Car Advice

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR Review

By Anthony Crawford |

2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR Review

tc-mr-open-2.jpg

“Mitsubishi have pulled off a remarkable feat. An EVO comfortable enough for the daily commute and still good enough to take on the world’s best performance cars”

- words and photography Anthony Crawford

Thanks to Western Sydney International Dragway

Model Tested:
• 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR Twin Clutch Sport Shift Transmission – $70,875 (RRP)
Options:
• Metallic Paint – $350

tc-mr-open.jpg

Driving an EVO, any EVO, can make you feel a little ‘dangerous’. It has a well-deserved reputation as a supercar slayer. In fact, I’d go so far as saying, that high-end sports car drivers tend to avoid eye contact with them, at any cost.

The best analogy I can give you is from a weapons brochure on the Apache Helicopter Gunship. The phrase reads simply “we own the night”. Many might also consider the Mitsubishi Evolution a weapon, and its catch line would read, “we own the tarmac” and they would be right, too.

The EVOs grip levels on the more recent incarnations (VIII, IX and X) are from another world and exceed that of some of the world’s best supercars.

But if you’re still not sold, just Google “EVO Vs Lamborghini” and click the Top Gear/YouTube link, and you will witness an astonishingly uplifting event, not unlike the Russel Crowe movie, “Gladiator”.

Mitsubishi’s Evolution VIII manages to bully a V12 Lamborghini Murcielago into a 180 degrees spin, and effectively wins the race. It’s a remarkable feat made all the more so, given Jeremy Clarkson was driving the EVO and British Touring Car driver, James Kaye was behind the wheel of the Lambo.

But for anyone lucky enough to have driven a recent iteration of Mitsubishi’s finest, it’s probably not surprising at all.

Clarkson is spot on for once. The absurd, if not comical ease, in which the EVO can neutralise a corner, and the sheer velocity the car can carry through that corner, is beyond astonishing, and will leave you thinking you’re the next Lewis Hamilton.

It’s as though an Alien race with no experience whatsoever in building cars, got to work and packaged all this advanced technology into the first thing they saw on the freeway and behold, the Mitsubishi Evolution!

And Evolution is exactly right. While the EVO VIII was a sensation, it was also too hardcore for many. A brutal ride, notchy gearshifts and only five forward speeds, meant a very select and very small market.

Along came the EVO IX with various improvements including an extra cog and a thing called MIVEC (Mitsubishi variable Valve Timing), which made the car faster, smoother and an easier drive than its predecessor.

And while the ride quality was still considered harsh by anyone other than a track day junkie, it was noticeably more compliant than the EVO VIII, especially over speed bumps and those wheel-warping potholes. Was it a twenty-four seven commuter? Not quite, but almost.

As good as the EVO IX was, and let me say, it was astonishing in every department bar the interior, not nearly enough enthusiasts had had the “EVO experience” so while the car had achieved sainthood status, sales were minimal.

In fact, Evolution 1 through IX has chalked up only 120,000 units worldwide, not nearly enough to turn a profit but undoubtedly, one of the best marketing tools in the business.

The bottom line is, Mitsubishi need to sell more EVO’s, so they built the Evolution X in the hope of doing just that.

tc-evo-side-shot.jpg

It’s still a hardcore machine, no doubt about that. But this particular variant, the MR, which I have been driving, has one of those automated manual gearboxes, which can swap ratios quicker, than it would take your left hand to reach the shifter.

tc-mr-sst.jpg

It works pretty much the same way as Volkswagen’s DSG gearbox although, Mitsubishi call it a Twin Clutch-Sport Shift Transmission (TC-SST), which was developed by German transmission and drivetrain gurus, Getrag.

Next page…

It’s fast shifting but doesn’t feel quite as refined as the DSG system but then again, this is an EVO and thankfully, things are still a lot more frenetic on board this car, including the shifts.

tc-mr-steering-wheel.jpg

You can still have a five-speed manual, if you’re a diehard or more importantly, if you can’t stretch the budget in these dark times, but its the TC-SST more than anything else, which makes this the first incarnation of the EVO you could live with twenty-four/seven.

Peak hour journeys in an EVO IX are what made the car unliveable for any sane enthusiast. By the time you made it to work, you may well have shifted gears over one thousand times or more, without ever making it to third gear. Fifty lashes in a Balinese prison would have been less painful.

tc-mr-normal.jpg

The New Evolution MR makes all that pain go away. Just select D in “normal” mode and for all intents and purposes, you are driving an automatic EVO! Perfect for the day-to-day commute.

tc-mr-high-front.jpg

But get away to some quiet, twisty tarmac and you will want to push the small TC-SST lever forward and engage “Sport Mode” where you will find more of the raw “EVO” DNA.

tc-mr-sport.jpg

Bury the throttle and things become decidedly more manic. Gearshifts and throttle response are way more urgent than in “Normal” mode. Keep you foot into it, and all hell breaks loose, with gear ratios held until close on 7000rpm before swapping cogs!

tc-mr-paddles.jpg

As you can expect with any Twin Clutch transmission these days, you also have the option of using paddle shifters, which despite working well enough, seem superfluous with “Sport” mode engaged with the tacho needle nudging the redline before shifting.

tc-mr-badge.jpg

And even as you are fast tracking into a corner, the gearbox will blip, blip, down a few gears, setting you up for the prefect exit. EVO magic!

Next page…

And if you fancy taking your EVO X MR to one of those adrenalin charged track days, then best you hold that little lever forward for a few seconds, until you see S-Sport light up for that true “EVO” experience. Shifts are not only faster again, but gears are engaged at higher revs. It’s no fun around suburbia, but perfect for closed, one-way tarmac.

evo-x-rear-wing.jpg

What made the EVO IX such a quick thing can be attributed in most part to its power to weight ratio, 7.1kw/kg. It had a kerb weight of just 1470kg and even less, if you opted for the performance pack, which included forged wheels by BBS, which sliced off another 1.1kg per corner.

tc-mr-brembo.jpg

The proverb says, “You can’t have your cake and eat it too”. You can, with a 2008 Evolution MR.

Sure it’s heavier, a full 155 kilograms if you want to get down to the nitty gritty, the Twin Clutch gearbox alone, makes up thirty kilos and the rest is down to various improvements and kit, which has transformed the EVO into a daily driver.

tcmr-open-3.jpg

Who’d have thought, Xenon headlamps with adaptive front lighting and self-levelling, Headlamp washers, Mitsubishi Multi Communication System with Sat Nav, Bluetooth and iPod connectivity, Rockford Fosgate 650 watt sound system and Leather combination seat trim with heated front seats – in an EVO!

rockford-1.jpg

But while the interior is a world away from the ultra basic materials and kit in the EVO IX, it is nowhere near the level of attention in the German marques. More work to be done here.

Next page…

But sitting in the driver’s seat of the Evolution MR remains the best seat in the house. The Recaro pews are slightly less bolstered than those in the EVO IX, but significantly more comfortable and easier to climb into and out of.

tc-mr-recaro.jpg

It’s not that Mitsubishi hasn’t been mindful of weight gain with the tenth incarnation. The new engine has been cast from aluminium not iron, which is not only 12.5kg lighter than that employed in the EVO IX, but produces more torque and more power at precisely the same revs.

tc-mr-mivac.jpg

If there was one thing I didn’t like when I first drove EVOs VIII and IX, it was the go kart like, quick ratio steering, which I found way too sensitive on a car which was capable of decimating any bend in any road.

I even called Mitsubishi’s press car boss in NSW and asked him, if anyone else had mentioned it. His answer was “no, never found that a problem”. He was dead right; I just needed more time behind the wheel after which, I would cherish its pinpoint accuracy. But it was also one of those things, which made the EVO a pure enthusiast’s machine and not exactly ‘punter’ friendly.

tcmr-evo-sunfront.jpg

The EVO MR is a much more comfortable steer with its rack and pinion set up. Not quite as accurate but more weight and less manic – all the better for tackling suburbia or the office commute.

The Brembo 2-piece front brake disc coupled with significantly larger brake rotors all round, has made a world of difference. Whereas, you had to bury your right foot deep into the firewall for a quick stop in the EVO IX, the MR requires a much lighter touch and feels far more progressive.

It just doesn’t feel as fast as the EVO IX, but that’s more about the way the power and torque are delivered, far more linear with new MR.

Its quieter too, more noise insulation this time around, unless of course you going for it in “Sport” mode, then that good old EVO metallic scream, is back where it belongs.

tc-mr-diffuser.jpg

While it might be heavier, the grip provided by the 18-inch BBS alloys shod with 245/40 Dunlop SP Sport 600’s in concert with Mitsubishi’s Super All Wheel Control System (S-AWC), which adds Active Stability Control, seems altogether contrary to the laws of nature and every bit as good as the EVO IX.

tc-mr-close.jpg

“Despite the added weight and slightly softer EVO experience provided by the specced up EVO X MR, I would suggest there is still no other car in this segment that can touch it, in the all round ‘go fast’ department”


 
  • Cracker Barrel

    What is this X111, 1X crap ?? X11 is a X Window System for GNU :D

    XIII, IX is your friend!

  • Matt

    Gotta say: great photos.

    No other Aussie car review web site (or even the magazines) get close to the quality of these. If they’re not using tiny press photos they’re all arty farty with stupid angles.

    Well done!

    Anyway, brilliant car. Would be nice if there was an option to tone down the rear spoiler.

  • Tom

    It’s getting seriously expensive isn’t it

    I love the front end, the back leaves me wanting, no doubt its an awesome car all around, its a real shame we don’t get the even higher output ones the pom’s get.

  • Tom

    Oh and this review makes out as if shifting gears is some sort of torturous activities. If you know how to drive a manual properly it is very rewarding. This may cut some tenths of the track, but i’ll take a manual anyday. I just wish mitsubishi didn’t cut the 6 speed manual (which was obviously so the DSG box would be faster then the old outdated 5 speed manual).

  • crouchy

    Great photos and story – found myself a new wallpaper =)

    Everyone seems to forget about the GTA evo available overseas in the EVOVII. Sure it wasnt a gearbox anywhere near in the same ballpark as this one, but it did have a full leather interior and steering wheel shifting~

    We didnt get it here but there are a few very quick imported AUTO evo VII’s getting around. Just look out for that GT-A badge.

  • http://www.littlepixiegifts.com.au Gift-Ed

    No doubt this is an awesome car and I don’t doubt any of its credentials. It just doesn’t LOOK like a $70k car to me. I guess that shouldn’t really matter, but I must be getting old.

  • http://www.fmgjbv.au rich boy

    looks like a normal evo but with the sat nav.

  • Fasthonda

    The dark colour tends to “hide” the dated shape of the car.It also doesn’t make the unsightly front completely overbear the car.
    I was a bit suprised about the 120,000 units(EVO 1-IX) sold world -wide.That shows such specialised sports cars just don’t sell well at all!.
    Good review but no way would I spend $70,000 on a Lancer.

  • smokin’R32

    Did you even read the article? Thought not

  • Wheelnut

    Quote [Tom]: It’s getting seriously expensive isn’t it?

    It’s all relative Tom.. It’s no more expensive than its direct main rival the Impreza WRX STi…. Besides if you bought a standard Lancer VRX and added the other features such as the Recaro Interior; Brembo Premium Brake Package; Eibach/Bilstein Suspension; BBS Wheels; and Rockford Fosgate ICE System either as a factory fitted option or aftermarket it would easily end up costing you more than $70k…. then there’s the engineering work in converting it from FWD to AWD and of course the TC-SST gearbox etc.

    So really you actually get more than what you pay for which makes it such good value…. I’d have one in a heartbeat

  • Milar

    It should be noted that the Top Gear “EVO Vs Lamborghini” video was a FQ400 (+100KW, Blisten shocks, Aluminum roof etc), not a stock EVO VIII. And yes, they are doing a FQ400 for the EVO X.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Im with you Tom on the manual…………Real Performance cars have clutches!

    • Max

      Really?? does F1 cars have clutch.. let me think ummmmmmm.. NO. THEY DON’T, what is more performance than an F1 car A Manual V6 Ute? LOL.. Budy things are changing.. Computer replaced the type writter, Laptop replaced the computer, ur nokia replace by an iphone..please don’t say real phones should have buttons as suppose to touch screen buttons ha ha ha . i have an MR and i know i dnt need clutch for this Pocket rocket. Thanks

  • Milar

    Woops. Never post before reading the article!

  • Big_End_Bearing

    I read with interest on autospeed that as a day to day drive, this car falls well short of what one would expect from a 70k performance car. Its the first review of this car I have read/viewed that states “Left in Normal mode, the Evo is almost undriveable in a sporty manner – the combination of trans lag and turbo lag mean you’ll miss every apex by many, many metres. In terms of response, a well-mapped standard auto – especially one in a current Honda – would walk all over the Evo.

    That is why I find it strange that this article states that all you need to do is to stick in D and it becomes a day-to-day driver, yet how can another reviewer make such a polar opposite comment?

    Anyway, thats my 2 cents. Give me an Evo VI Tommi Makinen Edition anyday!

  • Fasthonda

    “Smokin’R32 Says:
    November 8th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
    Did you even read the article? Thought not ”

    No I didn’t read the article – however,you must have been the only one that did judging by your indepth comment ;)

  • Tack

    Wheelnut

    I agree with you this time :D
    I think EVO X MR for 70K+ price is great value.
    (Well don’t mention about original price in Japan.)
    Well, new GT-R is 16K? more than double price and twice better than EVO MR?
    It is true value for money performance car.

  • Ivan

    Big_End_Bearing, you’re contradicting yourself. This article mention that it is bearable for normal driving, thus selecting D (start-stop traffic).

    If you want sproty driving, you have to engage “sports mode” by pushing forward the TC-SST.

    Please read the article before posting.

  • Yanzo

    i saw one of these on the street. i just stared at it. and i see it has a DGS gear box. but wait whay does it have a gear stick still?

  • Jared J

    Nice review guys. I’m not so sure about the idea of a luxury spec Evo (heated seats? a subwoofer? WTF?), but I’m sure its more than fast enough for me. what about the manual though? is it any better?

  • smokin’R32

    @Fasthonda: Yeah that was actually directed at rich boy, mustve been a delay with your post appearing. And for the record I did read the article, nicely done..

  • Cameron

    “power to weight ratio, 7.1kw/kg”
    Think, somehow, you got that backwards!
    @ 1470KG = 10437 KW would mean being powered by a small nuclear powerplant!
    what are the 0-100 & 1/4 mile figures?

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony

    Cameron, got that power/weight figure from Mitsu’s own “Lancer Evolution IX” brochure which I kept.

  • Adam L

    Well done to Car Advice for that article, and special mention for the photos, which are just fantastic! Really the leading car website in that regard…

    As for the Evo,it certainly comes across as being very desirable. It’s just a shame that it really is so expensive, I think the Ralliart will become the bigger seller of the two, especially given it’s also got the auto gearbox.

  • Fasthonda

    “smokin’R32 Says:
    November 9th, 2008 at 3:49 pm
    @Fasthonda: Yeah that was actually directed at rich boy, mustve been a delay with your post appearing. And for the record I did read the article, nicely done.. ”

    No problemmo :)

    Just to add,although I haven’t been kind in past posts regarding the look of the EVO,I certainly don’t doubt it’s performance attributes.

  • RoFlmaTiC

    I think it should be 7.1kilos for 1 kw

  • Ben Larden

    You took the time to take pics at the strip, so what about some times? Im guessing the times were a little embarassing.

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony

    Just a photo shoot Ben, no racing.

  • GGGGlen

    Great review, fantastic pics.
    Its the 2nd time now that I would go a EVO over an STI (Thought IX was hot).

    But that price is little steep…

    A VW Passat R36 is cheaper (whilst not same market) – for my requirements I\’d take R36 and bank the change.

  • WVB

    good read CA.
    I am surprised about the lack of slotted rotors on the brembos.
    and I can’t quite see $70K+ in it either.
    grab a used VII, IX or even a new VRX = same smile + change.

  • Big_End_Bearing

    Ivan, I did read the article. If you had read my article you would have seen the “contradiction” as you called it between CA’s comments on the day-to-day driving of the Evo and the comments from autospeed. I was purely highlighting that the two articles contradicted each other when commenting on the Evo’s every day driving performance when left in “D”. Maybe you should read the autospeed review, its quite interesting and provides a different aspect.

    Cheers

  • James

    Wheelnut…

    referencing a VRX Lancer and converting it to a EVO, by adding those features and modifying the drivetrain/chassis is very farfetch… yes it’ll obviously cost 100 grand easily if you account the work required… but its not a good comparo… A more suitable and fairer comparo would be the Ralliart Lancer converted to an EVO class… still the EVO has a different bodyshell, that the rear side fenders are flared to accomodate the wider track….

    moral of the story, its completely illogical to buy an inferior “version” and upgrade it to the elite version….
    And I think that was your point, but just thought I’d comment on the referencing method.

    back on topic this car is gun, thats all I’m gonna say. Yes some cannot justify the 70+K (75K drive away price tag atleast), but if you compare it to some of the Aussie big muscles, its actually decently priced.

    Its just so specialized as a race track car, that no matter how much they market it as a daily driver, it cannot be efficiently used as one…. if you live within 10km of work then I can see it as a daily driver, but anything further it’ll definitely add up cost wise, again for the people with extra dough its no issue….

    I still rather have the EVO IX or the current STi…or Audi S3 (as this is a better daily driver sports)…

  • http://navelcontemplation.blogspot.com Supercujo

    I could never bring myself to spend $75K on a Lancer…

    The WRX STi and the EVO are both based on much cheaper base cars, and going by the difference between the Subaru and Mitsu base models, I would pick the STi on that alone. Performance is similar. Looks are subjective, but I reckon the ‘new’ Lancer shape is dating almost as quick as the VT Commodore did.

    As an aside, I have found that modern cars that come out looking really good (aforementioned VT Commodore) date really fast. The other side of the coin being the ‘ugly ducklings’ at release (AU Falcon) end up growing on you and ending up being quite good looking by the end of the model run.

  • Nick

    Not sure but when you review a performance car would you not reveal the 0-100 kph time and 1/4 mile times? I am baffled by that omission. Guys come on please for street cred the times have to be given and please do not refer to the numbers from the Mitsubishi website… you had the car publsih the figures .. i suspect the Volkswagen R50 maybe quicker……….

  • http://caradvice.com.au OSU811

    My opinion is that a proper sports car should have a proper manual gearbox, in saying that though it seems these twin clutch auto/manuals are the way of the future eg(gtr,evo,911,m3) but I must be getting old because too me i still dont feel as in control or as confident unless its a proper man with a clutch!, thats why my vote would go to the STI plus the sound of the boxer engine is a lot nicer..

  • http://navelcontemplation.blogspot.com Supercujo

    Nick: Yeah, the 0-100 and 1/4 mile times would have been nice to see. Maybe some sort of in gear acceleration times.

    The in gear acceleration times really show up any turbo lag issues quite well.

    Maybe CarAdvice is trying to be like TGAU and not put any detail in their reviews (just kidding guys) :)

  • Big_End_Bearing

    Don’t know about Australian Evo X times, but UK Evo X FQ-300 auto and US Evo X GSR manual record 4.7s and 4.8s respectively.

  • Nick

    OSU811 … Evo does come in a 5 Speed manual. But the mystery around the acceleraltion times seem to be a really heavy guarded secret in Australia. CA .surely you have the 0-100 kph figures!!

  • WVB

    ^OSU, It seems a few here still like to use a full manual gearbox aswell. Bloody glad to hear it.
    Last time canned the dsg boxes I got flambéed which is why I gave up commenting on them as some are convinced they are the waaavvveee of the future, man!
    Contrary to what I said earlier, If it came down to it outside the evo models, I would stick with an STi 6 speeder too.
    Btw, these aren’t really proper sports cars as they’re based on 1.4 ton tin topped shopping hacks imo.

  • Joober

    “moral of the story, its completely illogical to buy an inferior “version” and upgrade it to the elite version….
    And I think that was your point, but just thought I’d comment on the referencing method.”

    Its a no brainer, Goes with every car, lets say from a G6 to G6E spending all the optioning to get to a E would cost you more than to buy the E itself.

  • h0tfuzz

    Now lets imagine Evo XI will have a carbon fibre body… that would be something…

  • simon

    I have driven as company cars- Evo 6 limited edition, evo 8, and currently an evo 9 ( not to mention a number of Sti’s etc). I am 50 years old, and the 9 is my daily drive and favorite. it has only done 25,000km

    I agree with all that is written here- The 6.5 was a brutal car, the 9 is more refined but you still have to work hard and “drive” all the time. Thats exactly what i like.

    My 2006 Sti was easier to drive daily but far less refined than the 9 in cornering. I even bought a current Sti but sold it a week later..awful awful awful car.

    I look forward to driving a 10… might suit an old bloke like me and I hope to be driving cars like this when I am super old. Price? who cares at $75,000 its 1/2 the price of a Skyline, and I am sure Mitsu dealers will discount

  • http://www.mitsubishiwd92840.org wd 92840

    Unquestionably imagine that that you said. Your favorite reason seemed to be at the web the easiest factor to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed at the same time as people think about issues that they just do not understand about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as outlined out the entire thing without having side-effects , other people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thank you