2013 Mazda6: official pictures and details | CarAdvice

Car Advice

2013 Mazda6: official pictures and details

MAZDA MAZDA6
By Jez Spinks |
FIND DEALS

The 2013 Mazda6 has been revealed in its entire, striking sedan form at the 2012 Moscow motor show.

Mazda’s new range of pictures, which follow previous teaser shots, show the Japanese car maker will have a dynamic-looking vehicle to take on medium-car rivals such as the Toyota Camry, Honda Accord Euro and Ford Mondeo from early 2013.

The third iteration of the Mazda6 since it replaced the 626 in 2002 is the company’s second model to be built from the ground up using its Skyactiv technologies aimed at fuel use reduction.

It follows the CX-5 SUV with which it shares its platform, though the Mazda6 is the brand’s first vehicle to feature a new brake energy recuperation system it calls i-Eloop.

The set-up incorporates a capacitor that stores electrical energy when the driver steps off the accelerator and distributes it to power the car’s electronics.

The 2013 Mazda6 retains the key proportions and elegant shape of the Mazda Takeri concept that previewed the medium car at last November’s 2011 Tokyho motor show. It is 130mm longer and 45mm wider than the outgoing model, moving to an overall length of 4865mm and overall width of 1840mm.

105mm of the body’s extra length is used up in a stretched wheelbase, which helps liberate 37mm more rear legroom. Mazda says the increased body width also increases rear shoulder space by 20mm.

The Mazda6’s interior is a near facsimile of the CX-5’s cabin, including a dash, centre stack and centre console layout that is virtually identical save for subtle differences such as air vent and heating/ventilation panel design.

The multifunction steering wheel and 5-inch colour satellite navigation screen are the same as the CX-5’s.

The Mazda6, however, features a stylish sweep of dark red metallic across the dash, which itself blends more harmoniously with the door trim compared with the CX-5’s cabin design.

Mazda says soft-touch materials have also been placed in key areas where driver and passengers are most likely to interact with, such as the doors and upper dash section.

A wider-opening aperture allows easier access to the 483-litre boot.

In addition to i-Eloop, other technologies in the new Mazda6 will include an intelligent headlight system that will switch from high to main beam if its sensor detects oncoming traffic as well as peering around corners, lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring, and a Smart City Brake Support system that will autonomously brake the Mazda6 to a standstill from up to 30km/h if the driver hasn’t reacted to an obstruction ahead.

Mazda Australia says it will confirm more details, including drivetrains, for local versions of the Mazda6 closer to its local debut at the 2012 Sydney motor show in mid October.

The company released details of two petrol engines that will power the Mazda6 in the Russian market.

A 110kW/210Nm 2.0-litre four-cylinder is mated to either a manual or automatic transmission with six speeds and is available locally in the Mazda CX-5.

The alternative is a 2.5-litre four-cylinder with 141kW of power and 256Nm of torque, teamed with the six-speed only.

Mazda’s i-Stop engine stop-start system is available with the 2.0-litre petrol auto and fractionally improves fuel consumption from 6.1L/100km to 5.9L/100km, according to Mazda’s target data for the all-new 6.

The i-Eloop system is tied with the 2.5-litre petrol that has target combined fuel consumption of 6.4L/100km.

The CX-5’s 2.2-litre four-cylinder turbo diesel wasn’t mentioned in the Moscow show release but will also be among the Mazda6’s engine options in other markets.

A wagon version of the Mazda6 will make an appearance at the 2012 Paris motor show. The ‘liftback’ hatch version of the current model has been dropped as predicted by CarAdvice last November.

A four-door coupe version of the new Mazda6 is also rumoured to be in the pipeline, creating a rival for the Volkswagen CC.
Click on the Photos tab above main picture for full image gallery.

And tell us what you think of the new-look Mazda6 on the comment thread below.

 

 


 

  • Des KSA

    The 6 was such a svelte car when it first came out. Now she is letting herself go. She’s packing on the pounds and her arse is getting bigger. So familiar.

    • Sumpguard

        Yep the teaser worked better than the reveal. A step backwards for Mazda.  The current 6 is one of the better looking cars out there. This one ,like the CX-5 is boring.

      • Sumpguard

        Though I do like the interior!

    • Car2012

      I agreed. I am surprised that they are referring to the new Mazda 6 as a medium sized car. It is now 4865mm long. The current Commodore is 4903mm. The new Mazda 6 is only 40mm shorter.

    • Edward

      My thoughts exactly! Lets hope mazda doesnt fall into the ho-hum of mediocrity like Toyota and Honda. I even read recently that those companies are trying to inject a bit more life into their designs. The new Camry looks pretty good, and the new US Accord looks like a step in the right direction.

      Learn from the mistakes of other car companies Mazda!

    • Danso

      Packing on the pounds? Its a lighter vehicle than the original Mazda6. Ive owned each model, and I must say Ive appreciated the progress the vehicle has made in pretty much all areas. It is without doubt a better vehicle today. Its easy to remain nostaligic, but the vehicle must move on… all things are relative, and the original 6 would not keep up with the current breed of medium vehicle today (though I would still own an original 6 over a camry!)
      I look forward to the new model sitting in my garage!

      • Zaccy16

        Exactly! i looking forward to my new wagon to replace my 2005 6 wagon!

  • HyundaiKIA

    BMW and AUDI have a baby?

  • Noddy of Toyland

    A very long car.

  • aware

    Side on it almost looks like a Volvo S60. I’d rather the Volvo.  

  • Chir

    Very nice looking on the outside. Excellent C pillar shape and front fender shape. The straight waistline makes it look incredibly long too. 

    Interior is not so flash hot – centre console is too rounded and thin/plain. 
    LCD is mounted in an oldschool looking way – needs to be more recessed or up higher and without buttons around it.

  • Basil Exposition

    Hmmm… Uglier and more expensive… No thanks

  • Baha

    Actually this car looks like the Mark-X

  • Zzc

    It looks nice!

    Doesn’t look overdone like some of the competitors

  • Zaccy16

    Looks Fantastic! cant wait to see the wagon version, i think it will be time to replace my 2005 classic wagon 6 with the new model!

  • Zaccy16

    Luckily they have made a 2.5 Skyactiv engine for this car because the 2.0 would be to slow. 141 kw and only 6.4 l per 200km sounds good to me!

    • Nasal Explorer

      6.4 l per 200km makes 3.2 per 100km. That’s outstanding!

      • Zaccy16

        Sorry I meant 6.4l per 100 km not 200

    • Dave L

      I have a 2012 2.5 wagon, and would say it is on the performance threshold. I would suggest Mazda stick to the 2.5 in the new model and not worry about the 2.0. Even with kerb weight coming down, the extra torque of the 2.5 would be really handy, especially when loaded up with kids and gear. Not sure the 2.0 is the way to go in a car of this size?

      • http://baji192.wordpress.com/ Baji

        The new SkyActiv-G 2.5L looks good. 
        Although it only runs 13:1 compression rather than the 14:1 of the 2.0L, figures are:

        141kw @ 5700RPM
        256nm @ 3250RPM

        The most interesting figure is the 256nm of max torque from 3250RPM

        • F1

          13:1 is still mega high!

        • Sydlocal

           Baji, the 2L in Australia has 13:1 compression to allow people to run it on our “very” regular unleaded.

          • Baji

            Yeah I’m aware of that. I’m just making the point that The Russian spec 2.5 still only runs 13:1 rather than 14:1 and if fuel was also an issue, the 2.0 would also be running 13:1. I’m just curious as to why the difference in compression.

      • Zaccy16

        Yeah the 2.0 is too underpowered, 2.5 looks good!

        • matt

          i reckon we will have the 2 litre… 100kg’s ish less weight… and 210nm? whats that 16nm less then the current 2.5 on sale now… the new 2.5 looks good though… circa 3.0 litre V6 power and torque from 15 years ago :P (magna)

          • Zaccy16

            Yeah it looks like a great engine the new 2.5!, i think it will be a good replacement for our 2005 mazda 6 classic wagon

  • Labrys

    I like it! I like it a lot.
    It looks good both inside and out.Can’t wait to see more pictures of the wagon.This was always on my list as potentially my next car and I’m not disappointed.

  • 80′s Robot

    As far as the exterior styling goes, I’ll take the current 6 over this any day. They killed off the Nagare design language before it really got anywhere…

  • mazdasbiggestfan

    without the hatch version I’ll have to choose between the 6 wagon or maybe the CX5 when they update the top of the range with the new 2.5.

    • Sydlocal

       What is wrong with the diesel?

      • Slick

        Just google cx5 diesel dpf and you’ll see.

        • Sydlocal

           It is not just a Mazda problem slick, it is a DPF issue and the same thing happens regardless of brand. If people actually READ their owners manual PROPERLY and did what it says etc they wouldn’t have as many problems. It is all the “stop/start” short distance driving that causes the most issues and oil dilution will happen to nearly all diesels fitted with a DPF regardless of brand (some actually have an extra injector in the exhaust which means they don’t have to richen the mixture in the engine. This richer mixture is the cause of the majority of the problems as some of the excess fuel passes the rings and then into the sump). I am NOT saying it is right, more that this is just the way it is. The things they have to do to keep the particulates out of the exhaust until something better comes along.
          P.S: I did Google it and the results weren’t anything worse than any other DPF diesel.

  • Legnab

    Good looker , timing is right to make it look bigger as the big OZ made cars disappear , and the interior is pretty close to euro standards , distancing themselves from the starwars dash crowd , mor upmarket look all round .

  • SM

    Looks nice – if only they’d release something with a bit more power… shame they stopped making the 6 MPS.

    • mazfan

      Blame the US v6 in the last model for killing off the mps.
      but it could make a come back in this new model in time
      just need a turbo version and beefed up suspension 
      if not in this sedan version then maybe in the 4 door coupe version coming later

  • Blair Waldorf

    Seriously? This this looks very, very nice. Extremely classy, euro level classy. It makes the Koreans look like a tacky mess.

    I’m saying this as someone who doesnt usually like Japanese cars and finds the current smiley-faced Mazda 3 a tacky, over-done mess.

    • HyundaiKIA

      the “smiley” face is still there, a tacky, mess done.

      • matt

        awww whatever back to you’re melted mess, SMILE! best selling car in oz

    • Luke Brinsmead

      Therein lies the answer to 80s Robot’s question about why Mazda canceled the Nigare design – was a bit too overdone and not as tasteful as this new “Kodo” design.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=737660467 Kit Ho

    BMW 3 series

  • BP

    Like CX-5, the design is poor and it’s already starting to age :/

  • PS

    In think the styling is very very elegant and resolved. Very sophisticated and will age really well. Interior looks a bit tame though.

  • TURBOVVB77777

    as if it doesn’t have an electronic park brake!

    • HyundaiKIA

      the jps like things sticking out, like their teeth.

      • Noddy of Toyland

        Woah there racist prick.

      • Legnab

        What like the BUCK TOOTHED  iX35 , dont mention teeth around hundi owners  .

      • Basil Exposition

        RACIST!!!!

  • Lindsay

    KERS!

    Or is that BERS?

  • Daniel

    There’s certainly nothing wrong with it, I just think it’s pretty boring. And I think Mazda are really falling behind and ruining their own interiors with those systems that are just plonked into the dash.  And on top of all that, they keep getting really expensive too!

    • TomGI

      What do you prefer?  Tell us so we can critique it.

  • Golfschwein

    Nice all-round.

  • Gunghrin

    Side profile is nice in my opinion however the rear looks squashed and thin and the front is less convincing than the previous model.

  • Robin_Graves

    Very nice looking car.  They should give the 3′s smiley face the flick and style it similar to this.

  • LN

    Looks like the old 929 has got a massive up grade

  • mo

    Why have you mentioned all the specs but the weight? Something to hide?

    • http://baji192.wordpress.com/ Baji

      Kerb Weights for the new mazda6 russian spec range from:

      2.0L MT = 1340KG2.0L AT = 1370KG
      2.0L AT with i-Stop = 1380KG

      2.5L with i-Eloop + iStop AT = 1410KG

      Its a much bigger car than the current model, and yet weighs less than each of its current equivalent models.

  • notatoy

    At nearly 4.9m, it is a big car. I guess it is a compromise for the US market. the 2.5 litre engine sounds impressive.

  • Priceless

    The side and rear profile reminds me of the eunos 800. nice looking car. it is quite a big, long car but they had to keep the american buyers happy =p

  • http://twitter.com/klowik klowik

    the horizontal lines on the grille make the car looks cheap. They should use honeycomb or mesh pattern on it. and should use black carbon fibre to  accentuate the lower air inlet instead of just straight bar across it. It looks so cheap..

  • Birty_B

    It’s obviously softened up a bit from the concept, but I think it’s the best looking car Mazda has put on the market in years. 

  • falcodore

    What a beautiful car! And i like how they’ve swept the dash out to meet the doors, just that little detail makes it look more cohesive and better finished off than the CX-5. This will not be mistaken for any other mid-size car.

    Looks like after 20yrs, Mazda finally have their mojo back!

  • Valet Dabess

    i do not like the c, and d pillars and the interior is waaaaaay to similar to the cx5 and it is a little softened down from the concept but other then that it looks ok

  • HyundaiKIA

    i45 back?

  • http://baji192.wordpress.com/ Baji

    A few details i’ve noticed:

    - New 6 does away with the Double Wishbone front suspension the 6 traditionally had, in favour of a simpler and probably cheaper MacPherson Strut setup.
    - No paddle shifters on the steering wheel.

    - New 6 is bigger in every dimension (Height: 1450mm, Width: 1840mm, Length: 4865, Wheelbase: 2830mm) Current 6: H: 1440mm, W: 1795mm, L:4735mm, WB: 2725mm)

    - New 6 is lighter ranging from 1340kg – 1410kg for the sedan. Current 6 weighs 1452kg for the petrol auto

    - Interior lighting is now consistent from the instrument cluster to centre console/HVAC controls

    - 2.5L engine runs 13:1 compression, 2.0L runs 14:1

    - Torque figures are class leading for N/A 4 cyl engines, and peak torque is reached much lower in the rev range; 210nm at 4000rpm for 2.0L, 256nm at 3250rpm for 2.5L

    - Drag coefficient: 0.26

    - Only 2.5L gets i-eloop regenerative breaking

    • mazfan

      Mazda had to make it bigger to appeal to the US market now they’re only doing one version..
      The current 6 is over 1500kg in the lux spec hatch.
      Personally for me the novelty of the paddle shifter wore off after a couple weeks, probably haven’t touched them in 2 1/2 years

  • Al

    I think it’s a big shame that there isn’t be a hatch. Hatches are so much more practical than a sedan. 
    Otherwise I think the interior looks good, the front & back looks good, but the side view doesn’t resolve well with the front & back. It’s just too elongated & curvy & already looks dated. 

    • JamesB

      The idea of midsize hatchbacks just hasn’t grown on me. I can’t remember anything that looks good. In trying to look like a coupe while being more practical than a sedan, it doesn’t quite hit the target in both aspects. Get a wagon if you need lots of cargo room, a coupe for style or sedan for something in between.

      • Baji

        Well I guess you’ve never actually had a hatchback? I can tell you they are so much more practical than anything a sedan could ever offer. Try getting 300kgs of flat pack furniture into a sedan or a 55″ LCD tv. The problem with a sedan is the fact that the boot opening is too small to put anything bulky inside, and even if you are able to, the pass through in the back isn’t big enough to put anything through. Hatchbacks also have a rear wiper where sedans don’t. I would actually rephrase your closing statement with : wagon if you need lots of room, coupe for style and hatchback/lift back for something in between.

  • Shak

    I may be in the minority here, but i think it’s absolutely stunning. The whole design, both inside and out really works for me; the engines on the other hand, if experience in the CX-5 is anything to go by will have to work very hard if they are to be near class leading.

    • Zaccy16

      I think it looks great too! cant wait for the wagon version with either the diesel 2.2 or new 2.5 petrol

    • Sydlocal

       I don’t know, the CX5 has the class well covered. One of the slowest with the petrol and one of the quickest with the diesel! ;-)
      I would be surprised if this 6 will perform any worse than the current one considering how much lighter it is plus better gearing with the auto models. Plus it is around 200+kg lighter than the the AWD CX5 which should help a little!

    • Pro346

      It looks great!

  • Rightindicators

    Lots more curves, not sure I’m liking it as much as the second generation. But this design refresh will help the model bring in modern looks on the bonnet with lines and curves on the exterior.

  • gt86.com.au

    Should have been released 3 years ago with this tech.. slowly falling behind the competition. Why are those engines not using forced enduction?
     

    • Hhzu

      I would much rather have a naturally aspirated 2L+ then a FI 1.4

    • Sydlocal

       Mazda have actually done a clever thing. They have met emission and fuel economy targets with a N/A engine re-design giving them the option down the track of adding forced induction to gain even more improvements. Something many others don’t have the luxury of. The Polo 1.2 is a classic example. Using an ancient single cam, 8 valve engine and whacking on a turbo and DI, nothing really high tech there and not much more scope for improvement. How is that more “technologically advanced” than the Mazda skyactiv engine?
      Plus how many other manufacturers lately have released a significantly larger car with more kit but weighing around 100kg less? Or how about Toyota still using its “high tech 4 speed automatic” transmission? Whilst you are at it, what “tech” does the GT86 have that would put it way ahead of this and why doesn’t IT have forced induction?

      Having said that it has only enabled Mazda to catch up to the rest of the field rather than leading the pack. Prior to this and the CX5 they were falling behind rather quickly.

  • HandBrake

    this car looks great, our homebred heroes are going to have to pick up their game, if they’re willing to compete.

  • Schn

    From the side on it looks much longer than the current model. Not a bad thing. Just an observation. Cabin is quite nice. I really like how the doors and dash merge. Although that head unit placing seems a bit odd. It’s a bit high for one for reach those controls i think… a bit inconvenient. Nevertheless, really good design all round. I quite like the curves above the wheel arch, though that’s to improve aerodynamics, it’s quite a nice detail.  

  • John

    has it got rear ac vents?

    • craig

      Yes, I saw them on a photo on another website somewhere.

    • Sydlocal

       The Mazda6 has always had rear air vents, they are just underneath the front seats and hence fairly useless!

    • http://baji192.wordpress.com/ Baji

      Yeah the new6 finally has rear air vents. About time too, considering nearly every single other midsize or any other sedan for that matter has them already.

      • Sydlocal

         Where did you see that? I have been looking for pictures online but no luck yet! Doesn’t exist if there aren’t pictures!!! ;-)

        • Zaccy16

          Have a look at this video from auto express 
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBLJhY80O7c

        • http://baji192.wordpress.com/ Baji

          Ok well here’s proof. its from the Moscow motor show.

          • https://dl.dropbox.com/u/31308672/mazda6interior.jpg Baji

            Ok so that image upload looks like it didnt go through. Click my name instead for the link

          • Sydlocal

             Thanks for that Baji! About …….. time!

  • Sydlocal

    So they made the exterior bigger however the boot is smaller. Bit of a shame. That was one of the good things about the current and original Mazda6, a boot larger than a Commodore. I also wouldn’t be surprised if it doesn’t have any centre air vents for the back seat…

  • Gus

    Looks like a well balanced car with a decent powertrain (i.e. 2.5L). I expect the coupe version to have a bit more oomph… hope the latter comes with 5 seats!

  • JamesB

    The Accord Euro makes 148kW but the Mazda’s delivery should be better with more torque down low. Still, this fast-looking design needs a turbo approaching 200kW.

    • Sydlocal

       Exactly right, torque and where the engine produces that torque makes a lot of difference. Many people are too focused on the “paper figures” which only show peaks and 0-100. Whilst it is a guide, it doesn’t fully convey the “real world” performance of the vehicle as lets face it, sprints from a standing start is a very small percentage of driving with “roll on” acceleration being more common.
      Whilst peak figures on paper show the current Mazda6 for example being way behind nearly all cars in its class, when it comes to real world performance (roll on/overtaking etc) it is a lot closer to the Accord Euro than what many people think and the peak figures show due to less weight and more low down torque where the average driver spends most of their time. In some tests it has even managed to show a clean set of heels to the much more powerful i45 with “in gear” tests.

      • Baji

        Agreed sydlocal. Also if you’ve seen the power and torque curves for the accord euro, peak torque is only hit through a very narrow band. IIrc it’s only for 100rpm, from 4300-4400rpm before dropping again. The only thing going for the engine in the euro is that it revs damn high.

  • Dave

    looks great but I bet Mazda goes soft and doesnt bring in manuals…..auto’s sux big time….

    • Sydlocal

       Have you actually tried the new skyactiv auto Dave? For a conventional auto it is actually very good and almost has a DSG feel to it. You really notice that the torque converter is locked up the majority of the time regardless of gear. I would much prefer an auto if all I ever did was drive in the stop/start city snarl, like in Sydney! I would be surprised if they only offer autos though as in the past the only model that never had a manual option was the petrol wagon.

      • Dave

        Sydlocal, I drove a manual 4×4 from Guildford to Willoughby every day for many years to work and never once wished I had an auto…..I test drove a 3 and CX5 sykdrive and thought….yeah its an auto….and my opinions of a DSG = Dumb Stupid Gearbox. I have owned Mazda’s for over 30yrs and wont buy anything else buts thats my choice…..don’t get me wrong auto’s have there place and I own one, my late Dads ’92 121 bubble but its sentimental value to me……I like to drive a car not steer it….before you all flame me its my opinion…..now in Orange NSW with a newer 4×4 diesel ute, manual is the only choice.  Mazda don’t follow the rest of the manufactures and go soft towards the yuppie set…….some of us still want to change gears…..with 3 pedals….

        • Sydlocal

           Thanks for the mature reply. I agree that on a country road nothing beats 3 pedals and a lever in between the seats to row backwards and forwards! I am not a huge fan of DSGs in city driving. Sure they are ok on an open road, but are a PITA in town/stop start/reversing up driveway etc. I guess it depends on what you want to use the car for!

  • F1

    It looks very nice from every angle!!!!!!

    That’s hardly the case for most cars!!

  • Luke Brinsmead

    I think it looks great, much better than the tasteless Camry, Aurion, Accord (not Euro) and Liberty. It reminds me of a budget version of the new BMW 3 series.

  • Bradsta

    I have a Gen1 Mazda6 (love it!) and have been waiting for this car all year but I can’t help but feel slightly disappointed in the rear end. It has no presence to me and seems too i45 which is alread dated. But it might look better in person. I’ll wait till Sydney motor show before making a final judgement on this or Optima as my next car…

  • Antmindel

    I cannot wait to see what the next Accord Euro will look like,as they have always been arch rivals,with Euro IMHO always looking slightly better,and arriving a few months later.

    Both are brilliant cars,let the new battles begin…

    • Crystal Ball

      Arch rivals no more – I think this one being almost 4.9m long is actually gonna do battle with the full-sized American Accord in the US and that’s the intention of Mazda.

      Over here it’s probably going to demolish the Liberty, Maxima, i45 and Optima in Sedan format but not camry and full-size accord cos Toyota and Honda will always have their buyers.

      But the real kicker is that the wagon will account for 50% of sales and being this big will be a true alternative to Commodore wagon and Mondeo Wagon. All those people who bought Mazda 3s (and there’s a lot of them) will be looking at this cos they have a couple of kids now.

      This is the first time in 20 years that a Commodore sized car has been ‘Made in Japan’ and exported here. The last one I can think of is the Toyota Cressida.

      The affordable real midsized sedan (4700mm long, <$40k) market is solely the preserve of VW Jetta and Accord Euro now. Kizashi has never been more than a small player. Accord Euro won't grow anymore because it would be the same size as the US Accord.

  • TimXxr

    Once again the transition from concept to production is a huge disappointment.

    • Josh

      I agree. They’ve totally taken the aggressive look out of the design. It looks tame
      now. After getting excited over the Takeri concept this production model
      is a disappointment.

  • Vins

    The concept car is exciting, this is just good looking

  • MattW

    I know I should wait until I see it in real life, but the photos are leaving me underwhelmed. I waited to see the CX-5 in real life and that was a disappointment. Shame Ford aren’t getting the next Mondeo here sooner…

  • ac

    The rear is an i45 rip off

  • Gibwater

    This is bloody good looking metal! Best thing since the current four door Audi A5. 

  • TomGI

    I’ve had many Mazdas, 626, Miata, RX and (2) 6s.  Love Mazda and their racing heritage.  This car looks real good.  I am disappointed the 3.7 V6 seems to be dropped.  I have a 2009 6s with the 3.7L and 6 speed auto.  I tear around the Sierra Nevada back roads on fat Michelin Pilots.  I also have a 2006 6s with the 3.0L.  The 2006 is very nimble and quick handling but the Ford origin V6 is down on power.  The 3.7L also found in some Lincolns is brute.  Drop a gear and hammer it and it blasts off.  I waited a long time for Mazda to catch up on power and now it seems to be going away.  Also, on MazdaUSA web site they show 2013 Mazda 6 i & s that look like the 2009-2012 body.  They are not showing this body.  I am praying they will roll out a street version of the AER MZR-R and drop it into the 6 super s.  Unfortunately, my driving requirements are not supported by a 2.0L I4 for a road sedan.  Maybe a Hyundai Genesis Coupe is in my future??

  • theillestlife

    It looks amazingly clean. I’d have one.

  • Aussie

    The new 2.5 litre engine with 141 kW 256 Nm of power and better fuel economy (than the current engine) should boost sales for the Mazda 6. Bravo.

  • B Maya

    Don’t like it at all the front air intake area looks like the Mazda cx5 which also doesn’t look right, prefer the one now, back looks like a Hyundai, not good.

  • Jbbanjo

    I wouldn’t trade my 2004 ^s MTX for this new one. The 6 has turned into hokey family sedan posing as a real mid sized sports sedan. The styling is improved on this model, but its gotten bigger and more less ‘sporty’, imo.  
    If they want to save the org Mazda 6 concept, go back to the original size specs, but improve  the few shortcomings it has: the turning radius, better seats and at least 275 hp.