Comments on: NAIAS – 2010 Toyota Camry

By: Frantelle

Frantelle — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:53:58 +0000

Unfortunately it’s still as bland as ever with nary a hint of style about it. Toyota’s may be reliable, but they are the most boring cars on the road.

By: Wheelnut

Wheelnut — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:14:43 +0000

Quote [Article]: The 2010 Camry and Camry Hybrid, which are scheduled to go on sale in the US in March, have an array of enhancements, inside and out, including exterior styling,

Yeah – changes that only a Trainspotter would be able to spot. Still looks like its been in used in an ANCrAP test.

If Toyota are in a partnership with Subaru why didn’t they try using one of Subarus potent Boxer engines from either the WRX or the Liberty?

By: o

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:53:03 +0000

It makes a world of difference to remove those door strips i dont like the taillights thougha dn i much prefer the new hybrid

By: Bret

Bret — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:54:38 +0000

AAA, adelaide – melb on less than one tank can be done by many cars, it’s nothing remarkable. Expect a Falcon to do it on about 60 Litres, a Diesal less (but a higher cost fuel).

By: AAA

AAA — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:11:59 +0000

Drove from Adelaide to Melb and back with less than 1 tank of fuel each way. Comfy car with good handling. Steering is a bit wooden though.

By: realcars

realcars — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:00:29 +0000

As long as it remains a good seller I doubt if u will see the better engine/gearbox.

In fairness the Mazda 6 does sip premium and is a smaller lighter car.

Hate the Camry nose cone.

By: Bret

Bret — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:53:04 +0000

Alan you may be correct on the engine as I think toyota use pretty much the same engine accross several vehicles, and I guess it’ll filter through in time, although I can see that being later rather than sooner.

By: Alan

Alan — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:06:21 +0000

Actually Bret, i think the 2.5 engine will be used here as well as Camry is a global car, so it would make more sense to use the same 2.5L 4 cylinder for all market. However i have doubts about the 6 speed auto being used here as well, seems cars sold here are more stingy with the level of standard equipement for the same price

By: Bret

Bret — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:24:33 +0000

Alan, the details are for the US market.
How much do you think we’ll get her in Aus other than the plastic grill update?
I’m doubting the 2.5 engine and 6 speed will be on the Aus menu.

By: Alan

Alan — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:39:41 +0000

Hopefully this upgraded 4 cylinder will have better fuel consumption. Like mentioned above, 9.9L/100km for a 4 cylinder family car is not acceptable. Rivals like Accord and Mazda 6 offers 4 cylinder engine of similar capacity yet with fuel consumption in the mid 8L/100km mark. With the 6 speed auto, hopefully Camry will get close to its rival for fuel consumption.

By: Simon

Simon — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:55:09 +0000

Agreed milobob. Fuel consumption is terrible. I remember how holden used that agains toyota when marketing their epica V6. It might be why the government is helping fund a camry hybrid.
I’m not sure what happened to the camry design-wise. I used to be a fan from 1990 – 2003. They were conservative, reliable and frugal. They made no statement apart from “value” and were no-nonsense motoring. Now they seem a bit confused. Trying to appeal to a young market with more aggressive styling which for mine, never works for a mid-sized family car that has no performance inclination.

By: milobob

milobob — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:43:19 +0000

I always thought we (Aus) were behind when it came to car models. Looks like in this case it is not but I do believe the current 2.4L (Which has been in service for a thousand years) needs an upgrade. The camry is still sipping 9.9L/100km even with its 5-speed auto (consumed the same with the 4-speed!) which by current standards isn’t acceptable.

By: Mossif Arasaft

Mossif Arasaft — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:02:43 +0000

hardly relevant for AUS. Talks about US trim levels, inc V6 (Aurion here) and about ESC standardization (Occurred. in 2007 here).