<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GM agrees to share technology with Saab for five years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/26754/gm-agrees-to-share-technology-with-saab-for-5-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/26754/gm-agrees-to-share-technology-with-saab-for-5-years/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:51:55 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dadd</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/26754/gm-agrees-to-share-technology-with-saab-for-5-years/comment-page-1/#comment-124360</link>
		<dc:creator>Dadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 08:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=26754#comment-124360</guid>
		<description>Does this mean Saabs will in future be rebadged Daewoos ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean Saabs will in future be rebadged Daewoos ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/26754/gm-agrees-to-share-technology-with-saab-for-5-years/comment-page-1/#comment-123988</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=26754#comment-123988</guid>
		<description>Hopefully Saab will be able to improve their cars soon. I&#039;ve always liked Saab&#039;s quirky designs and features. Maybe with GM (mostly) out of the picture things may pick up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully Saab will be able to improve their cars soon. I&#8217;ve always liked Saab&#8217;s quirky designs and features. Maybe with GM (mostly) out of the picture things may pick up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holstein hore ).( ).(</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/26754/gm-agrees-to-share-technology-with-saab-for-5-years/comment-page-1/#comment-123964</link>
		<dc:creator>holstein hore ).( ).(</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=26754#comment-123964</guid>
		<description>BUGGER TOM YOU BEAT ME TO IT , NO FURTHER COMMENT REQUIRED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUGGER TOM YOU BEAT ME TO IT , NO FURTHER COMMENT REQUIRED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limited Slip</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/26754/gm-agrees-to-share-technology-with-saab-for-5-years/comment-page-1/#comment-123947</link>
		<dc:creator>Limited Slip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=26754#comment-123947</guid>
		<description>For five years?? GM wont be around in 5 months !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For five years?? GM wont be around in 5 months !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonP</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/26754/gm-agrees-to-share-technology-with-saab-for-5-years/comment-page-1/#comment-123913</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=26754#comment-123913</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s more about continuity.

I mean if Saab could have continued on with their novel, quirky cars from the 80&#039;s, they wouldn&#039;t have been bought out by GM.

Just as Jag used Mondeo bits from Ford, (wiper &amp; mirror motors etc) this would mean that Saab wouldn&#039;t have to start from scratch with another Tech supplier, which would further delay new models.

It doesn&#039;t say Saab would have to use GM Tech stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s more about continuity.</p>
<p>I mean if Saab could have continued on with their novel, quirky cars from the 80&#8217;s, they wouldn&#8217;t have been bought out by GM.</p>
<p>Just as Jag used Mondeo bits from Ford, (wiper &amp; mirror motors etc) this would mean that Saab wouldn&#8217;t have to start from scratch with another Tech supplier, which would further delay new models.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t say Saab would have to use GM Tech stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/26754/gm-agrees-to-share-technology-with-saab-for-5-years/comment-page-1/#comment-123892</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=26754#comment-123892</guid>
		<description>That is one deal sweetener. Buy our loss generating niche brand in the next 15 minutes and we&#039;ll thrown in an exclusive 5 year lease for our massive portfolio of heavily outdated and uncompetitive automotive technologies, absolutely free*.

*For the buyer. Total postage and handling cost for the Swedish tax-payer is only several billion dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one deal sweetener. Buy our loss generating niche brand in the next 15 minutes and we&#8217;ll thrown in an exclusive 5 year lease for our massive portfolio of heavily outdated and uncompetitive automotive technologies, absolutely free*.</p>
<p>*For the buyer. Total postage and handling cost for the Swedish tax-payer is only several billion dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
