2009 Subaru Plug-in Stella Review
February 26, 2009 by Alborz Fallah

White goods on wheels is a tag often applied by some to the products of another Japanese car maker but it’s not one you would readily apply to those from Subaru.

However, the ground breaking Subaru Plug-in Stella is small, white, boxy and very expensive, at the moment.
It’s also a fully functioning electric vehicle or EV that is being produced in small numbers by Subaru and sold, at considerable cost, to Japanese government organisations so that testing can be carried out under controlled conditions.
One of these EVs is currently in Australia and this week CarAdvice took it for a very short, but interesting test drive.
You see we were amongst a small group of automotive media invited to meet the man in charge of the project, Mr Takashi Suzuki, and to drive the Plug-in Stella, not on the road as originally planned, but at a hastily hired go-kart track under Melbourne’s famed Westgate Bridge.
It was interesting to note that as thousands of petrol powered commuters whizzed overhead, we made swift but silent progress around the track below in a vehicle that has the potential to emit nothing other than a slight hum from its electric motors.

Potential, because Subaru currently calculate the Plug-in Stella, yes there is a petrol powered Stella that’s sold in Japan, emits 125 grams of carbon dioxide per 100 kilometres, because the electric power it uses is produced by a coal-fired power station.
That compares to 204g/100km of CO2 from an average 2.0-litre petrol powered small car, and the electric power unit in the Stella is deemed to provide similar performance to a 2.0-litre petrol engine.

The four-seat Stella can be recharged to 80 per cent of its 80 kilometre range in just 15 minutes and, according to figures calculated by Subaru, costs just 93 cents per 100 kilometres to run, if charged at off-peak rates, and $1.88 at peak rates.
That’s less than a reverse cycle air-conditioner, or the combined daily cost of running a fridge/freezer and hot water system.

Using a domestic home connection Stella can be charged from empty to full range in eight hours, based on a 100 Volt outlet, or four hours at 200V.
The Subaru Plug-in Stella, that’s its model name, has a small electric motor under the bonnet and lithium-ion batteries under the seats and even comes equipped with a power cord to plug it into a wall socket.

There’s what looks like a conventional petrol filler cap, that flips open to reveal a ‘fast charge’ socket that can make use of specially designed recharging stations to boost the batteries to 80 per cent in just 15 minutes.

Buying one would cost you the equivalent of about $60,000, an indication of the considerable expense of the Stella’s battery technology. By comparison the 660cc petrol-engine version of the same car costs the equivalent of $15,000.
While 80km of travel doesn’t sound like a lot of range, Mr Suzuki, manager of Subaru’s electric vehicle division, said research in Japan had shown that few daily commutes exceeded this distance.

He said Subaru has established this as the benchmark distance for a commuter EV and had developed much of its technology around that concept.
He said most people could charge the car overnight at home, drive to and from work and then recharge it.
If extra travel was required then the vehicle could be recharged, currently for free, from Fast Charge stations in parking stations.

Because of government regulations we were not allowed to drive the Plug-in Stella on our roads, only a Subaru engineer was trusted with that, but driving to and from our drive facility, four up the car was brisk and had absolutely no problems keeping up with commuter traffic.
A smooth, twisty go-kart track was not the ideal place to gain driving impressions but it was the nearest facility Subaru could come up with at the last minute.
Weighing in at 1060kgs the Stella isn’t heavy, but does tip the scales at more than a similar sized Toyota Yaris or Mazda2.

On the inside the Stella is pretty much like a regular car, there’s keyless start, so just twist the knob on the side of the steering column, listen intently for a very slight hum, and watch as the needles and dashboard spring to life and then a green ‘ready’ light comes on in the speedometer and you are good to make forward travel.

To one side of the speedometer is what looks like a conventional fuel gauge that shows how much charge remains in the batteries. It’s matched by a gauge that shows how much power the engine is drawing from the battery, or feeding back into it.

There is regenerative power provided when coasting, braking or travelling downhill.
Probably the most often heard comment about EVs is there quietness, and standing outside the Stella that’s true. However on the inside there’s always the low hum as the 40kW electric motor builds speed.
One thing power freaks will love is the fact that all 150Nm are available from zero rpm!
The result is smooth acceleration and as the revs rise towards the maximum of 6000rpm, which equates to 100km/h, the hum is replaced by wind buffeting the slab sided Stella and the roar of tyre noise.

Deceleration is another matter, sure there are conventional brakes that work just fine, but the Plug-in Stella can use its electric motors to reduce speed.
With its transmission in D the Stella slows gradually and I found on one tight corner it needed a slight dab of the brake pedal, although in this mode the Stella does use the electric motor as a generator to feed power back into the batteries.
Move the lever to L and the regenerative braking as you lift of the throttle is just like applying the brakes, in this mode I could take the corner mentioned above with just a slight lift of the throttle, no braking was needed at all.

In fact Mr Suzuki, who regularly drives one of these cars in Japan’s commuter traffic told me he could drive all the way to his office without touching the brake pedal!
One downside is that the brake lights don’t come on and we did discuss with him the need, with widespread use of these vehicles, for a different method of brake-light activation to avoid a huge rise in the number of rear-end accidents!

The Plug-in Stella is an experimental vehicle, of that there is no doubt, but a fully working one that has all the attributes of a ‘normal’ car and we can share Mr Suzuki’s belief that it won’t be too long before the battery technology is reduced in price to make this sort of thing a reality as our every day commuter.
It’s certain that the world will breathe a little easier when that happens.
Plug-in Stella specifications:
Dimensions (Length x Width x Height): 3395mm ×1475 ×1660
Curb weight: 1060 kg
Passenger seating: Four
Maximum.speed: 100km/h
Per-charge driving distance: 80km
Electric motor: Permanent magnet synchronous motor
Max. power output: 40kW
Max. torque: 150Nm
Drive-train: Front-wheel drive
Battery type: Lithium-ion batteries
Total voltage: 346V
Total energy capacity: 9.2kWh



I like the idea of an electric car and being able to drop my pants in the direction of the OPEC countries and saying kiss that. But rule 1 of any electric car is:-
IT MUST LOOK LIKE A CAR, Not a bread bin riding on baby pram wheels.
Interesting.
I think they are being a bit generous to themselves when they compare the carbon emissions to a 2.0l vehicle though.
It isn’t really as green as they claim, a more realistic comparison would be with its 660cc brother, which probably emits less CO2s per 100ks.
Manufacturing and disposal of the batteries is also probably not very green.
If you must use generated electricity for fuel, my choice would be to use it to make hydrogen, and spend the infrastructure money on hydrogen refilling stations not fast chargers.
Interesting concept, however for people to actually want to buy it the range needs to increase 3 fold and the price to decrease 3 fold.
And lazybones, why so negative on the looks man? How many bread bins come with aircon and sat nav……..I could be the coolest baker in town!
“my choice would be to use it to make hydrogen”
But what about the energy required to make hydrogen??
As I’ve pointed out in a previous post, you can offset electricity with a home PV Solar array.
I’d agree that comparison with a 2.0 ltr car at typically 100kws is a bit ambitious.
This will have as much success as a Beta video player, some will invest in them but to their own peril. Hydrogen is a much greener solution that gives us the performance and traveling distance we are used to.
I can see lots of scion influence in this. I wonder how much toyota had to do with this car?
$60K for 40kw, a disgusting style, and a top speed of 100km/h!
Great value, where do I sign??
lol.
“why so negative on the looks man?”
Ok, i’m looking again… Front err hmm ok a bit daihatsu terios.. backside.. Samsung 450ltr Fridge Freezer :)
Best looking & performing plugins so far are the Volt & Mini-E
What’s with its name? Sounds like the village whore…
$45k buys alot of petrol/diesel…
Its not about the looks, its about the technology. You want looks buy a Telsa.
“You want looks buy a Telsa.”
oooohhhh yesss, I simply call it the Jesus car :D
Your right salesman, it is about the technology. But at the same time you don’t want to scream everytime you open the garage door.
Why do they company’s create this crap, no one is going to wait 8 hours at home or even wait 15 minutes at a recharging station, until they get the recharge time down around 2 minutes there is not future for these cars.
Yeah, I’d stick with a Tesla.
Aleks, lots of people are interested in this technology. The main idea is you charge overnight – everynight and do less than 80kms per day. In the Europe some companies are putting in (charge points) in company car parks. Assuming your at work 8 hours a day this is a good idea.
Then with the volt you have good old petrol stuff to take you the extra 950kms if required.
Aleks, the answer to that is right in the article. Most people live within 40 km of work (80 km return trip) so you drive it to work and back home and then leave it plugged in overnight.
Having said that I do agree that there’s no real future for these. Hydrogen is the way to go. I saw a documentary a few years ago on alternative fuel sources and have been backing hydrogen ever since. And that was before the whole global warming thing REALLY blew up, so I can only imagine that the technology has improved greatly since then too.
Still even with that fact in mind, what if an emergency happens and you gotta drive somewhere, and things come up all the time, you would just get stranded somewhere. Now the Volt as Lazybones suggested, thats a great idea, have the electric part, but have the petrol part there aswell, I think that is a good way to go, but I agree with Joe aswell that Hydrogen is the way of the future.
Keep in mind the electric car is an interim solution until Hydrogen takes off. Infrastructure will hamper its development for some time. But basically your Hydrogen car is the same as your electric car, it just has a tank and fuel cell instead of a monster battery.
I believe Honda are actually trying to push for Home Hydrogen production system also!!
Electric thing is starting to happen slowly. Waaaay too pricey to be of any comercial value.
Oh where did you get “204g/100km of CO2″ for a 2.0litre petrol. Some Audis are touching 150’s now!!