2013 Mazda MX-5 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

2013 Mazda MX-5 Review

MAZDA MX-5

Pros: Looks; driving dynamics; road presence; fun factor; manual gearbox;,

Cons: Needs more oomph; noisy cabin; no Bluetooth connectivity or USB port; not all that different to predecessor

By Alborz Fallah
FIND DEALS

Price: $47,280 to $52,010

Our Rating:  

The second update to the third-generation Mazda MX-5 marks the final touches to the iconic roadster before an all-new generation hits the market in 2014.

The Mazda MX-5 has been around since 1989, and despite being on the market for more than two decades with essentially the same ‘lightweight fun convertible’ formula, it remains as exciting as ever.

The simple rear-wheel drive, front-engine open top philosophy has been a roaring success for the Hiroshima-based company, with the Mazda MX-5 having won a ton of awards in its time and gaining the status as the best selling two-seater convertible sports car in the world, with over 900,000 sold to date.

Despite all its past glory, times are different now. Since the global financial crisis a few years ago, sales of two-seater convertibles have literally plummeted to lows not seen during the MX-5’s long history. Nonetheless, and in credit to its appeal, the MX-5 has continued to account for at least 50 per cent of its recently shrinking segment.

But what have the Japanese done to entice buyers into the 2013 Mazda MX-5? A lot more than its looks would have you believe. From the outside it’s not all that different. The happy smiling face has been given a talking to, making it more edgy up front and the front licence plate bracket has been repositioned on a new, thinner and more aerodynamic front bumper – now also featuring more flare.

New alloy wheel designs are available for the base model roadster coupe, which starts from $47,280 ($80 more than before). The rear is pretty much identical while the interior has seen a colour change that has removed the chrome highlights for a darker and more European look that enhances the cabin’s appeal. Nonetheless, so far as facelifts go the 2013 Mazda MX-5 is a mild update over its predecessor.

The four-cylinder 2.0-litre engine continues unchanged, pumping out 118kW of power and 188Nm of torque. Transmission choices remain as six-speed automatic or manual, with the automatic’s gearing ratios allowing it to reach maximum power output at 6,700rpm, 300rpm quicker than the manual.

If you’re wondering what the MX-5’s unique selling point is, and what exactly you get for a near $50,000 two-seater convertible, the answer is lots of fun. The MX-5 can currently get away with its price tag given it remains the most affordable rear-wheel-drive sports convertible on the market.

Its closest rival is the much more powerful and performance-focused Nissan 370Z and if you don’t mind which end the power goes to but still crave something fun, the Mini Roadster is also thrown in to the competitors mix.

There’s no doubt that cars like the rear-wheel-drive Toyota 86 and its Subaru BRZ twin are pushing the MX-5 on performance credentials and fun factor, but neither offers an open-top experience (though we are pretty sure they will soon).

So while Mazda continues to be the dominant player in the two-seater convertible segment, the Mazda MX-5 remains a favourite of ours. It provides two comfortable seats and a well-designed cabin that will set the scene of many fond memories that one can only make in a convertible.

For this update the folks at Mazda have worked extensively on improving the brake and accelerator feel for a refined driving experience. On the manual models the accelerator pedal is now able to distinguish between the initial hard push and the continued effort that follows. The idea is that by being able to distinguish these two inputs into separate categories, the MX-5 can better understand what the driver wants and deliver the required engine output.

On the road, it’s hard to know how much this has improved the driving feel over the previous model, but it’s pretty obvious that, despite the work, it’s still begging for more raw power and torque. The 118kW and 188Nm from the 2.0-litre engine do a good job of moving the MX-5’s 1167kg kerb weight (which is roughly 1kg less than before), but an extra 30kW and 50Nm of torque would turn the MX-5 into a proper sports car and put it in the same league of enjoyment for the enthusiasts as the 86 and BRZ.

Around the mountainous roads of outer Gold Coast, where we reviewed the Mazda MX-5, it’s fair to say the two-seater roadster is a sincerely enjoyable car to steer. Pushed hard into a corner it behaves predictably with little sign of understeer or oversteer.

The brakes, which have a revised vacuum brake booster that help stablise it before a corner, are impressive and showed no sign of fade despite heavy use. The electronic nanny controls hardly come into play unless you’ve really made a fool of yourself and the old-school hydraulic steering system provides ample feedback when needed.

It all adds up to be the sort of car you can own and drive as a daily commuter to and from work and then, at a press of a button, take the roof off and go for an adventure on the weekend. It’s more that you’re buying a lifestyle than a performance convertible when you own an MX-5.

It’s nowhere near as hardcore and precise as an 86/BRZ in its driving feel, but there’s something about it that makes it still more fun to push into a corner. Perhaps it’s the open-air experience or maybe the raw and simple engineering or even the tight chassis that feels unshakable around bends. Whatever that X-factor maybe, it’s pretty obvious the MX-5 has appeal that goes well beyond its power and torque rating and specification sheet.

It does have its downsides, though. The cabin can be rather noisy with the roof in place and the steering wheel has a bit of play dead on centre. Then there’s the lack of technological features, such as Bluetooth connectivity of any kind or the unavailability of a satellite navigation system even as an option, which is unfortunate for a car wearing a 2013 model year badge.

There’s also no USB port, so the best you’re going to get is an old-school AUX input that would do the 1990s proud. Unlike many modern convertibles, the Mazda MX-5 still relies on a manual locking component to its roof but it’s simple and takes little effort.

Overall the Mazda MX-5 is a fantastic car. It’s starting to show its age, particularly on the technological front, but it remains as the most affordable (and most fun) rear-wheel-drive sports car convertible on the market.

If you’ve always wanted to own one and appreciate the look of the current shape, there’s never been a better time. This update puts the final engineering and cosmetic touches on the best MX-5 to date.

Mazda MX-5 Pricing

Mazda MX-5 Roadster Coupe 6-sp manual transmission $47,280
Mazda MX-5 Roadster Coupe 6-sp automatic transmission $49,405
Mazda MX-5 Roadster Coupe Sports 6-sp manual transmission $49,885
Mazda MX-5 Roadster Coupe Sports 6-sp automatic transmission $52,010

Read: 2013 Mazda MX-5 specifications and equipement level


 

Owner reviews of the MAZDA MX-5

Write a review for the MAZDA MX-5

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

  • pixxxels

    They’re going to have to cut at least $10-12k off the price if they don’t want to be obliterated in the sales-race by the 86/BRZ. If they won’t cut the price, then they need to add the 3 MPS’s turbo engine, which would at least differentiate the Miata from the underpowered Toybaru twins a little. 

    The MX-5 may still be a darling of car enthusiasts and journalists, but only because it never really had any competition in the driving purity sector. It can’t survive on good-will alone at this price when there is cheaper and arguably better products out there. 

    Also the facelift just looks strange. 

    • Huwtm

      Lets face it, things have moved and are moving backwards with the cost of cars, I think the world is finally passing it by. It needs to loose more than 15K. With the bottom Toyota 86 at 29K This has to be in the same ball park or it’s sales are just going to stop. 

      As for turbos, there are articles out there saying that the BRZ, will be out next year or the year after with all the trimmings to keep you puffer fans happy. Instantly the MX5 is behind the eight ball again. They need to price it ahead of the 86/BRZ if they want their affordable sports car to drag back some sales from the over flow of the Toybaru

      • Huwtm

        Forgot to mention the Mini roadster for the 21st century fashion conscious. 37 K and change. The 45 to 50 plus K is looking really bad. That’s why no one is buying them. Up there there is a lot better to be had for the money and also below.

        And lets face it, the MX 5 was a fashion victim car which actually drove well. Now the fashion victims have moved onto greener pastures and other trends.

        • Jp

          The Golf Gti is the new “fashion victim” car IMO. 

          Not to take anything away from its on-road credentials, but because a VW badge is viewed as “Euro luxury” in Australia, the hipsters have flocked to it. 

    • amlohac

      I honestly doubt Mazda are targeting the 86/brz with this car.

      The customer base for both vehicles would be a bit different. The mx-5 is more aimed at the older customer base, those with more disposable income, and want the feel the wind in their (balding) hair. The 86/brz is aimed at a younger audience, generally with not as much cash, so it would make sense for that car to be a lot cheaper.

  • bruzzer

    good luck… Mazda in recent times is aiming to be a BMW
    $50,000 for this car is way too much

  • gt86.com.au

    bye bye mx-5 hello 86 & BRZ :D

  • Homer

    Alborz it’s a 2 litre not 1.8. Owned one of these for 3 years and yes it does a lot of nice things but I would never recommend one as, put plain and simple, it’s gutless. You have to row the thing so hard to get some fun out it, it becomes tiresome. Drop a turbo 2 litre from VW, MPS or Renault into it and you’d have a real sports car. Purely from a manufacturing perspective why does this cost so much more than a Luxury Mazda 6?

    • amlohac

      Maybe dropping the MPS engine in it would upset the driving dynamics a little. Shift the perfect 50/50 weight ratio. Mazda have always said that car is and never has been about raw straight line speed.

      Mind you, i’d LOVE to see that engine in one.

  • Gavin

    Can someone please explain how modified gearing ratios in the auto box allow the engine to achieve “maximum power output 300rpm quicker than the manual”.

    This doesn’t seem all that logical to me.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Here are the gear ratios for reference:

      man/auto1st 3.709 / 3.538
      2nd 2.190 / 2.060
      3rd 1.536 / 1.404
      4th 1.177 / 1.000
      5th 1.000 / 0.713
      6th 0.832 / 0.582
      reverse 3.603 / 3.168
      final drive 3.727 / 4.100
      Chassis

  • AOK

    As an owner of a 2011 MX-5, the 2.0 if far from “gutless”..
    Again as usual ‘ignorance’ is rife if you have never owned an MX-5 particularly latest versions, you can not understand what “Car and Driver” as one means, MX-5′s have NEVER been about POWER, but learn what power to weight ratio means, this sports car has more than enough zip.
    Owners ‘who know’ have a permanent smile on their face…becasue they get it.

    Not many in used car lots…

    As for cost, yes it is pricey, BUT it also has a $6000 Power Retractable Hardtop, this is a ROADSTER not a Coupe….again a different sports car.

    The NC MX-5 has the same platform as the RX-8, almost all suspension parts are interchangeable
    by design.

    Funny how many owners come back for another every 5 years or so.
    Mine is superb, as is my 2009 RX-8.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      Thanks for your input, AOK. The MX-5 certainly a fun car to punt around and there’s a reason why it’s so popular. 

      • pixxxels

        It’s not really that popular anymore is it? They sell ~17 per month on average according to VFACTS. They only sold five in April.

        • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

          Yes, but as I said in the review, they still make up 50%+ of their direct segment. It’s not that the MX-5 is not popular so to speak, it’s that since the GFC fewer are buying convertibles. 

          • Huwtm

            I think you got it a little wrong, fewer are buying the MX5 because it is to expensive. It started out an affordable sports car. Now mazda have tried to plug the hole left by the RX 8. They are asking it to do something people are refusing to go along with.  It needs to be less that an 86/BRZ. What’s going to happen when the Astra drop top hits? It will be goodnight MX 5. 2 lt turbo, drop dead good looks, less compromise. It’s priced out of its market.  GFC has seen drop in prices, 86/BRZ to name but one and a half. Mazda have to meet the new pace setters or sign off on the MX 5, no matter how good it is in some areas.

          • pixxxels

            Yeah, good point. But its not really competing against the cars in the low-end 2-seat convertible segment (which i guess would just be the Mini Roadster; 370z and SLK at a stretch). These are fashion cars.

            Everyone knows what the MX-5 stands for – driving purity. Its competing for the customer who’s wants the no-frills, purest driving experience at the lowest cost.

            So, in reality, its competing with the BRZ and 86. And, you gotta admit, if Toyota and Subie had the supply, they’d be outselling the MX-5 at least 20:1 right now.

          • Huwtm

            They are already outselling by more than that aren’t they, if you take the orders into account.

          • Bryan

             It probably won’t be all that long before Hyundai offer a removable top of some sort on their turbo Velocitor(?) and that will really shake the small sports car market up!  Imagine a factory turbo ‘convertible’ that apparently goes really well for about thirty five grand…

          • Bryan

             I’m picturing a trans am or 300zx style glass targa top arrangement, that would look sweet!  Maybe I will put the idea to Hyundai and see what they say…

    • Zaccy16

      totally agree, its a driving icon, its got a rev happy nature and decent power but the fantastic handling and steering makes up for the moderate power levels

    • Golfmother

      Yes, not many on used lots , relative sold her old circa 1991 which was pretty tired in the first week end on car sales at a top price , sort after by all age groups

      Darn good drive .

      • Huwtm

        Again you know why that is, second hand even if priced high, still no where near 50K. I’d be buying pre loved to, Mazda have price themselves out of the market. 

      • Nasal Explorer

        *sought* after

  • fun

    Hard to justify 50k+ on the little Mazda when you can get a 120i convertible for $53k drive away. Sure the Mazda has the hardtop but the BMW has two kiddle/midget seats in the back.

  • Zaccy16

    I wonder if mazda could put the new skyactiv 2.5 that produces 138-140 kw, it might fit mounted north, south like the current 2.0, 140 kw would be very sufficient for such a light car

    • Dave W

      Of course it’ll fit. There’s a tuner in America that specialises in putting a V8 in their MX-5. Google “Monster Miata”.

    • 56th

      The crankshaft is balanced fro transverse mounting.  Then adding all that extra weight and power in front of the axle would make it understeer like a pig.

  • JamesB

    $47,280-52,010 – how not to sell an MX-5.

    It does not even have SkyActiv, let alone great power. Only the folding hardtop is a novelty here. There are certainly better buys around.

  • homer

    What a big rip off. Boycott Mazda! Let’s hope their sale volume plunges. Australian customers deserve fair price. F*** you Mazda.

    • Homer

      Intelligent comment homer…..not! As I am the original and real Homer how about you choose another name as I don’t want to be mistaken with you and your questionable comments.

  • Newbiejam

    Something tells me that it is not Mazda Japan’s fault. It is Mazda Australia’s fault – with the greedy CEO who makes millions sitting around drinking coffee all day. Then he says “yea 50k sounds about right for a MX5″

    • Newbiejam

      with about 30k profit to Mazda Australia alone. 

  • Baji

    I think people should remember that the NC mx5 started production in 2005, so it is a 7 year old design. Thats 7 years behind the BRZ/86. And yet the BRZ/86 aren’t a massive leap forward. The MX5 can still hold its own even being much older.

    With that said though, comapred to the BRZ/86 twins, it does appear very overpriced. HOWEVER having sat in an MX5 and the BRZ/86, the MX5 is a much nicer and classier place to be in. You can argue that being a sports car it doesn’t need to be flash/luxurious. But as an everyday drive, I’d prefer the MX5, as the twins just seem downright cheap in comparison.

    Perhaps mazda should have done a low spec stripped out version with cheaper materials, and kept the softtop and slashed thousands off the price. 

    I look forward to the next MX5, and i believe it will be back at the top when it eventually arrives, esp now that im sure mazda engineers will definitely be using the BRZ/86 as benchmarks. I do have worries that mazda may move the next MX5 up as a ‘premium’ product and distancing themselves from the low cost sports car market.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      The soft top made up less then three percent of sales, so clearly the price saving wasn’t worth it as customers wanted the hard top. 

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      The soft top made up less then three percent of sales, so clearly the price saving wasn’t worth it as customers wanted the hard top. 

  • BVravei

    it’s funny that those who cant afford the car is complaining about the price. News flash buddy if it’s too expensive for you and out of your budget that’s your problem not theirs

    • Huwtm

      The whole point of the story is, “is the price justified?” People in general are saying no it isn’t. That’s not only but in the real world where they are NOT selling, as good as they are because it is over priced compared to it’s competition..

  • Brian

    I’d be in tears parting even 30k for this.   Don’t know what Mazda is thinking. 

  • Byzon3

    $50k for a 2 seater mazda… umm no thanks. I like the mx5 but you’d have to have more money than sense to buy this.
    Way to much competetion as other readers have already mentioned.
    As example I may be sreatching a tad -  a used 370z roadster is a good benchmark… it has 245kw mx5 only has 118kw… 370z has more styling and has a better cabin feel and look along with better engine…
    This car would need to be at $30,000 mark to make a real impact as it does not come close to roadster above the $50,000… I would take a older Honda s2000 over a mx5 anyday
    So AOK & mx5 Owners please inform us why you have a permanent smiles on your face..? or what that just egg on it

  • Robb

    TW White in the UK have a 2.0 litre Tech Sport available for 23,000 pounds driveaway – equivalent to 35,000 aus dollars. How come the price difference is much less with the Mazda 2 & 3? Overpriced 15k.

    • Huwtm

      GREED!!!