Comments on: 2007 Cost Of Ownership Survey

By: RoFlmaTiC

RoFlmaTiC — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:08:57 +0000

I would also like to add that the major reason for the korean brands seemingly being less affected by the world recession is because their currency is rapidly depreciating. Thus if they sell the same number of cars in America for example, this will instantly convert into higher profits for them because of the exchange rate.

On the other hand the Japanese yen has skyrocketed (see: www . x-rates.com/d/USD/JPY/graph120.html for example) and thus the drop of sales in USA is amplified.

By: tredinertok

tredinertok — Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:35:33 +0000

Very interesting information! Thanks!

Bye

By: new buyer

new buyer — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:24:44 +0000

i agree with dingo …
why was the Toyota Prado used in the med SUV catagory ????? the Klugar would have been the natural choice to put up against the other rivales…

Drive .. can you give us a answer why the Prado was used insted of the Toyota Klugar ????

By: peter alex

peter alex — Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:49:02 +0000

In your comparison of diesal and hybrid running costs i was quite suprised to see the standard honda civic cheaper to run. I s this a general trend?

I was thinking of buying a mazda 6 sports in the diesel version assuming i would save some money instead of the standard model.

If it is going to cost so much i may be better off sticking to a large family sedan which is what i have had all my life.
I am confused!!

By: Diana

Diana — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:03:41 +0000

The RACV uses the highest volume selling vehicles in their survey and as a result the Kluger missed ot this year.

By: Nick

Nick — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:54:51 +0000

The 380 is great, would never go back to Holdens. I think they should have included more cars in categories like Light. Where was the colt for example? It has the most economical 1.5litre petrol engine in Aus.

By: Dingo

Dingo — Tue, 29 May 2007 12:38:21 +0000

ACTUALLY DRIVE – i do have a message to submit and i would appreciate a return offer.

Regarding the medium SUV comparison… why wasn’t the Kluger used instead of the Prado. I recognise the Prado is not not exactly a ‘medium’ hauler nor ‘large’ but agianst the Nissan Pathfinder and the Captiva or even the Ford Territory, it is not exactly within thier league either with it’s ‘FULL’ of road abilities. A far more appropriate choice would have been the Kluger in this instance so i beg the question…. why the Prado (with greater off-road abilities then the comparo)then the Kluger (of which is more comparable) ??