Comments on: Toyota to revive MR2 as Prius Coupe?

By: MisterTwo

MisterTwo — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:53:47 +0000

Correct Aball, don’t know where the “traditional roadster” comment came from. The MR2 was “traditionally” a coupe “Mid-ship Runabout 2 seater”. As long as it has these elements it can be called an MR2. As soon as the engine goes in the front and front wheel drive it becomes a Celica.

By: Tim

Tim — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 03:09:59 +0000

QUOTE DAN:

“Alex said – “Looks like the MX5 will still not have any competitors.”

Mazda can keep the fabulous hairdresser market to themselves hahaha”

I pity the fool.

By: Falcodore

Falcodore — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:18:14 +0000

Looks like a stormtrooper! Probably as smart as well….he says, toungue firmly planted in cheek

By: Phill

Phill — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:44:35 +0000

Just build it,whatever its called.

By: Dan

Dan — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:36:58 +0000

Phill, if you bother to read the article, it is not toyota “recycling” the pictures, it’s the media.

By: Phill

Phill — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:26:36 +0000

Why are Toyota recycling these pictures again,Just build it,whatever its called.

By: Fasthonda

Fasthonda — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:34:39 +0000

“It has to be fun to drive, too,”

That’s been HONDA’S motto for the past few years!The out-going CEO Mr Fukui always mentioned that in his speeches over the years.
I’m still waiting to see what Toyota has “cooked” up to counter-act Honda’s new jet aircraft?
A couple of years ago Toyota had an one-legged robot to show the world…it was supposed to serve some purpose,but I can’t remember what exactly.It also had robots that could “blow” into trumpets to create music……..whatever?I still however,don’t think that ASIMO has too much to worry about from Toyota.

By: Dan

Dan — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:53:19 +0000

Alex said – “Looks like the MX5 will still not have any competitors.”

Mazda can keep the fabulous hairdresser market to themselves hahaha

By: Bavarian Missile (.)(.)

Bavarian Missile (.)(.) — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:01:00 +0000

Hey Lukaas maybe not officially ,but was on this site like others as you say.

http://www.caradvice.com.au/1344/the-new-toyota-supra/comment-page-2/

Interesting to read some of the comments back then 2 years ago,some of the same people commented then as they have on this thread.

By: Lukaas

Lukaas — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:46:21 +0000

You have to understand.
Sports cars are getting harder to be “approved” for production due to all the regulations.

Also the market is niche… VERY NICHE…. lucky to make a couple of million profit in a year in such a market.

A Hybrid sports car in the other hand has potential.
Torque is no problem with Hybrids = 800NM is possible.

kW/hp = is the issue. But keeping it light and as low as possible (small too) solves that easily.

Turbos are hard to pass regulation these days. Why do you think current sports cars from Nissan and others are V8s or V6s. Because easier to be “approved” globally.
Emissions are tough these days.

If Toyota can keep this car reasonably light (900kg), with around 120kW maybe 600NM of torque. That would be a pretty darn good start.

If not under 1000kg, maybe around 1100kg… tune the engine to around 150kW and 650NM torque… thats GUN still.

And since its hybrid, there IS an incentive for people to buy it still… over the other sports cars (V8s and V6s).
Cheaper to re-fuel and has a more up to date driveline/power train.

And Bavarian Missile..
The FT-HS was never proclaimed to be the Supra.
I’m a HUGE Supra enthusiast (JZA) and MR2 (SW20) and the FT-HS was never proclaimed by official Toyota people as the Supra. Since it was a Toyota “sports car” concept people and the media put the “Supra” mantle on it.
A Mid-rear Supra?… unheard of. If anything the FT-HS was a replacement for both MR2 and Supra. Although I have seen concepts for next MR2.

And AXEL…
I guarantee you, that if the badge on that car didnt say Toyota.. You’d be interested..
You’re a hater of Toyota… understandable.