2009 Mitsubishi Pajero First Steer | Car Advice

Car Advice

2009 Mitsubishi Pajero First Steer

By Alborz Fallah |

The big news in the 2009 Mitsubishi NT Pajero is the heavily revised version of the 3.2-litre diesel engine now fitted to the vehicle and we can set the record straight, it is quieter, but then it would need to be.

pajero-front.jpg

- David Twomey

The previous diesel engine sounded more like a chaff cutter than an engine and was a serious drawback to what was otherwise a very good medium SUV.

However, for 2009 Mitsubishi has concentrated on improving the diesel power train and has also revised its model line-up, taking the range from three to five models, so that it can match arch-rival Toyota Prado spec-for-spec.

At yesterday’s brief media launch of the NT Pajero we were only able to drive a VRX model over a reasonably short drive route but it was immediately obvious that considerable work had been done on the diesel engine.

exceed-rear.jpg

The petrol engine cars retain the 3.8-litre, V6, SOHC, 24-valve engine with MIVEC (Mitsubishi’s variable valve timing), introduced with the NS model in 2006, which produces 184kW at 6000rpm and 329Nm at 2750rpm.

excered-interior.jpg

While the diesel gets a new AISIN five-speed auto with the sports-mode the petrol car retains the previous automatic transmission and both models will also offer a five-speed manual transmission.

Mitsubishi has also spent quite a bit of effort on improving quietness in the cabin of the latest Pajero and after driving the vehicle on both tarmac and gravel roads we would have to say they have achieved this.

exceed-nose.jpg

There’s a definite new level of refinement in the Pajero, but much of that is due to the fact that the harsh engine noise from the diesel has been substantially reduced.

On the road we found the Pajero was, well very much like a Pajero, competent and confident although the power steering had a certain vagueness to it that left you feeling a little unsure about just where the front wheels were pointing at times.

iexceed-wheel.jpg

Just how much difference the engine and NVH upgrades really make to the vehicle will have to wait until we have the chance to spend more time in the driver’s seat as about two hours is not enough time to make a full evaluation.

The new model has an increased towing capacity, with the previous model’s 2500 kilogram limited increased to 3000kg.

Next Page…

Mitsubishi’s product manager Tomm Pitman, made it clear that the major aim for this revised Pajero is to tackle the Toyota Prado on all fronts.

To that end the model range has been revised and two models previously dropped from the range, the GL and the GLS, are back.

gl-front.jpg

The GL is an entry level, plain-Jane, Pajero aimed at fleet and corporate buyers, who want a five-seat vehicle with plenty of rear load space. All other models are offered with seven-seat configuration.

However, like the entire Pajero range, it doesn’t scrimp on safety equipment, offering dual airbags, stability control, ABS with Brake Assist and Electronic Brakeforce Distribution. Side and curtain airbags are an option, along with a rear diff lock.

gl-rear.jpg

The GLS, which is aimed squarely at family buyers, will offer a high level of specification and enable Mitsubishi to take on the Prado GXL, Toyota’s volume-seller in this market segment, head-to-head.

gls-front.jpg

“This is the model we are really targeting for sales growth as it is 70 percent of Toyota’s sales,” Mr Pitman said.
The new diesel engine, designated the 4M41, offers common-rail direct injection and has significantly higher power and torque outputs than the previous diesel.

gls-interior.jpg

Mr Pitman said this had been achieved through a variety of mechanical improvements, including new heads, and the use of a larger, variable-vane geometry turbocharger.

Next Page…

The new engine produces 147kW at 3800rpm and 441Nm at 2000rpm, which compares to the diesel engine in the NS Pajero which produced 125kW and 373Nm.

gls-side.jpg

That’s an enormous 18 percent increase in both power and torque over the outgoing diesel and as is the case with modern technology, more power and more torque also means better fuel economy, in this case a 13 percent improvement.

It also compares more than favourably with the diesel offered in the Prado, which produces 127kW and 410Nm.
Fuel efficiency has also been improved with the new engine using 8.2 litres per 100 kilometres, which compares to 9.2L/100km for both the NS Pajero and the current Toyota Prado.

Mr Pitman told CarAdvice that to promote a much quieter and more efficient mode of operation, the 4M41 has received significant modifications, including an adjustment to the injection system has improved combustion efficiency, the intake port to the cylinder head has been upgraded, a larger size variable geometry turbocharger has been adopted for enhanced power delivery and the swirl ratio and port form of the Swirl Control Valve has been modified.

gls-engine.jpg

He said an improved emission control system included upgrades to the airflow, intake air temperature and boost pressure sensors, and EGR valves and coolers. Mr Pitman added that the new diesel engine conformed to Euro4 emissions controls.

Mitsubishi offered a range of price comparisons for the revised Pajero model range that showed the NTY Pajero to be a much more favourable purchase proposition, especially given that Toyota has already said it will increase the price of its Prado range by about $2000 from January 1, 2009.

However, Mr Pitman also conceded that give current exchange rates Mitsubishi would struggle to hold its Pajero price much beyond the early part of next year.

gls-rear-detail.jpg

Mitsubishi expects the GLS to become the volume seller in its range, replacing the VRX, which has moved to a slightly higher specification and price range, at $66,490, between the GLS and the range topping Exceed at $74,790.

For full details of the new model line-up see our earlier story on the release of the 2009 NT Pajero, which goes on sale on December 26.

The 2009 model range is:
Mitsubishi Pajero GL
Mitsubishi Pajero GLX
Mitsubishi Pajero GLS
Mitsubishi Pajero VRX
Mitsubishi Pajero Exceed


 
  • Bret

    2009 model?
    This thing looks like it could easily be a 10+ year old design.

  • JEYKL & HYDE

    that’s good enough to make toyota dealers look over their shoulder…

  • FRUGAL_ONE

    Nice!

    This is more carlike than its main comp. the Prado

    Prado is superior off-road and has 180L tank for a huge range.

    Just buy a car! :-)

    Cheers

    F-0

  • HAL

    Agreed Bret. Nice package, level of finish looks impressive, but this model has been rehashed so many times it’s become quite stale. Like the Subaru Liberty – nice car and well ahead of it’s time when first released, but the fact Subaru are bringing out another facelift in 09 is quite disappointing, and frankly, boring.

  • Jimbo

    HAL, I guess it is a case of not fixing what isn’t broken.
    But then again why by a 2009 model when you can buy second hand and do just as well.

  • HAL

    Jimbo

    I guess I just think that motor companies can’t rest on their laurels for too long. Even a successful and popular design should only have a life expectancy of 5 to 6 years. That’s how quickly a design becomes stale IMO, particularly a popular one meaning you see heaps of them on the road everyday. Like the Mazda 6 for eg – beautiful and radical design (for the time when it was released in 02?), but now they’re just ho-hum. And the evidence of that is in the less than expected sales numbers Mazda are getting from the new 6 i.e. it’s simply not different enough to the prvious model. So the “ain’t broke so don’t fix it” mantra isn’t really applicable here I reckon, because us consumers are a fickle bunch and want something new and exciting every 5 minutes, let alone every 7-10 years with facelifts. Mitsubishi have had a good run with the Pajero, as has Subaru with the Liberty, but they both risk being left behind if they don’t keep challenging themselves and being innovative in their design departments. Just my opinion though.

  • Jimbo

    HAL

    The old saying just seems to fit here. I agree with you completely. They are just being lazy, because they perceive themselves to be making more money this way.
    In reality they are losing potential sales because why go for a old model Subaru (as good as they are) when you can go for a fresh new Mazda 6 etc.

  • HAL

    Jimbo

    Exactly. I’ve banged on about the new designs coming out of Ford and mazda on a couple of posts here today. I just hate boring, recycled designs, and when they recycle/rehash/update/facelift existing models numerous times it really is tiring, and as you say, lazy.

    But then I guess you have the other end of the spectrum with the likes of Holden, who seem to do a new Commodore every 10 minutes, then facelift it every 5. I’d be pissed if I was a Commodore buyer, the thing is superceded before you drive out of the driveway!

  • dlr1

    It is common for large 4×4′s (SUVs) to have a longer model cycle than passenger cars, but at 8 years old a completely new model is well overdue. But it still looks young compared to the now 11 year old GU Patrol (and it sits on a 20+ year old platform).

  • davie

    Consumers are a fickle bunch…

    I disagree that consumers should expect something new and exciting from manufacturers ever 5 minutes. This is an expectation that has got the US manufactureres into trouble as they have sought to refresh 2 year old cars.

    The latest Mazda3 is the same C1 chassis as the previous model. Why? Mazda believe the chassis is so good it doesnt need an expensive remake. Good on them.

  • Spitfire

    However, Mr Pitman also conceded that give current exchange rates Mitsubishi would struggle to hold its Pajero price much beyond the early part of next year.

    Typical sales talk. Memo Mr Pitman, there is a massive oversupply of vehicles in the world today, it is a buyers market.

  • trackdaze

    Got the NP TD and its no slouch in the torque deparment but i am wetting myself with the thought of having 147kw’s under toe.

    Whilst i agree with you spitfire on allot of it being salespitch. The Motor Co’s have now had enough time to adjust their production to the new reality. That mean’s prices will go up when all the 08 stock is cleared.

    If anyone remembers the late 80′s early 90′s when japanese car prices were through the roof will have an idea of where prices will go.

  • offiman

    First of all, this is first facelift on 4th gen pajero, so what is so bad whit it ? Yes nothing. Seconldy, in 4×4′s it is a biit difference than in passenger cars, they cant be totally rebuilt every 3 years if they want to keep their company up and survive. It is a bit difference whit passenger cars, which have basicly more customers.

    Land Rover Discovery 3′s new model will come in 2016, and it was released in 2003. Same whit Land Cruisers. 4×4′s are longer in production, because they arent sold as much.

    Also these cars buyers respect the style of 4×4′s, rather than Touaregs etc, which havent really been big success. They dont want that kind of revolutionary changes in every thin, which basicly makes offroad perfomance worse. Pajero’s buyers want this kind of car, which is great offroader and can tow trailers well, is realible.

    There will be new Pajero, but not yet.

  • Silver Streak

    At long last an upgraded diesel motor. I am an ex-Mitsubishi employee and I wouldn’t even think about buying a Pajero with that horrible noisy “chaff-cutter”, as was said, engine. It was terrible, I felt ashamed we were trying to sell a product like that to the public. As I said, I’m an ‘X’, like most of us that worked at the Tonsley Park plant are now, but I do take an interest in their current vehicles and this one may be worth taking a look and more importantly, a listen to.

  • http://rynoiinet.net.au Ryno

    Hi there, I have a question for the Pajero buffs. I have a 2004 Pajero Exceed. We purchased it second hand about 5 months ago. When we initially drove it a bit it had a clunking noise near the rear wheels area when applying brakes or slowing down. It was taken to Southside Mitsubishi and they returned it with no noise and the Caryard we purchased it from footed the bill. Unfortunately….it started this noise again recently and was increasing….so….we returned it to Southside again yesterday for a service and for them to look at the clunking under warranty. $172 dollars later (not including the service), we were told that they heard the noise, checked the appropriate areas and the noise was gone, BUT, as they didn’t not repair anything that we had to foot the bill because there wasn’t a warranty claim. So….has anyone else got comments on this clunking before it comes back for the third time.
    Cheers Ryno

  • Ken

    I just purchased brand new an 08 VRX Pajero 25th Anniversary..it’s the one with all the bling but not the Exceed wood-grain interior, the Exceed mags and funky headlights.
    This is a fantastic car. It exceeded all expectations…I don’t really much care what everyone else says, I’ve done the test drives, did the research, scratched my head a thousand times tossing up Prado v Pathfinder v Pajero and the Diesel Paj just had the massive edge. Take it from a consumer…someone that is not necessarily Mitsu loyal or anything…but someone that had to admit after all the looking…that the Pajero was a superior car to its competitors and worth putting money where the mouth was…
    It has amazing suburban/soft road comfort and grunty off-road performance. The 25th Anniversary Limited Edition is the one to get…don’t pay for the Exceed and get what you don’t need…
    The Diesel runs on the smell of a…you know…11l/100km is what I average. Like I said, I’m not a brand loyal consumer (ie I’m a Nissan man or a Toyota man or whatever crap people get into) and I’m not someone that throws 60k at crap cars…I took a loan out and it’s worth every cent plus the interest!
    Don’t listen to the rubbish, get yourself one. You won’t regret it.

  • Graeme

    It’s disappointing reading a lot of rubbish from self opinionated people. The same as wines, everything is related to personal taste and importantly most people are not influenced by no-hopers who love to hear their own voice.

    Like many, I do my homework before investing my hard-earned cash into anything. Disappointingly, had I have listened to the rubbish here I would not have test driven the new Exceed. Having owned Discoveries in the past, my last vehicle was an NP Exceed after having compared the market thoroughly.

    For drivability and off-road performance there was little to add in the form of options to improve. We’ve travelled the Canning Stock route, crossed the Simpson and frequent Fraser and Moreton on a regular basis and have never been let down. In fact, having personally snatched 2 Prado’s, a Pathfinder and numerous Subaru’s from the soft stuff it’s clear that the problem lies with the nut behind the wheel.

    I have only just collected my 09 NT Diesel Exceed and am glad that I did run comparisons again. Guess what? The Pajero still stacked up the best value for money and one of the most competent available with grunt to spare.

    Get out and try one for yourself.

  • wayne

    I am not a weekender recreational driver. Some of the comments I read about Mitsubishi are far from true. I live in a remote region of the NT. I have been a devoted Mitsubishi owner for some-time. I currently own a 2005 Triton V6 before 2.8 Pajero. Yes there is room for improvements like any 4wd. Getting there and back time after time is important. I will be happly up grading to the 2009 Mitsubishi 3.2 Pajero shortly and yes I have pulled out of the sand and mud plently of makes and models. If you want a mobile phone near your side stick to the seal roads and coffee bars.

  • Cruisin

    Can anyone advise of the service intervals/costs of the Paj?
    Hidden expenses?
    Cheers.

  • Blinky Bill

    I’m very interested in the Pajero NT diesel. I live where roads are rough & creeks can turn into rivers thanks to high rainfall. I’ve read and tested the Pajero and it’s hard for me to see anything offering better value, comfort, warranty, economy, twoing capacity, safety, etc.

    All that’s left is costs to service.

    So can someone please answer the question asked by Cruisin (Aug 22nd 09)? Please!!!

  • Dave

    I remember reading the reviews about the 200seriers hen they come out, stuff like dust getting into the cabin in dusty condition and the transmission not knowing what gear to stay in on the highway, its a machine and that’s that, there are always going to be negative stuff about most reviews, after researching for many months online and buying the 4×4 mags i have made my decision to go for a NT demo exceed this week, I like the shape no matter how old she might be, the warranty gives me the best peace of mind, and to top it off 441nm that should be perfect for what i want to do.
    Value for money there was no comparison, lets see over the next 2 years how this upgraded version goes a other new models come out in $80 to $120K price range my buy driveway for $62K with tow ball and extras seems great value to me.
    With many extras that can be fitted, long range tanks, etc, i cant see any dramas for later mods or extras.
    This is my first real 4×4 after having a 80`s jackaroo, 2 v6 ford escapes, so im a newbie to this, many of my friends have patrols, prados, and landcruisers, so we gunna be a mixed bag.
    I have noticed in the last 12 months in the area we work in there seems to be more new pajeros getting round then prados, could be just me as im getting one though, but that’s the impression I get.
    Anyone who currently owns a pajero, or would like to follow me up on my thoughts of my new 4×4 down the track you can email me at bagsboy@hotmail.com and or facebook me.
    All the best to those looking to buy a new 4×4 we live in the best country to own one