2009 Honda City Review & Road Test | Car Advice

Car Advice

2009 Honda City Review & Road Test

HONDA CITY

Pros: Excellent fuel economy; roomy cabin & boot; smooth & quiet drive

Cons: No ESP; driver's seat height; pricing questionably high

By Matt Brogan |
Add to shortlist

Price: $11,430 to $20,040

Our Rating:  

2009 Honda City VTi Review & Road Test

honda_city_vti_001

The next BIG thing in family motoring?

Model Tested:

  • 2009 Honda City VTi, 1.5-litre, five-speed manual, sedan – $20,490 (RRP)

Options:

  • Metallic Paint $325

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

- by Matt Brogan

Once upon a time, not all that long ago, the average family car was a much smaller affair – case in point the 1964 EH Holden sedan.

At only 116mm longer and 32mm wider than the new Honda City the arithmetic proves just how much the family car has since ballooned, and that what we now consider a small sedan, in reality, isn’t.

While it seems bigger is better to most people, quite often the exterior dimensions of a vehicle only tell part of the tale, and it’s this perception of ‘size equals space’ that the new Honda City has turned on its head.

Though it is a reasonably compact affair, the City is one small car that shows rather obviously just how much space can be availed with some intelligent design work.

Surprisingly it is this inner-space that proves remarkably generous, especially in terms of boot capacity and rear leg room which are 10 litres (506/496 litres) and 97mm (1064/972mm) greater than Commodore and Camry respectively.

honda_city_vti_005

Styling wise the City looks much like its bigger brother the Accord Euro at first glance, though being based upon Jazz underpinings, the smaller outward scale of the car is certainly evident.

Inside the layout is simple, but rather stylish, with a mix of textures, forms and tone all contributing greatly to a decor that appears more elegant than the price tag would have you believe.

Layout and switchgear are both simplistic and easy to understand and in typical Honda style the City boasts a user-friendliness that is second to none.

honda_city_vti_003

Perhaps my only gripe with the cabin as a whole is that the driver’s seat position is unusually high. The risers in the floor on which the seat is mounted, a left-over from the more upright Jazz, counter the more raked windscreen with the resulting headroom being a little tighter than is preferable, something the seat adjustment can’t quite seem to counter.

All the same the seating is very comfortable and reasonably supportive. The legroom is quite generous, especially in the rear, and the ambiance quiet on all but the most coarse of roads, a pleasant surprise in a category not usually renowned for its on-road refinement.

honda_city_vti_004

Under the large bonnet a small yet capable 1.5-litre, SOHC, 16-valve, i-VTEC, four-cylinder engine manages 88kW at 6600rpm and 145Nm at 4800rpm to provide spirited performance in all but the most trying of situations.

Zero to 100km/h times come in just under the 12 second mark and unless the car is heavily loaded, say with four adults and a boot full of luggage, big hills are of little consequence to City’s performance proving just how well matched the torque curve is to the smooth shifting five-speed gearbox.

Freeway revs come in at just a whisker under 3000rpm at 100km/h, which combined with drive-by-wire throttle and programmed fuel injection mean excellent fuel consumption.

Around town our week managed 7.9-litres per 100km while on the open road mid-fives were easily achievable. In all seven days in the City returned an average consumption figure of 6.7-litres per 100km, which is just under half a litre more than the claimed ADR result.

honda_city_vti_007

Although initial turn-in is a little slow, the chassis reacts well thereafter meaning cornering is both fluid and settled. Handling as a result is well above average for a car of this class and size, and is actually somewhat surprising once you gain a feel for the car, especially so given the dated torsion beam rear-end, there is a strut arrangement at the front.

The electric power steering too provides a true, albeit rather light, feel to the front wheels, though the urethane steering wheel is a bit of a let down being a touch unpleasant of long trips and hot days.

honda_city_vti_006

With air-conditioning, cloth trim, cruise control, MP3 compatible CD/tuner (with iPod integration), power mirrors and windows, remote central locking (with alarm and immobiliser), seven cup holders, rear under-seat storage, tilt-adjustable steering column and trip computer the City certainly does present a lot of kit in base model form.

Safety features include dual front, side and full length curtain airbags, ABS, EBA and EBD meaning the City is certain to perform well once ANCAP testing is carried out – though perhaps not as well as it should given the lack of Electronic Stability Program (ESP) anywhere in the model range.

As touched on earlier the boot space is TARDIS-like at 506 litres, and with 60:40 split fold rear seats the additional area is quite welcomed when hauling odd shaped items, even if the aperture is a little on the tight side.

honda_city_vti_002

While the pricing may be just a touch on the heavy side, the practicality, purpose and presentation of the all-new City remain unchallenged in this category which all adds up to a very good argument for considering the City as your next family car.

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF

Pricing:

  • Honda City VTi $20,490 (Manual) / $22,790 (Auto)
  • Honda City VTi-L $22,990 (Manual) / $25,290 (Auto)

Specifications:

  • Engine: 1497cc SOHC four-cylinder (16 valve)
  • Power: 88kW @ 6600rpm
  • Torque: 145Nm @ 4800rpm
  • Induction: Multi-point
  • Transmission: Five-speed manual
  • Driven Wheels: Front
  • Brakes: Discs with ABS, EBA & EBD
  • Top Speed: 175km/h
  • 0-100km/h: 11.8 seconds
  • CO2 Emissions: 148g/km (combined)
  • Fuel Consumption: 6.3 litres per 100km (ADR)
  • Fuel Consumption: 6.7 litres per 100km (as tested)
  • Fuel Tank Capacity: 42 litres
  • Fuel Type: 91RON petrol
  • ANCAP Rating: TBC
  • Airbags: Dual Front, Side & Curtain
  • Safety: ABS, EBA & EBD
  • Spare Wheel: Full-size steel
  • Suspension: Strut (F) / Torsion Beam (R)
  • Cargo Capacity: 506 litres
  • Tow Capacity: 800kg (braked)
  • Turning Circle: 10.0 metres
  • Warranty: Three year/100,000km
  • Weight: 1110kg (tare)
  • Wheels: Steel 15 x 5.5-inch


 

Reader reviews of the HONDA CITY

<

Write a review for the HONDA CITY

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>

The competition

  Variant Body Style Price From
HONDA CITY VTi
  • 1.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 5 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $18,990*
HONDA CITY VTi
  • 1.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 5 SP AUTOMATIC
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $20,990*
HONDA CITY VTi-L
  • 1.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 5 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $21,490*
HONDA CITY VTi-L
  • 1.5L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 5 SP AUTOMATIC
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $23,490*
powered by
  VEHICLE PRICE
2010 HONDA CITY VTi GM MY10
  • 37,081 Kms
  • White
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • VIC
$19,880*
Enquire Now
Showrooms > Honda > City

2009 Honda City Review & Road Test
Honda
City

J5J09B
http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/matt-1.jpg

2009 Honda City Review & Road Test

3 stars
  • JEKYL & HYDE

    looks like a mini tarago.nissan tiida auto from about 20k drive away…

  • Adam

    Probably a decent car if you after that sort of thing.

    But there is better value out there for 20K.

  • KM

    I would get the New Kia Cerato over this any day. Looks better, priced better & comes with alot more standard features as well as a more powerful engine…

  • Tim

    Foul car! Horrible looking interior, look at that tachy orange speedo lol.

    Rear looks horrible, front a mix of Honda styling and a whizz box engine (12sec to 100km/h haha) and all this for 20 grand! Honda, please be serious!

  • Baji

    Hmm Cerato or City??

    Matt, having driving both the Kia Cerato and the Honda City, which one would be the more dynamically capable of the two?

    From pictures, I’d have to agree with KM. The Cerato looks a lot nicer.

  • http://skyline The Salesman

    Yes, it looks smart. Yes, it has a huge boot. Yes, it drives well. BUT, how on earth do Honda get away with asking 20K for this car? With all of 88kW under the bonnet? Just because of a Honda badge? Tell them they are DREAMING!!!!!

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Matt

    Hi Baji,

    I think it’s horses for courses really, and to be fair the Cerato is a little bigger than the City (City being closer to Rio in size – refer Road Test the Rivals).

    In terms of on-road dynamics, it’s a close call, and as I am yet to drive the Cerato in manual I’d have to say I prefer the City – purely because I don’t favour the four-speed auto found in Cerato.

    However, the best advice I can offer you is this – go drive the pair yourself and see what best suits your own driving style.

    Hope this helps, Matt.

  • http://skyline The Salesman

    Matt,
    Please be fair. These are two completely different market segments. Like you said the City is a competitor for Rio. And a Rio 1.6 is $14,990.00 drive away, miles better value. In fact just about every competitor is better value than City. I look forward to your thoughts after you have driven the manual Cerato :)

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au Matt

      I would have thought my statement was more than fair Salesman.

  • Sam

    Salesman, perhaps you should have a drive of one, then let us know if they are dreamers. It might seem a bit expensive, but only a bit. You dont like people bagging a new Kia if they havent driven one. Quite right too, that would be naive.

    Personally, my experience with Honda has been that their engines are smooth, reliable, frugal and as tough as nails. They are the kind of car you have for 10 years before it starts to show any signs of age. Some people call it ‘built in value’. Some see it in Honda, some dont.

  • Dlr1

    Honda only have to look at the pricing of their own civic sedan to realise that this is overpriced. The extra 2500 is worth it for the ESP and the 1.8 engine alone. Perhaps if the City was 17990 + on roads it would be a worthy alternative, but not at 20K+.

  • http://skyline The Salesman

    Sam,
    Yes i work for Kia but by no means do i defend them to anyone. We are all entitled to our opinions and i have no desire to transfer my feelings to everyone who has a negative or alternative comment, you know, free speech and all that. Yes i have driven the City, and IMO it is terrible value but that is just IMO. If i had a spare 20K i would be buying a used German or British car. A few weeks ago I spent lots (un disclosed for fear of retribution) on a 1977 Toyota Celica LT2000 fast back.

  • Yianni

    $20,500 is a lot of money. This is simply too expensive for what it is.

    Honda has really missed the boat with pricing lately. Unless they plan to raise the price of the Civic [AGAIN] then it makes sense to simply go for the Civic.

    I see the city as nothing more than a JAZZ with a boot with a larger price tag.

    This should have been priced at around $18,000 – $19,000.

  • zahmad

    This further displays how the Kia Cerato offers much more value!

  • eh179driver

    The City is basically a Jazz with a boot and less “upright” looks, so whty the big price disparity? Honda dealers are quoting $26’990 drive away for the base car. Go to a VW dealer and you can drive away a Golf for just a tad more. Know which one I’d rather have….

  • Tony

    isn’t the Tiida available for $16,990 driveaway?

    bigger everywhere? better stuff included?

  • sillyhonda

    No ESP even as an option..What a crap!! Buy Cerato instead…You get ESP, 6 air-bags and cruise control at just 19,990$..The person who buys City over Cerato must be insane!!

  • Tony

    i would guess the city is more fuel efficient than the 2.0 litre cerato

  • sillyhonda

    I cannot understand why City is more expensive than Jazz..Generally, it costs more to build Hatch than Sedan…

  • sillyhonda

    Tony/ That’s right..But Cerato is bigger and much more powerful..

  • sillyhonda

    City has timing belt or Timing chain? If you guys hate costly timing belt replacement, buy Cerato in that it has timing chain…

  • Tony

    i’d say you are a lot better off with a Jazz

    the Jazz has the ability to swallow a lot of luggage that a sedan just cannot come close to

    and it’s cheaper

  • Leafspring

    I wouldn’t touch or read about a Korean car – much less buy one! For those of you who would – well, you must be the type who are simply not into cars at all! Honda are very proud of their product and justifiably so. The emphasis is on the driving experience and engineering quality – not just blindly driving from A to B. And by the way, I don’t own a Honda. Have driven one and a new Korean car and there is no comparison.

  • j

    Leafspring, what new korean car are you reffering to?
    I’m no John Edwards, but I’m sensing a tiny bit of bias.
    Sure, Honda are proud of their product, but at a $20k starting price, maybe a little too proud.
    It’s not justifyable because there are cars such as the Cerato, which are equally capable, equally enjoyable
    to drive for a much less pricing proposition which the same, if not better, feature set.
    I don’t know about you, but a 1.5L isnt a terrific emphasis on driving experience, possibly only if you’re
    set to retire next year.

  • Maneesh

    Why dont you guys at Car Advice tell us WHERE the car was made? We want to know! Please tell us in the “specifications” where it was made.

    Thank You

  • o

    ahh leafspring did you jsut finish reading about the 1993 hyundai excel.Korean cars are world class look at the genesisi

  • JEKYL & HYDE

    someone please give me some wisdom on korean verses thailand built cars.do any really have an advantage????

  • Leafspring

    J, Can’t be sure, but think it was a ’06 Sonata. The car was a ‘demo’ and I had it for several hours when I was in WA at the end of 2006. Have never felt such poor driveline ‘dis-communication’. Not to mention niggling squeaks and general sloppiness. The Honda I co-drove to Adelaide from country Victoria was a ’98 Civic and it was a sheer delight – tight, beautiful handler and sweet revving motor. You speak of the Cerato – and by all accounts, it appears like a nice vehicle, but my first impression was how much it looked like the Civic Type R – well at least the front of it. You see J, driving to me is a little more than feature set and pricing. To me it’s about the fun factor/dynamics, quality, functionality and how it all works together. And respectfully J, if you prefer Korean, good for you, but my money’s on the Honda.

  • Pablo

    Honda needs a good kick in the butt for not including ESP

  • Cupid Stunt

    I’d rather buy the Jazz for the money, much more versatile.
    Not sure where Honda get off on pricing, they seem to pitch above GM, Ford etc but their residual values are not much higher to make it worthwhile and they cost a small fortune to repair.

  • Mark Greenburg

    “Once upon a time, not all that long ago, the average family car was a much smaller affair”. I think not. Vehicles from the 1950s-70s were enormous, some of them from GM in particular were over 6 metres long. In the 1980s, vehicle sizes decreased enormously as a result of the oil crises, and they have since increased slightly, but are nowhere near the size of those ‘tanks’ from the olden days.

  • Stephen

    Hi Matt,

    Thanks for the review. Could you please confirm that the car’s revs at 100 km/h are 3,000 rpm? This seams to be very high. Our 2007 Civic ( 5 speed auto) cruises at 100 km/h under 2,000 rpm.
    We have just had the 20K service and to date we have been pretty happy with the car. Ideal for our toddler, spacious, large boot for pram, quiet and reasonably economical to run. It was a pretty cheap car to buy, too (under $30K) so depreciation is not a big killer.

    Cheers,

    Stephen

  • Tony

    according to wikipedia:

    Assembly

    Ayutthaya, Thailand
    Greater Noida, India
    Lahore, Pakistan,
    PAGOH, Malaysia

  • Tom

    Why not just buy a civic?

  • Robin Graves

    Leafspring, these small Hondas are made in Thailand. Have a bit of a search around on the ‘net, there is so many people complaining about the rubbish quality of the Thai built Hondas. Squeaks, rattles, power windows sticking, just to name a few. I wouldnt touch one with a bargepole. What exactly is the premium price for? A Honda badge? Ripped off.

  • peter

    it seems to have more room inside than the accord euro. At least leg and boot space. Is this correct

  • Dan

    LOL! Gotta love Salesman’s usual Kia propaganda! Of course KIa is better than everything else, I wouldn’t expect you to say anything else otherwise mate :)

    “isn’t the Tiida available for $16,990 driveaway?
    bigger everywhere? better stuff included?

    Better stuff included? Like manual wind down windows as standard? LOL!

    “the type who are simply not into cars at all! Honda are very proud of their product and justifiably so. The emphasis is on the driving experience and engineering quality – not just blindly driving from A to B.
    driving to me is a little more than feature set and pricing. To me it’s about the fun factor/dynamics, quality, functionality and how it all works together”

    Couldn’t have said it better myself! The last bit above is all that Kia isn’t.

  • http://skyline The Salesman

    Dan says,
    But let me tell you this, you trying to paint me as a one badge oriented blind car shopper is a very false opinion. Hopefully now we can be on the same page, with no further misunderstandings, okey dokey?

    Practice what you preach Dan :)

  • Tony

    to me this is pretty simple

    88kW SOHC 1.5 litre – that’s not an engine i’d consider in any car

    i don’t care if it’s $20k or $16,990

    i can put up with a lot of things but not a motor that’s that far short of herbs

  • Dan

    “Practice what you preach Dan”

    I do. Just making an observation, that with every article that has a Kia competitor in it, you always talk up Kia as the better car. I understand it is your job. So that was just an observation. If you can show me an instance otherwise, where you said a competitor is better than Kia, I will take it back.

  • Leafspring

    Robin Graves, I respectfully took your advice to search and read the net for many hours to address your comments;

    “there is so many people complaining about the rubbish quality of the Thai built Hondas. Squeaks, rattles, power windows sticking, just to name a few…”

    I looked at over 350 owner reviews and over 80 driver reviews (including warranty issues) from 2003 onwards. Without putting a percentage on it, the vast majority were delighted in their Honda vehicles – all makes. The only issues of concern (and their were very few), were owners commenting about underpower, servicing costs and some for quality. Please note that the above comments were generally from older vehicles. As a ‘blogger’ had previously noted on another site, these vehicles whilst some are assembled in Thailand, are compelled to adhere to strict build and quality factory regulations. If you feel that this particular vehicle is overpriced and underperforms – go and buy Korean. I stand by my comments.

  • Robin Graves

    Leafspring, I was going from one particular forum I was reading, with lots of people complaining about rattles and power windows. Unfortunatley the forum is members-only, so you need to register. I found another (public) site with similar problems listed. Seems like a small number of complaints, but some of the vehicles seem to have multiple issues, like a ‘Friday car’ or lemon syndrome. By far the most popular complaints on this site is Nissan Navara, Daewoo Holdens and Kia Carvival (pre 2003) when they had a tendancy to blow head gaskets. Honda and Nissan used to be recognized as near indestructible. Not any more. Another American site has 5 Hondas in the ‘Top 20 worst vehicles for problems’ in such asteemed company like Ford Explorer and Dodge. Yuk.

    http://www.motorsm.com/complaints/model.asp?mke=HONDA

    http://www.carcomplaints.com/worst_vehicles.shtml

    I know you can find issues like this anywhere on the net if you look, but why pay a premium for a brand that clearly has no advantage over a cheaper Korean product (except for the Holden Daewoos of course)

  • Al Juraj

    The only good side on this car is economy. It looks bad and is terribly priced. I’d pick a Lancer for this amount of cash.

  • Fasthonda

    @ Robin Graves

    The American Civics are MADE in America,not Thailand.
    Quality on the Thailand built Hondas is very good.Infact in America recently,Honda/Acura products have done extremely well in Consumer satisfaction surveys.
    Forums are great,but you tend to have a concentration of people airing certain problems etc with their cars that may not reflect the wider ownership base.In other words, just because 3 or 4 people have the same problem may not neccessarily mean it’s a wide spread problem.
    Honda is a quality product,you remind of “Sillyhonda” who seems to have an axe to grind against Honda.
    AND for every “survey” you found I can find another that places Honda near the top of the survey.Numerous JD Power surveys(in 2008)in Britain has 3 Honda cars in the top ten including the Jazz and current Civic(hatch).
    Sure,EVERY manufacturer can have problems from time to time I’ll be biding my time until one of the Korean manufacturers stuffs up in a major way….someone will.
    If I was Honda I would sue KIA for copying the Civic Type R Front on their cerato.
    All the Kia supporters will soon be saying that their cars should be looked at as alternatives to an Audi or BMW.
    And to all the people that don’t like the price and suggest alternative cars to the City I say, GO AHEAD buy them !!!
    I don’t care whether Honda sells thousands of the City car or just one.

  • KM

    Fasthonda,

    In response to your “If I was Honda I would sue KIA for copying the Civic Type R Front on their cerato” comment – you got to be kidding right? This is a design in which Peter Schreyer has developed individually. Obviously some cars look like others, have you not seen the similarities between the current commodore & BA Falcon front end? The Cerato is a great step for the Korean brand, no copying invovled as Schreyer is very very good at what he does. As for the Civic Type R I personally think it is the ugliest car around, looks like a space ship out of the star wars!!

    cheers

  • Dan

    “All the Kia supporters will soon be saying that their cars should be looked at as alternatives to an Audi or BMW.”

    That wouldn’t surprise me if they did… To them Kia is the best car in the world…

  • sillyhonda

    “All the Kia supporters will soon be saying that their cars should be looked at as alternatives to an Audi or BMW.”

    It is already true at South Korea in that the top spec Hyundai Genesis’s (called Equss in Korea) price is almost same as Lexus LS 460..Both cars are price at approx A$ 140,000 in Korea market.

    I also would rather buy Genesis over Lexus LS 460, if I afford to buy…Genesis won north America car of year and Canadian car of the year and its V8 Tau engine won the World Top 10 Engine.

  • sillyhonda

    Actually, Motor trend stated that Genesis is miles better than BMW 5 or MB E class in every departments (Handling, Ride quality, Build Quality NVH, Refinement, etc…)..

  • Jonathan

    @ KM and Fasthonda

    I think the front end design looks like the toyota allion.
    http://toyota.jp/allion/

    i found out from another CarAdvice reader who put this up in one of the earlier Cerato review. Kudos to him/her :)

    anyway, i quite like this new honda city. Ive sat in the older generation and its quite a nice and comfortable car. I would presume that this could only be better. Shame about the price though. A tad overpriced :(

  • Leafspring

    ‘Robin Graves’, acknowledged & thanks. Hadn’t seen these 2 sites before, but now ‘bookmarked’. As you said, many of those complaints are duplicated with multiple responses. It seems that no mass production vehicles are immune. In my opinion, ‘Fasthonda’ has raised some salient points. I believe there are far more Hondas on the road worldwide – the company has been in existence longer, despite two combined Korean brands just ‘pipping’ Honda last year for outright world sales. I have never met a single Honda owner that speaks poorly of the make – being very satisfied with quality and longevity (amongst many other reasons) of their cars. It was interesting to note that there were few complaints made of the Thai built Hondas. Several bloggers mentioned the overseas $140,000 (approx) Hyundai Genesis. That it outplayed two reputable German makes in a number of areas. So what, and how long will that last? The big boys will raise the bar… if they have to. If you were a true car enthusiast and had a spare $140,000, would you HONESTLY buy a Hyundai? I would go the extra mile and get an M3. The Honda City hasn’t proved itself in Oz yet. It sounds like a ‘town dweller’ and if that’s what you want – give it a go – if not – don’t! I’d be surprised if it was a ‘dud’. It’s only my opinion though…

  • Dan

    “If you were a true car enthusiast and had a spare $140,000, would you HONESTLY buy a Hyundai?”

    As they say, “A fool and his money are soon parted”.

    Next they will claim the Soanata is more luxurious than a Maybach!

  • KM

    For all those who take interest in KIA.
    Salesman maybe interested in this. I drove a SOUL today… Very interesting car & looks are even more interesting. I drove the diesel one 5 spd manual. Car goes ok, very economical.. Interior is a very big improvement over previous KIA’s, however the biggest issue I had with the vehicle is the fact that its got no CRUISE CONTROL!!!!
    Anyhow, more driving tomorrow – will keep you guys posted.

    Cheers

  • shell

    Just wondering what it is that makes everyone say the honda is too pricey? Is it mainly because it doesnt have esc and the 1.5 litre engine? I really love the look of the city and I like that it has curtain airbags as standard, and is pretty roomy compared to some others I am looking at (impreza, mazda 3, tiida, corolla although i think corolla has more room) I’m going back to talk to the dealer and would love to be able to throw a few things at him about why the price is too high! Thanks everyone for all your opinions, I’m really loving these reviews and comments, I’m becoming addicted to researching cars….my husband thinks it is very strange behaviour!!

  • Simon

    I agree with many of the comments here it is a little overpriced however when compared to the Kia however don’t think anyone has mentioned resale value.

    I’ll eat my hat if the Honda does not have a better resale value than the Kia in fact it might be to the point where it makes the Honda cheaper in the long run (better return when you sell).

    Everyone’s different I would be trying to put the badges to one side and drive them (which one feels best) and which one can you see yourself living with everyday!

  • shell

    I test drove the city yesterday. Although it is beautiful to look at, and very spacious considering the size, I did feel that the 1.5 litre engine indeed felt like a 1.5 litre engine, despite the salesman telling me that a honda 1.5 is the same as a normal 1.8L. I found it a very smooth drive, and the steering is extremely light, almost too light. I feel like the lack of traction/stability control is even more disappointing considering that it would be quite easy to oversteer. I have test driven the impreza, corolla, tiida and mazda 3, and I think the city’s engine feels a bit like the tiida’s, which in my opinion is not quite in the same league as the 3, corolla and impreza. I’m testing the lancer tomorrow and at this stage am leaning towards the imprezza, which has everything you could want in safety plus drives like a dream. What do you car enthusiasts think?

  • Freddo

    Hi,

    Potential Honda City buyers: please read the latest review (http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_111112/article.html) of this car and compare it to the mainstream press favourable reviews.

    Does anyone still trust mass media car reviews (and maybe even caradvice reviews)?

  • Ryan

    $20,490 for a stetched jazz? give me a break, the car looks stunning and probably drives just as well as anyother honda. but they need to think seriously about the insane profit margains they make off their thai built cars…
    Not good enough.

  • Satisfied owner

    Excellent Styling, Awesome Comfort and Good Features..
    for a sub 30K driveaway car.

    Love my manual City Vti-L a lot.

  • Khan,Sarmad Tehseen

    In Pakistan City comes with a 1.3 i-vtec engine and costs $15,000.Build quality is very good and gives more than 20 km/liter.The honda city is worth every penny.Corolla in Pakistan costs $500 more than city and standard version is without power windows ABS and keyless entry.

  • Geoff

    We’ve just bought a Honda City. Test drove the auto and ordered a manual. The auto was too revy, the manual kicks along quite nice especially when you live in the mountains.
    Have owned a Daewoo and my wife a Hyundai and the city is a class above them, but there again Honda make motorbikes and have from year dot so it comes with Honda quality and engineering. We have a family and find that all can fit into it easily (6ft. teenagers included) and the boot space is a gods-end. For 23k onroad including tinted windows and tow bar we are very happy. We couldn’t even get a decent second-hand golf for that price. Servicing also less than half the price of the golf. (Honda gave us a great trade-in ,others were thousands less)

  • http://carsnetwork.blogspot.com/2008/08/new-honda-city-2009-exclusive-review.html honda city review

    Very nice and cool car!

    Worth what you pay!

  • maximark

    One word ; OVERPRICED

  • Bin

    While this may seem overpriced, I’ve had a Honda City (previous generation) for abt 4 yrs now and there is hardly anything for me to complain (I also have a 1993 & 2008 Honda Accord). Whereas I’ve driven many Kias and Hyundais (parent company of Kia, used to have 51% shares, now owning 38.6% shares), including their more expensive cars (and their latest models as well) and have always felt wanting (probably having driven Hondas regularly). This is from the moment the door is opened (and shut), to the seating arrangement, to the engine noise, the switchgear, ride and handling.

    I’m planning to get a car now and considering this City, as its been a much better drive than almost all else in the class (my experience) and truly value for money (from the perspective of quality and reliability). The total cost of ownership (including fuel costs, long term maintenance) of Kia and Hyundai vehicles are definitely a lot higher than that of Hondas (as I regularly check with my friends who own these vehicles).

    Truly there is no comparison between Honda and Kia/Hyundai.

    This is from my experience of abt 16yrs of using Hondas.

    I would truly recommend you drive these vehicles (for some distance) and ask Owners of these cars (Honda and Kia/Hyundai) abt their experiences with these vehicles.

    Bin

  • Nolram

    Overall, 09 City is the best in its class in terms of comfort and design…according to my wife hahaha. Resale value justifies higher acquisition price.

  • Angel

    Nolram^

    Ya tripping, YOU PAID MORE so in theory it *could* be worth more, but i doubt it.

    Just ask all the happy Haonda legend and nsx owners about so-called “resale” bwaaaahhh NOT!

    Enjoy your traction-control and stability control on your Thailand built buzz box.

    The simple fact is you could have purchased VASTLY SUPERIOR for less

    lol

  • Tamer

    Am gonna buy a the City VTI automatic so is there any advice I can get? especially about it’s stability?

  • esther

    The 3S and quality assurance that Honda is promoting and advertising in Malaysia is really a joke. The Customer Service Manager in Petaling Jaya, Malaysia has not return my calls for nearly two months despite the fact that her staff couldn’t resolve my complaints on a major defect on my brand new Honda City. She just sweeps the problem under the carpet and washed her hands off the case. Surprised that Honda have such employee in management level, hiding in the 4 walls of her office. I wonder what KPI that Honda has set for their Customer Service Department. Now, their staff is pushing me to accept an unacceptable solution and yet their Manager doesn’t want to return your calls to resolve the matter. Very, very disappointed with Honda and regretted buying a Honda car with so many other defects besides the paintwork.

  • Tacho

    just bought honda city 2010.. excellent car.. family car.. pleasure drive.. but still everything has its negatives.. i think honda could do better with city and put more options etc.

    (Still im a satisfied customer)

  • Ernest

    Hi everyone, talking about Jazz and City. For the same type, 1.5L machine, the price exactly same. So is City to expensive, then how about Jazz?
    I think price is not all about the quality and material only, but include the preference, and as we know honda’s second hand price is really good. specially for 1.5 and 1.8L one.

  • schonda

    Hi Everyone,

    Just like someone said above, you pro korean cars would start comparing them to audi or bmw just cause it has ‘similar specifications/features’ well guess what? I have a Vonson LCD screen and it has the same features as a top of the line Sony. The same features though, built in a platic cheaper way, if i had the cash i’d go for sony anyday and i would never compare cheap brands to sony. Same with Kia, NO COMPARISON to Honda.

    There are 1.8L BMW’s that cost probably 4 times the Kia’s or whateva weird names they call them these day, yet, the BMW is better.

    I can buy a house in the western suburbs with automatic windows or i can buy a smaller house in the northern suburbs and manually open the windows. I’d pick the northern, why? Cause I prefer the view and standards of people – not on an individual scale but a mass scale.

    Honda is above class of all the rest the korean made cars and Lancers and maybe even Toyota’s. They ensure standards in all their cars which the other brands do not. This is the difference.

    By the way, a hyundai grandeur has leather and the bmw 5 sseries has leather too, whats the difference? Except for the fact that the seats will melt in the sun cause it’s fake leather.

    HAVE RESPECT FOR CARS WITH CLASS AND DON’T COMPARE THEM TO LOWER ENDED CARS. NO COMPARISON.

  • hondacity

    the honda city 2010 with i-vtec engine, has timing chain or timing belt??

  • Sarah

    I’ve recently been looking at different cars for a first car but using it for business purposes. I’ll be travelling a lot with PA equipment and Keyboards etc. The big boot of the Honda City provides enough space to not have to use the backseat. And because it is not a hatch back like the jazz I have comfort in knowing I can go to the shops or leave my car parked with expensive equipment in it without feeling like someone can see what is on my car.
    I don’t think this car is over priced at all. I’ve been indecisive in choosing the HOnda City, Mazda 3 or Holden Cruze. Mazda 3 is around 2k more than the City and provides similar features. A higher L engine although I need as ,uch efficance on fuel economy as possible. As for the Holden Cruze it is courian made which puts me off alittle i must admit. Made from the same manafacturers as the daewoo.

    So the City is looking like the best option for me at the moment. I think the interior is okay. It has one of the best sound systems fitted in the Honda City which comes as a standard feature. I think the City looks really nice and stylish and it’s a really sturdy car.

    Heres a real fact, after the hail damage was done on March 6th earlier this year. Honda’s had the least amount of claims on hail damage, purely because of the way they are made and their sturdy body. Although the white paint is known to b the best for preventing your reguralar hits and dints on the Honda City.

    For all of you who think the City is just like a Jazz with a boot. I don’t agree. The space of a jazz inside is much smaller. And the bbot of a Honda City is much much much bigger. The exterior looks completely different also.

    I hope this comment helps someone out there!!

  • Aliesha

    I just bought a Honda City Vti-L.. And am loving it. I test drived a Toyota Corolla, Mazda 3, Holden Cruze, Ford Fiesta and a Suzuki Liana. I made my decision based upon my opinion of comfort, safety, power, fuel economy and passenger/boot space. For the price I was able to get it at, this was the best buy. I wanted a small car that didn’t sacrifice on safety and space, and with only have an automatic license means that most cars I drive have a little power, however the Honda City did go.

  • Etwills

    I bought a honda city 2009 and drove for just 7 months when i had a wheel bearing problem, shortly i had AC bearing problem. at 30,000km my fan belt went bad. brake pads wear out at 8000km while lining at 19000km. mileage of 6ltrs/100km can only be achieve if its an easy drive and not when one considers power and high acceleration. the throttle design aches the ankle if travel up to 120km.
    Headlamps are not as bright as those of hyundai. headlamp bulb gave way at 40,000km. AC performance aint excellent. that’s all i can. should all these things mentioned be taken of, it is a perfect and smooth ride far above kia