<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Skoda Octavia Review and Road Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:05:06 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-2/#comment-167149</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-167149</guid>
		<description>Hired a one of these in the OK last month, drove very well. Economy &amp; comfort also good.
No keyless entry was a big draw back, when travelling with others all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hired a one of these in the OK last month, drove very well. Economy &amp; comfort also good.<br />
No keyless entry was a big draw back, when travelling with others all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-2/#comment-161974</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-161974</guid>
		<description>2009 Skoda Octavia 1.8 TSI – $35,790
is this price in dollar?
If yes it is expensive I have to say...Which city?

I live in Shanghai China, maybe someone here knows...
the previous Octavia 1.8 TSI comfort version with 6AT is around 150，000rmb
which is around 22,000 US dollar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2009 Skoda Octavia 1.8 TSI – $35,790<br />
is this price in dollar?<br />
If yes it is expensive I have to say&#8230;Which city?</p>
<p>I live in Shanghai China, maybe someone here knows&#8230;<br />
the previous Octavia 1.8 TSI comfort version with 6AT is around 150，000rmb<br />
which is around 22,000 US dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-154950</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-154950</guid>
		<description>I live in Nigeria where information about Car performance is scanty.  I just got 1.6 Skoda Octavia.  My experience tallies with the test drive report put together by Paul.  I too perceive on my first drive that the car is tool big for the 1.6L engine.  As I have to rev up to 3600 before moving the car from traffic light stop (causing unnecessary stare from fellow drivers and on-lookers) and before it could change to gear 2.  However, the interior and exterior beauty is ok and alright for the price.

If I have got this information early, may be I would have waited for 1.8TSI which from the manufacturer&#039;s datasheet and the above test drive report shows that it has a better engine performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Nigeria where information about Car performance is scanty.  I just got 1.6 Skoda Octavia.  My experience tallies with the test drive report put together by Paul.  I too perceive on my first drive that the car is tool big for the 1.6L engine.  As I have to rev up to 3600 before moving the car from traffic light stop (causing unnecessary stare from fellow drivers and on-lookers) and before it could change to gear 2.  However, the interior and exterior beauty is ok and alright for the price.</p>
<p>If I have got this information early, may be I would have waited for 1.8TSI which from the manufacturer&#8217;s datasheet and the above test drive report shows that it has a better engine performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-143138</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-143138</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that nobody has compared this car to the older model VW Passat which it seems to look very much like from the rear lights of the Octavia and well basically the drive train and engines are identical in the 1.8 config sans the new DSG auto.

Agree with the reviewer as to why they updated this model in that only really body style has changed a bit and not really much else.  I have read though that Skoda is one of the most sought after cars in Germany in that they actually have better quality records compared to their own indigenous built VW&#039;s.  I still think the Jetta is a better looking car, but certainly more expensive for just looks really.

All up the Skoda range is really a poor mans Audi - most all of the specs are Audi of years past and certainly great value for money, not that they compete on a style level, that Audi has in spades.  I do think the brand will slowly catch fire though, they offer a lot of European car for the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that nobody has compared this car to the older model VW Passat which it seems to look very much like from the rear lights of the Octavia and well basically the drive train and engines are identical in the 1.8 config sans the new DSG auto.</p>
<p>Agree with the reviewer as to why they updated this model in that only really body style has changed a bit and not really much else.  I have read though that Skoda is one of the most sought after cars in Germany in that they actually have better quality records compared to their own indigenous built VW&#8217;s.  I still think the Jetta is a better looking car, but certainly more expensive for just looks really.</p>
<p>All up the Skoda range is really a poor mans Audi &#8211; most all of the specs are Audi of years past and certainly great value for money, not that they compete on a style level, that Audi has in spades.  I do think the brand will slowly catch fire though, they offer a lot of European car for the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake02</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140193</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140193</guid>
		<description>Sorry TSI, I went on to say that around town I get upto 600kms out of tank, and if needed it can last me two weeks at the maximum. I&#039;m pretty imressed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry TSI, I went on to say that around town I get upto 600kms out of tank, and if needed it can last me two weeks at the maximum. I&#8217;m pretty imressed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake02</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140190</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140190</guid>
		<description>TSI:
Yep I own an RS petrol hatch, and around town I get about 10L/100km, not particularly good but my old Subaru Liberty (2000 model) got around 14L/100km around town (all cars are the same) and the Skoda has alot better performance! on a trip from Sydney to Coffs Harbour (490km) it used just over half a tank of fuel, which impressed me immensly especially considering it&#039;s petrol-powered.

I paid the same with the Skoda as I originally did in 2000 with the Sube (37k), and it&#039;s amazing to see how much extra you get for your money now-a-days!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TSI:<br />
Yep I own an RS petrol hatch, and around town I get about 10L/100km, not particularly good but my old Subaru Liberty (2000 model) got around 14L/100km around town (all cars are the same) and the Skoda has alot better performance! on a trip from Sydney to Coffs Harbour (490km) it used just over half a tank of fuel, which impressed me immensly especially considering it&#8217;s petrol-powered.</p>
<p>I paid the same with the Skoda as I originally did in 2000 with the Sube (37k), and it&#8217;s amazing to see how much extra you get for your money now-a-days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AS</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140160</link>
		<dc:creator>AS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140160</guid>
		<description>Nice to see some discussion about the Skoda here.

I&#039;m in the market for a new car, and after years of Commodore wagons for the family I&#039;m after a car I can appreciate and enjoy.

Looked at the Mazda 6, Honda Accord Euro, Mondeo and Skoda. In the end, it&#039;s a personal choice isn&#039;t it? But my take was that Mazda 6 was too fussy inside (lots of switches) but great expanses of boring plastic, Mondeo is bland (looks like another family car), Accord is lovely to look at but underpowered (and unconvincing advice from the dealer on that pinging issue). Skoda just seemed to tick all the boxes - and no matter what anyone says I love the DSG having driven extensively with it in Europe.

98RON is a worry, but I guess I just factor it into the budget. Looks? Not racy, but having had the opportunity to have one for a day and then also take it home overnight it does look better in the flesh.

Size? Frankly I didn&#039;t think the Accord made good use of the extra dimensions and travelling with four or even five is a thing of the past.

So, now I just have to finalise the quote and get the salary packaging company organised.

But thanks everyone for the contributions, really good to hear so many views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see some discussion about the Skoda here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the market for a new car, and after years of Commodore wagons for the family I&#8217;m after a car I can appreciate and enjoy.</p>
<p>Looked at the Mazda 6, Honda Accord Euro, Mondeo and Skoda. In the end, it&#8217;s a personal choice isn&#8217;t it? But my take was that Mazda 6 was too fussy inside (lots of switches) but great expanses of boring plastic, Mondeo is bland (looks like another family car), Accord is lovely to look at but underpowered (and unconvincing advice from the dealer on that pinging issue). Skoda just seemed to tick all the boxes &#8211; and no matter what anyone says I love the DSG having driven extensively with it in Europe.</p>
<p>98RON is a worry, but I guess I just factor it into the budget. Looks? Not racy, but having had the opportunity to have one for a day and then also take it home overnight it does look better in the flesh.</p>
<p>Size? Frankly I didn&#8217;t think the Accord made good use of the extra dimensions and travelling with four or even five is a thing of the past.</p>
<p>So, now I just have to finalise the quote and get the salary packaging company organised.</p>
<p>But thanks everyone for the contributions, really good to hear so many views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveH</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140062</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140062</guid>
		<description>I was in the same boat as a few people here and was looking at the Mazda 6, Accord Euro, Mondeo XR5 and for something from left field, the Skoda Octavia RS.

I drove a Mondeo XR5 that felt really good, but then drove another that had about 5,000 k&#039;s on it and it felt &#039;loose&#039;, so it didn&#039;t feel well put together.

The Skoda was a nice car, but not as big as the other three.  It is a fair bit narrower and while interior room is comparable, I needed the wider cars.  Also, I had massive doubts about the resale value of a Skoda as it bourne out by the prices they are going for second hand.

For me it came down to the 6 and the Euro and I chose the Euro becuase it was far better equipped than the 6 for the same money.  Anyone who has driven the Euro in a manual will know that it is not a slow car and it handles very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in the same boat as a few people here and was looking at the Mazda 6, Accord Euro, Mondeo XR5 and for something from left field, the Skoda Octavia RS.</p>
<p>I drove a Mondeo XR5 that felt really good, but then drove another that had about 5,000 k&#8217;s on it and it felt &#8216;loose&#8217;, so it didn&#8217;t feel well put together.</p>
<p>The Skoda was a nice car, but not as big as the other three.  It is a fair bit narrower and while interior room is comparable, I needed the wider cars.  Also, I had massive doubts about the resale value of a Skoda as it bourne out by the prices they are going for second hand.</p>
<p>For me it came down to the 6 and the Euro and I chose the Euro becuase it was far better equipped than the 6 for the same money.  Anyone who has driven the Euro in a manual will know that it is not a slow car and it handles very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140059</link>
		<dc:creator>t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140059</guid>
		<description>looks like a blinged nose holden viva



*sighs*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like a blinged nose holden viva</p>
<p>*sighs*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140058</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140058</guid>
		<description>manufacturers need to pay attention to what the market desires

ask yourself why the Ford Focus is not sold here with a 1.6 petrol?

honda also have a 2.0 accord overseas and going by how lackluster the 2.4 is here you can see why they passed

as yet we do not have any arcane capacity laws in this country but you would think the importers would do a little market research and see what australians want?

no-one has an issue with direct injected small turbo diesels

what we don&#039;t want is tiny petrol engines in large cars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>manufacturers need to pay attention to what the market desires</p>
<p>ask yourself why the Ford Focus is not sold here with a 1.6 petrol?</p>
<p>honda also have a 2.0 accord overseas and going by how lackluster the 2.4 is here you can see why they passed</p>
<p>as yet we do not have any arcane capacity laws in this country but you would think the importers would do a little market research and see what australians want?</p>
<p>no-one has an issue with direct injected small turbo diesels</p>
<p>what we don&#8217;t want is tiny petrol engines in large cars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomoreoverpricedcrap</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140054</link>
		<dc:creator>nomoreoverpricedcrap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140054</guid>
		<description>What an underpowered and overpriced crap…!! Underpowered cars constantly make drivers annoying and tiring. People who buy this type of cars are simply insane…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an underpowered and overpriced crap…!! Underpowered cars constantly make drivers annoying and tiring. People who buy this type of cars are simply insane…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomoreoverpricedcrap</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140053</link>
		<dc:creator>nomoreoverpricedcrap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140053</guid>
		<description>1.6 litre? I would rather walk...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.6 litre? I would rather walk&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QwkEddie</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140043</link>
		<dc:creator>QwkEddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140043</guid>
		<description>No wonder VW has moved into turbo engines in a big way.That 1.6L proves what I have always suspected,that VW cannot build NA engines.The 1.6L has the same if not less power than the Getz 1.6 or the Jazz 1.5L or the KIA Rio.
If people think that this Skoda looks better than the Euro or Mazda 6 well,I suppose,if they say it as a mantra eventually they will come to believe it.The Skoda looks like it was styled during the Cold War era!it still has lingering design cues of those ugly limosines that used to chauffeur the Eastern Block generals!The rear is very early Korean with those dated light lenses.The interior seems ok.
The DSG didn&#039;t seem to function smoothly and I believe some of the interior trim(?) became loose during the review.
The RS version is somewhat half-decent in looks but I read it has chronic understeer,the suspension has not been uprated at all.
There are better alternatives,even in the VW stable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No wonder VW has moved into turbo engines in a big way.That 1.6L proves what I have always suspected,that VW cannot build NA engines.The 1.6L has the same if not less power than the Getz 1.6 or the Jazz 1.5L or the KIA Rio.<br />
If people think that this Skoda looks better than the Euro or Mazda 6 well,I suppose,if they say it as a mantra eventually they will come to believe it.The Skoda looks like it was styled during the Cold War era!it still has lingering design cues of those ugly limosines that used to chauffeur the Eastern Block generals!The rear is very early Korean with those dated light lenses.The interior seems ok.<br />
The DSG didn&#8217;t seem to function smoothly and I believe some of the interior trim(?) became loose during the review.<br />
The RS version is somewhat half-decent in looks but I read it has chronic understeer,the suspension has not been uprated at all.<br />
There are better alternatives,even in the VW stable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TSI</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140041</link>
		<dc:creator>TSI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140041</guid>
		<description>hey jake02, you are own the Rs, right?
I just wonder how many kms can you drive from full tank of petrol? Is ir really 8.2l/100kms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey jake02, you are own the Rs, right?<br />
I just wonder how many kms can you drive from full tank of petrol? Is ir really 8.2l/100kms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140036</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140036</guid>
		<description>Jake02: Not sure, I think the facelifted RS looks better than the current one. I&#039;m also partial towards the Mondeo TDCI hatch which will be facelifted in August, but it doesn&#039;t have as much power or torque, still drives nice though.

I&#039;ll take a look at all 3 a bit more closely over the next few months, no rush for me to buy a new car just yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake02: Not sure, I think the facelifted RS looks better than the current one. I&#8217;m also partial towards the Mondeo TDCI hatch which will be facelifted in August, but it doesn&#8217;t have as much power or torque, still drives nice though.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take a look at all 3 a bit more closely over the next few months, no rush for me to buy a new car just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake02</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140034</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140034</guid>
		<description>Kris:
which one you gonna buy? The RS facelift is out in 2 months.
Phillip:
I completely understand. I was saying that out of personal experience I thought the RS was more roomy than the 6. I sat behind myself (I&#039;m 6 ft 2) in both and found the RS to be better in all directions (especially the RS hatch, it had much more headroom than the 6 hatch suprisingly)  Of course, this does depend on the people testing (passengers in both behind a shorter driver will have more space etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kris:<br />
which one you gonna buy? The RS facelift is out in 2 months.<br />
Phillip:<br />
I completely understand. I was saying that out of personal experience I thought the RS was more roomy than the 6. I sat behind myself (I&#8217;m 6 ft 2) in both and found the RS to be better in all directions (especially the RS hatch, it had much more headroom than the 6 hatch suprisingly)  Of course, this does depend on the people testing (passengers in both behind a shorter driver will have more space etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillip</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140031</link>
		<dc:creator>phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140031</guid>
		<description>Jake02: I may be wrong, but I am quite sure that the Mazda 6 is considerably bigger inside than the Octavia. Can anyone back me up there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake02: I may be wrong, but I am quite sure that the Mazda 6 is considerably bigger inside than the Octavia. Can anyone back me up there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140030</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140030</guid>
		<description>I test drove the Ocavia RS TDI and Mazda 6 Wagon 2.2 TDI earlier this year and came away impressed with both, for different reasons.

Firstly the Skoda. I was very up in the air about the styling of the Octavia RS. On some angles in photos I thought it looked ok, other angles, just plain boring. Jumping inside my perception changed. Seats were very comfortable and sporty looking, along with the steering wheel. The dash made me feel like I was behind the wheel of my wife&#039;s Golf, no complaints with that. Opening the boot was the biggest surprise as there is heaps of space available.

Driving the car was even better. The RS with DSG certainly gets away quite well with not enough turbo lag to make it an issue. Once it&#039;s rolling though, it just pulls really well and I took it up some decent hills around Wollongong. Handling was more than adequate for my needs and the car was very comfortable and easy to drive. Road noise could have been better but I&#039;d simply sound deaden the car to solve that. So overall I liked it a lot.

The Mazda 6 wagon was also impressive. Visually it has the Skoda&#039;s measure, has plenty of storage and is well put together. It has a decent level of equipment but to get all the bells and whistles you would have to spend another 7k to get the sports hatch.

Driving the car I noticed more turbo lag in the Mazda than the Skoda. First gear was annoying as there is plenty of turbo lag when taking off, once you change into second that disappears as this car really gets up and hauls in any gear. For those that know Wollongong, I drove up Mt Ousley in 5th gear doing 100km and 6th at 110km without any fuss. 6 speed manual worked well but gearing is tall though, so 6th is freeway only. Turbo lag and throttle response are an issue below 1800rpm. A Tunit diesel tuning module would probably sort this out. Handling was also pretty good considering it&#039;s a mid-size family car, and the Mazda was a bit quieter than the Skoda. I preferred the steerig feel in the Skoda, although the Mazda was light and direct, just lacked the feel of the Skoda.

Close call as to which one I would buy. The Skoda RS gets a bit of extra gear and comes in below the 6 diesel sports hatch, but the 6 wagon comes in below the Skoda RS, but not quite as well equipped. I&#039;d be happy with either though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I test drove the Ocavia RS TDI and Mazda 6 Wagon 2.2 TDI earlier this year and came away impressed with both, for different reasons.</p>
<p>Firstly the Skoda. I was very up in the air about the styling of the Octavia RS. On some angles in photos I thought it looked ok, other angles, just plain boring. Jumping inside my perception changed. Seats were very comfortable and sporty looking, along with the steering wheel. The dash made me feel like I was behind the wheel of my wife&#8217;s Golf, no complaints with that. Opening the boot was the biggest surprise as there is heaps of space available.</p>
<p>Driving the car was even better. The RS with DSG certainly gets away quite well with not enough turbo lag to make it an issue. Once it&#8217;s rolling though, it just pulls really well and I took it up some decent hills around Wollongong. Handling was more than adequate for my needs and the car was very comfortable and easy to drive. Road noise could have been better but I&#8217;d simply sound deaden the car to solve that. So overall I liked it a lot.</p>
<p>The Mazda 6 wagon was also impressive. Visually it has the Skoda&#8217;s measure, has plenty of storage and is well put together. It has a decent level of equipment but to get all the bells and whistles you would have to spend another 7k to get the sports hatch.</p>
<p>Driving the car I noticed more turbo lag in the Mazda than the Skoda. First gear was annoying as there is plenty of turbo lag when taking off, once you change into second that disappears as this car really gets up and hauls in any gear. For those that know Wollongong, I drove up Mt Ousley in 5th gear doing 100km and 6th at 110km without any fuss. 6 speed manual worked well but gearing is tall though, so 6th is freeway only. Turbo lag and throttle response are an issue below 1800rpm. A Tunit diesel tuning module would probably sort this out. Handling was also pretty good considering it&#8217;s a mid-size family car, and the Mazda was a bit quieter than the Skoda. I preferred the steerig feel in the Skoda, although the Mazda was light and direct, just lacked the feel of the Skoda.</p>
<p>Close call as to which one I would buy. The Skoda RS gets a bit of extra gear and comes in below the 6 diesel sports hatch, but the 6 wagon comes in below the Skoda RS, but not quite as well equipped. I&#8217;d be happy with either though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake02</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140019</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140019</guid>
		<description>I know its just opinion I&#039;m up against, but I would easily have an Octavia over a Euro/Mazda6 (and I did). The Octavia is tricky because in Europe family cars are like Mazda3 and the like, so its hard when it comes out here. Still, despite having a smaller exterior, the interior is quite big (just look at the Superb and Roomster, its something that Skoda does really well) and easily eclipses the Mazda6. 

The Octavia does look good in person (yes its one of those cars) but I feel you need big wheels to complete the look (eg my RS) which is why the normal models look abit disappointing. The Euro in person isnt very nice...too many lines, and the rear end is ugly (not boring, but ugly). The 6 is a good car, but rear space is limited and I feel Australia doesnt get enough choice in the line-up (yes I&#039;d like a 6 MZR-CD wagon, but can I get sat-nav or leather? nup). 

Octavia offers advantages in pricing, space, economy, power (well not power, but its lighter and therefore quicker) and equipment. The handling is equal to the 6 (eg very good). 

Overall these are the leaders in mid-size cars. The Liberty cannot be counted - the replacement is due in 3 months. The Epica is BORING, the Camry is reliablity and nothing else, the Sebring...just no and the Jetta (how could you with the Octavia on offer?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know its just opinion I&#8217;m up against, but I would easily have an Octavia over a Euro/Mazda6 (and I did). The Octavia is tricky because in Europe family cars are like Mazda3 and the like, so its hard when it comes out here. Still, despite having a smaller exterior, the interior is quite big (just look at the Superb and Roomster, its something that Skoda does really well) and easily eclipses the Mazda6. </p>
<p>The Octavia does look good in person (yes its one of those cars) but I feel you need big wheels to complete the look (eg my RS) which is why the normal models look abit disappointing. The Euro in person isnt very nice&#8230;too many lines, and the rear end is ugly (not boring, but ugly). The 6 is a good car, but rear space is limited and I feel Australia doesnt get enough choice in the line-up (yes I&#8217;d like a 6 MZR-CD wagon, but can I get sat-nav or leather? nup). </p>
<p>Octavia offers advantages in pricing, space, economy, power (well not power, but its lighter and therefore quicker) and equipment. The handling is equal to the 6 (eg very good). </p>
<p>Overall these are the leaders in mid-size cars. The Liberty cannot be counted &#8211; the replacement is due in 3 months. The Epica is BORING, the Camry is reliablity and nothing else, the Sebring&#8230;just no and the Jetta (how could you with the Octavia on offer?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chubbs</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/33752/2009-skoda-octavia-review-and-road-test/comment-page-1/#comment-140003</link>
		<dc:creator>Chubbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=33752#comment-140003</guid>
		<description>Agree it is a tough sell on the sedan as the looks don&#039;t float my boat compared with euro/mazda 6...but it clearly wins on perfomance and fuel due to better engine/gear box than euro/6.

Wagon harder call - quite like the look and not many other options out there. Mazda looks good and is bigger but has only one engine/trim in the auto wagon - engine a bit soft yet still 2L more per 100 km, hate the silver plastic on the dash/steering wheel and no option for rear sensors or leather...also 10000km service interval is poor.

Octavia has a great drivetrain, great interior, and I think in wagon form it looks good...Any other competitors out there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree it is a tough sell on the sedan as the looks don&#8217;t float my boat compared with euro/mazda 6&#8230;but it clearly wins on perfomance and fuel due to better engine/gear box than euro/6.</p>
<p>Wagon harder call &#8211; quite like the look and not many other options out there. Mazda looks good and is bigger but has only one engine/trim in the auto wagon &#8211; engine a bit soft yet still 2L more per 100 km, hate the silver plastic on the dash/steering wheel and no option for rear sensors or leather&#8230;also 10000km service interval is poor.</p>
<p>Octavia has a great drivetrain, great interior, and I think in wagon form it looks good&#8230;Any other competitors out there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
