2009 Ford Territory hits the market | Car Advice

Car Advice

2009 Ford Territory hits the market

By David Twomey |

Ford Australia has finally unleashed its “lightly” revised SY Territory Mark II, which features styling changes, minor model revisions and slightly improved fuel consumption on rear-wheel-drive models.

The new look was shown to the public back at the Melbourne International Motor Show in March and is now moving into showrooms.

Territory is currently struggling to make sales numbers and the once darling of the medium SUV market is now running fourth in the sales race, behind Toyota’s Prado and Kluger, and Holden’s Korean-sourced Captiva.

The Territory was a Ford Australia success story after its 2004 introduction, with its not overtly bush-bashing styling and urban friendly functionality, which included a highly successful RWD model.

ford-sy-territory-ghia-turbo-mkii_2b

From a peak of 23,454 sales in 2005 its sales have slowly declined to a total of 12,882 units in 2008.

Ford’s fight back is mild if nothing else, with no major mechanical changes, although some powertrain revisions have yielded slight fuel consumption savings.

A revised model line-up for the SY Territory MkII range consists of the TX, TS and Ghia models, in rear-wheel drive (RWD) and all-wheel drive (AWD) configurations, along with the Ghia Turbo AWD – the Territory Turbo model will no longer be offered.

ford-sy-territory-ghia-turbo-mkii_2c

Major design changes include an all-new bonnet, with a complementary new front bumper, upper and lower grilles, new headlamps and a new fog lamp bezel.

Body coloured bumpers and door cladding, new body coloured door handles, new chrome belt moulding, revised tail lamps and body coloured exterior mirrors are also part of the new exterior package.

ford-sy-territory-ghia-turbo-mkii_3b

The interior of the new Territory has also received a significant freshening, with new seat materials, colour finishes and trim highlights on all models, along with the choice of two new interior environments on TS and Ghia.

Additional equipment and features are now fitted as standard on the new look SY Territory MkII range, further improving its competitiveness in the hotly contested Medium SUV segment, as well as delivering a compelling value-for-money proposition for customers.

ford-sy-territory-ghia-turbo-mkii_brochure-int-1

Territory TX now comes standard with side curtain airbags, cruise control, 17-inch alloy wheels and a full body colour package for the bumpers, door handles and mirrors.

Territory TS is also fitted with the full body colour package, along with a reverse parking camera, front fog lamps, leather-wrapped steering wheel, handbrake and gearshift, and a third row seat as standard.

ford-sy-territory-ghia-mkii_1a

Ghia models also gain a third row seat as standard equipment, along with an Alpine rear DVD system, side steps, rear privacy glass and 18-inch alloy wheels, while the Ghia Turbo picks up the same list of additions and a new alloy wheel design (18-inch wheels are already standard fitment on the top-of-the-line Territory model).

ford-sy-territory-ghia-turbo-mkii_1d

CarAdvice will have First Steer impressions of the revised Ford Territory and the revised Ranger pickup range on Wednesday, after an initial drive of the new models.

Recommended retail pricing* for the new look SY Territory MkII range:

Model Drivetrain Transmission RRP
Territory TX RWD 4-speed auto $39,490
Territory TS RWD 4-speed auto $44,490
Territory Ghia RWD 4-speed auto $52,490
Territory TX AWD 6-speed auto $44,490
Territory TS AWD 6-speed auto $49,490
Territory Ghia AWD 6-speed auto $57,490
Territory Ghia Turbo AWD 6-speed auto $66,420


 
  • Alex

    That interior looks awfully cheap. It’s not a very good looking car either. It’s really quite plain but with awfully fidgety details. There’s also too much chrome, makes it look too American.

  • Damian

    Typical Ford… Still as complacent as ever, relying on blind patriotism and brand loyalty to sell cars, rather than manufacturing a quality vehicle.

  • smokin’R32

    Since when has the Territory been a bad quality vehicle?

  • phillip

    Sticking with the 4-speed auto for the RWD models is a mistake that will cost Ford dearly. Still, it’s 100 times better than the held-together-with-duct-tape Captiva.

  • RoFlmaTiC

    I’ll be surprised if this puts the territory back on the top of suv sales.

  • RWD

    This is not a new model…………it is an update to carry it through to the new model next year. Great interior in the GHIA with good quality materials and the usual great ergonomics that Ford always have in their Aussie designed cars. No cheap Daewoo quality plastics here. The exterior looks good..as the Territory always has. It may be the oldest medium SUV on the market but it is still by far the best drive…………and the ability to be so versatile inside and out still makes it the best Medium SUV. As for the Captiva………go drive one and then drive a Territory………….it may be newer but it is nowhere near as good.

  • Alex

    Why are people bringing up the Captiva? It’s a compact SUV, this is a medium-full size one like the Kluger. The Captiva is a Rav4 and CR-V competitor.

  • HAL

    ^ They bring it up because it’s the good old Ford v Holden argument Alex. Totally irrelevant here but nonetheless a lot of people on this website can’t look past it.

    It’s funny how when this Territory initially came out it was widely lauded as a very good, accomplished and smart looking vehicle. But wow, it sure has dated. It’s almost a bit cringe-worthy to see Ford dressing it up with bits and bobs of chrome, and a slightly revamped front bumper. But then they stick with those rectangular headlights. Bring on the new model, STAT.

  • Roddy

    They’re bringing up the Captiva because it’s a direct competitor to the Territory…and in this reader’s opinion Captiva is a hell of a lot more appealing than this grandfather’s car

  • Jazrod (formally Twilight)

    the captiva adds of old bring in territory? so in a sense theyre competitors regardless of size…

    this is a territory SY-MKII, not a new model…

    dad works for ford – as some may know – and a lot of his collegues are annoyed that ford coudlt even change the interior in the slightest, or the steering wheel.

    that said, this is a much better quality product than captiva (not kluger), and should be alright for another year…

    a new territory is well under development and should be ready to reveal at next years melbourne or sydney motor show…

  • Azza21

    ford simply doesnt have the money to make big upgrades, this is the cheapest way for them to go…still wouldnt be caught near one though, such an ugly SUV.

  • Martin

    Centre stack appears of cheap hard plastic. No surprises really.

  • adam (aka mada)

    Alex,

    Captiva is not a CRV/RAV-4 competitor, jeez some of you need to get with it!

    Martin,

    Check out the material quality in the NEWER kluger, you might be surprised :-)

    Styling wise the territory is overdue for an update, otherwise the kluger, captiva and other competitors still can’t outhandle territory, it’s still one the best for practicality and performance.

    So territory maybe be outdated styling wise, it sure as hell puts into perpective how newer competition can only manage to look newer and not move the goal posts when it comes to an entertaining vehicle to drive.

  • Daniel. W

    this HORRID facelift is absolutely HIDEOUS! i see they have tried to incorporate Kinetic Design themes within the Territory’s fascia…….but gee…..thats horrid.
    With the talent at Ford Australia…….THIS is what they come up with to sway Kluger, Captiva buyers with?
    The internals are great……the externals…absolutely SCREAM outdated US SUV. (Yes……I’m aware its Aussie lol)

  • Devil666

    Still no diesel? I’d have to say that Ford deserve last place for that effort.

  • adam (aka mada)

    Does the kluger have a diesel???

  • Bret

    Devil, What is the specs of the Kluger diesel? Ohh that;s right it doesn’t have one either.
    Captiva? A small midsize deisel SUV that drinks more than a V8 deisel Landcruiser, gee that’s realy good – not.

    Anyone claiming cheap nasty interior or ugly styling, should get off the keyboard and into their VN and go and actually look at one.

    There is still nothing that this doesn’t do better than Kluger. How many “experts” here have actually driven them, back to back, hired them for a fourtnight and actually lived with them?

  • The Realist

    Cheap and nasty – I didn’t expect anything else from Ford Australia. Which bright spark decided to apply the “elevated rep mobile” approach?

    And who on earth would pay $67K for a Territory??

  • Andrew

    It was said somewhere that manufacturers can’t introduce a new engine that is not Euro V emissions compliant. Although the current Territory engine is only Euro IV compliant, it passed ADRs some time ago and meets standards for vehicles currently on sale. A new model means meeting new standards. The I6 is being developed for Euro V compliancy but is not expected until next year, also when Ford’s commitment to the DSI 4-speed auto ends.

    Read between the lines and expect a full-blown model refresh with new engines and transmissions, updated exterior and interior style to bring it into line with FG.

  • adam (aka mada)

    The realist,

    yeah…i know rite…

    Ford Oz never lives up to my expectations either…

  • matt

    Damien (waay above)

    to say that it is typical of a complacent Ford is a bit rich considering all of the other marvelous cars they have on offer at the moment. To say it was the weak link in an otherwise strong line-up would be more accurate.

  • Alec

    I have had a Territory Ghia AWD and TX RWD for extended periods and nothing else in this price range compares for comfort, handling and space.
    After a long trip fully loaded with 5 mates and luggage everyone agreed it was the most comfortable and relaxed they have felt on a long journey of all cars they have driven!

    Styling is subjective, but praise for a quality vehicle is not!

  • Karen

    This is Hideous

    Would much rather a new Mitsubishi Outlander or Toyota Kluger. At least these vehicle changed dramatically between new models. The dash and exterior looks so simmilar to the original Territory

    Silly Ford

  • Martin

    Adam (Aka Mada),
    I don’t like the Kluger either, horribly overpriced and questionable styling. I’d still take a Sorento over both, at least it comes with a diesel option.

    …Shouldn’t the Captiva be compared with the Escape?

  • adam (aka mada)

    Martin,

    So you like the sorento, doesn’t make the others bad vehicles, the sorento is certainly not a class leader either.

    No the captiva should not be compared to the escape!

    Are we on an auto enthusiast site?

    Karen,

    The original kluger was an old model to begin with while Toyota waited for the current, new model.
    This territory is not a new model, it’s simply an update until the heavily facelifted version is released early next year.

  • everyready

    Has anyone actually seen it in the flesh before they make comments that it is hideous and ugly?

    Because – it looks alot better in real life – especially the Ghia’s. For me it beats the Kluger & Capitiva for looks.

  • Jazrod (formally Twilight)

    karen,
    this is not a new model, it is a MK-II!
    just like with falcons, BA, BA MKI, BF, BFMKII

    this is an SY MKII territory! NOT A NEW MODEL!!!

    new territory will come NEXT YEAR and a diesel either by the end of the year OR when the new model comes!

  • Jazrod (formally Twilight)

    sorry, MKII for the second gen. BA…

  • Andrew

    Adam, I agree that the Captiva is competition to the Territory because of it’s size and V6 engine, however Karen has a point about the Kluger and Outlander. You’re right that the Territory is a facelift and not a new model, but Ford released the Territory in 2004 and this is the first “significant” facelift and model revision since, and it’s now 2009.

    While the Kluger was already an old vehicle, the Outlander was not. The Outlander was released to Australia in 2003 and completely replaced in 2006. While it is a quick turnover, it supports Karen’s point about a definite difference in appearance.

    But I think the 2010 Territory overhaul will be worth waiting for.

  • Bret

    Territory:
    SX Launched 2004
    SY released 2006
    SY spec update 2007
    SY MkII 2009

    There’s only so much you can do with a vehicle in a market the size of Australia + (limited) exports.

  • Andronicus

    Captiva…. dog.
    Kluger…. dog.
    Mk II Territory… dog.

    Hmmm, decisions, decisions.

    I’ll take a Q5 thanks. It hurts my pocket but not my eyes.

  • adam (aka mada)

    Bret,

    thank you.

    Andronicus,

    How much more is a Q5!? come on, use some common sense here.

    Andrew,

    Was the first gen outlander a 7 seater??

  • Andrew

    Adam, no the first generation Outlander was not a 7 seater, but we weren’t talking about seating capacity, or were we? Whether a car has 7 seats or 5 does not change the fact that the Outlander was replaced with an all-new model 3 years after the original.

    But if that is your argument, the new Outlander IS a seven seater! While Ford have offered the option from the get-go, Mitsubishi had to develop this capability for the ZG yet still managed to get the all-new model on the market three years later. It’s been 5 years for a facelift alone for the big Ford.

    I am not comparing the Outlander with Territory or even the Kluger because it’s smaller, cheaper and more economical and therefore is not a competitor. But Karen’s post still stands – there’s no denying that the Kluger and Outlander look vastly different to their predecessors.

    I’m on Ford’s side, don’t get me wrong, and I agree with some of your points. But I can also see Karen’s point of view.

  • Alex

    Ive just had a look at the wikipedia page for the Outlander and it actually came out in Japanese markets in 2001. It was just another one to get here late. They didn’t make a completely new model three years after they released the first, it was just time to make a new one.

    Adam, I have just looked up the Captiva and you are wrong, it is officially classed as a compact SUV. And of course it is, it isn’t very big.

  • Andrew

    Alex, my apologies. I retract my saying of the model being three years old before update, but that still means the Outlander was 5 years old when the all new model came about as opposed to the big Ford which, in a similar timeframe, has only came up for a new bumper/headlights, different colour choices and interior trims, and a few powertrain updates.

    Maybe this reflects on today’s consumers demand, I am always thinking back to EF-EL Falcons where now it seems new models pop up before any significant facelift!

  • http://. Naughtyius Maximus

    Puk full on. Sad excuse of an update (inside is fine but). Seen an Escape today and is just as bad. And I like like Fords a tad! With these updates it will struggle with sales numbers against better lookers!

  • Baji

    Captiva? Kluger? Territory? Well what do i plan to do with it? To drive, i’d Terriotry would definitly be my pick. To move people? i would probalby say the kluger as it is just that little bit more roomy than the territory, but not by much.

    The territory is not bad looking. It looks quite nice in my opinion, just not very flash. The interior is cheap though. I’d have to say the Captiva has better fit and finish then the territory.

    For the money, i wouldn’t choose any of these 3. My money would be on the CX9. Better looking, better to drive, better quality, more room, and can proudly park next to more expensive Europeans without shame.

    Overall though, the way ford are going, if they can improve drastically on the interior, the next territory will probalby come close to being the BEST vehcile in this segment and price.

  • figjam

    the captiva is not even a competitor in this segment its in the rav & cvx market and should not even be compared with the kluger and territory! the best seller at the moment is the kluger it’s roomier has more power and is way better on fuel and is better to drive and looks a hell of a lot better than the territory and that’s why its market leader, the mazda cx9 is not selling very well and is to small inside and to expensive, check current “vfacts”!

  • Byron

    Whats the go with the Territory.They haven’t changed anything.Probably one of the worst upgrades of an exterior of a car ever done.Interior’s shit.Exactly the same as the old model.Ford is already down in sales with Territory & the under-peforming Falcon & this is just embarassing & isn’t going 2 suceed.Sucked in Ford, its what u get for leaving the Territory without a facelift in it’s 4-5yr lifetime.

    Tell me Would you rather the Ghia Interior or The upgraded Holden Captiva LX Interior with standard reversing camera? Captiva! Captiva! Captiva!

    Sure i know its korean but it’s attractive inside & out & better looking than a Territory or that hideous Toyota Kluger.I wonder if the major overhaul next year will be any better.Interesting 2c if this minor upgrade,will do anything to sales?

  • Andrew M

    Figjam,
    Holden announced to the world that they do pitch the Captiva at the Territory.
    Perhaps you should ask holden why they do so rather than blame others for assuming it to be what the manufacturer claims it to be.

    Byron,
    If its the toyotas claimed fuel efficiency you are comparing, then it will be suss.
    At least Ford states achievable economy figures.

    One of the wrst upgrades ever???
    Have you seen the Facelifted Hilux???
    Its harder to pick the differences in the new Hilux than it is to find Aussies at Seaworld

  • Andrew M

    Sorry Byron,
    first Para was meant to be in response to Figjam

  • RWD

    Byron are you serious? The word quality and Daewoo do not go together. The Captiva is a piece of junk to drive and its fuel economy is dreadful…especially the Diesel. The Ghia Terry interior is way better finished with much higher quality materials the any Daewoo|Holden has or will ever have………..thats why they have that reputation. Even the VE has a crap interior compared to the FG which is all class……….

  • Bavarian Missile (.)(.)

    Quote “kluger it’s roomier has more power and is way better on fuel and is better to drive ”

    mmmmmmm Im guessing thats your opinion AGAIN ,Asian D1ngo ??

    Oh and the diesels due out end of the year for Territory from memory…

    Kluger looks like a stretched Prado, not pretty at all !

  • David

    Why would anyone buy one of these over priced, over sized thirsty cumbersome barges ?

  • Marcus

    Ford Territorys are expensive gas guzzlers, there are much better SUV’s around these days, stay clear of this dinosaur unless you have money to burn…..

  • omgwot

    I don’t think the update will do much for sales, i think most would wait for the 2010 model or wait for the runout deals on these.
    Yes it’s a bit old now it’s still a fantastic deal and drive. I have only driven the AWD Ghia and thought it could do with a bit more kick as you can feel the difference after diving a Falcon.
    Factory LPG is something they should really be looking into as 14l per 100km is insane with fuel prices the way they are and a massive hit to the pocket

  • JEKYL & HYDE

    ah the territory,

    roomy.powerful.towing ability…

    thirsty,cheap loooking,suspension destroying(utterly),mindlessly depreciating,ageing,dated,house brick styling….

    diesel 3 years to late…

    destroyed by the arabs,and from within…

  • Bret

    figjam Says:
    May 12th, 2009 at 7:27 pm
    “…the kluger it’s roomier has more power and is way better on fuel and is better to drive and looks a hell of a lot better than the territory”

    Roomier?
    OK probably is, but it is much harder to park – real experience, I haven’t checked the dimensions.

    More power?
    OK but NOOOOO torque to speak of – the engine screams just to keep up with daily traffic flow. No relaxed daily driver.

    Way better on fuel?
    Not my experience, in a real world test, in fact Territory was better. 11.7 Territory vs 11.9 Kluger.

    Looks a hell of a lot better?
    Very questionable and subjective. Personally I don’t like Toyota’s “bump” styling. For a newish car the Kluger (and Captiva for that matter) already look very very dated.

    Better to drive?
    Now we see that your only guessing (or you’re in Toyota la la land) because the Kluger handles like a bloated whale – this was the biggest deciding factor for me. Oh and BTW the Kluger has a terrible driving position.

  • Bavarian Missile (.)(.)

    Quote “Oh and BTW the Kluger has a terrible driving position. ”

    hahaha yeah especially when your on your roof,just ask the boys from Wheels Magazine ;)

  • RWD

    At the core of the Territory’s appeal is its brilliantly refined dynamic package. Be it the rear-wheel-drive or all-wheel-drive version, it still outclasses virtually all rivals and embarrasses some.

    The gulf in ride and handling between Territory and direct competition such as the Toyota Kluger and Holden Captiva is obvious. BMW’s much more expensive X5 is its logical competitor in handling terms, but there is no doubt the Territory rides better on its orthodox rubber.

    The Territory has the ability to soak up potholes, broken edges, depressions and ridges with disciplined authority. Yet it manages to avoid harshness.

    The steering is accurate and responsive without being becoming rattly and annoying. Territory’s body control is one of its great assets, retaining its balance as speeds rise in corners.

    The Territory is designed for Australia’s grumbly bitumen and slippery gravel roads and drives like it. Importantly, the tuning of the stability control and ABS systems are obviously compatible with our conditions.

    There is more to a car than looks alone……….whay dont you dickheads here go drive one…….

  • Bret

    RWD.
    It’s usually considered appropriate that you at least put quotes around what you cut and paste, even if you don’t name the source. eg DriveDotCom

  • Frontman

    FigJam, How do you come up with the Kluger being roomier?? What kind of measuring stick do you use? Kluger is miles narrower, the centre seat of the second row stows in the front arm rest fercissakes!! Try actually parking them side by side before you make assumptions. As for Kluger being on top of the sales ladder, what price did Hertz pay for the recen 180 delivered in Qld?? Again we come down to numbers versus proffit.
    Hmmm Fuel consumption hey? Why not compare Territory consumption in real life to comparable vehicles. You know Petrol engined Seven seaters able to tow 24′ power boats or Twenty foot caravans. PRado, Pajero, Pathfinder and Disco all use way more fuel. Kluger under full load does as well and Santa Fe V6 equals Territory in real life. But hey 22mpg out of a 2 tonne vehicle is absolutely deplorable isn’t it??
    As for this face lift, have an actual look at it in the flesh. Whilst it is late (thank you mr Gorman) and it is NOT allowed to be a new Model due to Euro IV compliancing, it is more noticable than BF to BF11.

  • RWD

    Bret…….it was from drive.com.au

  • The Realist

    Hilarious quote from a Ford Director on carpoint.com.au

    “Where we have positioned Territory, that [poor NVH] is unacceptable. That [Territory] customer is a sophisticated customer. That customer wants to have a diesel engine but doesn’t want to know they’ve got a diesel engine.

    No wonder they can’t sell their cars – they’re targeting Vaucluse but building cars for Mt Druitt.

    Or do they think their customer base in Sydney’s West is sophisticated…

  • Andrew M

    Realist,
    In a nut shell they dont want to put any half baked ideas into the territory……..

    Whats wrong with that???
    Same reason why they havent put LPG on it yet

    The Territory is renowned as having the best drive line/engine/handling in its class, I agree that they would be mad to rush in any changes to any of those factors with out thinking it right through

  • Andrew M

    Quote Realist……….

    “Which bright spark decided to apply the “elevated rep mobile” approach?

    Im not sure of exact names, but you can rest assured that the person responsible was made aware of the awards their “idea” achieved

    “And who on earth would pay $67K for a Territory??”

    Well a lot more people than those that would pay 67K for a Camry

  • jackson

    hey how about all u shutup and give ford Australia a break, this is a hard economic climate and they dont have all the money in the world, look at GM for gods sake, hopefully they go broke and they deserve to because they can nener build a decent looking car the territory deserves more sales than the captiva, and at least ford is actually supporting Australian workers by having this as an AUSTRALIAN BUILT CAR unlike holdens korean captiva

    and a word to andrew M ur an idiot and i would gladly pay $67K for a territory and F no i would never pay that much for a camry because their design and ride is that poor its not even funny

  • The Realist

    Jackson, it’s obvious you belong to Ford’s target market…

  • Andrew M

    Jackson,
    No, I am not an idiot, you just have a poor understanding of grammer

    Did you see the bit right at the start where i listed my post as quoting “The Realist”????

    When you use these funny little things “……..”, it means what you are writing is a quote.

    Now please re-read my post and consider that everything with in those funny little marks as a quote from The Realist, and everything outside them as my response to what he said.

  • Martyn

    I wonder how many of the Territory critics commenting have actually driven one? I am not Australian but personally I think Aussies should be proud of the Terri as a locally designed vehicle. We looked at many other options when we bought and none come close to it in terms of handling or value for money. That said the update doesn’t bring much new to the table, bring on the diesel next year….

  • James

    The wiki page for the Outlander states that the ORIGINAL model came out in 2001, and the CURRENT model came out in 2005 in Japan “when all markets adopted the Outlander name”

  • Kas

    How can one purchase a Territory when Ball joints drop off at 20,000km, transmissions give in at 50,000km, electrical faults, etc…To top this off Ford take no responsibility for their faulty product! No Thanks!

    • omgwot

      The same way Kia sold heaps of Pregios even though the brakes fell off them. The same way BMW & Peugeot sell cars not made to withstand the Aussie summer and have an incredibly high brake down rate. The same way Toyota continues to be the best selling brand…

      It’s because most people buy on price, are brand loyal or have their blinkers on and don’t care. Even after reading that I would still buy one or a FG, would not even step foot into a Holden or Toyota dealer

  • http://daleford.com.au/NewVehicles Ford Territory Sydney

    According to user review about Ford Territory, ford has change many thing in this car to hit the car market with a bang!