blog counter
Tata loss delays Nano launch indefinitely : Car Advice | News Blog

Tata loss delays Nano launch indefinitely

February 2, 2009 by Matt Brogan  




Tata posted an unexpected loss in its fiscal third quarter (down 32 per cent) which, according to Managing Director Ravi Kant, could delay the launch of its Nano budget model indefinitely.

tata_nano_004

It’s worrying news for the global car industry following the Indian brand’s recent acquisition of Jaguar and Land Rover brands from Ford Motor in June 2008.

Tata temporarily closed some plants in the December quarter to prevent a build-up of stock but as local vehicle sales fell to 98,760 units in the quarter (from 144,608 a year earlier), coupled with a sales fall at Jaguar Land Rover (down to 49,000 from 76,000 year ago), the brand now faced a less than bright future.

Earlier this month, Jaguar Land Rover also announced it would cut 450 jobs.

Chief financial officer C. Ramakrishnan said the company was in discussions with banks to refinance $2 billion of bridging loans, having already paid back $1 billion.

The loans, used to fund the $2.3 billion acquisition last year of Jaguar and Land Rover from Ford, need to be repaid by June.

Tata Motors posted a loss of 2.63 billion rupees ($54 million) in the December quarter, which included a foreign exchange loss of 2.27 billion, from a 4.99 billion profit a year earlier.

Tata said auto demand in India had severely contracted as a result of financial market turmoil and weakening growth.

“I do believe we had the worst in the December quarter, and don’t expect to see [a repeat of] anything like that. We are on a positive trend on the ascendancy curve but it’s going to take time,” Kant said of the Nano, “It’s a fairly complex project.”

No date has been set for the rescheudling of the world’s cheapest car, for now it’s wait and see.

Share this article:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg



Related Articles:

Tata Nano investigated for electrical fires
Could it be that quality sacrifices made in producing the world's cheapest car have led to its downfall? The Tata Nano

Tata Nano to be sold by lottery
To cope with demand, Indian carmaker Tata will sell the first 100,000 examples of its ultra-cheap Nano by lottery. Application forms

Tata Nano Europa
Despite earlier reports that Tata was struggling to bring the Nano to the market, demand for smaller, cheap and city

Tata Motors to boost Nano production
With the Indian-built Nano undercutting most two-wheeled transport in price, Tata Motors has decided to increase production to meet growing

First Tata Nano delivered to proud Indian family
While most of us take driving and owning a car for granted, Tata's ambition to sell the world's cheapest car

Comments

10 Responses to “Tata loss delays Nano launch indefinitely”
  1. FRUGAL_ONE says:

    *****PRIMO!*****

    This vehicle is rapidly becoming vapourware.

    Now we know why nobody else has built a US$2500 “car”, simple, because it cannot be done and make a profit.

    Maybe the huge outlay for Jag and L/R is starting to really hurt them.[As i said it would]

    All lies, if they built it, at that price the public would buy it.

    Cheers

    F-0

  2. Reckless1 says:

    I’ll bet Ford is glad they disposed of Jag/LR – sales from 76,000 to 49,000 in one year.

    I guess Tata will put them on the market again???? They should offer them to Chrysler, they’re always looking to get into bed with someone.

  3. Robj says:

    F-O, you wouldn’t seriously suggest this should be sold outside of India? I doubt it would meet any sort of safety standards in other markets..

  4. Car Tuning says:

    well i’d rather buy a second hand car than this cheap ride that will easily win an award for worst car design. If i were to decide at Tata, i would tell them to cancel this car’s production completely.

  5. Joober@Work says:

    “F-O, you wouldn’t seriously suggest this should be sold outside of India? I doubt it would meet any sort of safety standards in other markets.. ” Funny though there are many other countries that have the laxed safety regulation like India, add them all up, its a bigger market than the USA. This car is potential, but as F-O stated, a $2500 car… is there even a worthwhile margin on the sale, even the repairs and servicing may all add up comparable to the cost of the car…

    As hideous as it is, for the price if it does happen to sell it, is very alluring to the cheap cabbies, bajaj riders looking for a new vehicle..

  6. Lloyd says:

    Don’t need rubbish like this clogging the roads.

  7. FRUGAL_ONE says:

    I would be interested in 1 for AUS$3250, would not pay any more than that.

    It would be a 3rd. vehicle, to run down to the shop, city lanes parking, supermarket trolley rash [who cares!] running around the farm, no more than say 80km in a sitting
    its only moped/ride-on-mower coinage.

    Its not a Benz with 5-star-safety, but its a MILLION times safer than a moped/motorcycle, u dont get wet, u cannot fall off, and u can lock it all up etc.

    BUT….it needs to be built first.

    The real MAIN reason is to enter the C/A sponsered NanoCup, motor racing for the masses at the cheapest possible price

    Cheers

    F-0

  8. Myke says:

    ^If it was your 3rd vehicle, I don’t know why you’d bother. Your 1st and 2nd cars could probably do what you’re describing F-O (run down to the shop, city lanes parking, etc). A ride-on mower could probably be a better option :P.

  9. Carl says:

    If companies like these that have slave wages and can pollute their soils and waterways are having a hard time of it what can be expected from our companies???? that’s not FREE trade or a level playing field!! So i wouldn’t feel too sorry for them!

  10. Alex says:

    Well Car Tuning, that would make you an idiot then. There is no doubt that this car will sell in the millions if they only started building it. The fact is that it’s made for Indians that would be upgrading from a motorbike and they probably could afford this. Canceling production would be stupid as it would end the company. If they keep it going and make it a success, which I think they probably will, it would save the company.

    Why doesn’t Ratan Tata put some of his own money into it? Last I read he was worth about 35 billion.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word