Car Advice

Volvo XC60 Review & Road Test

VOLVO XC60

Pros: Stylish, sophisticated, safety, quality, ride on D5, T6's excellent engine

Cons: Automatic on D5, noisy diesel, steering a bit dead, expensive options list

By Karl Peskett |
Add to shortlist

Price: $36,180 to $56,160

Our Rating:  

2009 Volvo XC60 Review & Road Test

Safe, sexy and strong – what more could you want?

Model Tested:

  • 2009 Volvo XC60 D5 and T6 – $57,950 (D5), $64,950 (T6)

Options (As fitted to D5):

  • Drive Assist Pack $5910
  • Teknic Pack $4990
  • Premium Sound $2400
  • Personal Car Communicator $1575
  • Metallic Paint $1550
  • Interior Air Quality System $275
  • Clean Zone Interior Package $275

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

By Karl Peskett

It’s inevitable. The world craves SUVs and so car companies deliver. Supply and demand means that just about every car company has an SUV or a crossover in one form or another, but the thing is, the market is virtually flooded.

XC60D5-F3quzoom

It only took a few years, but they’ve gone from almost being able to go off road, to now being luxury vehicles that both the manufacturers and buyers know will never leave the black top, but if it means that soccer mums can feel better with being able to see further from their high driving position, you’ve got a ready made market.

They also feel safer, too. In a bigger car, there’s more room, and more crumple zones. If you add swags of airbags, Electronic Stability Control (ESC) and other equipment, the case is being made for a better buy.

It also has to look good, too. See, you can be in the safest car in the world, but if it looks like a Ssangyong Stavic, then it’s hardly going to be a big seller, is it?

XC60T6-R3qucloser

If it’s safety and sexy you want, then Volvo’s new baby, the XC60 will be right up your alley.

XC60D5-sideview

It’s a bit of a weird looking thing. It’s kind of like an XC90 that’s been shrunk and slanted a bit. In photos it looks fantastic, but in real life, it takes a few glances to get used to. You have to take your sunglasses off to see whether there’s some sort of distortion through the lens. Upon second inspection though, I’m satisfied it’s actually a good looking car.

XC60T6-F3quzoom2

It especially looks good with bigger wheels, although they do kill the ride quality to a degree. We tested a D5 and a T6 over a couple of weeks to find out which is the better car, and in the looks department, the T6 (the red car) has it all over the D5. The silver accent on the front bumper, the larger rims, and the darker paint all serve to highlight the T6′s visual appeal.

XC60D5-dashboard

Regardless of the model, however, the XC60 looks especially nice from the inside. With a driver oriented cabin, the floating console and radio screen pod are angled toward you. The door trims have a spiralled metal pattern that includes the door pull. The space is very good, and the build, although not quite Audi Q5 in quality, is solid and looks classy.

XC60D5-doorpull

When it comes to SUVs though, all manufacturers should take note of Volvo’s lead in one significant area. Visibility.

Here is an SUV that can be looked out of in all directions without hindrance. Now, there’s one area in which the XC60 sits head and shoulders above the rest, the A-pillars.

It has just about the thinnest A-pillars of any four-wheel-drive I can think of, and as a result, there’s never a blocked car, motorbike, scooter when going through a round-about, it’s absolutely brilliant.

XC60T6-interior

The optional reversing camera, which is included with the $4990 Teknic Pack, is also one of the best around. Instead of just using the reversing sensors to beep at you, the screen displays bars that change colour, and indicate your distance from objects as you get closer. It’s like virtual reality reversing. Sure, it’s not a game, but boy it’s practical.

XC60D5-Rearseats&bolsters

The child boosters built into the rear seats also suit this car’s demographic perfectly, too. Both mum and dad will be happy to drive this little beast around. For the driving enthusiast, though, it’s a little bland.

XC60D5-F3qucloser

The steering, for instance, is a bit numb. You can place the car on the road, but it’s never going to threaten the Tiguan for driveability. It also has a tendency to understeer when pushed, unlike some rivals, which are better balanced.

XC60T6-F3qulow

The ride, for the first time in a Volvo, is excellent though, more so on the D5 with its smaller wheels. There’s a touch of firmness to facilitate grip, but enough initial compliance to remove most of the jitteriness and crash that plagued Volvos past.

The T6 doesn’t nearly ride as well, with a lot firmer vertical movements, and a stuttery delivery. They don’t look as good, but the smaller wheels are also better off road.

XC60T6-Instruments

Braking is assured, and pedal feel is good without the over assisted feel of some small four-wheel-drives. Where the two cars are completely separated, though, is in their powertrains.

XC60D5-Enginebay

The D5 has a five-cylinder diesel engine, whereas the T6 has a turbocharged, six-cylinder petrol. From that description, you can probably see my preference, but let me qualify why the T6 has my vote.

XC60T6-frontview

The D5 is loud. By that I mean when you put the boot in, the noise levels are nothing like a Germanic diesel. The warbly, gravelly sound is a bit much for a luxury SUV, and although the torque and fuel economy is quite good (400Nm and 8.3L/100km) the torque in the T6 is the same, and I’d be happy to use more fuel (11.3L/100km) to get 74 more kilowatts of power and bucket loads more silence.

XC60T6-brakelights

There are other reasons, too. The automatic gearbox mated to the D5 is a too slow to respond. Slow down for entry to an intersection and if you turn left and roll through when there’s no traffic, you put your foot and wait. There’s no gear change for a while, and when it does finally happen, there’s plenty of lag waiting for you. There’s little adaptability, or predictability.

XC60D5-badge

It should be down shifting as you slow down, but it seems to hold off until you press on. Combine that with the slow take-off of a diesel engine, and it can make for some heart stopping moments pulling out in front of traffic.

XC60T6-sideview

The T6, however, is a revelation. The automatic obeys your commands, is smoother, and more willing to hold gears instead of dropping them. There’s also zero lag, despite also being turbocharged, and when the six-cylinder spools up, the car is a rocket ship. It also has a beautiful, smooth and engaging sound while revving.

XC60D5-Rear3quzoom

The all-wheel-drive system, using a Haldex coupling, responds instantly, too, containing wheel spin as soon as it starts. There’s very few instances where the front wheels will chirp, even in the wet, which means there’s enough grip, making it very safe.

XC60T6-citysafety

But perhaps the piece de resistance of the XC60 is its City Safety technology. A laser scans the road in front of you for traffic, and below 30km/h, in stop start conditions, if you aren’t paying attention, it will slam on the brakes for you, preventing a nasty rear ender.

XC60T6-R3quzoom

Volvo claims that with any steering, brake or throttle input, the system leaves it completely up to the driver, without taking over. I however can vouch that it definitely does take over in certain situations.

Pulling into my driveway, there’s a point that I can skim the car underneath our panel-lift garage door while it’s still opening. The City Safety system recognised the panel moving as a car and BAM! The Volvo slammed on the brakes. I had my foot on the brake, and a little bit of steering input as well, which was a perfect real-life scenario.

It could be looked at as a device that dumbs us down, but I prefer to look at it as piece of mind. Insurance, if you will. You might never use it, but it’s there if necessary. In fact, some insurance companies are offering reduced premiums for buyers of the baby Volvo SUV. Something to think about when considering long term costs.

The XC60 has been described by some publications as distinctly middle of the road. But I reckon it’s got enough left-field influences to set it apart from being “just another SUV”. The quirky exterior styling, the quality and presentation inside, and safety features all make the XC60 an excellent choice for the luxury soft-roader buyer.

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif


 

Reader reviews of the VOLVO XC60

<

Write a review for the VOLVO XC60

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>
  • fishman

    What’s going on with the wonky central console??

  • adam (aka mada)

    What do you mean??

    I have to confess i like the styling inside and out on this volvo, quality is also there.
    If they can manage to to bring ride/handling balance together like every other Ford product i’d be a buyer.

  • Frontman

    Try as much as I like to hate these things, I just can’t. There’s a black T6 near my home and it just looks stunning. Volvo Whatever happened to the Kellogs box styling????

  • Supply & Demand

    This review fails to address or even mention the vehicles luggage capacity. Really disappointing – I’m not a wannabe motoring journo or a even a media critic – I genuinly require an insight on this, and I assume others will too.

  • adam (aka mada)

    At the end of the day, simply go view one at your local volvo dealership! Thats if you’re really serious about purchasing one…;-)

  • FrugalOne

    One word [at this ~ coin $]

    “BMW X1″

    Sell Volvo,["i roll"]sell, BMW is coming to spoil YOUR [and others] party, sell ASAP…

    Cheers

    F-0

    ps// To many, and to expensive option list.

  • adam (aka mada)

    BMW X1??

    Yeah right, comparable…

  • JEKYL & HYDE

    $1500 metallic paint?am i reading that right…

  • NYS

    Still cheaper than BMW’s options prices

  • TSI

    the optional are too expensive….

  • adam (aka mada)

    NYS,

    Correct, it’s relative to Volvo’s competition.

  • The Realist

    Sorry, $70K is too much for a Volvo in Oz.

  • adam (aka mada)

    sorry, can you back your statement up please?

  • Pops

    Best looking midsize SUV IMO.

    Interior is good as well & unlike other euros, Volvo are practical in maximising boot space, i.e. they scallop out the boot walls aft the wheel arches. Other euros stupidly (I believe for aesthetics) have straight boot walls limited by the width of the inside face of the wheel arches. Ridiculous IMO & severly hinders your ability to fit large items, e.g. prams across the width of the car. I have seen several SUVs with prams having to be loaded on an angle (either vertically or horizontally) taking up valuable boot space.

    A T6 XC60 is currently the front runner for my next purchase but adding in the required options their pricing does get out of hand. May have to wait for one to undergo the usual Volvo depreciation & pick up a newish 2nd hand one next year at a more reasonable price.

    What is a joke though is the blanked out centre console stack area you end up with if you don’t go for the sat nav / camera option. To simply blank of the void with the same dashboard plastic makes the console look very cheap & is an extremely poor by Volvo. At least other car manufacturers (e.g. Audi) supply a colour monitor displaying radio controls, etc in place if you don’t option up for sat nav.

  • Alex

    Has anybody else seen pictures of the R Design version? From the front, I would actually describe it as beautiful. It just looks perfect. I think it loses it around the back slightly but for a compact SUV, it really does look stunning. Especially with the R Design wheels.
    My only real problem with this car is that it’s the only compact SUV I can think of where I would rather the petrol engine because the D5′s noisy, but the T6 is pretty thirsty next to a diesel. Other than that, I can’t fault it. Id rather a Q5, but that’s just preference and because of the 2.0 TDI being available. Great car.

  • TonyB

    I really do love this car. I’m looking forward to the new twin-turbo D5 diesel coming later this year. From all accounts it should address most of the issues (noise, fuel economy, performance) of this current D5 engine. Also looking forward to an Aussie comparison review between the XC60,Q5 & maybe X3 (hint, hint). My only real gripe with the XC60 (and also the Q5)is that despite its “softroader” pretendions and the fact that both Volvo and Audi love to push the “driving on dirt road theme” in their brochures, it only has a space saver spare tyre with absolutely no option for a full sized spare

  • Andrew

    The six cylinder sure does present as a flexible engine, with the same torque over a much broader range. I know that this is due to a diesel engine’s inability to rev like a petrol, but still, I agree with Karl that it is worth the extra fuel.

  • Mumble Duck

    Not too bad. Not a fan of the off centre, centre console area though.

  • http://Caradvice.com.au Baddass

    Very sexy indeed, but I’d have to disagree with you about the silver accent in the bumper. It’s like one of those designer beards gone wrong.

  • Love GT-R

    Considered buying one of these for the wife, it’s quite an attractive Volvo, but got a Murano Ti instead. As the author said, once you add the options, the thing becomes too expensive. The Ti has all the fruits which are options on the Volvo. $1500 for metallic paint is outrageous and that’s why I will never get a European car. The Japanese charge $500 for metallic paint..and you can’t tell me that their paint is inferior. The diesel engine is aging a bit and would definitely wait for the new diesel to arrive.

  • Motorhead

    I really like the XC60 but I’ll stick to the XC70 I have now as a conventional wagon is still far more practical then the soccermum mobiles & men realy don’t look right in them.

  • Bavarian Missile®™

    Sorry as much as I like Volvos I still dont like this as much as the V70 T6…………..and if you re-read Pauls first steer of that it seems to get more praise as well.
    Along with the fact the XC60 T6 seems to be similar money to the V70 T6 .

    http://www.caradvice.com.au/11557/2008-volvo-v70-t6-first-steer/

    Gorgeous car though, and beautifully finished off . As good if not better than Germans in areas.

    Love GT-R…….. how can you compare this to a Murano Ti ???????? Quality level in the Volvo is far superior and lets not bring the huge array of safety devices Volvo brings in with it!

    You know you dont have to buy brand new car ,something second hand ….6 months old you can pick up for 6-10 k cheaper and manage to find all the fruit you have ever wanted on it :)

  • NotTheStig

    As much as I love my 08 XC70, I don’t like the XC60 at all.

    All the same interior components but laid out in a different way (instead of a nice balanced look, it is all over the place). Then there is the radio display pod on the dashboard top even if you get no Nav. Awful.

    The XC70 D5 weighs the same and gets the same economy as the XC60 D5 but has very heavy looking rear quarters. I know it is a X3, Q5 (etc) competitor but it has zero going for it compared to a XC70 apart from City Safety (and that will be in other Volvos soon anyway).

    And it may understeer and not be the sharpest handler but if it is anything like my XC70, it is a great and comfortable long distance cruiser. I doubt many will fling these around like a sports car.

  • The Realist

    adam (aka mada) Says:
    July 15th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
    “sorry, can you back your statement up please?”

    I can purchase a world class Ford Territory F6XYZ for $76K, which is the best handling and performing SUV on the market. It has class, quality and luxury you can only find in Germans that cost three times as much. Why would I buy a Porsche Cayenne Turbo for $200K+ or a V8 BMW X5 when I can buy an F6ABC AND a G6ET XYZ and still have enough money to invest in an apartment in Macquarie Fields!

    If Porsche or BMW can’t handle the Ford, a $70K Volvo doesn’t stand a chance against Aussie muscle and pride!!

  • http://Supply&Demand Supply & Demand

    Adam aka (Mada) I don’t have time to physically browse through the 20 or so small/medium SUV’s on the market. I also shouldn’t have to search through every vehicle specs sheet on manufacturer websites for a detail that could be covered in a much more accessible and unbiased manor by a motoring journalist. I was disappointed such an important attribute was left out of this review because I rated this website as half reputable. I’m also frustrated because I need to find a small/medium diesel SUV with much more cargo capacity than a Tiguan – information I can get elsewhere – yes, but information that SHOULD be available on this website and in this review.

  • Alex

    To The Realist, I had no idea you had such a sense of humour!
    Seriously, the Territory F6X is a pretty good car, but it doesn’t even begin to compare to any of the Germans. And it certainly isn’t the best performance SUV on the market. I don’t know where you got that from.
    The Territory doesn’t have anywhere near the quality of the German – I was going to write rivals but they’re not. As for class, well perhaps an X5 has a bit but none of them really have much class, especially not the slightly naff Ford.
    I think that you may be a little more blown away by the FPV range than anybody else is. Don’t get me wrong, they are great cars but they’re not nearly of a Porsche or BMW level.
    However, I actually envy you, because although I don’t agree with your opinions, I only wish that I could find such pleasure in such affordable cars.
    Just don’t try and compare incomparable cars. I could write chalk and cheese, but I feel Ford and Porsche works prefectly as a metaphor here.

    Finally, I think you should consider a name change; you’re not very realistic.

  • Wheelnut®™

    I don’t mind the current range of Volvo’s as they have a number of unique quirky features that their rivals don’t – such as the inbuilt booster seats.. having said that I’d prefer a XC-70 or even a V60 T5 AWD

    A possible reason for the centre console appearing to be “wonky” [in the photo which is taken from back seat looking in between the front seats] could be that its angled slightly more towards the driver.. which is more evident in the Photo taken from the drivers seat
    The other thing is that its known as a floating console as there is nothing behind it – the panel is less than 20mm thick

  • observer

    The Realist does have some merit in his comparison Alex.

    BMW turned to the Ford Territory when they developed the unique front suspesion setup/geometry on the latest X5 model. The only difference is that BMW uses Aluminiun components and hence this adds to the $$$ difference.

    Credit where credit is due…Aus 1 Germany 0.

    Cheers

  • Alex

    Observer, fair enough but that doesn’t make the Territory better than the X5 as Realist writes.

  • The Realist

    I also think the Ford BF Falcon G6E Turbo is a better car than a BMW M5 and that the Holden Caprice is miles ahead of an S Class Mercedes in comfort, luxury and quality.

    Go Australia! We are the worlds best when it comes to manufacturing and productivity. We are so talented that our automotive companies survive for years whilst not making turning a profit! (Just don’t ask the Aussie tax payer why…) Australia 2 – The World 0 !!!

  • The Realist

    Volvo in Oz – just as irrelevant as Peugeot and Saab.

  • Tomas79

    No need to argue people the slow selling Territory F6X has been axed…

  • Alex

    So you really are joking then?

  • Andrew

    I think you mean FG Falcon G6E Turbo, not BF

  • The Realist

    Alex Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 2:07 am
    “So you really are joking then?”

    110%.

    Andrew Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 9:14 am
    “I think you mean FG Falcon G6E Turbo, not BF”

    Looks like a BF Falcon to me!

  • Murano

    Nice looking SUV but if I’m in the market for one, I won’t buy the X60-not yet. While the D5 is noisy (Volvo isn’t well known for its diesel), the T6 has a bad impression on me. The previous T6 I’ve owned had been problematic. I like the creamy smooth acceleration of the car but there has been just too many problems with the engine and geartronic shift. First thing, the engine is too huge for the bay resulting in virtually no space for hands to move around during repairs. Any major repair will require the engine to be dropped. In my case, the replacement of an “O” ring in the return pipe (a consumable item) could not be done without dropping the engine. Second, because it is twin turbo-there are heating issues. Not during the first 3 years but surely after that. The hot Australian summers will ensure that you need to replace your cooling system after year 3. Thirdly, the GM made (huge) geartronic ‘box-it’s ok but it gets clunky after awhile. I would rather have the X60 in 2.5T which is a proven engine and the bread & butter auto’box. Lower level of performance but ultimately I get to sleep at night.

  • adam (aka mada)

    So is BMW and Merc irrelevant in OZ along with Saab etc?

    All of a sudden you’re praising Oz made Fords!?

    yeah ok…

    This particular Volvo is one of the cheapest amongst the prestige competition.
    As much as i think the territory is a fantastic effort by Ford, i certainly would rather be travelling in the Volvo rather than the territory during a serious accident/rollover.

  • Love GT-R

    BM…a 12 month old XC60 with all the fruits will still cost more than a brand new Murano Ti. I guest it depends on how much u want to pay for “quality”. Also add in the higher cost of maintenance of the Euros down the track when its out of warranty. My in-laws just got rid of their 6yo 5-series because it was costing them a fortune to maintain.

  • The Realist

    adam (aka mada) Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 9:59 am
    “So is BMW and Merc irrelevant in OZ along with Saab etc?”

    Compare sales of BMW and MB against Saab etc. No contest.

    “All of a sudden you’re praising Oz made Fords!?”

    Obviously understanding sarcasm isn’t a strong point for you.

  • The Realist

    Love GT-R Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
    “My in-laws just got rid of their 6yo 5-series because it was costing them a fortune to maintain.”

    Perhaps they should stick with their Mazdas and Holdens.

  • Bavarian Missile®™

    Sorry I think your wrong Love GT-R……….in twelve months that XC60 would have reduced by a min of 10k and as you dont pay that much extra second-hand for fruit on a car you will find it will pretty well match your $55,000 Murano and be better quality .

  • Love GT-R

    To Realist…they got the new Honda Euro.

  • tigervicas

    I have been driving a D5 for the past 3 weeks and absolutely love it. Yes it is a bit noisy being a diesel, but by all means it is not intrusive. Im averaging approx 750 litres per tank for city driving – not bad considering the size and weight of the vehicle.
    Yes there is a slight lag when taking off, but its not like you can throw these vehicles around the road, they are not designed for that, but upon travelling long distances and up bigger hills, the power is there when its most needed. The major factor for me choosing the vehicle was the safety features of the car and the massive boot space. With a little one on the way, the XC60 was the only one with a large enough boot capacity in its class. I did test drive the X3 and Murano and they did not compare to the lovely ride of the Volvo. Im sure if you went out to test drive one you would be most impressed!

  • Love GT-R

    Tigervicas

    I’m interested how much u paid for your car on-road and with any options.

  • The Realist

    Love GT-R Says:
    July 16th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
    “To Realist…they got the new Honda Euro.”

    Good choice – top car for the money.

  • tigervicas

    I paid $65500 with the tekpack included, tinted windows and front and rear park assist.

  • Love GT-R

    Tigervicas

    Which model was that..D5 or D5LE?

  • Tigervicas

    I got the D5 and love it !!!!

  • http://caradvice.com.au Spike

    Got my XC60 D5 two weeks ago. Absolutely love it. Had a 2004 Territory – there is no comparison in the ride and handling. The Territory wallows around corners and its brakes grab and shudder, plus the fuel economy was ridiculous. The Volvo is smooth, firm and perfectly balanced. You do notice the D5′s distinctive tone at low speed but there is no more noise than other engines it is just that its at a much lower pitch. At high speed the car is very quite. It is true that the auto is reluctant to change down under light acceleration, but if you give it some gas it will change down instantly. This seems to be by design because it is explained in the manual. Guess it is to give you some means to control the shift pattern with the accelerator. Have to say the auto in the Territory was very reluctant to change down when you tried to overtake.

  • camsand

    Just ordered a D5 after a lot of reviewing, but with a catch. The new D5 is what you get when you order now. A mostly new engine with twin turbo (as opposed to the twin scroll) 150kw and 420nm. If you surf the net, the reviews in a S80, which is only slightly lighter are very good. Smoother, much broader power range and 1.5 l/100km better fuel ecomony. So here’s hoping it’s this good. I think it should be much closer to the T6 in performance, with the diesel benefits also. It’s interesting assesing the value equation. The xc60 is much better value than the competitors. Try getting a Q5 or X3 with the same kit and power and you will spend $20K more. A tiguan or X1 (new in 2010) are much smaller and so useless for a family (oh the luggage!). Passat’s are close to this price for the same spec, commodore sportwagon, well, it’s a commodore, territory, well, you need a tanker to follow you around. Overall the toughest decision was swallowing the thought of buying a volvo. Isn’t mid-life great.

  • Tigervicas

    Congrats on your purchase camsand, im sure u will not be disappointed.

    Just a query, was the new one priced the same as the old D5?

  • camsand

    Officially the list price is approx $1K dearer but it comes std with the elec tailgate. Unofficially post negotiations, about the same as I had a quote for the previous D5 model from a couple of months ago.

  • http://caradvice Louiedfly

    I have ordered the T6 with all the bells and whistles after driving my beloved kluger since 2005. I was reluctant to change from Toyota and would never in my wildest dreams imagine that I would become a dreaded VOLVO driver. I had told my husband only old men with hats drive volvos but after driving 3 of them from our local Penrith dealer I was SOLD! The dealer told me most people would even know it was a VOLVO! The diesel was far too noisy for me and the T6 went like a shower of sh*t! The dealer was lovely and allowed us to take it overnight and I parked 100\’s of km\’s on the demo. Toyota is lucky to let you drive theirs around the block! I can\’t wait till it arrives. WELL WORTH A DRIVE TO ANYONE THAT IS IN THE MARKET!

  • Philip

    Perhaps it has been said before, in that case I’m sorry to repeat it.
    Volvo has two new Diesels coming out for MY2010 (in Europe) based on a 2.5l 5 cyl engine. One has a single turbo and turns out 175hp and the other two turbos (one small for low rev and one big for high revs) turning out 205hp/151kw. Both engines have gotten very good reviews, so if you’re in the market for Diesel but you think the current one is to load, wait for the new one. Plenty of power with improved fuel efficiency

  • dennis

    Ordered T6 back in April with pretty much all the safety features plus couple of other options. And it was early August when we got the XC60 built to our specification delivered to our home. (The dealer was nice that they loaned us C30 to drive around a week as the delivery was delayed somehow from original ETD.)

    I’m glad that I chosen T6 as it really drive like bat out of cave~ From standing start it’s bloody fast for a car weighs nearly 2 tons! And those numerous safety features are interesting but I really like BLIS as it saves me from near miss couple of times. And reversing camera~ Because of the location of our garage building being at the far corner of the backyard we have to drive through the narrow gap between the fence and the house and the reversing camera along with the F/R parking sensor do wonders for missus. She really like this features.

    Fuel wise it definitely isn’t frugal but since it normally does the school during weekdays it’s not too bad – I did take it to the Blue Mountain following its Sat-Nav and it was beautiful and stress free trip both ways.

  • observer

    I actually like this volvo, nice shape and well packaged. Better value than x3 and Q5,

  • Chris

    I had a 2006 Toyota Passo(same as a Daihatsu Siron which is a poverty pack new car) when I lived in Japan and it was also the base model. It had those child booster seat as standard and also keyless/remote entry like top spec cars arriving in Australia of late. I just can’t understand why in Australia the cool specs and options available overseas never make it here or are only available as expensive options on luxury models!?

    • Bo

      Indeed! I even start to think maybe the only car Australian needs is a car with super powerful engine with the locker from Mr Bean’s Mini…Oh, it for locking the engine from stealing…

  • Ballet mum

    Had an XC60 for a year and love it but have had recurring problems with the two-stage booster seat (keeps dropping down spontaneously almost before the child gets on it). Anyone else had this problem?

  • nj

    I think it looks good but will wait for the Diesel Plug in Hybrid version in 2012. uses just 2l per 100km but can run on electric only for around 50km