blog counter

Road Signs Distracting

May 25, 2007 by Alborz Fallah  

A keen reader recently emailed us regarding the ironic state of our government’s approach to road safety. On one hand, you must always keep your eyes glued to the speedo – since speed is the killer – on the other hand taking your eyes of the road (to say, check your speedo or read the sign below) is also a killer.

Road Signs Distracting

To compound the problem, Road Safety signs warning drivers to NOT take their eyes of the road or to slow down are adding to the problem. The Victorian government published a report in 2006 titled “inquiry into driver distraction“. The report suggested that advertising on the roadside has been linked to higher crash risks.

Although no Australian study has been undertaken to show the extent of the linkage, A 2004 Canadian study found that 90% of drivers glanced at one or more signs for at least 0.75 seconds, while 20 per cent glanced for a duration longer than 2 seconds. A 2 second distraction can easily lead to a head on collision or any other type of accident.

So if the State/Federal governments are really keen to reduce the road toll, why are they selling more and more government owned space for road side advertising? And more importantly, why are they advertising – road safety messages – on distracting road signs?

In 2005 The Age reported a survey (conducted by AAMI) of 2400 drivers across Victoria and found that just under half of the Victorian respondents said they had been distracted by roadside billboards. The survey also found Victorian motorists to be the most cynical in the nation about speed cameras. 60% of Victorians believe that Speed Cameras are not reliable while 89% admitted to sometimes speeding.

No tags for this post.
Related Articles:
  • Schuey signs off on Ferrari California- Even in racing retirement, Michael Schumacher still has...
  • Speed Check Signs Lead To Unfair Tickets- Its one thing to deliberately speed, but its...
  • BMW speed limit display begins local testing- Australia's roads are notorious for being overcautious and...
  • Roadside art ‘distracting’ to drivers- Insurance statistics from the UK have shown that...
  • Study Finds Alternatives to Speed Bumps and Cameras- A Virginia Department of Transportation sponsored report finds...
  • Comments

    3 Responses to “Road Signs Distracting”
    1. Vote -1 Vote +1Samâ„¢
      says:

      your a f**king retard if it takes you longer than 2 seconds to read PLEASE SLOW DOWN in 3 meter large letters

    2. Vote -1 Vote +1Mike Austin
      says:

      Advertising on the roadside should be banned unless on low volume roads or within the city.

    3. Vote -1 Vote +1Mitchell Hope
      says:

      I agree with Mike saying that they should have the signs only on low volume roads. Because I live in Geelong, and there is a bridge on the highway which is the M1 (Princess Freeway.) So as I was saying there is a part missing on the side of the bridge and it is there because there is a TAC Sign next to the bridge, and someone was reading it, when he plummetted off the side of the bridge and landing on the train track, he was lucky that there was not a train coming at the time

    Speak Your Mind

    Tell us what you're thinking...
    and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

    *
    To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
    Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word