Car Advice

Chrysler & GM offer more worker buyouts

By Matt Brogan |

General Motors and Chrysler have today offered a new round of hourly worker buyouts and retirement incentives to help themselves cope with the industry downturn and meet federal labour-saving requirements for the manufacturer’s rescue package.

While no comment could be secured from the GM camp, Chrysler confirmed the planned buyouts in a statement which said “Given the difficult economic and market conditions in the US, Chrysler LLC determined in December 2008 that it would offer another phase of special programs.”

Chrysler and GM want to move veteran workers off its payrolls to eventually bring on new staff who will earn half the $28-an-hour wage of current veteran workers and half their benefits.

The manufacturers must also bring labour costs in line with Japanese transplant automakers by February 17th, the date set by when the two firms are required to justify federal rescue loans of $4 billion and $13.4 bilion USD (for Chrysler and GM respectively).

Toluca Assembly Complex-09

Chrysler’s incentives are more generous than those offered by GM. Retirement-eligible Chrysler workers who leave will receive a $50,000 cash incentive plus a voucher of $25,000 for a new Chrysler vehicle, according to the notice. Last year the incentive was $70,000.

GM hourly workers who retire are eligible for $20,000 in cash and a $25,000 car voucher, according to a union source. About 18,000 GM hourly workers took larger buyout incentives in 2008 to leave the company.

Chrysler workers who take a buyout and leave with no retiree health care benefits get $75,000 and a $25,000 car voucher, the union source said. The incentive was $100,000 last year. GM buyouts offer $20,000 and a $25,000 car voucher.


 
  • Deano

    You’d be crazy to take the 25k and forego health benefits in the US, stubbing your toe can cost you 25k over there!!

  • JEKYL & HYDE

    talk about a receipe for disharmony in the workplace.a young bloke starts at g.m.,first week in he goes to his older workmate”so what are they paying you ???”"double what your getting young mate”

  • http://skyline The Salesman

    How do you turn multi billion dollar loss into gains? Work Choices! Some one get on the phone to Howard…….

  • Andrew M

    Salesman,
    I assume you werent being sarcastic????
    Most people hated the idea of “work choices”

    You will never really understand what Howard tried to put in place for Australia unless you were a business person yourself.
    the opposition rallied the public against him with scare tactic campaigns that every one was going to end up working for nothing, or lose their job all together.

    Deano,
    not sure what health costs are worth in the US, but one would wonder if they should take their money out of chrysler and GM while they can still be guaranteed to get it. I mean if chrysler or GM file for bankruptcy, those benefits go straight out the window any way. It would be like being on “deal or no deal” and saying no deal to the offer, only to find out the next turn you knock out all the high end cases

  • Andrew M

    Just out of interest, does anyone know what the Japanese manufacturers in the US are paying in comparison to the US 3??

    Im assuming its half of what the US 3 pay because it was stipulated that wages must drop to the Jap manufacturers rates

  • Frontman

    Andrew M, it is widely reported that the Southern State factories are paying the “equivalent” to $34.00 /hr as apposed to $72.00 these figures are cumulitive oof health and retirement benefits. So actual cost to manufacturer.

    It is also interesting to note that some of the senators against the government loans, (N.B naming names on information from public sources) like Senator Richard Shelby, are showing somewhat hidden agendas as he was instrumental in Getting M/Benz a $253mil incentive to set up a factory there, this equates to $180,000/ job created. Plus the state contracted to buy 2,500 vehicles /annum.
    It is widely understood that this was the norm for all the “New” manufacturers to set up out side of Michigan. So the wages difference is even greater than face value when it comes to companies in trouble.

    One of the references can be found here,
    (sorry if this link offends the moderators, it is not meant to)
    http://theintermountain.com/page/content.detail/id/513450.html?nav=5011