<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama moves to limit US vehicle emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorro</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/#comment-112770</link>
		<dc:creator>Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21135#comment-112770</guid>
		<description>Yes, just to clarify, I was infact refering to solar panel&#039;s on the roof of your home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, just to clarify, I was infact refering to solar panel&#8217;s on the roof of your home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/#comment-112744</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21135#comment-112744</guid>
		<description>Ahh here we go again Richo. Authority on oil reserves now hey? You are quick to state &quot;simply not true&quot; so please provide some credible facts to support your statement. You yourself state &quot;scientists cannot accurately predict just how much oil is left&quot; so by your own argument you are suggesting perhaps there isn&#039;t much left because we don&#039;t know. A bit ironic don&#039;t you think?
I welcome your opinions but if you want to argue then you need to back them up with facts.
As to Zorro&#039;s statement about solar panels on your roof, did you ever consider he may have meant on your house roof?
This is certainly what I would be thinking. I could power my car from my own solar power system.
All I&#039;m suggesting is you change your language so you don&#039;t treat people like idiots.

Geni, electric cars will probably never be a fix all as they don&#039;t have the range and fast charge required for everyone. The do offer a good solution for most people who will not travel far on a daily basis. With concerns for batteries, they will be forced to recycle them. This will create new industry too so while it&#039;s not a perfect system, it can be made more efficient. As Joober said the technology should improve given a few years. Car companies put big research dollars into making their product better than their competitors. Another thing that excites me is new companies will enter the electric car market. More choice and more competition will in time make these cars more affordable.
Again I congratulate Obama for his initiatives in embracing the future and reducing oil consumption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh here we go again Richo. Authority on oil reserves now hey? You are quick to state &#8220;simply not true&#8221; so please provide some credible facts to support your statement. You yourself state &#8220;scientists cannot accurately predict just how much oil is left&#8221; so by your own argument you are suggesting perhaps there isn&#8217;t much left because we don&#8217;t know. A bit ironic don&#8217;t you think?<br />
I welcome your opinions but if you want to argue then you need to back them up with facts.<br />
As to Zorro&#8217;s statement about solar panels on your roof, did you ever consider he may have meant on your house roof?<br />
This is certainly what I would be thinking. I could power my car from my own solar power system.<br />
All I&#8217;m suggesting is you change your language so you don&#8217;t treat people like idiots.</p>
<p>Geni, electric cars will probably never be a fix all as they don&#8217;t have the range and fast charge required for everyone. The do offer a good solution for most people who will not travel far on a daily basis. With concerns for batteries, they will be forced to recycle them. This will create new industry too so while it&#8217;s not a perfect system, it can be made more efficient. As Joober said the technology should improve given a few years. Car companies put big research dollars into making their product better than their competitors. Another thing that excites me is new companies will enter the electric car market. More choice and more competition will in time make these cars more affordable.<br />
Again I congratulate Obama for his initiatives in embracing the future and reducing oil consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geni</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/#comment-112734</link>
		<dc:creator>geni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21135#comment-112734</guid>
		<description>Joober, a lot of people say that, however batteries aren&#039;t some new technology on the beginning of the development curve. They are an older technology than petrol engines, and while they have improved many fold in the last century, they are very mature technology. Its not like we&#039;ve only just started using batteries and electric motors after all, its only we&#039;ve just re-discovered their use for electric cars. Industry has created the necessary demand for high capacity, low weight batteries and high power electric motors for the last century to ensure companies have thrown a lot of money into their development. 

As a result, they simply won&#039;t follow the same development curve that the combustion motor has done over the last 50 years. I&#039;m not boo-hooing electric cars, I&#039;m boo-hooing plugin electrics that rely heavily or entirely on a big battery pack as &#039;the final solution&#039; to diminishing oil availability. It can&#039;t be, because the car became so popular because it evolved to suit the lifestyles of everyone. Thus any future solution must do the same, hence why we still need hybrids, we still need fuel cell powered cars, and a few plugin electrics. 

But as i said, even if we all get electric cars, thats just the small shriveled fruit on the top of the tree called sustainability which is what we are aiming for. It doesn&#039;t make sense to be putting so much effort into getting that, whilst ignoring the big, juicy easy to reach fruit that for some reason we just leave dangling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joober, a lot of people say that, however batteries aren&#8217;t some new technology on the beginning of the development curve. They are an older technology than petrol engines, and while they have improved many fold in the last century, they are very mature technology. Its not like we&#8217;ve only just started using batteries and electric motors after all, its only we&#8217;ve just re-discovered their use for electric cars. Industry has created the necessary demand for high capacity, low weight batteries and high power electric motors for the last century to ensure companies have thrown a lot of money into their development. </p>
<p>As a result, they simply won&#8217;t follow the same development curve that the combustion motor has done over the last 50 years. I&#8217;m not boo-hooing electric cars, I&#8217;m boo-hooing plugin electrics that rely heavily or entirely on a big battery pack as &#8216;the final solution&#8217; to diminishing oil availability. It can&#8217;t be, because the car became so popular because it evolved to suit the lifestyles of everyone. Thus any future solution must do the same, hence why we still need hybrids, we still need fuel cell powered cars, and a few plugin electrics. </p>
<p>But as i said, even if we all get electric cars, thats just the small shriveled fruit on the top of the tree called sustainability which is what we are aiming for. It doesn&#8217;t make sense to be putting so much effort into getting that, whilst ignoring the big, juicy easy to reach fruit that for some reason we just leave dangling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joober</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/#comment-112718</link>
		<dc:creator>Joober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21135#comment-112718</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I think what SamR was saying is that people buy extravagant &#039;big fancy&#039; cars over a cheap realiable one, not just cars in general. 

and Geni - regarding electric cars, note this, how efficient were Petrol cars 50yrs ago?, now picture an electric car in the same trend, give it time and we&#039;ll get to a point where electric or any other alternative fuels become as efficient and effective if not better. And yes it is a definate solution, oil is a finite resource so going electric or alternative is a must, maybe not today or tomorrow but eventually...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I think what SamR was saying is that people buy extravagant &#8216;big fancy&#8217; cars over a cheap realiable one, not just cars in general. </p>
<p>and Geni &#8211; regarding electric cars, note this, how efficient were Petrol cars 50yrs ago?, now picture an electric car in the same trend, give it time and we&#8217;ll get to a point where electric or any other alternative fuels become as efficient and effective if not better. And yes it is a definate solution, oil is a finite resource so going electric or alternative is a must, maybe not today or tomorrow but eventually&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geni</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/#comment-112712</link>
		<dc:creator>geni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21135#comment-112712</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t make it right though SamR, all it does is distract people from what we really need to do for the next few decades, until one day we&#039;ll all be driving electric vehicles with their inherent compromises and realise &#039;hey, the environment is still getting screwed&#039;. And I don&#039;t buy the &#039;car is an useless luxury&#039; argument, once it was, but society as we have it today wouldn&#039;t be possible without it. Sure, public transport in cities should be good enough to replace the need for a car for a lot of people (it isn&#039;t though, and won&#039;t ever be whilst we continue to have state governments that can only look as far as the next election). I am a car enthusiast (which may seem hypocritical) however my main point is why are we wasting so much time trying to pick the high up small fruit when we have nice big ones in close reach? I&#039;m not a communist that thinks we should only drive cars that have 1L engines and are as exciting as sanding floorboards. If someone really wants a powerful car and changes other aspects of his/her lifestyle to compensate, then good on them, if they can continue to afford petrol. If someone drives a prius but insists on having their house set at 32C during the wintertime, then same thing. But forcing car manufacturers to dramatically increase fuel efficiency as our only answer to reducing our environmental footprint is ridiculous and counter productive, because if people are satisfied with that as an answer, then we&#039;re stuffed, basically.

Seems that at the moment, CO2 and global warming have overshadowed the original goal of sustainability. CO2 is but a small part, and we are not even looking at the whole of that small part at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t make it right though SamR, all it does is distract people from what we really need to do for the next few decades, until one day we&#8217;ll all be driving electric vehicles with their inherent compromises and realise &#8216;hey, the environment is still getting screwed&#8217;. And I don&#8217;t buy the &#8216;car is an useless luxury&#8217; argument, once it was, but society as we have it today wouldn&#8217;t be possible without it. Sure, public transport in cities should be good enough to replace the need for a car for a lot of people (it isn&#8217;t though, and won&#8217;t ever be whilst we continue to have state governments that can only look as far as the next election). I am a car enthusiast (which may seem hypocritical) however my main point is why are we wasting so much time trying to pick the high up small fruit when we have nice big ones in close reach? I&#8217;m not a communist that thinks we should only drive cars that have 1L engines and are as exciting as sanding floorboards. If someone really wants a powerful car and changes other aspects of his/her lifestyle to compensate, then good on them, if they can continue to afford petrol. If someone drives a prius but insists on having their house set at 32C during the wintertime, then same thing. But forcing car manufacturers to dramatically increase fuel efficiency as our only answer to reducing our environmental footprint is ridiculous and counter productive, because if people are satisfied with that as an answer, then we&#8217;re stuffed, basically.</p>
<p>Seems that at the moment, CO2 and global warming have overshadowed the original goal of sustainability. CO2 is but a small part, and we are not even looking at the whole of that small part at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamR</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/#comment-112711</link>
		<dc:creator>SamR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21135#comment-112711</guid>
		<description>Geni, Cars are easy to attack to reduce foreign oil usage, balance of payments blowouts and even CO2.

Why?

Because cars big fancy cars are a WANT not a NEED. Some Bozo will come out and say I need an SUV to transport my HUGE boat or dancing stallions or to circumnavigate the globe. All those thing are not important to the well-being of the world, country or even personally. They are extravagant 20th century pleasures previously only the domain of Royalty.

Get over it, you do not need a turbo six litre sedan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geni, Cars are easy to attack to reduce foreign oil usage, balance of payments blowouts and even CO2.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Because cars big fancy cars are a WANT not a NEED. Some Bozo will come out and say I need an SUV to transport my HUGE boat or dancing stallions or to circumnavigate the globe. All those thing are not important to the well-being of the world, country or even personally. They are extravagant 20th century pleasures previously only the domain of Royalty.</p>
<p>Get over it, you do not need a turbo six litre sedan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geni</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/#comment-112708</link>
		<dc:creator>geni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21135#comment-112708</guid>
		<description>What annoys me about initiatives like this is why the sole focus on car manufacturers? Where&#039;s the tax on the near thousands of coal powerplants that produce many more times CO2 compared to the entire vehicle fleet in the US? People all squeal when they&#039;re told the cost of producing green energy will increase their electricity bill 20%, but cheer when car manufacturers, hardly the most profitable companies in the world, are forced to increase efficiency by 40%. That accuse car manufacturers of environmental murder for producing the cars that CONSUMERS asked for, like huge SUV&#039;s, and then when they can&#039;t retool fast enough to compensate for an oil price that quadrupled in a year, say they are out of touch and start picketing factories. 

I&#039;m all for cleaning up our emissions as a society, however lets drop this torch and pitchforks lynching we are currently doing to car manufacturers because we need a scapegoat to hide our inability to face the fact that WE wanted huge SUVs and V8 powered everything. That demand triggered car manufacturers to produce those vehicles, and with the multi-year time period it takes to go from design to retooling to manufacture, car manufacturers simply can&#039;t respond to the sort of oil prices rises we saw last year.

To those who say plug-in electric cars are the answer, answer this. How environmentally friendly will it be to produce the battery packs for the near 60 million cars sold each year across the world? Small town runabouts like the volt have a 182kg battery pack, the tesla has a 500kg one. 60 million * 250kg average = 15 million tonnes of batteries each year for vehicles alone. Batteries aren&#039;t exactly daisies and butterflys to the environment, lithium ion batteries are very toxic. Electric cars are a part of the solution, but aren&#039;t THE solution. Never mind our antiquated suburban electricty grid infrastructure which was designed shortly after WW2 and struggles to handle the power draw of all our airconditioners and plasma tv&#039;s at the moment (just ask Victorian industry about the regular brownouts each summer). How well do you think they&#039;ll hold up when we start charging up a couple of million electric cars each day?

All I&#039;m saying is that if you really give a shit about CO2 emissions and the environment, get less rapped up in these symbolic but largely useless initiatives and  start demanding changes that will actually make a real difference. Real clean power, real lifestyle change to reduce energy consumption. Stop buying bottled water, insulate your roof, seal windowsills, install a solar hot water cylinder, recycle more. That&#039;ll do far more to help the environment than buying a new slightly more fuel efficient car every few years, when all that happens is the energy consumption of manufacture eats away the fuel and emission savings. 

But hey, thats too hard. Much easier to stone the car manufacturers and convince ourselves we&#039;re doing something, when really, we&#039;re just running away from the true problem, our consumption centric selves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What annoys me about initiatives like this is why the sole focus on car manufacturers? Where&#8217;s the tax on the near thousands of coal powerplants that produce many more times CO2 compared to the entire vehicle fleet in the US? People all squeal when they&#8217;re told the cost of producing green energy will increase their electricity bill 20%, but cheer when car manufacturers, hardly the most profitable companies in the world, are forced to increase efficiency by 40%. That accuse car manufacturers of environmental murder for producing the cars that CONSUMERS asked for, like huge SUV&#8217;s, and then when they can&#8217;t retool fast enough to compensate for an oil price that quadrupled in a year, say they are out of touch and start picketing factories. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for cleaning up our emissions as a society, however lets drop this torch and pitchforks lynching we are currently doing to car manufacturers because we need a scapegoat to hide our inability to face the fact that WE wanted huge SUVs and V8 powered everything. That demand triggered car manufacturers to produce those vehicles, and with the multi-year time period it takes to go from design to retooling to manufacture, car manufacturers simply can&#8217;t respond to the sort of oil prices rises we saw last year.</p>
<p>To those who say plug-in electric cars are the answer, answer this. How environmentally friendly will it be to produce the battery packs for the near 60 million cars sold each year across the world? Small town runabouts like the volt have a 182kg battery pack, the tesla has a 500kg one. 60 million * 250kg average = 15 million tonnes of batteries each year for vehicles alone. Batteries aren&#8217;t exactly daisies and butterflys to the environment, lithium ion batteries are very toxic. Electric cars are a part of the solution, but aren&#8217;t THE solution. Never mind our antiquated suburban electricty grid infrastructure which was designed shortly after WW2 and struggles to handle the power draw of all our airconditioners and plasma tv&#8217;s at the moment (just ask Victorian industry about the regular brownouts each summer). How well do you think they&#8217;ll hold up when we start charging up a couple of million electric cars each day?</p>
<p>All I&#8217;m saying is that if you really give a shit about CO2 emissions and the environment, get less rapped up in these symbolic but largely useless initiatives and  start demanding changes that will actually make a real difference. Real clean power, real lifestyle change to reduce energy consumption. Stop buying bottled water, insulate your roof, seal windowsills, install a solar hot water cylinder, recycle more. That&#8217;ll do far more to help the environment than buying a new slightly more fuel efficient car every few years, when all that happens is the energy consumption of manufacture eats away the fuel and emission savings. </p>
<p>But hey, thats too hard. Much easier to stone the car manufacturers and convince ourselves we&#8217;re doing something, when really, we&#8217;re just running away from the true problem, our consumption centric selves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamR</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/#comment-112700</link>
		<dc:creator>SamR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21135#comment-112700</guid>
		<description>Andrew M, I disagree raising fuel costs is part of the answer.

Low fuel costs encourages truck freight instead of rail. It encourages air freight of items which should go by ship or not be sold internationally at all like food.

It also encourages diesel electric trains instead of electric.

Cut the crap about CO2 and just encourage people to drive fuel efficient cars or use public transport. There are lots of small cars fun to drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew M, I disagree raising fuel costs is part of the answer.</p>
<p>Low fuel costs encourages truck freight instead of rail. It encourages air freight of items which should go by ship or not be sold internationally at all like food.</p>
<p>It also encourages diesel electric trains instead of electric.</p>
<p>Cut the crap about CO2 and just encourage people to drive fuel efficient cars or use public transport. There are lots of small cars fun to drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/#comment-112684</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21135#comment-112684</guid>
		<description>SamR,
the annual fuel bill hardly registers come time to claim on those fuel receipts in comparison to the other costs of running the vehicle for 12 months</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SamR,<br />
the annual fuel bill hardly registers come time to claim on those fuel receipts in comparison to the other costs of running the vehicle for 12 months</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/21135/obama-moves-to-limit-us-vehicle-emissions/#comment-112683</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/?p=21135#comment-112683</guid>
		<description>increasing fuel taxes is not the answer.

fuel goes up, so too does good and services.
Not everyone can ride a bike or train to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>increasing fuel taxes is not the answer.</p>
<p>fuel goes up, so too does good and services.<br />
Not everyone can ride a bike or train to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/300 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-12 05:08:26 -->
