2009 Nissan 370Z Review & Road Test
June 15, 2009 by Matt Brogan
2009 Nissan 370Z Review & Road Test
Godzilla on a beer budget
Model Tested:
- 2009 Nissan 370Z; 3.7-litre, V6, seven-speed automatic; coupe – $69,990 (RRP)
Options:
- Metallic Paint $495 (Fitted – Chicane Yellow)
Peerless performance; seven-speed auto; grip & handling
Road noise; compact cockpit; visibility; options shortfall
CarAdvice Rating: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- by Matt Brogan
When you stop to consider the 370Z’s price tag then what I’m about to say will begin to make a whole lot more sense: this is the best sports car on the market under $100K.
Perhaps what’s even more impressive is that the all new Zed is almost at a level whereby it will give a great many cars north of that figure a run for their money too. Yes, it’s that good.
Sure some will be bound to say it doesn’t look different enough, and at a glance that may well be true, but spend some time with the 370Z, and you’ll agree that these subtle styling differences have made the car far more formidable in pose, and not without good reason.
It’s smaller, wider, lower, and in my humble opinion, substantially tougher than the model it replaces.
Sure the 350Z went reasonably well, handled neatly and sold in droves, but when you drive the all-new 370Z you quickly appreciate just how far the development of the iconic nameplate has come in only a few short years.
Firstly, and most noticeably, is the increase in performance, and I don’t just mean the numbers. The whole car feels more alive. It accelerates more aggressively, is more responsive in both power delivery and handling, and best of all hasn’t become so perfect that it has lost its sense of humour.
It truly is a car you can actually enjoy driving again and again. The steering is positive with just the right amount of assistance to feel when you’ve reached the threshold of the front wheels’ grip. Turn in is quick, and sharp with the chassis reacting quickly to sudden changes in direction.
In fact it so rigid torsionally that to induce oversteer only takes a little feed in from the right foot, almost like the Z is a purpose-built drift machine.
To help that along Nissan has shoehorned its 245kW, 3.7-litre, V6 under the bonnet to provide scorching performance to the rear wheels through a new, and very sharp, seven-speed automatic transmission.
This gearbox likes to be driven on torque and makes good use of the 363Nm on tap from 5200rpm, which incidentally is just about where you should start thinking about pulling the + paddle.
The car is so quick to change in manual mode that the car almost feels asleep once back in Drive which let’s face it, will only be used in case of amputation or female company.
Braking is competent, but not as strong of feel as I’d have liked, though that said there are enough electronic nannies on board to keep you out of harms way with ABS, EBA, EBD, ESP and Traction Control all offered as standard.
The cockpit offers quite a list of goodies too with satellite navigation, Bose six-disc CD tuner, cruise control, heated and electrically operated leather sports seats, full trip computer, key-less entry with push button start, Bluetooth mobile phone integration, iPod connectivity, and of course the afore mentioned paddle shifts.
Dusk sensing xenon headlamps with washers, 18-inch alloy wheels and a centrally mounted rear fog lamp round out the kit list outside – just in case the jet fighter-like coupe doesn’t look good enough already.
It’s a touch concerning that there’s no barrier between you and your cargo, though I will admit, the ability to look through the rear glass and enjoy the sight of that polished strut brace does remind you that the family car might have done for the run to the shops, but then again, what would you rather be seen in?
That’s what so much of this comes back to, the Z makes you feel good about being seen in a sports car, and for all those environmental types, my argument is this: 11.4-litres per 100km real world average. Enough said!
If there has to be a downside to the 370Z, in addition to the copious road noise, it would be that the cockpit is a little on the compact side for taller drivers thanks to the high bonnet and dash forcing a less “legs-out” seating position.
Visibility through the “C” pillar and rear leaves you begging for parking sensors (or a camera as fitted in Maxima models) and there’s also a slight shortfall when it comes to options with extras like rain sensing wipers, an auto-dimming mirror and some form of rear park assist seeming like an accidental omission when you consider the rest of the kit inside.
That aside though, the 370Z remains a pretty well packed piece of kit for the money and despite the abundance of options doesn’t lose that sports edge so badly lacking in competitors of this price range, and even a few above it.
Yes for any one chasing that honest, undiluted feeling that can only come from a front engine, rear drive sports coupe then the 370Z is the only choice this side of $100K, or as I’ve come to think of it: Godzilla on a beer budget.
Ratings:
CarAdvice Overall Rating: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does it Drive: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does it Look: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does it Go: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Specifications:
- Engine: 3696cc DOHC V6 (24-valve)
- Power: 245kW @ 7000rpm
- Torque: 363Nm @ 5200rpm
- Induction: Multi-point
- Transmission: Seven-speed automatic
- Driven Wheels: Rear (LSD)
- Brakes: Discs with ABS, EBA & EBD
- Top Speed: Not Tested
- 0-100km/h: 5.6 seconds
- 0-400m: 13.9 seconds
- CO2 Emissions: 247 grams per kilometre
- Fuel Consumption: 10.4 litres per 100km (ADR c0mbined)
- Fuel Consumption: 11.4 litres per 100km (as tested)
- Fuel Tank Capacity: 72 litres
- Fuel Type: 95 – 98RON petrol
- ANCAP Rating: TBC
- Airbags: Dual Front & Side
- Safety: ESP with Traction Control
- Spare Wheel: Space saver
- Suspension: Wishbone (F)/Multi-Link (R)
- Tow Capacity: N/A
- Turning Circle: 10.0 metres
- Warranty: Three year/100,000km
- Weight: 1532kg (Tare)
- Wheels: Alloy 18 x 8.0-inch



















My Opinion, Nice car!! FPV F6310 better all up on performance, 80-120 and 0-100 and 0-400 F6 looks tough and you don’t see many on the road either that the FG F6310, but there both different cars for different people simple as that. It all comes to a personal opinion. But i do guarantee if you drive an F6 you would not want to get out of it.
BMW 135i, 0 to 100 time of 5.3 sec is faster than the Z, so why does it have no peers?
Sorry CA but you have got it wrong this time and at the end of the day you can’t go past the prestige of the BMW badge!
I bought a Golf GTI pirelli and it’s a blast but if I had more money I would have picked the 135i over the Nissan and that’s maybe because I’m over 40!
WHAT’S THE FASCINATION WITH 0-100KM/H & 1/4 MILE TIMES?
Today we need to be more concerned with how clean the engine is, and this is directly linked to MPG NOT MPH!
Cheers,
F-0[The Green warm and fuzzy one!]
Source : Discount New cars and Prestige New cars
Nissan 370Z $73,950 driveaway
BMW 135i Coupe $80,050 driveaway
And that’s before adding the $4500 or so on the 135 for the sat nav which is standard on the 370Z
So basically you need to pay an extra $10k for the Beemer.
I’d go with the Zed, it’s better looking IMHO
Oh the Zed. Not sure why people respect this car. Rip off, not hugely quick, pretty ugly, not convenient. Peoples buy a new WRX Sti. It will smash this car and with a few bolt ons you will be doing 11sec down the WSID if you wanted. Just watch some of the BMI videos for evidence of the EVO’s and WRX’s murdering this car buy lots. Yet its more expensive, What the.
I have driven all 3 and how you can say it’s ugly compared to an STI and EVO is unclear to me. If you want a drive line and engine with crappy plastics go the STI, they are all fun to drive but 370 leads that crop IMO.
You’re also lucky to get a 135 under 90k on road with similar specs while getting a 370 under 70k on road. Loved the 135 to drive but its styling a little cute in my opinion.