Land Rover Freelander 2 TD4 – Long Term Wrap Up | Car Advice

Car Advice

Land Rover Freelander 2 TD4 – Long Term Wrap Up

LAND ROVER FREELANDER 2
By Anthony Crawford |


2009 LandRover Freelander 2 TD4 – Long Term Wrap Up

We decided to take the Freelander 2 off-road to see if it could keep up with a Discovery 3 when the going got really tough. Here’s our footage of what happened in the Lithgow foothills outside Sydney.

Free wrap 1
“If you can find an SUV in this small to medium segment that better combines outstanding road manners and comfort with serious off road capability and economy than Land Rover’s Freelander 2 TD4 – buy it”

When a Land Rover insider from the UK told us that the Freelander 2 will go anywhere the Defender can on their own proving ground, albeit a little slower, we thought he might have been a little too enthusiastic for his own good.After 24 hours behind the wheel of this baby Land Rover in seriously hard-core four-wheel-drive terrain, negotiating all kinds of nasty stuff, including deep mud ruts in torrential rain, we can assure you he is one hundred percent on the money, this is a remarkably capable off-roader.

free wrap 2
Even more encouraging was that this particular test vehicle was shod with ordinary road tyres, and yet we still managed to make it through some dreadfully soft red mud.

free wrap 4
It’s a testament to the brand’s heritage and any vehicle that wears the Land Rover badge.

RR badge
You forget how well this thing tackles both suburbia and freeways, its front and rear coil-sprung struts are uniquely calibrated to provide a comfortable ride regardless of whether you are powering through a twisty mountain stretch or running the gauntlet of Sydney’s potholes.

free wrap dash
Put that down to a body, which is almost twice as stiff as some competitors. You can feel that torsional rigidity as you push hard into some sweeping bends, there’s a lot of refinement and very little body roll.

I’m a huge fan of this 2.2-litre, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel engine and its 400Nm of torque, with half of that available from 1000rpm to 4500rpm.

free wrap eng
What that means is that the Freelander has plenty of pull from the moment you tap the throttle and enough low down grunt for difficult rock crawling at 10km/h.

free wrap 12
There’s never any jarring through to the supremely well-designed pews either, that’s all five of them. Lots of support and back friendly is how I would describe them. That’s not surprising, given the front seat frames are similar to those in the upmarket, Range Rover Sport.

free wrap seat
I know it’s an SUV, but on the tarmac it feels more car-like in the way it both rides and handles general suburban duties.

I’m not a fan of overly light or too sensitive steering, it can ruin the driving experience, but there’s none of that with the Freelander, it’s just well weighted and responsive, and a joy to drive.  Easy to park too, with just 2.6 turns to lock, making it exceptionally manoeuvrable in tight spots.

free wrap 7
In reality, we’ve covered all this in previous long term reports on the Freelander 2, but what we haven’t yet talked about is our off road testing with this vehicle, and I don’t mean the dirt driveway to your nanna’s country property.

free wrap 5
We’re on our way to some scary 4WD tracks in regional New South Wales, close to Lithgow.

I’ve driven up here previously but never in a soft-roader, only larger more serious four-wheel-drive machines dare to tread in these parts.

free wrap 6
This was going to fun, a veritable muddy quagmire in a suburban SUV with standard fit road tyres.

At least we had big brother around, in the form of a Land Rover Discovery as an escort, just in case it all went horribly wrong.

free wrap 11

It had rained cats and dogs all night long, so there were plenty of deep puddles – make that water holes – around, but that didn’t worry the Freelander 2, with its 500mm wade depth capability.

It was unstoppable through this stuff, although it does pay to check the depth in these mini billabongs.

free wrap 8

So far, so good, but when we came to the edge of a steep track, full of deep mud ruts, which seemed to allow just a few centimetres each side, before metal would be surely be crushed, all kinds of negative thoughts entered my mind.

free wrap 10
I don’t wear RM Williams boots or even don an Akubra hat, I’m far more at home on the tarmac, but with sophisticated off road electronics such as Terrain Response and Hill Descent Control, you can claim a level of expertise beyond your level of experience.

free wrap HD 2
Before moving off the edge, I double-checked that MUD RUTS was selected, which automatically engaged Hill Descent Control, meaning all I had to do was literally steer the vehicle.

free wrap mud ruts
Don’t quite get it? I mean I’m not using the brake or accelerator pedals, just steering. It’s more like an off road cruise control for dummies.

Once at the bottom of this steep descent without so much as a wheel spin, I expected  the climb up the other side might require some assistance from the Discovery.

free wrap disco
Again, the Freelander climbed the muddy terrain without issue and with an unusual degree of comfort as far as off road adventures go.

free wrap 12
Then it was time to take on a particularly mean track, which had already caused the Disco to backtrack and find another way around.

free wrap 21
So far so good, but when we got to some seriously deep red clay in the Freelander, my better judgement told me to follow suit and get out of there.

free wrap 22
I’m certain that with a decent set of all terrain or mud terrain rubber, the only thing that would stop the Freelander 2, would be its 210mm ground clearance.

free wrap 14

Without question, Land Rover’s Freelander 2 TD4 HSE is a cut above any of the competition. Its both a luxury SUV with a significant dollop of cachet, as well as a highly capable off road vehicle.


 
  • http://Caradvice.com.au Baddass

    I do like the Freelander 2. It was very clever how well Land Rover integrated Discovery and Range Rover themes into the Freelander without making it look like a tacky remake (and it is a good representation of the previous Freelander). And what’s more, it won’t be mistaken for anything other than a Land Rover.

  • FrugalOne

    Nice vehicle, but silly money.

    Last model was one of the most problematic vehicles ever made, dealers dont even want to take them as a trade in, Kia Carnival style.

    Odd looking air intake with them tubes hanging off it!

    Cheers

    F-0

  • Hagar

    Looked at this a few weeks ago, dated interior and not great value for money. Waiting for the Forester Diesel which should kill anything in this class, if overseas reports are anything to go by…

    • The Guv

      Might want to look a little closer at the reports on the Forester Diesel as I have heard nothing but constant complaints about the terrible gearbox in them.

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony

    Hagar,

    Forester has always been an excellent soft-roader but it certainly won’t have the level of luxury (from seating to switchgear) or anywhere near the off road capability of the Freelander 2 TD4 HSE.

  • Will

    Anthony; you will be waiting a long time for the Forester diesel. Best go the Skoda Scout, great little package.

  • John of Perth

    I’ll say it again – Nissan Xtrail TL dci manual.

  • Myke

    ^If you wanted a diesel, I’d go for a VW Tiguan TDI. The Forester’s interior ruins it Imo. If you wanted to spent more, I definitely look at the Freelander or the Volvo XC60.

  • Matt

    @FrugalOne

    Not sure why this is ‘silly money’. The Audi Q5 is $20,000 more. A top of the range Forrester is only $10k or so cheaper, and as noted, nowhere near in terms of build quality.

    Yes, the previous model was diabolical, but don’t you think they have learned from that? This new one has had rave reviews, it looks good, drives well and is not over the odds price-wise. (No, I’m not employed by Land Rover, don’t even like 4WDs in general, but you can tell when they get a car right.)

  • Andrew

    I’ve had mine for 33000km now and it has served me well. No squeaks or rattles and if you work for a large company they throw in free servicing for 3 years which helps lessen the premium you’re paying for this vehicle.

    Unlike most owners of this vehicle I actually take mine off road and down the beach. I’ve fitted AT tyres which help a lot as the standard tyres have very weak sidewalls and I punctured one. However the ground clearance is an issue and it sometimes takes some creative lines to get you around obstacles. The underbody protection while generally adequate the fuel tank is particularly vulnerable and in a ramp over situation often scrapes. There is an after market although expensive guard for this problem though.

    What really impresses me about this car is its overall capability. I do long highway drives, then camping on the weekend and sometimes towing a tonne of junk to the tip. It handles all these brilliantly and with style, comfort and safety.

    For those comparing it to the last model there’s no point as this is in every way a new car, reliability hasn’t been a problem. The Xtrail has an old gen diesel with far less power and torque and the auto has limited towing capacity. The Tiguan has limited boot space and no where near the off road capability. I’m yet to find a car with the same safety, capability and luxury for the price.

  • http://carz.com/ Carz

    Wow! This car looks very useful in this situation. It sounds like a good car…

  • Reckless1

    Matt Says:
    July 19th, 2009 at 10:03 am
    “The Audi Q5 is $20,000 more.”

    That’s not true at all. The 2.0 TDI Q5 is $63930 D/A in my postcode, the SE Freelander 2.2TD is $56790, and the HES is $63040.

    The Q5 can be more, but only when you go for the 3.0 V6 TDI, and then the Audi is in a different class of vehicle.

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony

    Reckless, which class is that?

    Off-road, the Audi wouldn’t see the light of day as it is a true soft roader.

    Inside, there is no denying Audi do superb interiors.

    Engine wise, I’ll take the Freelander’s 2.2 TD and the seats in the Land Rover are equally if not more comfortable on long hauls than the Audi.

  • Reckless1

    Anthony, it wasn’t me that brought the Q5 into the argument, was it? I was merely correcting the false price statement, and stating that the Q5 3.0 was a different class ov vehicle to the 4 pot diesels, which it is. Or do you think that V6s and 4cyls are no different?

    Engine wise, anyone in their right mind would take the V6 diesel over either of the 4 pots, comfort wise they are equal on road, and off road the Freelander wins. The only way the 2.2 is better than the 2.0 is the .2.

  • mad max

    The Freelander does look like a good package. The problem it has is it is treated with suspision by potential buyers (as well as owners of previous models) due to the poor quality reputation of the previous models. I test drove one recently and while its under consideration, I cautios of the resale value. The other problem I have is that of servicing. I live in the South Eastern suburbs of Melbourne and the closest dealer is in Port Melbourne, 45k’s away. If Landrover want to widen their potential market for this (as well as Jaguar) they need more (than the current) 2 dealerships in Melbourne.
    It was a good drive though.

  • steve of Solihull

    I am a classic Rangerover owner and love the shape and capability of it, but it is getting tired and have decided to replace it with the freelander2. I know others who have done the same and are delighted with its performance, although the automatic is required for towing, as it hasnt got low range. This offroad report agrees with what i have heard from a lot of people. Where I live in England I see a lot on the local roads and agree it has the landrover/rangerover lines. I am off to order one on Monday although I will miss the stand on tailgate of the RR.

  • DesignEng©™

    Anthony, thanks for the long promised update, particularly the bit about the towing capability. Oh that’s right, it’s not here! DISSAPOINTED!

  • Alex

    Steve of Solihull, why don’t you buy a used Range Rover? They lose their value so quickly in the UK so you can pick up a really really good one for around the 20,000 to 25,000 pound mark. In other words, as much as a new Freelander would cost. It would only be a couple of years old and I doubt it would have been much farther than the 20,000 mile mark.
    Mines been a dream and with the TDV8 engine, you can’t go wrong. You get 20-25 MPG most of the time. You would also get the status, the tailgate and fantastic towing and offroad ability.

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony

    DesignEng,

    Thanks for your input. With 400Nm of torque and only weighing 1770kg, I doubt you will have any trouble with routine towing, except if you use it to tow an A380 or a B Double!

  • observer

    Aahhhhh…..MUD glorious MUD
    I dont mind this 2nd gen Freelander. Certainly a big improvement from the older model…and havnt seen any broken down on the road side. 400Nm of torque from a 2.2 capicity is excellent. It does look a little conservative inside but then I suppose it’s for a different audience.

    I’ve had my Forester XS Auto for about 9 months now and I can say with confidence that it has covered terrain just as challenging as this report without breaking a sweat. With 220mm of ground clearance constant AWD and intelligent T/C and Stabitity Control it just goes and goes without a fuss. More power and gears would be be nice though.

    Apparently the Turbo Diesel Boxer Outback/Forester should be here by the end of this year.

    Great report and images C/A.

  • Mike

    Anthony,
    Really looks like you gave the car a good of a going over….well done! I love going off road with mine as often as possible but tend to tone it down a bit as it is a relatively expensive car for bush bashing. It seems that your opinion of the car is the same as mine, hard to really fault.
    Towing wise, I have had a double sprung trailer full of 300 bricks and 2 bobcat scoops of sand behind mine. The guy at the yard said I was right at the limit of the trailers capacity. The car handled it very comfortably indeed, no undue labouring at all.
    British TV show 5th Gear have done comparisons with X-Trail and new Forrester and neither came close in quality or ability. I think they are available on YouTube. They particularly panned the Forrester. Still, I’ve seen some well setup Forresters do some cool stuff off road. The thing about the FL2 is that it comes well setup as standard.

  • Jo

    This would be superb value if it was 10k cheaper.

    But not at this price…

  • observer

    Mike
    The comparo of thr FL2 and Forester by 5th gear lacked any credibility. They pitched an auto 2.0 Forester with 150hp against a 230hp FL2 then complained about the lack of power. They could have used the Boxer Turbo Diesel or 2.5XT Turbo Petrol to level out the power issues but chose not to make any reference to this or even use the manual with the Dual range gearbox.

    He then complained about the Forester bottoming out whilst virtually ignoring that the same thing happened in the FL2 or that the Forester has 220mm ground clearance (10mm more than the FL2)

    In the end both cars covered the same offroad terrain without any getting stuck. A quick you tube search found plenty of unmodified Forester tackling some extremely gruelling offroad conditions very well (45% hillclimbs, deepsnow, mud ruts, sand etc)

    It’s this type of sloppy car reporting that will ensure that 5th gear will never be a serious contender to Top Gear.

    Funny how they failed to mention Subarus tough Symetrical AWD system, good build quality,lower cost of ownership, strong resale value, and mechanical reliabiluity but hey I suppose it makes for good British TV.

  • James

    We purchased a TD4 HSE in March after test driving most of the SUVs in this market segment. It is an absolute dream to drive and really comfortable, especially on long trips (really like the seating and armrests). The controls are easy to use, it has good visibility and a very good sound system. Also the power delivery of the diesel, and drivability are fantastic. Amazingly manoeuvrable and easy to park – due to the turning circle, shape and of course, the parking sensors.

    Recently had a towbar fitted and found the service centre (Trivett Parramatta) to be extremely professional and helpful. Has been mentioned that the tow-bar is a touch expensive, but is a full import.

    The only negatives: 1) the only clock is on the radio (would be nice to have one on the dash), and 2) you need to insert the key fob into a slot on the dash (proper keyless would be great). Saying that, I do like the fact that it is waterproof & drop-proof (have tested the latter). Also the lights under the side mirrors and ability to switch on the headlights from the remote, initially seemed to be a bit of a ‘gimmick’, but have actually been very useful.

    We got a really good deal, especially as the HSE had everything we wanted and more! Some of the Freelander’s competitors may initially appear to be cheaper, but start adding in the extras? We love our car and would highly recommend it.

  • James

    Two Land Rover models have triumphed once again at the prestigious Auto Express 2009 New Car Awards. Freelander 2 winning Best Compact SUV and the Discovery 3 Best Large SUV.

  • Jo

    This would be awesome value at 40k

    • Alex

      It’s a bit too good and built a bit too far away for it to be that cheap. I think it’s excellent value as it is, but then I am a massive Land Rover fan. But it is really because the Land Rover badge has the same prestige as the BMW or Audi badge and their competitors (X3 and Q5) cost a lot more and aren’t all that much better. They don’t have the same abilities as the Freelander either.

  • ALAN

    HI
    Can anyone answer a question

    I have taken deliver of a 2010 freelander 2 limited edition 2.2 tde this model does not come with Terain Responce but does have HDS and DSC. I have been told that the Terain Responce is just an off road butler. and that my Freelander will be able to do anything that one`s with a TR system fitted can do?.

    Regards
    Alan

  • Navidi SL

    Hope, I am not late in commenting. I bought my Freelander 2 TD4 in late July 2007 in Sydney and set on driving to Cape York (Weipa and Bamaga)in early August. As a precaution, first I took a 4WD only track from Tribulations to Cooktown which Freelander 2 did with great ease. On reaching Cooktown, I consulted a few well prepared Off-road drivers going north. They (including a Motor cyclist)gave me thumps down and advised me to go no further. But my partner was adamant that we must, even though we expected many days to get there. To our surprise Freelander 2 did it style. Also, there were two memorable incidents. We found the motor cyclist stranded in Laura on his first day. and a 5 days later I met a another guy driving a large Japanese vehicle stranded at Bramwell Junction. I am not human if I didn’t get a satisfaction seeing 2 guys who gave me thumps down eat their words. Another surprise was our trip back from Bamaga to Port Douglas which we did in 11 hours. Since then I have taken the vehicle in many moderately difficult tracks earning admiration from ‘some’ on lookers.

    Freelander 2 also proven that it is a competent on road car too. So far there are no apparent problems with the vehicle.

  • Seif

    I’m super keen to buy myself a 2010 Land Rover Freelander 2 Td4_e LF. I have 3 children and would like to know if anyone has tried a reto fit of a 6th or 7th seat. I’ve made some inquires with very little info offered.

  • ruralreg

    For similar money, why wouldn’t you buy a Pajero with a 5 year warranty and a wider dealer network ?

    • The Guv

      Because the Pajero is a Mitsubishi… enough said I reckon!

      • ruralreg

        If they warrant their cars for 5 years, 10 years on the powertrain they have more confidence in them than Landrover have in theirs

  • Ian

    The people that knock the Freelander obviously have not driven or owned one. In my opinion, you need to live with a Landrover for a while to appreciate it. Then you will understand. You can not just compare the paper specs or have a brief test drive and understand them.
    I owned Range Rovers for 25 years. Every one used to ask me why until they spent some time in them, then they understood. Unfortunately at present I do not own a Landrover product but hope to get a new Defender if they ever bring out a new model that would suit my use.

  • Axman

    Our TD4 Freelander is now 2 years old and it’s without a doubt the best 4×4 we have ever had. I comes after only 5 months of ownership of our 3.0 TDI VW Touarag which replaced our 3.2 NP Pajero. On paper and on an interstate trips the VW was great, but on a day to day basis very dissapointing. Terrible visibility, tyre wear, hard to park and bad round town economy. All of the VW’s bad points are what the Freelander excel’s in. The FL2′ only possible knockers are those that are too narrow minded to try one!

  • turbotico

    FL2 TD4 auto, 4 years +100k KM, no issues, this car over exceeded my expectations, please drive it, use it and it will amaze you on and off road. No reason to think else were only if more room for family is needed.