Ford Ranger Wildtrak Review & Road Test
July 24, 2009 by Matt Brogan
2009 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Review & Road Test
Make traks for a dirty weekend
Model Tested:
- 2009 Ford PK Ranger ‘Wildtrak’ 4×4; 3.0-litre TDCi, four-cylinder, turbo-diesel; five-speed automatic; crew-cab: $50,990*
Options:
- Metallic Paint $400 (Fitted – Winning Blue)
Distinctive appearance; strong engine; capable off-road
Vague steering; rear centre lap seatbelt; non-lockable tailgate
CarAdvice Rating: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
By Matt Brogan
It seems more and more people are wanting more and more from their vehicles, and fair enough too, for in this age of high-technology engineering wizardry cross purpose vehicles make just as much sense as cameras in mobile phones.
So, what of the ever increasing number of commercial vehicles that double as family transport on the weekend? Is the line between the two now so far blurred that it doesn’t matter? Or has the humble work ute grown to a point where it’s now accepted into the family fold?
To find out, I decided to spend a dirty weekend with the new Ford Ranger Wildtrak and see if it could be the answer to all my questions.
Visually the added enhancements of the Wildtrak pack have certainly made for a more interesting, masculine and rugged looking vehicle than the standard Ranger.
Included in the $3000 premium above the Ranger XLT, on which the Wildtrak is based, are ‘Wildtrak’ decals, 18-inch alloy wheels, side steps, roof and tub rails, polyurethane tub liner and lockable retractable hard tonneau, all of which give this special edition model a more unique and tougher appearance.
The cab is suitably attired for a vehicle of such utilitarian purposes and provides passengers with ample space and storage throughout. Of note is the comfort of the front seats, which make a pleasant change from those found in most commercial vehicles in this class.
Interior features include binnacle gauges featuring pitch and roll, internal and external temperature and compass; alcantara ‘Wildtrak’ seats; ‘Wildtrak’ floor mats; leather clad steering wheel and gear knob; six-disc CD tuner with auxiliary input; power windows; power wing mirrors with puddle lights; cruise control; and remote central locking.
Rear seat accommodation is also more than adequate in terms of space but is less than ideal in terms of a relaxing ride with reduced cushioning and a more upright recline angle making longer trips a little hard going.
On a positive note the sail across the rear window proves handy in keeping sun from the rear seat passengers necks, even if it does make reversing from a 45-degree angle rather tricky.
Under the bonnet Wildtrak features a diesel-only offering in the form of Ford’s 3.0-litre, common-rail, turbocharged four-cylinder engine that offers 115kW at 3200rpm and a suitably strong 380Nm from just 1800 revs. It’s a little noisy under idle and heavy acceleration but is otherwise acceptable given the vehicle’s commercial orientation.
Our test vehicle was coupled to a five-speed automatic transmission (with switchable overdrive) which is a little uncouth in application and slow in decision. A five-speed manual box is also offered for those who prefer a clutch and would easily be my pick.
Fuel economy returns were a little above ADR claims but not dramatically so with our week of city, highway and off-road use returning 11.6L/100km (ADR Combined claim is 10.4L/100km).
The four-wheel-drive system offers a proper low-range ratio, auto-locking hubs plus on-the-fly switching, and despite the 18-inch alloys wheels (with road bias tyres), Wildtrak is certainly very capable off-road availing 214mm of ground clearance and enough guts in the rear springs to ensure adequate laden suspension travel.
Unfortunately from a driver’s perspective the power steering is dramatically over assisted meaning feel is somewhat … err, lacking, and although light steering may prove handy when parking or tackling a bush track, it can see this utility tending to follow camber, like flies to a barbecue, once you’re back on the black stuff.
Up front the Ranger features disc brakes but makes do with drums on the rear. ABS is standard and features Electronic Brake Force Distribution though I can’t help but notice the pedal is soft of feel with a great deal of travel before any real ‘bite’ is felt. On the plus side, ABS calibration is suitably delayed in threshold for off-road use.
Wildtrak offers 1016kg of payload though unfortunately the load area is slightly diminished due to the sails and retractable tonneau cover. I should point out though that even though the tonneau is lockable the tailgate isn’t, so bear that in mind if carrying trade tools or valuables.
Safety includes dual-front airbags and anti-lock brakes with electronic brake force distribution but misses out on three-point inertia belt for the centre rear seat passenger. The Ford Ranger also only manages a three-star ANCAP rating (from a possible five-stars) which may lead a re-think on using the car as the primary family hauler.
As a tough, no-nonsense crew-cab Ranger is one of the better vehicles in this market sector, and with the individuality the Wildtrak pack offers above the XLT, it is bound to appeal to buyers wanting to combine work and play in the one trusty, and very distinct, vehicle.
*Pricing is a guide as recommended to us by the manufacturer
Ratings:
CarAdvice Overall Rating: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does it Drive: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does it Look: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does it Go: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Road Test the Rivals:
- Holden Colorado
- Isuzu D-Max
- Mahindra Pik-Up
- Mazda BT-50
- Mitsubishi Triton
- Nissan Navara
- Toyota HiLux
- Comparison – BT-50, Hilux & Colorado
Specifications:
- Engine: 2953cc DOHC, four-cylinder, 16-valve
- Power: 115kW @ 3200rpm
- Torque: 380Nm @ 1800rpm
- Induction: Common-rail & turbocharged
- Transmission: Five-speed automatic
- Driven Wheels: All (with rear LSD)
- Brakes: Disc/Drum with ABS & EBD
- Top Speed: Not tested
- 0-100km/h: 12.9 seconds (as tested)
- CO2 Emissions: 274 grams per kilometre
- Fuel Consumption: 10.4 litres per 100km (ADR combined)
- Fuel Consumption: 11.6 litres per 100km (as tested)
- Fuel Tank Capacity: 70 litres
- Fuel Type: Diesel
- ANCAP Rating: Three-star (maximum five)
- Airbags: Dual front
- Safety: ABS, EBD & dual front airbags
- Spare Wheel: Full-size steel
- Suspension: Wishbone (F)/Leaf (R)
- Cargo Capacity: 1530mm (L) x 1459mm (W)
- Ground Clearance: 214mm (Unladen)
- Payload: 1016kg (maximum legal)
- Tow Capacity: 2500kg (braked)
- Turning Circle: 13.0 metres
- Warranty: Three-year/100,000km
- Weight: 2005kg (tare)/3021kg (gross)
- Wheels: 18 x 7.0-inch alloy













For that price give me a SS Ute
Or a TMR Triton, but either way I think this is a good looking truck.
I would like to see a review on the Great Wall though, after Graham Smith’s (flattering) attempt in CarsGuide the other weekend.
Does “Vague steering” mean: Drives like a shopping trolley with a bung wheel? Because that’s how it felt to me when I had a drive of the work Ranger. I would have a Navarra over this any day. The Nissan is a joy to drive, miles better than this heap.
Antispam word – Ford, coincidence lol
I was looking at utes last year, chose a Triton for the business. Navara was good, but forgot that people may want to sit in the back as the back seat was literally the most awful place I’ve ever sat in. Ranger/BT-50 (same car remember) also forgot about the rear seat but in the way of getting in there. Door was waaaaay too small! Colorado/D-Max were awful on the inside with grey plastic everywhere! Hilux was too exxy for stuff that was on the others for thousands less. Didn’t look at a Mahindra because I had no idea where a dealer was (didn’t want to either by the sound..)
I chose the Triton GLX-R Di-D manual with optional side/curtain airbags and a rear-difff lock which I got for $38,990 drive away, which I thought was a pretty good deal! It’s the facelifted model with the nice 17″ wheels too….The back seat has acres of room (more than the whole of ute market), it’s very well equipped, the Diesel engine is a very good one and it’s actually resonably sporty too!
Not bad but the tray/load area on almost all dual cabs is just too small. If i can’t fit my downhill bike in the back, no deal.
no mention of stability control?
no mention of the fact the Triton has a full time 4wd system which is good in the rain
i think every other 4wd has a ‘4-High’ mode which cuts off at high speed
i assume this doesn’t have a full time 4wd option?
I would never buy this car, but I’m glad that Ford made the styling a standout. It may not be pretty, but it is bold.
Your star rating is not displayed properly in some browser.
Looks like 2 stars????
Or 4 stars????
Toxic Horse……..an SS Ute? ROFL They should call it a mobile glovebox!! Coil springs and IRS in a ute is useless.
And useless for towing as they drag their arse on the ground. Holden utes are useless and not very versatile. Holden never have been able to build a descent ute.
Anyone who thinks this truck looks good needs glasses, what a butt ugly contraption
The LT-R Colorado looks the best pick-up truck on the market.
Dont agree. The steering is not over-assisted but just right. The only thing to complain about is the problem how to get out of the car if u sat in the rear bench. You’ll need to turn your feet left or rite at 90 degrees angle.. :-) . o’wise a nice smal pick-up, but still i hope for the all new one next year – more space, permanent 4×4, better crash result for the actual, pretty weak, cabin…..
nb – the TRITON is just an ugly piece of used soap…….means i dont like its looks
LT-R Colorado looks the biz???? Each their own. Wildtrack looks outstanding IMO.
Can you get a petrol 6 with these? Needs a way better interior for 50 grand to. Why couldnt it have gotten XR spec front buckets?
when your pricing up your next ford(madza bt),factor in the 20k service(a few bad stories there)…
Yeah you need to be careful, you should hear the tails of woe from the Nissan owners here at work. Poor B#astards!
For the Record…. 20K Service of Ranger is $560>650 depending on dealer, however this is a 3+ hour service where they reset the tappets, this is then done again at 120,000kms I openly tell my customers this and they don’t have a problem. When you factor in that the others have expensive service at different intervals and more often, it isn’t such a big deal…
Cheers
The comments made are to everyones own opinion my father owns a wildtrack and honestly is the best vehicle on the market the new look is excellect way better then the nissan navara trition colorado dmax and hilux for wot u pay yoyu get your moneys worth and feel economy is unbelaivable smooth quite engine i must say make a few minor mods and u have a nice looking truck we fitted a arb deluxe bull bar, winch lifted the front and was runnin the 255/18inch tyre and now running the 285/18inch tyres and has improved everythin ford have made a very nice truck
Don’t think I dissagree with anything you said, but I’m not sure.
Haven’t you heard of punctuation? If you want your posts to have any credibility you have to try just a bit. At least you didn’t use the txting cr#p.