XJ headlight transplant would be my idea of sex on wheels. Better yet… Jaguar could bring out a limited edition in honour of the C-XF.

        I can love this car.

        • The Realist

          “It’s THE car of the moment, styled right, wonderful drive train and refinement with the right amount of Eco credential, exquisitely understated but yet classy interior.”

          Sounds like you own one – or are you an arm chair expert?

          “The “Realist” is speaking through ignorance to suggest that Tata ownership somehow devalues or reduce the credibility of this cat. Grow up!”

          Perhaps you need to learn a bit more about badge cache bud. What do you drive? I’ll have a chuckle if it’s a rep mobile.

          • Alex

            Just out of interest, what do you drive, Realist?

            And just what do you have against Jaguar?

          • rym

            We are ALL armchair experts in our own lunch time arn’t we? Looks like you’re an armchair expert on badge snobbery? For goodness sake, we are talking about a Jaguar here and not a Proton, a Holden or Ford… get real… pun fully intended… ;-)

            Anyway, don’t own one yet… but was keen enough to test drive the previous 2.7l diesel and now, the 3.0l XF-S.

            Also, listen to yourself comparing this to the 5 series GT that you can’t even touch yet, let alone driven and here you are suggesting that I’m an armchair expert eventhought I’ve driven the XF and unlike the 5 series GT, I can drive away with the the XF-S right now if I can convince my Hubby that we need more room than our current 2 door Rep Mobile M3.

            You’re not making much sense…? Oh, and don’t get me started on the 5 series GT, must have pretty bad Karma in prior lives to be inflicted and be seen driving that… the pics on it looks bad, not sure if it will improve in real life but the 2d pics of it is already looking rather sad.

          • The Realist

            “Just out of interest, what do you drive, Realist?”

            E60 BMW M5.

            “And just what do you have against Jaguar?”

            Nothing really – I just tell it like it is and people seem to get upset.

            “We are ALL armchair experts in our own lunch time arn’t we? Looks like you’re an armchair expert on badge snobbery? For goodness sake, we are talking about a Jaguar here and not a Proton, a Holden or Ford… get real… pun fully intended… ;-)

            Ahh, “badge snobbery”, the words used by those who can’t afford.

            “Anyway, don’t own one yet… but was keen enough to test drive the previous 2.7l diesel and now, the 3.0l XF-S.”

            A guy at my gym who’s on god’s doorstep has the V8 XF. He wanted to drive me around the block, and I found it’s got a beautiful engine note – but the ride was soft, and that interior is not worth $150K. The touchscreen menu is low rent, especially when compared to the latest I-drive you can get in a $55K 320i.

            “Also, listen to yourself comparing this to the 5 series GT that you can’t even touch yet, let alone driven and here you are suggesting that I’m an armchair expert eventhought I’ve driven the XF and unlike the 5 series GT, I can drive away with the the XF-S right now if I can convince my Hubby that we need more room than our current 2 door Rep Mobile M3.”

            That “rep mobile” M3 looks better, handles better, and is built better. And it’ll hold its value better than your Tata. But you should know that if you really own an E92 Coupe.

            How old are you and your hubby? 50+?

            “You’re not making much sense…? Oh, and don’t get me started on the 5 series GT, must have pretty bad Karma in prior lives to be inflicted and be seen driving that… the pics on it looks bad, not sure if it will improve in real life but the 2d pics of it is already looking rather sad.”

            All I care about is the next generation M5, which I don’t doubt will blow away anything from Jaguar.

          • Alex

            Realist, no wonder you think the 5 Series is so much better; you own one. You previously implied that rym liked the XF so much because he/she owns one, but you own an M5? Well that’s not a very fair implication then, is it?
            You’re not writing it like it is because you have it completely wrong. It may be hard for you to absorb, but Jaguar have actually made a car that can hold it’s own in a contest with even the next 5 Series. It’s that good. Sure, on paper and probably even in the drive the next 5 will be better, it usually is, but it’s not as if the XF is going to fall a thousand miles behind just because BMW put another 5 Series out. It doesn’t sound as if you’ve even driven the XF considering you quote your experience as being driven around the block in one by a guy at your gym, so I believe that makes you the armchair expert. And a pretty crap one at that.
            What exactly is wrong with a soft ride? Do you enjoy being uncomfortable? All that matters is that the XF handles brilliantly. It’s not as if it just flops about the place, so what’s wrong with being comfortable?
            I also completely disagree with your claims about the interior. The XF has a lovely interior made of great quality materials. Certainly good enough for the price and quite a lot better.
            You need to learn to be less biased. I own an M5 too, but I manage to realise when a car without a BMW badge is good or better than good. The XF is one of them.

          • The Realist

            Thanks for the essay – I lost 30 seconds of my life that I’ll never get back.

            We’ll just have to agree to disagree on this vehicle from 100% Tata owned Jaguar.

    • Callum

      The C-XF I reckon was actually designed after the XF, which is why the headlights look different. I would have to agree with you though.

      • rym

        hear hear, well said Alex! The XF has a great interior. Brilliant actually.

        I just love the feel of the thick leather, the wood panelling that is real wood, rather than certain brands that somehow manages to make real wood look and feel like plastic.

        The tactile feel of the brushed alloy is also spot on. It’s as if I get to specify all the materials myself… except, that’s how it is off the shelf.

        This will age well.

        • Shak

          In my opinion this is alot more modern and simpler to use than the compicated and generic interior of the BMW’s. They all seem to have the same design and all use that over complicated i-Drive. By the Realist’s logic because Aston Martin was owned by Ford at one point that makes all A-M’s Mustangs .

  • Hank

    So glad we’ve got someone on here able to tell it like it is. I was worried there for a bit.

    I think it’s a great looking car in the flesh – better than anything for around the money. Including the 5-series BMW. A lot more character in my opinion. Check out the back 3/4 view of both – no contest.

    • rym

      Couldn’t agree more Hank.

      Realist, get real. I don’t believe a single thing you’ve said.

      The fact that you don’t even understand Jaguar lineage and continues to compare this XFs to an M5 speak volumes about the size of your blinkers. Get real.

      I like BMWs, until the Bangle era… ruined it for me. I will come back to the fold when BMW starts building cars with with a cohesive design again. BMW will do well to take a leaf from Jaguar. Really, the feel of the leather in BMW cars are cheap…

      My 6 cyl M3 is the only salvation and fond memory of a BMW era that was once… elegant, exquisite, delightful, fun, luxurious and a sports car all at once. The exact terms that I can use to describe the XFs.

      As for the current crop of 5 series, what a try hard (Dame Edna goggles and whale hump bootlid) and bland bland bland for everything else on that car. If you really are unfortunate enough to be driving one, well, may be it’s just deserves.

      • NobWrangler

        Get over it Bavarian Missile,
        The only reason you still push your E36 M3 is cause you can’t afford a new one, let alone a E90 M5!!

        • Allergic to Bavarian Missile

          Please dont tell me that “rym’ is Bavarian Missile, please no !

          I hope it isn’t as I finally thought she had f***** off at last.

          I had wondered if she was using a differnt name, but hadn’t noticed the excessive use of cutting and pasting with very little content otherwise.

          C’mon “rym” identify yourself, please tell me NobWrangler is wrong.

          • RYM

            Nope, I’m not BM. I did cross path with her over the X6 M forum here in CA.

            I assume she drives a BMW also and that’s about the only commonality there is.

            I like BMWs but not one eyed enough to like everything from BMW.

            I would jump wagon if there’s an alternative better product on its own merit.

            If you have any beef with BM, take it else where as you will be barking up the wrong tree here.

      • The Realist

        “Realist, get real. I don’t believe a single thing you’ve said.”

        I couldn’t care less.

        “The fact that you don’t even understand Jaguar lineage and continues to compare this XFs to an M5 speak volumes about the size of your blinkers. Get real.”

        Lineage? Formerly British owned and now Indian parents – surely you can see the irony?

        “I like BMWs, until the Bangle era… ruined it for me. I will come back to the fold when BMW starts building cars with with a cohesive design again. BMW will do well to take a leaf from Jaguar. Really, the feel of the leather in BMW cars are cheap… “

        I don’t think you were ever in the fold to begin with.

        “My 6 cyl M3 is the only salvation and fond memory of a BMW era that was once… elegant, exquisite, delightful, fun, luxurious and a sports car all at once. The exact terms that I can use to describe the XFs.”

        Are you talking about the E46 M3 that was designed during Bangle’s era?

        “As for the current crop of 5 series, what a try hard (Dame Edna goggles and whale hump bootlid) and bland bland bland for everything else on that car. If you really are unfortunate enough to be driving one, well, may be it’s just deserves.”

        Gee, with cutting remarks like that I should trade in my M5 now. Perhaps you need to take a nice long look at this Tata head on and tell me what you think.

        “Jaguar lineage” – thanks for the laugh.

        Anti-spam word: TATA :-)

        • rym

          I couldn’t give a toss for who owns the company but the brand is Jaguar, not Tata. Get it through your thick head…

          Yes you should trade in your M5 for a XF. It’s that good.

          Oh wait, perhaps you won’t be able to because the depreciation on the M5 has reached flatline.

          • Allergic To Bavarian Missile

            To rym, from the bottom of my heart I apologies for thinking you may have been BM, I didn’t fully think you were as you actually make sense and seem like a grown-up with fair comments and as you say, not totally biased towards BM’s.
            I have owned, fixed up from a write-off, and consequently driven a BMW all over the north of the UK in my past, and I remember the experiences with happiness. I too do not like all things BMW because of this, although I do appreciate thier engineering expertise.
            Look forward to reading more of your comments in the future rym,
            lots of love, Agro-nup. ( for now )

          • rym

            Gidday Allergic one, it’s spring here in Oz and allergies are in full flight here.

            No harm done and thanks for your kind words. The only BMW of late that has got my attention again is the BMW Vision EfficientDynamic, it this is the sign of things to come from BMW, I think there’s hope that BMW may have a product in their line up for me again. Let’s hope that not too long in the future as they do have great engineering depth. It’s just their style and design has left me cold for the last few Bangle years.

            Cheers.

          • Allergic To Bavarian Missile

            Hi rym, just read the goings on back there re the X6, it gets hot in here sometimes,but you seem to handle yourself very well, good on ya.
            Just to clarify a point, I have lived in wonderful Oz for 15 years, take care and look forward to your insightful words soon.
            I love Jags by the way, but will never be able to afford a new one in this lifetime, maybe a 20 yo 1.

        • Alex

          Well have your misguided and stupid opinions then (though I don’t know how you can be so contemptuous about my “essay” and then write a series of longer comments) but please, change your name; it’s misleading.
          If you’re really stupid enough to think that Jaguars are Tatas just because Tata own them, there is only one name for you and it’s not Realist, it’s Idiot, or perhaps something that would have this comment deleted. You also really need to stop contradicting yourself; first writing that you’ve nothing against Jaguar and then making it obvious that you do.

          • Allergic To Bavarian Missile

            Oh Alex, have you read the code of conduct lately.
            Two-shay

  • http://www.thestig.org The Stig

    I think that the Jag is superb. I am determined to have one in 2 years.