<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Ford Mustang early debut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:14:38 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al Juraj</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-2/#comment-102817</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Juraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102817</guid>
		<description>FG chassis and turbo engine would make this twice the car!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FG chassis and turbo engine would make this twice the car!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-2/#comment-102807</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102807</guid>
		<description>thanks for that info Minnow.

I doubt the mustang would get any more movie gigs if it wouldnt slide easily around corners :)
imagine if someone went to throw an american bit of muscle around a corner and it actually turned in and hugged the road.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for that info Minnow.</p>
<p>I doubt the mustang would get any more movie gigs if it wouldnt slide easily around corners :)<br />
imagine if someone went to throw an american bit of muscle around a corner and it actually turned in and hugged the road&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minnow</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-2/#comment-102805</link>
		<dc:creator>Minnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102805</guid>
		<description>I wouldnt say the live rear axle is bad.. its just the set up in this mustang. The EL falcon (noteably the XR6) was considered one of the best handling live rear axle cars in the world. Those of you in the know will know an EF falcons are very twitchy in the rear, tickford fixed that problem in the EL by moving the watts-link 20mm lower making it awesome. V8supercars use wattslink and adjust the roll in the rear by adjusting the height of the watts-link.  If you look carefully this mustang doesnt have a watts link so in heavy cornering the axle will move sideways. They&#039;re missing technology that the falcon had back in 1984!! just copy Australia, Yanks!!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldnt say the live rear axle is bad.. its just the set up in this mustang. The EL falcon (noteably the XR6) was considered one of the best handling live rear axle cars in the world. Those of you in the know will know an EF falcons are very twitchy in the rear, tickford fixed that problem in the EL by moving the watts-link 20mm lower making it awesome. V8supercars use wattslink and adjust the roll in the rear by adjusting the height of the watts-link.  If you look carefully this mustang doesnt have a watts link so in heavy cornering the axle will move sideways. They&#8217;re missing technology that the falcon had back in 1984!! just copy Australia, Yanks!!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-2/#comment-102792</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102792</guid>
		<description>Andrew M  - I was just alluding to the fact that the Suspension on the FG as well as its track/wheelbase and almost perfect weight distribution make it handle a lot better and deal with 300Kw+ really well.... more like a sports car nstead of a family sedan. 

Which is why I think the sooner Detroit should have used the Falcon platform for the 2010 Mustang particularly if it wants/is to compete against the new generation of sports cars from both Europe and Japan that are invading the USA with better handling better performance. 

Who knows the decision to delay using the Falcon Platform and Ford Oz RWD expertise could possibly see the end of the iconic American Sports car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew M  &#8211; I was just alluding to the fact that the Suspension on the FG as well as its track/wheelbase and almost perfect weight distribution make it handle a lot better and deal with 300Kw+ really well&#8230;. more like a sports car nstead of a family sedan. </p>
<p>Which is why I think the sooner Detroit should have used the Falcon platform for the 2010 Mustang particularly if it wants/is to compete against the new generation of sports cars from both Europe and Japan that are invading the USA with better handling better performance. </p>
<p>Who knows the decision to delay using the Falcon Platform and Ford Oz RWD expertise could possibly see the end of the iconic American Sports car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-2/#comment-102783</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102783</guid>
		<description>Im guessing not many have driven leaf sprung rear end cars let alone modernday ones.

as Escort says you can get decent handling out of an old school/basic rear end.
I read a review some years back where the falcon ute was pitched as a better handler than the equivalent commodore ute, and as it still stands, there is nothing in it between the 2.

wheelnut,
The Stang running on the FG Platform.
Ford OZ&#039;s RWD Global platform isnt being used yet, from what i understand it could be 2 years away, unless the stang gets it before the falcon which could be possible. but either way, the FG platform isnt the global platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im guessing not many have driven leaf sprung rear end cars let alone modernday ones.</p>
<p>as Escort says you can get decent handling out of an old school/basic rear end.<br />
I read a review some years back where the falcon ute was pitched as a better handler than the equivalent commodore ute, and as it still stands, there is nothing in it between the 2.</p>
<p>wheelnut,<br />
The Stang running on the FG Platform.<br />
Ford OZ&#8217;s RWD Global platform isnt being used yet, from what i understand it could be 2 years away, unless the stang gets it before the falcon which could be possible. but either way, the FG platform isnt the global platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escort_Ghia</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-2/#comment-102778</link>
		<dc:creator>Escort_Ghia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102778</guid>
		<description>CB you miss understood if the mustang cost as much as say an aston martin or BMW it would be a no brainer but over in the states it cost like nothing compared to them i would rather spend 25,000 on a mustang than 150,000 on a aston martin or 50,000 on a bmw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CB you miss understood if the mustang cost as much as say an aston martin or BMW it would be a no brainer but over in the states it cost like nothing compared to them i would rather spend 25,000 on a mustang than 150,000 on a aston martin or 50,000 on a bmw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102773</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102773</guid>
		<description>The thing is, in America a car like this is fairly cheap to buy in relation to how much a car like this would be in australia. I was there last year and i saw so many mustangs, comaro&#039;s and the like driving around, no one even looks twice. 
So the mustang, even the GT sells in such high number that the average buyer does not give a shit about the rear axel or even know what one is. 
The real car fans will get the Shelby .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, in America a car like this is fairly cheap to buy in relation to how much a car like this would be in australia. I was there last year and i saw so many mustangs, comaro&#8217;s and the like driving around, no one even looks twice.<br />
So the mustang, even the GT sells in such high number that the average buyer does not give a shit about the rear axel or even know what one is.<br />
The real car fans will get the Shelby .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102768</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102768</guid>
		<description>Escort_Ghia Im a Ford follower and as much as I love the old GTs {had a few,modified and stock} they are scary things when you wind them up,dont handle dont stop and on cheese cutters are lethal in the rain!

Havent driven the new FG GT but the BA and BF GT I had up till recently in the family drove like a lot of other performance cars Ive and owned and own currently,apart for the grunt I feel they still lack. They handle, brake and are pleasant to drive unlike the Hertz Shelby GT Mustang I drove last year in the States.Very different than current Ozzie Muscle ,did a lot of cornering coming back from San Fran to LA and had a Mini Cooper on our arse for most of the tight corners,it was pretty woeful,although being auto didnt help it .A great looking car and I think with Australian chassis and running gear under it would be a fab car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Escort_Ghia Im a Ford follower and as much as I love the old GTs {had a few,modified and stock} they are scary things when you wind them up,dont handle dont stop and on cheese cutters are lethal in the rain!</p>
<p>Havent driven the new FG GT but the BA and BF GT I had up till recently in the family drove like a lot of other performance cars Ive and owned and own currently,apart for the grunt I feel they still lack. They handle, brake and are pleasant to drive unlike the Hertz Shelby GT Mustang I drove last year in the States.Very different than current Ozzie Muscle ,did a lot of cornering coming back from San Fran to LA and had a Mini Cooper on our arse for most of the tight corners,it was pretty woeful,although being auto didnt help it .A great looking car and I think with Australian chassis and running gear under it would be a fab car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102765</link>
		<dc:creator>CB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102765</guid>
		<description>Wheelnut Says: 
November 19th, 2008 at 10:38 am 
\&quot;If that’s the case B-Man why do so many Americans feel the need to replace their new cars more often than Australians. Because if the cars were reliable and held together etc surely they would keep them longer than a couple of years?\&quot;

The corrosion from all the salt sprinkled over the road to combat snow also plays a part in places like New York.


Escort_Ghia Says: 
November 19th, 2008 at 2:34 pm 
\&quot;ok you got me there wheel nut i would not have this over an Aston Martin but bmw bmw i cant stand the look of or the people that drive them audis i dont mind but for the price of them I’ll take a mustang thanks\&quot;

Are you serious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wheelnut Says:<br />
November 19th, 2008 at 10:38 am<br />
\&#8221;If that’s the case B-Man why do so many Americans feel the need to replace their new cars more often than Australians. Because if the cars were reliable and held together etc surely they would keep them longer than a couple of years?\&#8221;</p>
<p>The corrosion from all the salt sprinkled over the road to combat snow also plays a part in places like New York.</p>
<p>Escort_Ghia Says:<br />
November 19th, 2008 at 2:34 pm<br />
\&#8221;ok you got me there wheel nut i would not have this over an Aston Martin but bmw bmw i cant stand the look of or the people that drive them audis i dont mind but for the price of them I’ll take a mustang thanks\&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you serious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escort_Ghia</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102757</link>
		<dc:creator>Escort_Ghia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102757</guid>
		<description>but the mustang sells very well so there doing something right and the poeple spoke and told ford to get rid of the irs and put the live rear axel back in so they did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but the mustang sells very well so there doing something right and the poeple spoke and told ford to get rid of the irs and put the live rear axel back in so they did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102755</link>
		<dc:creator>B-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102755</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid I&#039;ll have to go with Wheelnut on this one. If you are going to buy a car purely on looks, spend your money on a true classic insted of one of the new retro mobiles. The truth is, the old battle axes are truly scary to drive at the same speeds as modern vehicles, and most of them are down right dangerous. Most of the modern re-hashed designs are trying to cash in on previous popular designs as a way to sell a sub-par vehicle under the fancy body work. The &#039;new&#039; Mustang is very dissapointing in my view, and not the direction Ford US needs to be taking to dig itself out of a deep hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid I&#8217;ll have to go with Wheelnut on this one. If you are going to buy a car purely on looks, spend your money on a true classic insted of one of the new retro mobiles. The truth is, the old battle axes are truly scary to drive at the same speeds as modern vehicles, and most of them are down right dangerous. Most of the modern re-hashed designs are trying to cash in on previous popular designs as a way to sell a sub-par vehicle under the fancy body work. The &#8216;new&#8217; Mustang is very dissapointing in my view, and not the direction Ford US needs to be taking to dig itself out of a deep hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escort_Ghia</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102736</link>
		<dc:creator>Escort_Ghia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102736</guid>
		<description>ok you got me there wheel nut i would not have this over an Aston Martin but bmw bmw i cant stand the look of or the people that drive them audis i dont mind but for the price of them I&#039;ll take a mustang thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok you got me there wheel nut i would not have this over an Aston Martin but bmw bmw i cant stand the look of or the people that drive them audis i dont mind but for the price of them I&#8217;ll take a mustang thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escort_Ghia</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102735</link>
		<dc:creator>Escort_Ghia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102735</guid>
		<description>wheelnut trust me we used to drive car with live rear axels with the AU falcon and the AU handeled better than the VT and the VT had IRS the mustang is on the same platform its just shorter,
it uses the AU front and rear suspetion.

if amerian car can&#039;t turn around corners then neather can an old falcon or commodore with out irs going buy Jeremy Clarkson&#039;s logic, as much as i like him.

Yes there old technollagy but gess what there more fun.

the mustang is what it is cheap and fun just what it was ment to be, and it lives up to it ansestores unlike the current GT falcon as good as they as a performance car there not a real GT falcon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wheelnut trust me we used to drive car with live rear axels with the AU falcon and the AU handeled better than the VT and the VT had IRS the mustang is on the same platform its just shorter,<br />
it uses the AU front and rear suspetion.</p>
<p>if amerian car can&#8217;t turn around corners then neather can an old falcon or commodore with out irs going buy Jeremy Clarkson&#8217;s logic, as much as i like him.</p>
<p>Yes there old technollagy but gess what there more fun.</p>
<p>the mustang is what it is cheap and fun just what it was ment to be, and it lives up to it ansestores unlike the current GT falcon as good as they as a performance car there not a real GT falcon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wheelnut</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102733</link>
		<dc:creator>Wheelnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102733</guid>
		<description>Escort - It looks pretty much the same as previous model Mustangs.. the fact that it&#039;s a &quot;retro&quot; design [in the same way the new Camaro is] means that its built on the classic lines of the Mustangs that were built before it.

Therefore; it to is nothing new.. as it too looks the same
Which is one of the reasons that it is still so popular - just as the Porsche Carrera Aston Martin and the Golf are

As for having a Mustang over any other car...WTF? Over a Aston Martin; a Konigsiegg;  an Audi R8; a BMW M3? Surely you can&#039;t be serious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Escort &#8211; It looks pretty much the same as previous model Mustangs.. the fact that it&#8217;s a &#8220;retro&#8221; design [in the same way the new Camaro is] means that its built on the classic lines of the Mustangs that were built before it.</p>
<p>Therefore; it to is nothing new.. as it too looks the same<br />
Which is one of the reasons that it is still so popular &#8211; just as the Porsche Carrera Aston Martin and the Golf are</p>
<p>As for having a Mustang over any other car&#8230;WTF? Over a Aston Martin; a Konigsiegg;  an Audi R8; a BMW M3? Surely you can&#8217;t be serious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wheelnut</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102732</link>
		<dc:creator>Wheelnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102732</guid>
		<description>Mind you as Jeremy Clarkson says &quot;most american cars aren&#039;t meant to go around corners&quot; 

Sure they have the POWER - but controlling that power in terms of braking and suspension is where alot of American cars fall short; compared to those from Europe and even Oz.. and power is nothing without control!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mind you as Jeremy Clarkson says &#8220;most american cars aren&#8217;t meant to go around corners&#8221; </p>
<p>Sure they have the POWER &#8211; but controlling that power in terms of braking and suspension is where alot of American cars fall short; compared to those from Europe and even Oz.. and power is nothing without control!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escort_Ghia</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102730</link>
		<dc:creator>Escort_Ghia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102730</guid>
		<description>i prefure this desighn over any new car and pluse look at the vw gold it still looks like the first golf only more moderne.

at least with a retro design the mustang stands out unlike most new cars which all look the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i prefure this desighn over any new car and pluse look at the vw gold it still looks like the first golf only more moderne.</p>
<p>at least with a retro design the mustang stands out unlike most new cars which all look the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wheelnut</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102729</link>
		<dc:creator>Wheelnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102729</guid>
		<description>Quote [Escort Ghia]: &quot;most of you dont get what the mustang is a very cheap sports car that performs just as well as our FPV GT and Clubsport&quot;

If you believe that; you are obviously Angle Parked in a Parallel universe somewhere

IRS is gives a better ride particularly when driving over uneven or rough surfaces covered with pot holes as only the wheels that hit the pot holes absorb the shock whereas a live axle would transfer the shockwave of the bump through the entire car.

And depending upon the rating of the shock absorbers [which on the Taurus/Probe are very low] could continue long after you have gone over the bump - it would almost feel as though you&#039;re on a boat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote [Escort Ghia]: &#8220;most of you dont get what the mustang is a very cheap sports car that performs just as well as our FPV GT and Clubsport&#8221;</p>
<p>If you believe that; you are obviously Angle Parked in a Parallel universe somewhere</p>
<p>IRS is gives a better ride particularly when driving over uneven or rough surfaces covered with pot holes as only the wheels that hit the pot holes absorb the shock whereas a live axle would transfer the shockwave of the bump through the entire car.</p>
<p>And depending upon the rating of the shock absorbers [which on the Taurus/Probe are very low] could continue long after you have gone over the bump &#8211; it would almost feel as though you&#8217;re on a boat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102727</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102727</guid>
		<description>Love the look of it although I thought the yanks may have come up with a more advanced engine and drivetrain for it. Should be a tuner&#039;s dream though. Looks like the US are finally starting to catch on in the interior department but they&#039;ve got some catching up to do still. Hope the fuel tank is larger than the 59 litre tank in the current Mustang, you&#039;d be lucky to drive from Sydney to Canberra wihtout having to fill up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the look of it although I thought the yanks may have come up with a more advanced engine and drivetrain for it. Should be a tuner&#8217;s dream though. Looks like the US are finally starting to catch on in the interior department but they&#8217;ve got some catching up to do still. Hope the fuel tank is larger than the 59 litre tank in the current Mustang, you&#8217;d be lucky to drive from Sydney to Canberra wihtout having to fill up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naughtyius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102725</link>
		<dc:creator>Naughtyius Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102725</guid>
		<description>Truly rubbish. Looks outdated and boring. No wonder Ford have trouble as harking back to a bygone long ago day and stuck in rut. Thus they make it easier for opposition to overtake Ford&#039;s outdated design ethos (e.g. Toyota, Hyundai, Kia and VW) and make Ford&#039;s sales dwindle. Its not up to Govt to bail them out......they need to wake up and move with times! Ford - gee has some crap designs and living in time warp!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly rubbish. Looks outdated and boring. No wonder Ford have trouble as harking back to a bygone long ago day and stuck in rut. Thus they make it easier for opposition to overtake Ford&#8217;s outdated design ethos (e.g. Toyota, Hyundai, Kia and VW) and make Ford&#8217;s sales dwindle. Its not up to Govt to bail them out&#8230;&#8230;they need to wake up and move with times! Ford &#8211; gee has some crap designs and living in time warp!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escort_Ghia</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/comment-page-1/#comment-102724</link>
		<dc:creator>Escort_Ghia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18999/2010-ford-mustang-early-debut/#comment-102724</guid>
		<description>shane your exactly right the stang is not as bad as they say but it need the 4.0l falcon six as a base engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shane your exactly right the stang is not as bad as they say but it need the 4.0l falcon six as a base engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
