2013 Mazda 6 diesel to beat Camry Hybrid on fuel efficiency | CarAdvice

Car Advice

2013 Mazda 6 diesel to beat Camry Hybrid on fuel efficiency

MAZDA MAZDA6
By Jez Spinks |
FIND DEALS

The 2013 Mazda6 range will include a variant that is set to be more fuel efficient than the Toyota Camry Hybrid.

A ‘high power’ version of Mazda’s 2.2-litre turbo diesel that will form one of two engine choices for the Mazda6 in Australia will have an official European fuel rating of 4.5 litres per 100km.

The Australian figure is expected to be slightly higher based on local ADR testing but is still expected to be superior to the 5.2L/100km of Toyota’s petrol-electric Camry.

Mazda’s most frugal 6 uses a Prius hybrid-matching 3.9L/100km, though this ‘standard power’ diesel has not been selected for the Australian market.

The fuel consumption data is part of the final details released by Mazda to coincide with the public debut of the Mazda6 wagon at the 2012 Paris motor show.

The petrol alternative for Australian buyers is a 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol with 141kW of power and 256Nm of torque, and fuel use and emissions of 6.3L/100km and 148 grams of CO2 per kilometre respectively.

A six-speed automatic is the only transmission option for the petrol. The diesel, which debuted in the Mazda CX-5, has outputs of 129kW and 420Nm and is offered with a choice of the self-shifter that increases consumption to 4.8L/100km or a six-speed manual.

Both the 2.5 petrol and 2.2 diesel come standard with i-Eloop, which stands for ‘intelligent energy loop’ and incorporates a capacitor that stores electricity under deceleration and uses it to power areas such as the climate control and audio.

It works in conjunction with the 6’s iStop engine stop-start technology, allowing electrical components to be powered without sapping battery life when the engine is shut down.

The diesel manual and petrol auto versions of the new Mazda6 both accelerate from 0-100km/h in 7.8 seconds, says Mazda, with the diesel auto taking 8.4sec.

Mazda has been drip-feeding information on the Mazda6 in recent weeks, but the latest details also reveal all dimensions for both the sedan and wagon variants.

The important US market’s preference for large sedans means the Mazda6 wagon is actually shorter in both length and wheelbase than its four-door sibling.

The wagon is 65mm shorter than the 4865mm-long sedan, while the sedan’s 2830mm wheelbase boasts an extra 80mm between the front and rear axles.

Both models share a 1840mm width but the wagon is 30mm taller at 1480mm.

The wagon’s 522-litre boot has the edge over the 489 litres of the sedan’s boot, though the sedan actually has longer load lengths to both the rear seats and front seats.

The size of the new Mazda6 also makes it 130mm longer and 45mm wider than the outgoing model.

The 2013 Mazda6 utilises the SkyActiv platform of the CX-5 SUV that has proved popular in Australian since it launched in early 2012.

Mazda says the architecture has been “optimised for the longer, lower, lighter Mazda6”, adding that the front strut and rear multi-link suspension is lighter and stiffer than before.

A lighter yet stronger body sits over the platform, and the sedan’s shape yields a slippery drag coefficient of just 0.26cd. The wagon still has decent aerodynamics with 0.28cd.

Mazda is confident the new 6 will be better in almost every area compared with the old model, saying the third-generation mid-sizer brings more cabin space, improved handling and a quieter interior.

The company says it will also be its most advanced model yet, with a variety of driver assist technologies available that include radar cruise control, lane departure and blind spot warning systems, headlights than can peer around corners and switch automatically between high and low beam, and automatic braking functions that can operate from both 15-145km/h and 4-30km/h speed ranges to help avoid collisions if the driver has been distracted.

Mazda Australia isn’t releasing pricing for the new Mazda6 until closer to the model’s local launch in the first quarter of 2013.

Stay tuned to CarAdvice later next week for a review of the 2013 Mazda6.


 

  • james

    Performance is very decent (at least the 0-100km/h times are) and max torque is available at a very low RPM for a petrol engine.. I hope others will learn!

    Design…. I don’t particularly love though

    • Zaccy16

      Yeah performance sounds good! i like the look

      • DanielD

        Ok Zaccy settle down. I own two Mazda 6′s, but i don’t get as excited as you.

    • Sumpguard

      Agreed James. The design is yawn inducing. A step backwards from the current car.

      • Phunken

        I recon the current is a bit frumpy and bulgy compare to this Kodo styling with a more Mazda classical line like those from their past glory days of the 90s. There are more emotional detailings in the front that doesn’t look like a Peugeot. The surface language make it look less slab sided too.

      • matt

        “the design is yawn inducing”  lololol in real life i bet you sound like dame edna when you say it.. queen

        • Sumpguard

          …and I bet you spend all your days imagining what people in this blog look like. ….kid.

  • Able

    Well that pretty much guarantees the Aus-spec model to be auto-only as I doubt they’ll do the manual diesel again. Shame…

  • Dan

    mps in how many year? If at all?

  • Mark

    That’s a little confusing, ”
    A six-speed automatic is the only transmission option for the petrol ” and ”
    The diesel and petrol manual versions of the new Mazda6 both accelerate from 0-100km/h in 7.8 seconds, says Mazda, with the petrol auto taking 8.4sec” 
    Well which is it? Are we getting a diesel manual? Woo Hoo if we are, automatic and Zoom Zoom just don’t go together!

  • Zaccy16

    Sounds like a very impressive car and the medium segment should be very worried!

  • Zaccy16

    Who would buy a camry hybrid when they could buy this! 10 times better in looks and handling etc etc

    • Guest

      Stop it. You make me laugh.

      • Sumpguard

        You too?

        • Guest

          Your mother too,

  • Legnab

    Economy and darn good looks , mazda still do the best lookers out of asia .

    • Zaccy16

      Yeah! why would anyone buy the camry hybrid!

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

        Horses for courses. While I would agree with you most of the time go the 6, the Hybrid would be the better option if you did mostly stop-start city traffic. Remember diesel is generally speaking a dirtier fuel than petrol with a higher energy density, so using slightly less of it isn’t necessarily more efficient.

        • Zaccy16

          Stuff the environment, it wouldn’t make much difference over the Camry

        • Sydlocal

           If all I did was short distance/stop/start city driving I wouldn’t go anywhere near the diesel. Or any diesel with a DPF for that matter…

      • Latin Fish Names

        I would if the battery was not in the boot. Diesels have other issues.

  • Gimp

    More BS fuel consumption figures from Mazda. They quote 5.7L per 100km combined for the diesel CX-5 and owners cannot get anywhere near it!

    • AOK

      Most owners and reviewers are getting better than what Mazda says in the SA-G Gasoline engines, so I see no reason why it would not happen in the diesel.

      • AOK

        The same drive cycle conditions used by car makers must also be used by owners.

    • Mark

      I regularly get 5.6l/100km in my 2010 6 and I’m what could be described as an enthusiastic driver, best I have done is 4.8l/100km for a tank, about 1180km from memory. So I think the projected economy is possible.

    • Sydlocal

       Don’t forget that quoted figures are done to the same standard as every other manufacturer. It is not just BS figures from Mazda, it is from everyone else as well because all cars are tested under the same conditions. Hence why it is called an ADR test. Also, remember it is only a GUIDE to allow comparison with other cars so people can see how they compare under the same conditions…..

      Even then, less than 6L/100km is impressive for a car that is close in size to a VE Commodore (within 3cm in length)….

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

    This is a great all rounder and I’m starting to get used to the looks.

  • Tony

    will the 2.5L petrol end up in the CX5?  I dont want the complexity of the diesel, but the current 2L petrol CX5 is too painful, especially with a 6spd auto that only seems to use 2 gears, 1st and 6th…

  • dustonearth

    looks like a modern version of 626…

    • Phunken

      Thats what i was thinking… bought the 626 for one month to drive around temporary while my car was getting repair from a roo incident. Love the 626 ride composure and  stately look 20 years later. Mazda early 90s golden era is what the new design langauge is doing.

  • qikturbo

    I hope it does beat the Prius and Honda hybrids!
    Just to show them that current available technology and not re-inventing the wheel,in the case with Honda and it’s obsession with hybrids,can equal if not surpass the fuel economy of hybrids.

    • Latin Fish Names

      Ummm… A modern diesel uses a DPF, piezo electric injectors, high pressure fuel pump, needs special low sulphur oil. Pray nothing goes wrong ’cause the cost of repair is scary. Add to this that there is no warranty on the DPF and that you can’t drive in urban conditions for long without having to do a freeway run to regen the DPF.

  • Bjm88

    Australia is getting a less powerful petrol engine (138kW/250Nm)

    • Spook

       Because it is tuned to run on 91RON unleaded. The quoted 141kW/256Nm is based on PULP.

  • Sydlocal

    You can’t half tell the sedan was primarily designed for the US market and the wagon for the Euro market looking at the size diferences! Not bad fuel consumption considering this new Mazda6 in sedan form is a larger car than the Camry and is nearly as big as a VE Commodore. This or a Camry, let me think for a nano-second…..

    • Igomi Watabi

      hmm, I think it’s called perspective. It’s not small, it’s far away.

      • Sydlocal

        I presume you mean the “perspective” of the photo of the wagon compared to the photo of the sedan? If you read the article again you would see that they mentioned the wagon and the sedan are in fact different in length.

        To make it quicker and easier for you here is a “cut and paste” directly from the above article:
        “The important US market’s preference for large sedans means the Mazda6
        wagon is actually shorter in both length and wheelbase than its
        four-door sibling.” You can even see it if you study the rear door.

        So it is not just the difference of perspective of the photo, but also a real difference in size between the two models. However yes, the perspective of the wagon photo would emphasise the size difference even more through both angle of the wagon in the photo and the actual difference in length between the two. :-)

        • Huwtm

          Interesting point. Those dimensions also mean it is the same size as the Falcon and Commodore, so what’s with the midsize comment in the article. Nothing mid size about this car. I do like the looks though, but can see the Mondeo in it too. Again puts the Falcon on shaky ground with two cars in Fords line up, with the same or nearly the same dimensions.

  • Sydlocal

    Wouldn’t be hard having a quieter interior than any previous Mazda6! At least they have finally seen the light and fitted proper rear air vents….

    • matt

      if you hate it that much… bugger off, why you feel the need to comment 50 times about a car you seem to have something personal against, is beyond some normal people

  • http://www.ozmazda.com/ Dave

    Oh my god Mazda yo going to offer a manual diesel…..wonders never cease….now offer a diesel manual in the CX5 and more people might be happier…
    The new 6 looks fantastic….

    • Sydlocal

      What do you mean wonders never cease Dave? Up until the CX5 a manual diesel was all you could get in all of Mazda’s diesel passenger cars/SUVs. LOL!
      They get blasted for not offering an auto with the diesel with the older MZR-CD, now they are getting blasted for not offering a manual with the new one. Damned if they do, damned if they don’t. As the saying goes you can never satisfy all the people all of the time!

      PS: I agree though, they should offer both transmissions. Depends on the demand for the manual I guess as the non-car-enthusiasts (ie not us and the majority of the buying public) in this country prefer automatics. The same could be said for the local manufacturers etc as how many of the “non-sporting” versions of the Commodore/Falcon/Camry/Aurion are available with a manual? Just as well then that the most modern autos are actually pretty good ie the ZF in the Falcon and the skyactiv auto of Mazda’s. Still not as good as a manual though when driving on your favorite twisty road!

      • Zaccy16

        Yeah, people are never happy, first they were upset the the mazda 3 mzr-cd, Mazda 6 mzr-cd and cx7 mzr-cd didn’t have autos and now people are upset that theres no manual!

      • Phunken

        70 of the population drives auto so it might be a good idea to do so. Thats how many euro don’t do well here cos they only offer some varient manual only.

        • Phunken

          *70%

        • Sydlocal

           That is part of the reason why the MXR-CD was manual only as their primary market was Europe and since they like manuals they didn’t develop an auto for it.

      • http://www.ozmazda.com/ Dave

        Well Mazda didnt have an auto strong enough for the old school diesels but like our Yanky cuzins we are all getting lazy and want bloody auto’s….I’m shocked that Mazda will offer a manual as I thought they went soft because of the whingers wanting to steer a car and not drive it. I have driven plenty of DSG and yuppie autos but give me a manual anyday…..and yes I use to drive from Guilford to Brookvale everyday for work in the bloody sydney traffic in a manual and never once complained….if they offer both for choice there wouldn’t be any complaints and as for 70% Phunken if this is correct it shows that Aussies are becoming bloody lazy drivers….

  • Luke Brinsmead

    I hope I see more of these in Brisbane than the ubiquitous Camry.

  • ABCDEFG

    Keep in mind that where I am at, diesel costs 10% more than petrol. Toyota’s $130 or $170 per service vs Mazda’s $560. Diesel costs more to service and shorter intervals. Also check out “diesel run away” on youtube.

  • Latin Fish Names

    If it uses a DPF that is not covered by warranty and costs 000s to replace… No thanks!

  • Yankee

    wacky aussie comments, but funny all the same

  • http://www.wrong-fuel-recovery.co.uk/index.php/Main/DieselInPetrol diesel in a petrol car

    I have found this information.This post is really helpful for us. i certainly love this website, keep on it. really happy to found that.