BMW M135i Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

BMW M135i Review

BMW 1

Pros: Balance, grip and stopping ability all excellent; brilliant six-cylinder - refined, muscular, rev hungry and sounds great; suspension not overly firm; stealth looks

Cons: Tyre noise on coarse surfaces; cabin could look more special and noticeable hard plastics in places; far from the roomiest rear seat in the hatchback class

By Jez Spinks |
FIND DEALS

Price: $68,400

Our Rating:  

 

BMW M135i will be an unfamiliar badge as it joins the German car maker’s current line-up. Its origins, however, date back to the late 1970s.

The first time BMW used a sequence of the capital M and three numbers was the M535i of 1979, which was the first proper, road-focused offering from the company’s M performance division (following the M1 that was more of a race car) – and the precursor to the now-famous M5.

The BMW M135i isn’t a fully fledged M model. Instead it’s the first passenger car from BMW’s newly formed M Performance range, following the M50d X5 and X6 SUVs released earlier this year.

It’s the new range-topping version of the BMW 1 Series hatchback range, and will provide some consolation to those buyers who missed out on the 1 Series M Coupe that’s now discontinued.

If that 1M Coupe made the M badge more attainable than ever before at $99,900, then enthusiasts with more limited budgets are likely to be excited about the $68,400 price tag for the BMW M135i.

Or $72,400 if you want to swap the six-speed manual gearbox for the eight-speed auto version we sampled on the car’s local launch.

BMW is initially pitching the M135i against the Volkswagen Golf R, although the 188kW all-wheel-drive five-door is significantly cheaper at $49,990. In terms of price, more natural rivals will be both the upcoming – but still a fair way off – Audi S3 Sportback and Mercedes-Benz A45 AMG.

And with BMW stating there may never be a successor to the 1M, this hatch is set to be the only way to have some form of M badge on a 1 Series.

Yet while the M135i is more of a top-spec 1 Series hatchback rather than a proper M car like the 1M that essentially sat on M3 underpinnings, the new M Performance model isn’t far off the latter car’s power.


The BMW M135i’s single turbo 3.0-litre six-cylinder develops 235kW at 5800 revs, making it just 15kW shy of the twin-turbo six 1M Coupe. It’s also a match for maximum torque with 450Nm.

It’s also just as fast – providing you have the auto that was never an option on the 1M.

The BMW M135i will accelerate from 0-100km/h in just 4.9 seconds, taking a couple of tenths longer with the six-speed manual.

You won’t disbelieve those figures from the driver’s seat, either, because Munich’s five-door feels properly quick. With those 450 Newton metres riding along a plateau that runs from 1250 to 5000rpm, the M135i surges through the gears – with a touch of extra driver satisfaction if you use the paddle levers rather than leaving the auto to do its own thing.

The six-cylinder turbo loves to rev and is a joy to take to about 6000rpm before it’s worth changing up to garner more momentum. Acceleration is accompanied by a snarling soundtrack that is a treat to the ears, even if part of it is artificially produced to help it sound like the old non-turbo BMW sixes now sadly departed.

Speaking of which, throttle response isn’t quite as crisp or linear as the best versions of those atom six-cylinder BMWs, though the M135i is still almost (but not entirely) lag free.

Flicking the console switch from Comfort to Sport Plus brings the sharpest accelerator pedal and most aggressive shift mapping. You can also choose Eco Pro that dulls everything for the sake of fuel efficiency – which is 7.5L/100km officially in auto form and 8.0L/100km in manual – but is not for anyone who savours driving.

And this is a car for motorists who actively search for winding roads.

Cruise along in the BMW M135i and the supple ride is reminiscent of a Golf GTI, and this initially raises concerns that the car maker has gone to the other extreme of its hard-riding M cars despite its lowered, M-tuned suspension.

But fears are quickly alleviated when a sequence of corners arrives, because the M135i is terrifically poised and highly capable.

And its advantages as the only rear-wheel-drive hatchback in the world come to the fore.

Head into a corner at speed, and just as you think you may be reaching the point of understeer, the M135i remains beautifully balanced on its outer rear wheel, encouraging the driver to squeeze the accelerator harder to push out and on to the next bend.

There’s no torque steer to worry about, either, of course, and instead you’re afforded steering that is praiseworthy for its precision and weighting even if there isn’t the same level of feedback through the fingertips that you got from the previous 1 Series.

The M Sport brakes are endearingly progressive and you’ll also barely hear a protest from the 18-inch tyres – 2cm wider at the rear – which generate monumental amounts of grip.

Some driving enthusiasts might actually prefer a bit more movement from the M135i’s rear end – and there’s no M differential like the 1M – though drive the M135i hard and, even with the racey Sport Plus mode selected, the orange dash light of the stability control system is kept busy.

The BMW M135i may not be an M car but it’s certainly a Q-car – one of those classic wolf-in-sheep’s-clothing performance vehicles.

There’s certainly none of the visual theatre found on the mini-muscle-car 1M Coupe. Just unique alloy wheels, a 10mm-lower ride height and dual outer exhaust pipes the key differentiators from a 125i hatch.

Inside there’s an M badge on the steering wheel but little else to make the BMW M135i cabin look noticeably different to a regular 1 Series hatch.

That also means the same smart-looking presentation and usefully sized boot, though also the presence of some hard plastics that lower the overall perception of quality and the back seat that doesn’t offer as much legroom as the average front-wheel-drive hatch.

The BMW M135i is a bit cheeky to ask $4000 for an auto gearbox and $3500 for satellite navigation but is otherwise well specified – in addition to the M touches – with the likes of engine stop-start, bi-xenon headlights, rain-sensing wipers, leather upholstery, rear parking sensors, climate control, Bluetooth connectivity and a 6.5-inch colour screen.

When BMW announced it was introducing a new M Performance range, it was easy to be sceptical that the company was simply looking to cash-in on its fabled go-fast division with the potential to dilute the sub-brand.

But as proof that the existence of a halfway point between a regular BMW model and a full M-car is worthwhile, the BMW M135i is perfect.


 

Owner reviews of the BMW 1 Add a New Review

  • gt86.com.au

    Could be the best car in its class, could be the car of your dreams, but its just too ugly!
    and what about a LSD?
    ty

    • AndyGF

      If it had an LSD. It would be as fast as a 1M… Me personally I don’t like M differentials (electronically controlled) anyway, its much better to buy a M135i and fit your own Quaife LSD (helical LSD), fitting an LSD is pretty straight forward in a RWD car, diff being so accessible and all.

      Chris Harris did a pretty interesting review of this vs the RS3, and listen to that familiar but no-less amazing soundtrack of the straight six. And for almost half the money of a 1M, fitting a decent diff gives you a proper track weapon and sublime daily driver all in one.

      Its ugly I admit, but you needn’t look at it while you are driving… ;-)

      • 5reasonreviews.com

        Chris Harris review is great – cheers for that

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

    Looks like the headlights are upside down.

  • Blair Waldorf

    I’d gladly take one of these, in white, with a manual transmission and no options.

    • Chris

      And I would want the exact same

  • Wile E Coyote

    Not sure why they are comparing the 135i hatch to the 1M Coupe.
    A more close comparison (especially price) would be the 135i Coupe (it also has M monikers if you must have them) I prefer the 135i Coupe because I don’t need the extra space of the hatch and I think the Coupe looks better .The hatch looks too suburban for such awesome performance.

    • Wile E Coyote

      I like looking at diesel electric trains and noting them in a little book I do, yes

      • Wile E Coyote

        You must be a twain dwiver, a diesel one at that, to be drawn to such comments..
        If the real Wile E was asked to stand up you would need to ask your low brow HSV mates ( nothing against the high brow ones mind you) whether that was you or you the twain driver that should stand up… toot toot.
        Now here’s a challenge…. post something intelligent ,can’t wait .
        If you are short of ideas you can always ask me

      • Wile E Coyote

        You must be a twain dwiver, a diesel one at that, to be drawn to such comments..
        If the real Wile E was asked to stand up you would need to ask your low brow HSV mates ( nothing against the high brow ones mind you) whether that was you or you the twain driver that should stand up… toot toot.
        Now here’s a challenge…. post something intelligent ,can’t wait .
        If you are short of ideas you can always ask me

        • Garry Floppy

          Well said

      • Garry Floppy

        Interesting to read the other posts here 12 hours ago and its not took hard to work out you are the fake Wile E- meathead.And following on immediately below is a love note from me.moi

        • Golfmother

          EASY to pick gary floppy the brainless tool , back in your falcoon you little animal loving transfat .

  • Daniel

    It’s going to be a tough choice for premium hatch buyers! Most reviews I’m reading are saying the 1 Series is the best to drive by far, but most comments I’m reading are people saying how much they want an A Class or A3. I don’t think the 1 Series is ugly personally, but it’s definitely a bit awkward. But then if you see a new A Class side on, though not awkward, it definitely has strange proportions; the front is really big and chunky but from the A pillar backward it’s quite sleek and svelte. Still looks great, but it isn’t perfect either. And of course the A3 may be a little boring to some, but it supposedly has the highest quality interior of the three and it also has the best exterior proportions, even if they are a bit bland. It used to be a no brainer when the A Class was an MPV and the 1 Series hatch was a little dull to drive, now it’s a hard one. 

    • Harley

      So true. A year ago, A3 was probably an easy suggestion and no one would even think to buy an A Class, but now they’ve just all raised the bar and put out great cars. I guess the one good thing is that the consumer can’t possibly go wrong.

    • Zaccy16

      Yeah very tough choice, the styling of the 1 series is growing on me, i think its a bargain for $70,000! i would take this over a HSV anyday!

      • Zaccy16

        Just like I’d take men over womem

        • Wile E Coyote

          Spoken like a true HSV meathead

          • Golfmother

            Yes frair tuck , perfect pairing with garry floppy .

          • Golfmother

            Me and Zaccy are a pair although he caught me playing flirting with a VK driver running a drug deal in the Adelaide hills the other day, he was so so mad

        • twincharger

          Enough Zaccy16,we dont want to hear any more.AS for the BMA,typical high standard from BMW.

      • Shak

        Power to you, although i doubt anyone who was SERIOUSLY considering a new BMW hatchback would actually cross shop it with anything from HSV. They fulfil different roles for different people. 

      • Dominique Vøn Hütch

        …only if you don’t bother with the Sat Nav and the Auto and SAVE YOURSELF EIGHT AND A HALF GRAND WTF BMW??!?!

  • Dave W

    I have to say the RWD makes the 1 series very desireable for me, specially this M version, though I don’t really like the styling.

    • James Cortez

      Wrong wrong wrong. RWD sucks in the snow. Learn that!!

      • Dave W

        Mate, I think you’re rather lost. This is not an American website. I live in Sydney, AUSTRALIA. What do I care about snow?

        • James Cortez

          That’s not the point. In slippery, snowy, roads FWD beats RWD. Don’t tell me it never rains in Austraulia! I participate in this forum to give a neutral and unbias opinion about FWD vs RWD as I am a car enthusiast.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

            Yes, FWD is better in the snow. 
            However RWD vehicles are better balanced, put power down better, better for towing, easier to work on due to the orientation of the engine and aren’t limited as to the amount of power you can put through the wheels. FWD is good for econo-boxes because they’re cheaper to manufacture and allow for more interior room. F1 and virtually all serious road based race cars use RWD for good reason.

  • Robin_Graves

    Very nice car, just a little too bizarre looking.

  • MangeRover

    It would be great to know if this model has a dual mass flywheel.

  • charskin

    Why is this car so expensive in Oz? I’ve just ordered one. I was originally looking at getting a Golf R, which in the UK costs more than a M135i with 8 speed auto. My car with virtually every option you could possibly want translates to $54,306.

    • gt86.com.au

       because bmw is a rip off in aus ;)

    • Cbf

      protectionism ~ Luxury Car Tax

      • PoisonEagle

        How is this protectionism when local cars >$54k are affected in the same way?

        • CharlesB

          Protectionism in the strict import laws which govern that only a manufacturer can import vehicles. Effectively killing parrallel importing and meaning that the manufacturers hold a monopoly on the supply of cars into Australia and with a monopoly they charge what they want.

          Go and browse the Department of Infrastructures website and see if you can privately import a vehicle newer than 15 years of age. For the everyday punter there is zero chance!
           
          And to show things are getting worse they decided to recently cap the limit of personal imports on vehicles owned for over a year overseas to no more than 1 every 5 years.

  • Jack

    I own a 2008, 6spd manual 135i coupe, the only work done to it is a chip, filter and 265/35/18 tires at the rear. The car is running 280kw and 520nm torque and has been my daily driver since 2009, no problems, 78000 km’s and embarrassed everything from a C63 to a Maserati Gransport. My only complaint would be the harsh ride on Sydney’s F grade roads. BFYB the only thing that comes close (performance/$ wise) would be a HSV or FPV – personally, not my type of car. As usual, BMW have set the benchmark in the hot hatch segment, but it will be interesting to see how the S3 and new Golf R perform against it.

    • qikturbo

      If you check out Chris Harris’s YouTube Vid (M135i vs Audi RS3)you will most likely find your answer.

      • Jack

        Cheers mate, the RS3 in that video was built off the old A3 platform. The new S3/Golf R will
        be built off the new VAG group MQB architecture and from what I have read, it promises to have better balance and less weight, two issues which plagued the S3 and Golf R in the past. Also I’m sure they will be priced similarly when they are released. So will be interesting to see a comparison when they are released. That being said, I am
        not getting rid of my 135 anytime soon :)

  • jav

     I would get this over any holden or ford regardless of its looks as it is still a BMW and has amazing performance. By the way I drive a Scriocco R so it’s not a biased comment, just my real thoughts.

  • F1orce

    The main reason why this is much better than the ‘hot hatches’ is because this has 6-cylinders & is RWD

    Considering how the price difference is slim between this and the Golf R I would choose this easily.

    • Dave W

      Slim price difference? The manual Golf R is $50,000 while the manual M135i is $68,000. That’s before on-road cost. I guess if you’re wealthy enough the $18,000 difference can be considered slim.

    • James Cortez

      6 cylinders yes makes it better compared to four or five (actually it’s the extra displacement of 1 lt  compared to the golf, focus ST etc). RWD, you’re wrong! FWD gives much better road feel. 3 days before x’mas in 1982 my dad’s Ford Victoria slide and hit the snow bank on interstate 70 just past Colombus Ohio. Being RWD it had marginal road feel and unstable in the snow. Years later I drove a 1982 Buck skylark (FWD) and what a difference it was. FWD gives a better road feel and more steering feel as well as more stable in the snow. All you RWD fans wake up and learn.

      • Wile E Coyote

        James FWD and AWD for the mountains.Everywhere else RWD.

        • James Cortez

          Wile not really. Try testing FWD against RWD car in slippery, wet, snowy roads and you will realize that what I just say is true!!

      • F1orce

        Yeah I know you mean.. But FWD means torque steer which is what you are describing

        AWD is good, but most cars with AWD are actually FWD until loss of traction is detected and power is sent to all the wheels.

        RWD is just the better system. Bicycles have always been RWD etc

        It’s not good having the same wheels doing the steering and moving the subject.

        • Golfmother

          So F1 that counts out all toyota and hyundi/kia from your shopping list , pray tell us what you would buy .

      • Phil

        Oh dear.

        Who cares about your single experience from 1982? You do realise that was 30 years ago?

        You must be seriously deluded if you think a old Buick Skylark is better to drive than a new BMW M135i.

        • James Cortez

          Listen you stubborn a**, it doesn’t matter 30 – 20 or 10 years ago, FWD handles better in slippery, wet, snowy roads than RWD. I did not say Buick Skylark is better than 135i. I merely highlighted the difference in handling between Ford LTD (RWD) against Buick Skylark (FWD). It sounds like you have no common sense at all.

          • Phil

            Your common sense is to compare 30 year old Yank Tanks in a article about a brand new small BMW?

          • James Cortez

            Hey Airh**d, I compare RWD vs FWD 30 years ago and that rationale still holds up to present, I***t. Can’t you understand proper english?

  • Garrywhopper

    Great all round car

    • Golfmother

      Too bad you wouldn’t fit in it floppy .

      • Wile E Coyote

        or should that be Garryflaccid

  • Ugly

    ugly ugly ugly ugly x 11ty

  • R10RRK

    Please can someone help me ship my BMW M5 to Sydney from London. Any directions would be really helpful. 

  • Bob Jane II

    Hats off to them regarding the performace, but this car is just UGLY!!!

  • madmanhiker

    Seriously. Ugly.

  • bob

    This would be my next car if they offered it in 3 door down here. The 5 door is just too ugly looking. Shame it’s not offered.

    AC Schnitzer is about to release a body kit for it. With it, the 3 door looks amazing. Still stuck with the boxy rear lights though.