Land Rover Defender replacement remains on the backburner | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Land Rover Defender replacement remains on the backburner

LAND ROVER DEFENDER
By Anthony Crawford |
FIND DEALS

A new-generation Land Rover Defender is likely to remain on the backburner for the foreseeable future despite the fact the current utilitarian 4WD will fail to meet European pedestrian safety regulations from 2015.

Land Rover advanced design studio director Richard Woolley told CarAdvice there were significant design and engineering challenges to overcome before a new Defender could go into production.

“On one hand, we need to design a vehicle that is as capable off road as the current Land Rover Defender, and on the other, we need to satisfy strict new safety regulations with a modern interpretation of the ergonomically challenged Defender that will attract a much broader customer base,” Woolley said.

The current Land Rover Defender has been in production since 1991 but has not met US safety requirements since 1998.

Apart from meeting new safety regulations, the next Defender will also need to offer something of a dynamic revolution in terms of ride and handling, as well as a raft of modern electronic systems that enable the vehicle to be more urban-friendly for day-to-day use.

When the Indian-owned, UK-based company first showed the Land Rover DC100 and DC100 Sport concepts at the 2011 Frankfurt Motor Show it said an all-new Defender would need to hit 100,000 annual sales, with the US market to play a significant role in reaching that target.

While there was plenty of enthusiasm from the public and dealers alike for the DC100 concepts during a global roadshow, Land Rover purists weren’t convinced and the project seemingly ground to a halt.

Woolley could not confirm whether the new Defender would adopt any of the ground breaking off-road technologies that were highlighted in the DC100 – namely Terrain-i and Wade Aid – but indicated the Automatic Terrain Response that is new to the upcoming Range Rover would be a likely inclusion.


 

  • Zaccy16

    Very much needed update for better on road manners

    • Cup of Concrete

      No.. If you want that, buy a Discovery. The Defender is meant to be a tractor, leave it as that. The “i want better on road manners” idea is watering down every decent 4wd. Its a Land Rover, not a car. 

      • trololololol

        Unfortunately that mentality will confine the Defender to a sad and depressing grave…with all due respect.

        • Cup of Concrete

          Not necessarily, look at the JK Wrangler as a prime example. You see one around every corner these days. 

  • www.automobiliaforsale.co.uk

    Hi Land Rover, please  just get on with it !

  • MisterZed

    1991, maybe, but the design dates back to 1983.

    • Scott

      more like 1948 but that’s ok, it’s timeless. I do have to concede, the ergonomics are 1948 as well

  • MisterZed

    What model is the black one at the top? Do we get that one here in Australia?

    • Henry Toussaint

       I think that’s the Defender 90.

    • Nigeinperth

      60th Anniversary SVX Ltd Edition

  • trololololol

    C’mon Land rover! If jeep can do it, why can’t you guys???

  • Aquahead

    I think that if Land Rover had stayed inside the Ford family, there could have been an easy way to develop a completely new Defender, that kept with its utilitarian heritage and complied with the modern safety and emisions standards. It could have been built on the T6 chassis shortened (or using the Everest multilink rear suspension). It could have easily been another body style (or top hat) as the Mazda BT-50 is to the Ranger. It could have kept its unique body styel and even used its own alloy panels. The short and mid wheel base models could have had the multilink rear and the long wheel base the leaf springs from the Ranger as well.

  • Vanguard

    The DC100 should not take the Defender badge… they can call it the iGay or something similar.  The Defender may not meet pedestrian safety requirements, but hey, put a sign on the front that warns pedestrians to get out of the way and jump under a Toyota instead.  Is the Army going to have to buy rounded bubble cars so that when they drive them on the roads, people get deflected off safely?  Hell no.  It’s a box.  It will still be better being hit by a Defender than a Mack Truck or Volvo bus.  

    The only modification they should be forced to make is to give the driver a right arm rest and some more room from the pillar.  The rest is magic (even if it leaks).

    • http://www.facebook.com/james.derksen.7 James Derksen

       Just use tons of silicon to fill up the gaps and beef up the door seals. Then it’s not any worse than a wrangler.

      • Vanguard

        And it doesn’t overheat like a diesel Wrangler either (I’ve got one of them – can’t get up hills mid summer without the tranny overheating).