<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hyundai scores best in ownership costs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:25:59 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frontman</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112947</link>
		<dc:creator>Frontman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112947</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that J&amp;H ;-)
But even so still demonstrates the differing costs of service outside of the terms quoted.
As for the indicator possition either side is only a weeks worth of a clean windscreen. People who complain on Focus and (old) Astra don&#039;t complain  about it when looking at BMW or MB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that J&amp;H ;-)<br />
But even so still demonstrates the differing costs of service outside of the terms quoted.<br />
As for the indicator possition either side is only a weeks worth of a clean windscreen. People who complain on Focus and (old) Astra don&#8217;t complain  about it when looking at BMW or MB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEKYL &#38; HYDE</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112910</link>
		<dc:creator>JEKYL &#38; HYDE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112910</guid>
		<description>FRONTMAN,

just so you know,the astra belt change is now 10yr/150k.only early ts was 60k,then 90k.and the indicator stalk is now right side,unlike focus...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FRONTMAN,</p>
<p>just so you know,the astra belt change is now 10yr/150k.only early ts was 60k,then 90k.and the indicator stalk is now right side,unlike focus&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cupid Stunt</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112887</link>
		<dc:creator>Cupid Stunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112887</guid>
		<description>Reckon Hyundai is up there with Toyota now. However there is still prejudice agianst Korean cars.

Talking of depreciation throw in the fact that say a Mondeo bought for AU$35,000 sold in 3yrs with 57,000 has lost say $20k. But a BMW 3 series bought for $50K sold in 3yrs with same mileage has lost oooh $20K. I know what I would rather drive. upmarket everytime. (typical UK prices used by the way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reckon Hyundai is up there with Toyota now. However there is still prejudice agianst Korean cars.</p>
<p>Talking of depreciation throw in the fact that say a Mondeo bought for AU$35,000 sold in 3yrs with 57,000 has lost say $20k. But a BMW 3 series bought for $50K sold in 3yrs with same mileage has lost oooh $20K. I know what I would rather drive. upmarket everytime. (typical UK prices used by the way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowman</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112880</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112880</guid>
		<description>OK, Sam I misunderstood about that - apologies then</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Sam I misunderstood about that &#8211; apologies then</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamR</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112877</link>
		<dc:creator>SamR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112877</guid>
		<description>Snowman, Nope “vehicle whole of life costs” in this study was 15,000km a year for 5 years

Biggest costs, financing, depreciation and fuel.

Since Hyundai cars have a 5 year warranty then only servicing costs need to be counted not repairs and they could both be VERY high and still not affect the final result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snowman, Nope “vehicle whole of life costs” in this study was 15,000km a year for 5 years</p>
<p>Biggest costs, financing, depreciation and fuel.</p>
<p>Since Hyundai cars have a 5 year warranty then only servicing costs need to be counted not repairs and they could both be VERY high and still not affect the final result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowman</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112876</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112876</guid>
		<description>Geez, the Hyundai bashing is just getting childish. I speak from the fact that I am an owner of an i30 SX CRDi, just as used in that survey. It is my first ever Hyundai, and I&#039;ve come from a Holden and Ford background, and have ALWAYS serviced my cars to the handbook specs.
If I was only interested in buying cheap, I would have gone the petrol model and saved $2.5K, or bought a Yaris! I  was coming from a V6 so wanted the diesel as I was used to a slow revving motor, and lots of torque. I test drove this against the 207, C4, Golf and Focus diesels, and there were very few points of all these cars to justify the extra 4 to 8 thou above the price of the i30. So far I have done 26,000km in 9 months, have had it serviced twice, and it has not missed a beat, and nor have I anything to complain about in regard to build quality or the way it performs. I challenge these bashers to go drive one of these cars with an open mind for once.
With regards to everyone bleating about the trade in on these cars when you&#039;ve finished, may I remind you that this survey mentioned was on &quot;vehicle whole of life costs&quot;, with the emphasis on whole of life! That&#039;s as long as I plan to keep mine - I bought it from new and I am going to keep it until its worn out and dead.

Again, anyone who judges Hyundai by the old Excel, egt your head out of wherever it is, and go in with an open mind and try the newer cars out. You might be pleasantly surprised!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, the Hyundai bashing is just getting childish. I speak from the fact that I am an owner of an i30 SX CRDi, just as used in that survey. It is my first ever Hyundai, and I&#8217;ve come from a Holden and Ford background, and have ALWAYS serviced my cars to the handbook specs.<br />
If I was only interested in buying cheap, I would have gone the petrol model and saved $2.5K, or bought a Yaris! I  was coming from a V6 so wanted the diesel as I was used to a slow revving motor, and lots of torque. I test drove this against the 207, C4, Golf and Focus diesels, and there were very few points of all these cars to justify the extra 4 to 8 thou above the price of the i30. So far I have done 26,000km in 9 months, have had it serviced twice, and it has not missed a beat, and nor have I anything to complain about in regard to build quality or the way it performs. I challenge these bashers to go drive one of these cars with an open mind for once.<br />
With regards to everyone bleating about the trade in on these cars when you&#8217;ve finished, may I remind you that this survey mentioned was on &#8220;vehicle whole of life costs&#8221;, with the emphasis on whole of life! That&#8217;s as long as I plan to keep mine &#8211; I bought it from new and I am going to keep it until its worn out and dead.</p>
<p>Again, anyone who judges Hyundai by the old Excel, egt your head out of wherever it is, and go in with an open mind and try the newer cars out. You might be pleasantly surprised!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joober</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112872</link>
		<dc:creator>Joober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112872</guid>
		<description>Tack, don&#039;t even have to look at the US, even here check out the Australia&#039;s best cars website for COTY 2008 and the i30 sx made number 1 followed by Civic then Lancer then the Polo,Focus,Corolla, Mazda3, Citroen C3....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tack, don&#8217;t even have to look at the US, even here check out the Australia&#8217;s best cars website for COTY 2008 and the i30 sx made number 1 followed by Civic then Lancer then the Polo,Focus,Corolla, Mazda3, Citroen C3&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joober</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112870</link>
		<dc:creator>Joober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112870</guid>
		<description>Add to that just breaking news, Toyota is calling a GLOBAL recall on Yaris&#039;s due to faults on Exhausts and Seat belts!. 

Cmon Hyundai capitalise on this!!!, slap the big T to put the quality back into their cars..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add to that just breaking news, Toyota is calling a GLOBAL recall on Yaris&#8217;s due to faults on Exhausts and Seat belts!. </p>
<p>Cmon Hyundai capitalise on this!!!, slap the big T to put the quality back into their cars..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112869</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112869</guid>
		<description>Gasman,
here is your example of a nowdays hyundai......the getz.

go jump in that and tell me there are no ties to the old&#039;n days hyundai attitude of packing to together a cheap car.

at least a plus for hyundai is that they sell them for what they are worth unlike toyota</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gasman,<br />
here is your example of a nowdays hyundai&#8230;&#8230;the getz.</p>
<p>go jump in that and tell me there are no ties to the old&#8217;n days hyundai attitude of packing to together a cheap car.</p>
<p>at least a plus for hyundai is that they sell them for what they are worth unlike toyota</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tack</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112866</link>
		<dc:creator>tack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112866</guid>
		<description>Naughtyius Maximus
Please give us the source of information, I just can&#039;t believe it.
i30 would be a good car, but not good as VW or Honda as someone mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naughtyius Maximus<br />
Please give us the source of information, I just can&#8217;t believe it.<br />
i30 would be a good car, but not good as VW or Honda as someone mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gasman</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112860</link>
		<dc:creator>gasman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112860</guid>
		<description>It is not surprising people continue to denigrate Hyundai- without actually having driven in one of their new models. I think Hyundai&#039;s early quality woes have really dented their reputation even today as a car maker. Since they&#039;ve realised they can&#039;t sell on price alone, they&#039;ve upped their quality and each new model (that has been released since ~2002) reflects this commitment. Drive a Toyota or Nissan back to back with a Hyundai and you will see. Koreans do strive to be number one, in whatever field, and good luck to them. Hyundai/Kia group&#039;s exponential rise is indicative of this.

On the other hand, VW perceived quality is somehow ranked very highly. Partly due to their &#039;German&#039; origins. In Europe, though, it is a very mainstream brand; perhaps innovative, like most well resourced German manufacturers. Unfortunately, quality has suffered as cars are mass produced with cheaper components and outsourcing. Their focus seems to have shifted to quantity rather than quality. Kind of like Hyundai&#039;s early attitude to their sales and marketing. I own a current VW, which was bought new, and have had so many quality problems. I know it could be an isolated problem (with myself just being an unlucky one) , but quality surveys and owner reviews indicate there is a more deep seated problem.

My point is, reputations are very hard to break, whether good or bad. Unfortunately, for Hyundai, they will need to continually show they have the innovation and quality for  at least a decade, before people&#039;s perceptions change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not surprising people continue to denigrate Hyundai- without actually having driven in one of their new models. I think Hyundai&#8217;s early quality woes have really dented their reputation even today as a car maker. Since they&#8217;ve realised they can&#8217;t sell on price alone, they&#8217;ve upped their quality and each new model (that has been released since ~2002) reflects this commitment. Drive a Toyota or Nissan back to back with a Hyundai and you will see. Koreans do strive to be number one, in whatever field, and good luck to them. Hyundai/Kia group&#8217;s exponential rise is indicative of this.</p>
<p>On the other hand, VW perceived quality is somehow ranked very highly. Partly due to their &#8216;German&#8217; origins. In Europe, though, it is a very mainstream brand; perhaps innovative, like most well resourced German manufacturers. Unfortunately, quality has suffered as cars are mass produced with cheaper components and outsourcing. Their focus seems to have shifted to quantity rather than quality. Kind of like Hyundai&#8217;s early attitude to their sales and marketing. I own a current VW, which was bought new, and have had so many quality problems. I know it could be an isolated problem (with myself just being an unlucky one) , but quality surveys and owner reviews indicate there is a more deep seated problem.</p>
<p>My point is, reputations are very hard to break, whether good or bad. Unfortunately, for Hyundai, they will need to continually show they have the innovation and quality for  at least a decade, before people&#8217;s perceptions change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112858</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112858</guid>
		<description>I agree with Sam and Richo,

NM, sure the i30 is a massive leap forward for hyundai, but with the i30 excluded, richo and sam couldnt be closer to the truth with every word they said.

Yes they are good and reliable cars (no one has said otherwise), but they are basic. Yes they are good cars, but they are certainly no engineering masterpiece.

the i30 is one hyundai that i have not driven as of yet, but i still cant see it as having the engineering qualities to match others such as the Golf or Focus, and no review has hinted they are close in that area.

Im not a hyundai basher either, i respect what they offer and the audience they try and target.
*whisper* i feel what i said is fair because there is a hyundai sitting in my other driveway *end whisper*

A friend has a Getz, still very cheap and basic. The silly bugger went and paid full price for it walking out with a debt of just over 20K!!!! 
The hyundai dealer down the road has about 10 Getzs lined up on the foot path with fluro paint advertising them for 9K drive away with very low k&#039;s.
imagine what you would get for a trade....4K??

track the 2nd hand price of a competitors vehicle and im sure you will find they fare a lot better.

anyway, back to the quality/experience stuff.....
another friend has a Barina, and i can safely say the Barina, YES BARINA is much better quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Sam and Richo,</p>
<p>NM, sure the i30 is a massive leap forward for hyundai, but with the i30 excluded, richo and sam couldnt be closer to the truth with every word they said.</p>
<p>Yes they are good and reliable cars (no one has said otherwise), but they are basic. Yes they are good cars, but they are certainly no engineering masterpiece.</p>
<p>the i30 is one hyundai that i have not driven as of yet, but i still cant see it as having the engineering qualities to match others such as the Golf or Focus, and no review has hinted they are close in that area.</p>
<p>Im not a hyundai basher either, i respect what they offer and the audience they try and target.<br />
*whisper* i feel what i said is fair because there is a hyundai sitting in my other driveway *end whisper*</p>
<p>A friend has a Getz, still very cheap and basic. The silly bugger went and paid full price for it walking out with a debt of just over 20K!!!!<br />
The hyundai dealer down the road has about 10 Getzs lined up on the foot path with fluro paint advertising them for 9K drive away with very low k&#8217;s.<br />
imagine what you would get for a trade&#8230;.4K??</p>
<p>track the 2nd hand price of a competitors vehicle and im sure you will find they fare a lot better.</p>
<p>anyway, back to the quality/experience stuff&#8230;..<br />
another friend has a Barina, and i can safely say the Barina, YES BARINA is much better quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamR</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112856</link>
		<dc:creator>SamR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112856</guid>
		<description>It is a good result for Hyundai BUT it is not quite what you think guys.

I think you will find that the biggest costs the NRMA considers is purchase price (for loan interest) and depreciation. Since Hyundais are cheap then this cost is very low so they win.

ACTUAL running costs would probably be higher then a Corolla.

People will then say they depreciate less so that is good too, Well maybe but if you start low and have higher then average depreciation the $ loss is still low.

Still good result for Hyundai.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good result for Hyundai BUT it is not quite what you think guys.</p>
<p>I think you will find that the biggest costs the NRMA considers is purchase price (for loan interest) and depreciation. Since Hyundais are cheap then this cost is very low so they win.</p>
<p>ACTUAL running costs would probably be higher then a Corolla.</p>
<p>People will then say they depreciate less so that is good too, Well maybe but if you start low and have higher then average depreciation the $ loss is still low.</p>
<p>Still good result for Hyundai.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naughtyius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112852</link>
		<dc:creator>Naughtyius Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112852</guid>
		<description>I read that in USA the i30 had rated highest amongst all Jap cars and was even in front of Lexus..... so how you think Hyundai is a cheap car company and not as refined as Honda or VW defies logic. Thus the awards flow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that in USA the i30 had rated highest amongst all Jap cars and was even in front of Lexus&#8230;.. so how you think Hyundai is a cheap car company and not as refined as Honda or VW defies logic. Thus the awards flow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naughtyius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112851</link>
		<dc:creator>Naughtyius Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112851</guid>
		<description>RICHO and SAM.....the i30 is ranked high on quality and reliability (fact). So your comment is your opinion (as your generalising as you &quot;still&quot; see Hyundai as the cheap nasty company that it was when it started here. Reality is Hyundai is beyond that as voting on car awards stacked against others are well documented. The i30 has the kudos to shove the belief you have that Hyundai is not as refined as others. Do not generalise as yes I agree some of there range is not refined..... but then again any car maker has not got that quality across the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RICHO and SAM&#8230;..the i30 is ranked high on quality and reliability (fact). So your comment is your opinion (as your generalising as you &#8220;still&#8221; see Hyundai as the cheap nasty company that it was when it started here. Reality is Hyundai is beyond that as voting on car awards stacked against others are well documented. The i30 has the kudos to shove the belief you have that Hyundai is not as refined as others. Do not generalise as yes I agree some of there range is not refined&#8230;.. but then again any car maker has not got that quality across the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realcars</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112839</link>
		<dc:creator>Realcars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112839</guid>
		<description>Agree Fugal one in relation to servicing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree Fugal one in relation to servicing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realcars</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112838</link>
		<dc:creator>Realcars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112838</guid>
		<description>Agree Frontman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree Frontman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frontman</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112837</link>
		<dc:creator>Frontman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112837</guid>
		<description>When are you people &amp; the motoring organizations going to realise that NOTHING has RESALE value anymore????

Seriously trying to workout running costs whilst quoting a resale value these days is just plain stupid. Also throw into the mix that these figures only account for a small portion of the population as more used cars are sold to private buyers, and then they are starting to look at cam belt services and such and then the tables can be completely reversed. ie Getz has a cam belt at 90k, Astra @ 60k (IIRC same with Barina) whilst Fiesta is 170k &amp; Focus is 240k. Sorry but I just get p&#039;d with reading half a&#039;d surveys that don&#039;t give the correct info to the greater portion of the public who would really benefit from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are you people &amp; the motoring organizations going to realise that NOTHING has RESALE value anymore????</p>
<p>Seriously trying to workout running costs whilst quoting a resale value these days is just plain stupid. Also throw into the mix that these figures only account for a small portion of the population as more used cars are sold to private buyers, and then they are starting to look at cam belt services and such and then the tables can be completely reversed. ie Getz has a cam belt at 90k, Astra @ 60k (IIRC same with Barina) whilst Fiesta is 170k &amp; Focus is 240k. Sorry but I just get p&#8217;d with reading half a&#8217;d surveys that don&#8217;t give the correct info to the greater portion of the public who would really benefit from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSU811</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112832</link>
		<dc:creator>OSU811</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112832</guid>
		<description>Freddy is correct as resale is calculated as a percentage of the purchase cost. You will always loose more money on a car, the more you spend on one new. Because  for eg if you loose 40% on a $20,000 car, it is a much smaller amount than 40% of a  $50,000 car..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freddy is correct as resale is calculated as a percentage of the purchase cost. You will always loose more money on a car, the more you spend on one new. Because  for eg if you loose 40% on a $20,000 car, it is a much smaller amount than 40% of a  $50,000 car..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSU811</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21269/hyundai-scores-best-in-ownership-costs/comment-page-1/#comment-112831</link>
		<dc:creator>OSU811</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21269#comment-112831</guid>
		<description>it all comes back to the same old saying.. CHEAP things arnt good and GOOD things arnt cheap..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it all comes back to the same old saying.. CHEAP things arnt good and GOOD things arnt cheap..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
