<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 Ford Ranger Price Reduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/3597/2007-ford-ranger-price-reduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3597/2007-ford-ranger-price-reduction/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3597/2007-ford-ranger-price-reduction/#comment-36306</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3597/2007-ford-ranger-price-reduction/#comment-36306</guid>
		<description>Test drove a TD Ranger today against the Navara STX TD, both autos.  The Ford won due to more usable power and price.  They are different vehicles and both are a comprise - depends on what your preferences are - both are good, but the Ford pulled ahead faster and seemed a better tow vehicle even with the lower tow rating in auto - i think the Navara couldnt pull 3T along the highway at 100kph (60mph) - or maybe it was just Navara I drove..... both vehicles had 3000kms on them.

Choose (test drive its free) for yourself - dont belive me or what anybody writes, Im not getting paid for it but some magazines do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test drove a TD Ranger today against the Navara STX TD, both autos.  The Ford won due to more usable power and price.  They are different vehicles and both are a comprise &#8211; depends on what your preferences are &#8211; both are good, but the Ford pulled ahead faster and seemed a better tow vehicle even with the lower tow rating in auto &#8211; i think the Navara couldnt pull 3T along the highway at 100kph (60mph) &#8211; or maybe it was just Navara I drove&#8230;.. both vehicles had 3000kms on them.</p>
<p>Choose (test drive its free) for yourself &#8211; dont belive me or what anybody writes, Im not getting paid for it but some magazines do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3597/2007-ford-ranger-price-reduction/#comment-18469</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 06:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3597/2007-ford-ranger-price-reduction/#comment-18469</guid>
		<description>Oh look everyone! Ford has pulled its head out of the clouds and ralised that they are not selling lots of these vehicles, I wonder why. Take a look at it, I mean really how do they expect this to compete with the Hilux, Triton and that nissan thingy??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh look everyone! Ford has pulled its head out of the clouds and ralised that they are not selling lots of these vehicles, I wonder why. Take a look at it, I mean really how do they expect this to compete with the Hilux, Triton and that nissan thingy??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OttoAu</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/3597/2007-ford-ranger-price-reduction/#comment-18465</link>
		<dc:creator>OttoAu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 06:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/3597/2007-ford-ranger-price-reduction/#comment-18465</guid>
		<description>This Ute needs the widebody treatment ASAP

The Nissan [star] Toyota and Mitsu are all much bigger and nicer Utes

O/A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Ute needs the widebody treatment ASAP</p>
<p>The Nissan [star] Toyota and Mitsu are all much bigger and nicer Utes</p>
<p>O/A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 221/222 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-11 23:19:32 -->
