Proton S16 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Proton S16 Review

PROTON S16 FLX

Pros: Responsive engine that pulls well and is quiet; decent ride and handling; well laid out instrumentation and switchgear, reasonable interior and boot space

Cons: Noisy engine with CVT, long throw manual transmission, some cheap plastics used, unpleasant plastic steering wheel on GX model, no Bluetooth; 3-star safety rating.

By Anthony Crawford |
FIND DEALS

Price: $13,990 to $16,990

Our Rating:  

The Proton S16 FLX is the Malaysian manufacturer’s best-selling model in Australia, leaving showrooms at a rate of around 30 cars a month.

It was Australia’s cheapest car before the arrival of Chinese brand Chery with its J1 hatch, though the Proton S16 remains the most affordable sedan in the country.

Driveaway pricing for the most popular Proton starts at $13,990 for the GX manual variant – making for a standout sticker even in a competitive playing field that features eight other car manufacturers offering four-door city-size sedans.

We tested the S16 FLX entry-level GX with manual transmission and the range-topping GXR with CVT, which has a driveaway price of $16,990.

The S16 FLX facelift offers a number of style improvements over the previous version, including new front guards, bonnet, headlamps, grille, as well as front and rear bumpers, which are all more pronounced.

The S16 FLX also introduces side mirrors incorporating LED turn signals, rear LED combination lamps, front fog lights, newly designed alloy wheels.

The GXR adds boot-lid spoiler and leather upholstery.

Inside, the S16 boasts a new audio system with auxiliary and USB ports, but there’s no Bluetooth phone or music streaming function – no big surprise for a budget sedan at this price point.

Standard features across the Proton S16 range include all the basic mod cons, such as remote keyless entry and central locking, power windows (front only on GX), electrically operated door mirrors, reverse sensors, front fog lights, alloy wheels, air conditioning, alarm system and immobiliser.

The instrumentation, switchgear and general layout of the centre stack is clean and uncomplicated in the S16, and there are enough metal-look accents throughout the cockpit to make it feel like a civilised ride.

However, the Proton’s interior does fall flat in some areas.

The plastic steering wheel fitted to the GX models is cause enough for this reviewer to strongly favour the more expensive GXR model, which gets a multifunction leather-wrapped version that’s infinitely more tactile.

There are also too many nasty-looking hard plastics inside the S16, which cheapen the general feel of the cabin – although that doesn’t include the dashboard, which is wrapped in a more sophisticated patterned material.

The leather seats in the S16 GXR lack acceptable levels of bolstering for proper support of the torso, and the cushioning is too firm to ever be considered comfortable.

While the exterior styling with more curves and character is certainly an improvement over the previous iteration, it’s still an inescapably plain-looking car.

The same Campro (short for Cam Profiling) 1.6-litre four-cylinder petrol engine generating 80kW and 150Nm powers all Proton S16 FLX model variants.

Despite the perceived lack of grunt that these numbers might suggest, the S16 is actually quite perky in manual guise.

That’s no surprise, as this was the first engine to be co-developed by Proton and Lotus Engineering.

The Proton S16 FLX GX manual only weighs 1070kg, so there’s satisfactory throttle response from this engine even from low down in the rev range.

The standard five-speed manual transmission is smooth shifting, but it’s a long throw from one gear ratio to another compared with some rivals.

Despite peak torque arriving at 4000rpm the S16 FLX pulls well in all five forward gears.

Proton claim fuel-consumption of 6.2L/100km for the manual and 6.5L/100km for the CVT, but that’s using the recommended, and more expensive, 95 RON fuel.

Noise insulation is surprisingly good for a car in this segment (at least with the manual). Not so with the S16 FLX with CVT transmission, which is best described as unbearably noisy at times with inconsistent throttle response during mid-range acceleration.

Better than expected, though, is the S16’s hydraulic power steering. It’s weighty, responsive and provides decent levels of feedback through the steering wheel.

It’s not going to trouble a Ford Fiesta for dynamics, but the S16’s driving manners have been helped by engineering assistance from Proton-owned Lotus Engineering.

Turn-in is reasonably sharp and the S16 feels composed through bends, even when pushed.

It’s much the same story with ride – there’s a comfortable level of compliance built in to the McPherson Strut/Torsion Beam combination suspension that irons out the bumps well enough, while providing decent chassis control.

Braking in the Proton S16 is solid and is courtesy of ventilated front discs and drums on the rear.

Standard safety features across the S16 range include electronic stability control, anti-locking brakes, but only two airbags (dual-front) are fitted. It’s a major let down for the S16, which Proton says will be replaced late in 2014 with a new-generation car that will include additional airbags.

The Proton S16 was last crash-tested by ANCAP (Australian New car Assessment Program) in 2010 and gained a three-star rating without electronic stability control fitted.

It’s not perfect by any means, but from $13,990 (driveaway) the Proton S16 FLX is still a bargain. The closest sedan rival is the Holden Barina at $16,490 before on-road costs are added.

Other major players in the segment include the Hyundai Accent and Nissan Almera at $16,990 each, Ford Fiesta at $17,490, Honda City at $18,490, Kia Rio at $21,690 and finally, the Toyota Yaris at $18,190.

Owner reviews of the PROTON S16 FLX

Write a review for the PROTON S16 FLX

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

WE RECOMMEND YOU ALSO CONSIDER...

  • Andrew Fries

    3 years ago the rock bottom model of Hyundai Getz offered bluetooth streaming and run just fine on regular… all the while costing under 13k. Apparently we’ve made no progress whatsoever since then, if anything we are going backwards.

    • rfs1970

      No mate… I respectfully disagree…

      I just bought a nissan micra (ST-manual) and mate I have to say that I am pretty impressed:    a) The car has a nice design (althought I believe the previous model had a much better/funker look), 
          b) the fuel economy is very good (not amazing),     c) I paid 12.777K (drive-away)

      So yes… there are a lot of bad options currently available,
      but I still believe that we improved a lot in these last years…

    • Patrick

      This car is a death trap…

      • Anthony

         Hi there,

        Would you mind explaining that statement.

        Like we have said in the review, the S16 isn’t perfect – few cars are, but it has stability control, ABS brakes and dual front airbags. The last time the vehicle was tested it gained a three-star ANCAP safety rating (without ESP) so by definition, it’s better than three stars.

        • Jax

          Are you Anthony Crawford or an imposter ?

        • Amlohac

          Anthony, you would have to conceed that 3 stars is a fairly poor effort for a new car though right?

          • The Salesman

            Conciser the alternative. A used car (with 3 – 5 years or wear)  will not give you the same level of safety in this price range. 
            In addition. You will get new car warranty.
            For the money. This is brilliant value.   

          • Huwtm

            Salesman you are simply wrong, here’s an example, i30 ex company car around the same money maybe 20K on the clock, still got 4 years of factory warranty. I could go on but you get the point.

      • Zaccy16

        i agree, i would stay clear of this if it was me and buy a better made used car, eg used mazda 3?

    • Chevrons

      Though this seems to have some pretty good kit over and above the Getz and others as standard: alloys, reverse sensors and fog lights. Not bad the money. I wonder if Proton are offering this with the 5-year free servicing as they are with the Preve?

    • Zaccy16

      But the getz was a terrible terrible car, probably worse than this, we had to have one a few months ago when are car was getting fixed. It was the most refined car i had ever driven!

  • Damian

    You’d get one for the in-laws if you want a premature inheritance.

  • F1orce

    If I see anyone driving around in one of these then I’ll make sure to question them.

  • Antmindel

    A 10 year old Corolla is a WAY better buy…

    • peddy.d

      I was going to say the same thing! Though instead of 10 year old was going to say 3 year old, i personally wouldn’t buy a 10 year old corolla for 13k

    • Modern Man

      so a 10 year old corolla only has two airbags if you go for the higher models, has no stability control, no emergency brake assist etc, and lucky to even have abs is better?

      personally i would not buy one myself, but if i had to choose i would prefer to avoid an accident rather than have one in a 4 star rated car.

      Oh, and you get a real warranty not a dodgy aftermarket one.

      • Amlohac

        Yes but if you buy a proton, you get a dodgy car.

        • The Salesman

          I have been driving a Proton Satria for 10 years. Speaking from experience your statement is wrong.
          After 170,000 klms i can not report a single fault. 

  • pixxxels

    When it comes to this price bracket, I simply cannot understand why people don’t just buy used. You can get some damn good cars for $13k.  

    • JooberJCW

      Some people think of used cars as used pants, to some people the thought of whats been done in that car can turn off buying a new car. Theres also tax implications of leasing / salsac on a new car that can be used to some advantage.

  • Roger

    It looks like a 16 years old Nissan N15 pulsar

    • Darryl

      True, but right now Nissan don’t sell that, they (try to) sell the Almera. The S16 has a kind of timeless understated elegance compared to that device. Also I thought Ford stopped selling the sedan version of the Fiesta due to lack of interest. I guess because it too is very ungainly looking.

      • Modern Man

        Almera is bigger (and only just arriving now) the Pulsar is almost here again

        • Darryl

          Yes it is bigger I know, but CA have listed it as a competitor. The Pulsar is maybe a bit less ugly too. And Huwtm, I was damning it with faint praise, with just a hint of sarcasm perhaps?

          • Huwtm

            Fair enough, I should have realized because it was so outrageous.

      • Huwtm

        Timely understated elegance, are we looking at the same car? Here’s some news, boots are an American thing, according to a lot of US sites, the yanks don’t like hatch backs. Hard to understand why, but there you go. In Australia and Europe we seem to prefer a hatch, in a car this size especially, to a boot. Obviously much more versatile. Again as I said in another recent Proton story, they need to learn their market (that is OUR market) Sneaky sliding the front seats forward to do a brochure shot of the back seats foot room. Get real any reasonable hight driver will have their seat jammed against the back pew. Naughty CA.

        Again news for CA, there are a lot of people out there that prefer a three door in lots of car sizes but especially this size of car. If it’s designed well, and priced right, young and not so young will flock to it. For example, the original Civic, the Golf, the Mirage, to name a few. Character, style, prescenence!

        • Anthony

           I was hoping someone would make this point – this is precisely where this reviewer has the driver’s seat positioned, so no incorrect positioning of the seats here, sir.

          • Huwtm

            Mind if I ask how tall you are?

          • Anthony

             Of course not, 172cm. Wish I was taller.

          • Huwtm

            You should try sliding the seat all the way back where most of us will have it and then take your pics. (notice I haven’t commented on your disability)

  • Hi

    For such money, I would buy a proper used car.

  • NotTheStig

    No, no and no.  Second hand is a far better choice is this is your budget ceiling…

  • Phil

    No DCT?

    • Phil

      For shame, Proton.

  • Wile E Coyote

     3 stars plus ESP not good enough no matter the price

    • D Is For Drive

      Rated three stars BEFORE ESP was fitted, can’t you read?

  • Altezza

    Proton should’ve priced the S16 at a more attractive $9,990 driveaway for a base model and $11,990 max for better equipped model of S16.

  • Modern Man

    would love to know what people actually own and drive?

    as mentioned previously, i would probably not own one but once again, if i can avoid an accident (ESP etc.) then the 3 star saftey rating never comes into play.

    this is why people buy this sort of car over a used one. warranty is also another big factor.

    • Wile E Coyote

      ESP ,ABS brakes are irrelevant if you don’t see the other car.

      Don’t expect the 2 airbags to be enough to save you and the misses with the kids in the back say if you are rear ended at high speed.

      Well designed crumple zones count.

    • Huwtm

      Just  note, you can get some pretty recent cars, with all the safety gear, for this money with low Ks, 4 discs not two, and it goes on. Oh would be a bit bigger too, with more engine under the bonnet. Doesn’t have to be an old rust bucket to get into or below this price bracket.

      • Simon

        I am surprised drum brakes are still used.  Back in the day, my first car – a 1988 Nissan Pintara, had 4 wheels discs - it was the base GLi model.

        • Amlohac

          Drums on the rear isnt really a huge disadvantage, I’ve been told (could be malicous lies however) that drums are actually more effective than discs under certain circumstances. However they loose this effectivness much faster as they suffer horribly under hard braking due to the heat produced (they heat up quicker) . Most braking is done by the front two anyway. I’d assume your average proton buyer wont put the brakes under prolonged heavy stress.

          • Wile E Coyote

            Drums are initially better in deep water however this car is no way intended for river crossings.
            Otherwise the big advantage is cheaper cost .

  • Golfmother

    They obviously have no taste those tail lights were ripped of robins G6E falcoon .

  • Mike

    I had a Getz once, got a good deal on it and bought 5 door. It was the most uncomfortable car I’d ever driven in, with a stiff bouncy ride and not much foot room for the passenger. Have a new Cerato now and the difference is amazing, korean cars are improving all the time.

    • Huwtm

      You do realize that the Cerato, (undoubtedly a better car) is a third bigger than a Getz. Could explain the extra room. But i tried to sit in a Getz once and was just to tall. Felt totally cramped, no room for head or feet around the pedals or legs in general. Great for 5 foot girls. Or their male equivalent.

  • Amlohac

    Proton. The word sends shivvers down my spine. I honestly doubt they have ever made a decent car.

    Then again I am probably biased, as the hate I have for Proton is so engrained i’ll probably never change my view.

    3 stars for a “modern car” is really awful, and you really cant bring up the “oh but its cheap, you get what you pay for”, as there is the VW up!, and its very close in price.

  • D Is For Drive

    I owned the model before this, it was a great car and all the stuff you here about “oh you should have bought a second hand car” is nonsense, I paid $7000 for mine with trade (2000 subaru liberty) for a brand new car with 10kms on the clock, 3 years warranty and 24 hour roadside assistance. A used car couldn’t beat it.

    • Huwtm

      Again it could very easily. You just didn’t look hard enough. I gave an example above, so I wont waste space repeating it. The one important thing we need to remember, is we need people like you, so we end up with second hand cars to buy. Good luck with the Proton.

  • Guest

    Are these guys from Proton still living in 20th century? This looks horrible and is underpowered. Even old Hyundai Getz wasn’t this bad. At least Hyundai had guts to offer 5 year warranty. I would consider S16 if it was $10,990, no how about $9,990 or $8,990 or…or…never mind. Meh, I just realised no matter how cheap this one goes I don’t see I’m buying this one of rubbish.

  • Guest

    Are these guys from Proton still living in 20th century? This looks horrible and is underpowered. Even old Hyundai Getz wasn’t this bad. At least Hyundai had guts to offer 5 year warranty. I would consider S16 if it was $10,990, no how about $9,990 or $8,990 or…or…never mind. Meh, I just realised no matter how cheap this one goes I don’t see I’m buying this one of rubbish.

  • Jack

    It is a value for money car, can bring my golf set, groceries for a week, occasional getaway or luggage to the airport.