Lutz: GM not losing US$50,000 on every Volt it makes | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Lutz: GM not losing US$50,000 on every Volt it makes

HOLDEN -1
By Tim Beissmann
FIND DEALS

Former General Motors executive Bob Lutz has defended the brand’s Chevrolet/Holden Volt plug-in hybrid vehicle against claims that the manufacturer loses almost US$50,000 ($47,000) on each one it produces.

Lutz’s remarks were in response to a Reuters report published earlier this week, which claimed each US$39,995 ($38,300) Volt costs up to US$89,000 ($85,300) to build.

Lutz says Reuters’ figure, purportedly generated by “industry analysts and manufacturing experts”, was obtained using an overly-simplistic method, dividing the Volt’s total development cost by the number of vehicles sold so far.

“That’s like saying that a real estate company that puts up a $10 million building and has rental income of one million the first year is “losing” $9 million, or several hundred thousand per renter,” Lutz wrote in his Forbes column.

“That’s not how car business cost accounting works.”

Reuters quoted Dennis Virag, the president of Michigan’s Automotive Consulting Group, who said the problem with the Volt is that it is “over-engineered and overpriced”.

In a lengthy rebuttal, Lutz explained that it makes no sense to rate the car’s success against its first two years of sales, but rather against the total number to be produced over the lifetime of the vehicle and any related spin-offs.

“The Volt, by my estimate, is either close to ‘variable break-even’ or may be on the cusp of a positive gross margin,” he said.

“Deduct the per-unit allocation for all fixed cost, depreciation and amortisation and it is, surely, still ‘under water’ … but not by much, and less and less so as the volume builds and other, higher-margin GM cars, like the Cadillac ELR, piggy-back off of the Volt’s initial investment.”

Lutz admitted the first-generation Volt may “never really make a decent profit”, but insisted “succeeding generations of the same technology will”.

He said the “knee-jerk Volt bashers” could say what they liked about the innovative plug-in hybrid: “The car doesn’t care: The volumes are building globally and it’s doing exactly what it was designed to do”.

GM has sold roughly 13,500 Chevrolet Volts in the US this year, and will fall well short of its initial 40,000 sales target for 2012.

GM confirmed late last month it would stop production of the Volt at its Hamtramck plant from September 17 to October 12 because of soft demand for the range extender.

The Holden Volt goes on sale in Australia on November 1, priced from $59,990 before on-road costs.


 

  • Noddy of Toyland

    I like Lutz. 10/10 would meet.

  • Martin

    Looking forward to the second generation of the Volt (already I know!) as I would assume the battery pack will get smaller and further mileage, prices drop and the designers can liberate some more interior room. I haven’t personally seen a Volt but the rear looked small on a Youtube review. Is it GM’s intention to grow the Volt family like Toyota have done successfully with their Prius? A sporty looking coupe in the Prius range would be interesting.

    • Shak

      They haven’t said anything about the Chevrolet Volt getting a family, but the Voltec drivetrain will be going into a lot of other models first of which will be the Cadillac ELR.

      • Zaccy16

        It might get a family to compete with the new horrible prius family

  • Sven

    I would buy Volt tomorrow if it only was priced like his American cousin, $39,000! 

  • Trolololol

    Its a conspiracy theory. The headlines will show in the AUS market that GM is actually losing $30,000 every volt sold in Oz. 

    No one in oz would by a volt if that were the case when they see they are getting ripped off by the yanks…. oh wait.

  • Kennyboye

    40k sounds like the right price for a volt in Australia, let’s hope that this type of ‘consciousness raising’ will bring some sanity to the psychopathic pricing of these cars (and their European ilk) in Australia. I look forward to seeing how much the dealers are prepared to knock off the price of these in a few months…..

  • bd

    That Reuters piece was just another in a line of stupid articles on the Volt.

    The Prius lost $$ for Toyota well into its 2nd generation.

    The R&D expenditure for the Voltec system will be used not only for future generations of the Volt, but for other products as GM expands the Voltec lineup starting with the Cadillac ELR coupe.

  • Will

    Klutz still on the pay-roll…LOL!!!

  • Tech the world needs

    If this car has a cost to GM of over $100,000 i’d be very surprised.. Prius did apparently cost Toyota $$$ for each car produced in the early editions and now it’s the 3rd best selling vehicle nameplate in the world so the persistance does pay off. This sort of ground breaking tech needs to happen if we are to cut our dependence on fossil juice so keep up the good work GM. The car will get cheaper in the long run…

  • Go BL !

    BTW if any of the Trolls on here had acheived anywhere near the life acheivements of Mr Lutz i’d be impressed but I know they haven’t so shut the F&$# up !

    • Will

       And that would be running GM. into the ground while supporting his aviation habit, to the point where GM. is now a subsidiary of the US. Feds, the Oz sub-branch being funded by the Oz Govt. to a level that would put the funding of the Oz public service in the $2 shop…LOL!!!

      • Go BL !

        Hello GFC.. Hello..?? The fiancial woes of many car companies can be put down to the Financial masters of wall street relying on get rich quick schemes and gambling with the publics money. Doesn’t mean that someone shouldn’t try to do something to bring fuel saving tech to the world and to the fore and in turn maybe just maybe find a way out of the mess created by others whilst focusing on another issue at the same time. What car technology have you designed lately Will…?

  • Fairgo

    My understanding is GM is well on the way to paying back the US Government

  • john

    For GM to pay back the US government (ak American taxpayer) they need the GM share price to be $54 a share. For every $1 under this share price they are $1B in the red. Currently the share price is $23 a share so GM still owes the taxpayers a little over $30B. So they are nowhere near paying back the government at all. The share price is in a 1 step forward, 2 steps back pattern now and has been for all this year so GM will be lucky to hold onto $20 a share in the forthcoming year let alone getting back to the $50′s where they can give back some money.
    As for Lutz saying that GM does not lose big money on every volt sold. He is 100% correct. It is the taxpayers of America who lose big on every volt sold and not Government Motors!