<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK Spy Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/18532/2009-mercedes-benz-clk-spy-photos-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18532/2009-mercedes-benz-clk-spy-photos-2/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:41:07 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: O</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18532/2009-mercedes-benz-clk-spy-photos-2/comment-page-1/#comment-100839</link>
		<dc:creator>O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18532/2009-mercedes-benz-clk-spy-photos-2/#comment-100839</guid>
		<description>that small part of the window that is covered up will meant hat the window can roll down there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that small part of the window that is covered up will meant hat the window can roll down there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twilight</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18532/2009-mercedes-benz-clk-spy-photos-2/comment-page-1/#comment-100771</link>
		<dc:creator>Twilight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18532/2009-mercedes-benz-clk-spy-photos-2/#comment-100771</guid>
		<description>i hate how in the rear window it seems to have a chunk taken out of it? almost as if merc wanted the long window design, but put a plastic piece there for vertical rear window operation perhaps? hmmm...

either way, besides that one small &#039;defect&#039; i like it. and i hope they keep it CLK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate how in the rear window it seems to have a chunk taken out of it? almost as if merc wanted the long window design, but put a plastic piece there for vertical rear window operation perhaps? hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>either way, besides that one small &#8216;defect&#8217; i like it. and i hope they keep it CLK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18532/2009-mercedes-benz-clk-spy-photos-2/comment-page-1/#comment-100767</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18532/2009-mercedes-benz-clk-spy-photos-2/#comment-100767</guid>
		<description>I know Caradvice isn&#039;t the originator of the rumours that it will be called an E-class coupe rather than a CLK, but I&#039;ve heard it so many times I thought it was time to comment. The first generation CLK had the same frontal design as its E-class contemporary, but was based on the C-class - just like the next generation. Just because it wears an E-class face doesn&#039;t mean it will be called an E-class coupe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Caradvice isn&#8217;t the originator of the rumours that it will be called an E-class coupe rather than a CLK, but I&#8217;ve heard it so many times I thought it was time to comment. The first generation CLK had the same frontal design as its E-class contemporary, but was based on the C-class &#8211; just like the next generation. Just because it wears an E-class face doesn&#8217;t mean it will be called an E-class coupe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
