Rolls Royce Phantom Review & Road Test
June 11, 2009 by Karl Peskett

Rolls Royce Phantom Review & Road test
Affordable luxury for the masses – well, sort of…
Model Tested:
- Rolls Royce Phantom, 6.75-litre, V12, automatic Provenance
Opulence, elegance, craftsmanship, quietness, smoothness – too many superlatives to list
Sheer size can be a bit intimidating – but it needn’t be
CarAdvice Rating: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
- by Karl Peskett
When a luxury car costs north of $1 million, you tend to expect a lot from it.
You expect it to be finished perfectly, you expect it to be smooth as silk, you expect it to cosset and comfort its passengers, and you expect it to have all the bells and whistles available.
Having driven supercar after supercar this year, it was time to slow things down and just glide.
The Rolls Royce Phantom range represents eloquence and class in spades, especially compared to its melted-plastic-looking Germanic competitor. With that in mind, we contacted Rolls Royce for a road test, it was time to find out if our expectations would be met.
Our original request to Rolls Royce was for a Phantom Drophead, but as you probably realise, Australia isn’t exactly a massive market, and so unlike Holden and Ford, there aren’t that many press cars running around.
Try one, in fact. Thus, by the time we had gone to pick up our test car, it was sold.
We were, of course, disappointed, but as they say, every Cloud has a Silver Shadow, or was that lining? Anyway, it gave us another opportunity for a story.
We were led to a Titanium Phantom, gleaming under the mercury vapour lamps of the garage. We cast our eye over it, and quickly realised that this, too, was not a press car – the Victorian registration gave that away.
“So, you can have this one instead,” said Bevin Clayton, Rolls Royce’s Australian representative. “It’ll be an interesting test.”
“Why is that?” I asked.
“Well, how old do you think it is?”
Alborz Fallah and I looked around, opened doors, inspected the interior, checked the wheels and concluded it couldn’t be very old at all. We had to be honest. “No idea. It must have been delivered recently,” I said.
“Well actually, it’s five years old,” said Mr Clayton. “And, it’s been driven more than most examples around its age.”
Alborz and I looked at each other, then back at the car.
“That’s…um…impressive,” we said, stuck for anything else to say.
“Wait until you drive it”, added Mr Clayton.
The necessary forms were signed, and we were handed the keys.
If you’ve never started a Rolls Royce Phantom, I suggest you try it at some point in your life. It’s possibly the most eerie feeling, this side of a Toyota Prius. There’s an age old adage about being able to place a cup of tea on top of the engine while it cranks over. The saying goes that if it’s tuned correctly, it won’t spill a drop.
It’s true, and five years from coming off the production line, this example still wreaks havoc with your mind, as it plays the “is it on, or is it off” guessing game.
The lack of sound and vibration when firing up 12 cylinders and 6.75-litres from a five-year-old car is like telling a calculator to divide by zero. It just doesn’t make sense. Neither does the fact that when the doors are shut, there is no way known of telling if the car is still swigging from its fuel tank. If you think I’m kidding, just try it.
See, we’re not usually into used-car testing here at CarAdvice, but the Phantom we were handed is part of a program called Provenance. What that means is the car was bought back from its owner by the factory, and is being sold as a completely refurbished unit. It then comes with a factory warranty, roadside assistance, servicing included and even emissions tested, if need be.
So what you’re getting is not like any other secondhand car; it’s basically a brand new one, but someone else has taken a massive depreciation hit for you. In this case, the car was listed for sale at $595,000. To my mind, that brings it down to a level of affordability that opens it up to a new market of buyers.
So, how does it drive in comparison to a brand spanker? One word – identical.
We headed out from the Rolls office in Darlinghurst toward Wollongong. Some of the lumpiest, most broken up bitumen in Australia was waiting for us, not to mention wide freeways, narrow laneways and every other sized ways in between. The five-year-old Roller’s suspension and build integrity had its work cut out for it.
But before we move on to that, there’s something I have to mention about the Phantom. Despite the sheer, colossal size of this beast, it’s a surprisingly easy car to drive.
With its parking sensors front and rear, you never are left in the dark about when to brake while parking. The folded ridges which run the length of the bonnet, also mark the outer perimeter of the car, meaning when you swing into small spaces, you can see exactly where you’re going.
The steering is also fairly light at low speed – perhaps a little too much – making twirling the wheel an easy affair for anyone older than three. Thankfully it firms up at higher speeds, with enough meat and feel to keep you well informed as to what’s going on. A slightly thicker rim would be good, though, even despite the elegance of the standard issue piece.
But it’s the way it soaks up the cracks and potholes with 21-inch wheels that left us truly impressed. Despite their massive diameter, the wheels, in concert with brilliant air suspension, manage to make the ride one of the most pleasant experiences in a car on sale today.
Wait on, it’s five years old, and the roads were rubbish!
Yes, on the huge, crater-like cracks in Sydney’s asphalt, you can feel something happening underneath the car. It’s just so fuss free, though, that you could be doing a Nullabor trek and clobbering a road full of kangaroos, but you’d hardly notice.
Think of it as a virtual steam-roller. Whatever bump you were going to feel has just been flattened out for you, which means that being a passenger is suddenly one of life’s pleasures.
As a motoring enthusiast, I’m all for hogging the driver’s seat. However, in the Phantom, I was happy to hand over the driving to Alborz for a while and just soak up the ambience of possibly the world’s best cabin.
After five years of use, I made it my mission to try and pick a fault with the interior. I was sure that there was some rattling, or creaking, or even scratches I could find, wrong! The leather was pristine, the wood was in perfect nick, and the chrome still glistened like it was plated yesterday.
Apart from a slightly outdated menu system (don’t call it iDrive – Rolls Royce gets mighty upset) the rest of the cabin was perfect. The Provenance programme really does make sure you’re getting the finest of the finest.
That annoys me. Not because a buyer is getting more than they pay for, but because I thought I could pick a fault with the car. I couldn’t and now I have to eat humble pie.
Here’s the thing: If you’re going to make a statement, then you need to have a Rolls Royce. Nothing screams wealth and good taste more than rocking up to an event in a Phantom. However, why pay full dollar?
Sure, you may not get the exact colour you wanted, or the particular walnut you might prefer, but you’ve just saved yourself over $500,000. With that you could buy a Lamborghini for the weekends, or even a Bentley GTC.
When you turn up to a function, how are people going to tell the difference between your Phantom, and the brand new one in the showroom?
Let me tell you, based on the time we spent in a Provenance car, they’re not.
If it’s the impression you make which you’re after, then well done Rolls Royce.
Provenance has proven its providence.
CarAdvice Overall Rating: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does it Drive: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does it Look: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How does it Go: ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Specifications:
- Engine: 6.75-litre V12
- Power: 338kW @ 5350rpm
- Torque: 720Nm @ 3500rpm
- Induction: Direct injection, naturally aspirated
- Transmission: ZF six-speed automatic
- Differential/Driven Wheels: LSD/Rear
- Brakes: 374mm vented front discs, 370mm vented rear discs
- Top Speed: 240km/h
- 0-100km/h: 5.7 seconds
- 0-400m: 14.2 seconds
- CO2 Emissions: 377g/km
- Fuel Consumption: 15.7L/100km combined
- Fuel Tank Capacity: 100-litres
- Fuel Type: 95RON
- ANCAP Rating: Not available
- Airbags: Eight
- Safety: DSC, TC, ABS, BA, EBD
- Spare Wheel: None
- Tow Capacity: N/A
- Turning Circle: 13.8m
- Warranty: Two years on Provenance program
- Weight: 2550kgs
- Wheels: 21-inch alloys
Road Test the Rivals: – Are there really any?


























How can they not change the car in 5 years o.0?
Congratulations Karl and Alborz duo!
This is the flip-side of being Auto Journalist!
So were you nervous you might hit a tree or some other car or bump the backside (despite the sensor)?
These expensive cars are not driven in fact, they are showpiece of status symbol. Hence they remain new. Well, I don’t know, for example, Ford Falcon would remain as new if it is driven only 10000 km in five years?
Well, I am out to get a Lancer or mazda 3, not this one, anyway.
Speaking of the Phantom, who won the RR Phantom competition from OCT 2007?
http://www.caradvice.com.au/73.....mpetition/
Nice car.
I just don’t like the cheap interior plastic
Wow this is revelent.. A review of the vehicle which has had the lowest sales in the world for the last 5 years…
Oh well kept you out of trouble for the day I guess. I know it’s vulgar to mention but how much folding for this gin palace?
Toxic Horse – Are you serious??? Where are the cheap plastics? I can only see wood, leaether and metal.
Danman2, the car which sold the least would be the Maybach. Heaps of Rolls get sold.
To quote Arnie in Predator “You are one ugly motherf#@ker”.
I hate everything about it. It looks like a brick on wheels that would just suck down the juice.
If you can afford the money to buy one then petrol is the last thing that will be on your mind
laurie
Yucky interior!
You got me, was joking
This car would cruise the city not hwy so its urban consumption according to http://www.rolls-roycemotorcars.com is 25l/100km. Also according to Redbook the average millage for a 5 year old one of these is 50,000 – 90,000km and you would have bought it for $935K in 2004 and now it is worth $340k. It must feel good to loose $600k in 5 years. That is at best $7 lost per kilometer driven, never mid the fuel, rego, insurance and Luxury car tax :)
What the hell is wrong with the people commenting here? You don’t buy a Rolls Royce based on fuel economy or resale value.
This car is in a league of it’s own and I really do love it. I don’t think it looks that great but I think how a Rolls Royce looks is more about presence than being beautiful. It couldn’t have beautiful swoopy lines and still look like if you went to close to it it might kill you. It needs to look like a brick. I think it carries it off wonderfully. And the interior is just perfect. There will be people who don’t think it looks good but I think that most will agree that this is the perfect interior for a Rolls Royce. In reality, this is another one of those cars like the Mini and the Beetle that has taken many cues from previous models and that interior is just so characteristic of a Rolls Royce. And so very comfortable.
Don’t insult this car until you have experienced it. I once borrowed one from a friend’s father for a weekend and drove it from London to Cornwall to Oxfordshire to Brighton and then back to London and it was one of the best drives I have ever driven. Up until then I just used to think they were ugly wastes of spaces. It was just unbelievably quiet and comfortable. I’d buy one if they weren’t so noticeable. There are some very good value used ones in the UK. It’s also the only car that I have ever had on UK roads that soaked up EVERYTHING and not once on any B Road did I feel that I would waft off into a ditch. You really aren’t paying for the badge here. They are as well if not better engineered than a GT3.
The only thing that I don’t like about this one is the colour of the lower bumpers. It reminds me of the gold bumpers that some Subarus have. They look best in dark blue or dark green.
i love this car in pearl white or black… christina aguilera has 2, and theyre the above colours. lol.
and btw, its Wollongong, not Woolongong… lol
Alex is right – Being a Roller its got to look like a brick because if it didn’t look like a brick it wouldn’t look like a Roller would it? ….and what a mighty powerful German engineered brick it is!
Always reminds me of Lady Penelope’s car from the Thunderbirds. Must be why I love the looks so much.
Can’t type comment – busy Drooling
still wouldn’t be as comfortable as the ride in the back seat of a hindustan ambassador – the most comfortable rear seat in the world
has anybody ever tried the rear seat of an 84′ ford meteor gl? thats pretty damn comfy! serious! haha.
Hey guys,
I once took the V8 Vantage for a test drive, and before I did, I was asked to sign an insurance waiver. There was no desk in sight to sign it, however there was a Rolls Phantom. The salesman just said…”Yeah sign in on the hood” I thought he was kidding…he wasn’t. I was very nervous signing a document on the hood of a million dollar car.
Adam.
Deco, they don’t have to change any thing because it is a rolls Royce and they are prefect and all the comments about the bad plastic on the dash I bet it’s a thousand times better then any other car
I thought I recognised that scenery; next time take it through wollongong uni and I might catch a glimpse of it.
And Ben im pretty sure that plastics comment was tongue in cheek (right?)
This car does not resemble a brick at all.
The squarest car on our roads would have to be a range rover.