Car Advice

2008 Mitsubishi Triton 4×2 Review

By Karl Peskett |

2008 Mitsubishi Triton 4×2 Review & Road Test

08triton4×2-f3quzoom.jpg

Model Tested:

  • 2008 Mitsubishi Triton Dual Cab 2.5-litre 4×2 – $ 28,990 (RRP)

Options:

  • Automatic transmission – $2000
  • Metallic Paint – $350

plus.jpg Spacious, Comfortable, Practical, Fuel consumption

minus.jpg Coarse Engine, Suspension too stiff, Plasticky interior

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF (3.5/5)

- Photography and words by Karl Peskett

The tradie’s truck. It has to be tough as nails, go anywhere, carry anything, and cart everyone, but now, there’s an economic downturn so, there’s going to be a budget constraint.Fuel economy comes to the fore, reliability, servicing, ease of use, etc, all play their part. If you’re never going to go off-road with it, then two-wheel drive is all you need.

08triton4×2-f3qu2.jpg

Enter, Mitsubishi’s latest offering – the Triton 4×2 Dual Cab. Now using a 2.5-litre diesel, instead of the previous 3.2-litre, Mitsubishi has shaved 0.9L/100km off the fuel consumption. It has also simplified the Triton, so it’s a bare-bones workhorse.

08triton4×2-interiorpass.jpg

We’re talking industrial-grade carpeting, a cheap plastic dash and door trims, and very hard-wearing fabric for the seats. It’s almost as if once you’ve finished with it for the day, you could hose the interior out, and hang it up to dry.

Thing is, while there’s more plastic inside than a Fisher Price factory, it doesn’t feel too cheaply done. Sure, look closer, and you’ll see the way it’s been put together – the fake screws around the gear-lever, the fluted grain of the dash, the visible seat bolts – but the colouring and mixture of textures means it hides a lot of the cheap’n'nasty look.

Pages: 1 2 3 4

08triton4×2-rearseats.jpg

The other thing the Triton has going for it, is the space. This can and does affect the look of the car. We’re quite aware that it’s not exactly the most attractive utility on offer – the Nissan Navara takes that title – but part of it has to do with the rear seating.

08triton4×2-sideview.jpg

If the area behind the cab was vertical, to maintain the tray length the wheelbase would have to increase. Can’t have that now, can we? The other reason for the scalloped rear, is for passenger comfort.

08triton4×2-instruments.jpg

The front seats are fine. Very comfortable, if a little flat. However, the rear seats are able to maintain an angled backrest, due to the curvature of the cab. This makes for a comfortable back seat ride. Anyone who’s been in the back of a Holden Crewman will know what we’re on about. While that’s all well and good in theory, the space is not the problem, it’s the floor pan.

The distance of the floor to the seat squab is simply not enough. As a result, you end up sitting with your knees around your ears, not a great look. However if it’s kids you’re throwing in the back, you’ll be fine.

08triton4×2-traybackdown.jpg

Speaking of throwing in the back; one job this week was to help someone out lifting a few panels in a shop. What’s going to be better than testing out the new Triton with a two-metre step ladder in the back? Two two-metre step ladders. Sadly, the Triton couldn’t load them in without them hanging out of the tray.

08triton4×2-r3quview.jpg

The only way to get around it, was to lean them up against the bar at the front of the tray, and tie them down. Considering how many tradies do have ladders, that was a disappointment. However the load capacity isn’t bad at all. 944kgs for the model we tested, which doesn’t make it a true one-tonner, but it’s pretty damn close.

08triton4×2-r3quviewzoom.jpg

That’s due to the leaf springs, which although enable it to carry a load, also make the back end highly stiff, and unforgiving. Sure, it’s expected, but every time you go over a speedhump, or a pothole, you get a massive jolt through the cabin, and a wobble that continues for a second or two.

The ride, then, isn’t exactly smooth. It’s almost truck-like in its handling, too, with plenty of roll, and bounce. Remember, though, that this is a workhorse, not a sports utility. It would be nice to have more direct steering however.

08triton4×2-f3quhigh.jpg

Similar to the four-wheel-drive version, the Triton 4×2 suffers from woeful steering input. You can whirl and twirl the wheel, but you’ll still be turning, long after the corner’s gone. The front drive-shafts are missing, so what gives? At least the feel is excellent – you’ll never push it too far.

08triton4×2-enginebay.jpg

It stops better than you expect with good feel and response from the brakes, and plenty of grip from the 16-inch tyres. What it doesn’t have plenty of, is power.

08triton4×2-dashlayout.jpg

Now, I’m not expecting to have my pants set on fire, but with a yawning 0-100km/h time of 13.4-seconds, the 2.5-litre fails to inspire, and four-hundred metres? Forget it, you’d start, and the next century would be here before you finished. It also is one of the roughest diesels around.

08triton4×2-didbadge.jpg

Thankfully it’s reasonably economical. 9.1-litres/100km isn’t bad considering the load capacity, though, and on test, we were returning under that – around 8.7L/100km – despite mostly city driving.

The automatic that we tested also held its own, with very smooth shifts, and no flaring, or clunking. It’s still a four-speed, but it wafts on the diesel torque, and the ratios are fairly evenly spaced, meaning it doesn’t suffer too much from big drops in power every time it shifts up a gear.

Considering you get Mitsubishi’s 5/10 warranty, as a tradies truck the 4×2 is value for money. If you’re on a budget, and you don’t want a Proton Jumbuck, at $28,990, with nearly a one-tonne payload, the Triton represents good buying.

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF (3.5/5)
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gif

Specifications:

  • Engine: 2477cc, four-cylinder,
  • Power: 100kW @ 3800rpm
  • Torque: 314Nm @ 2000rpm
  • Induction: Turbocharged, intercooled, common-rail diesel
  • Transmission: Four-speed automatic
  • Top Speed: N/A
  • 0-100km/h: 13.4 seconds
  • 0-400m: Not tested
  • Fuel Consumption: 9.1-litres/100km (Combined)
  • Fuel Tank Capacity: 75 litres
  • Fuel Type: Diesel
  • ANCAP rating: NA
  • Airbags: Front
  • Safety: ABS, EBD
  • Spare wheel: Full size steel (mounted under tray)
  • Tow capacity: 2500kg (braked)
  • Turning Circle: 11.8m
  • Warranty: 5-year/10-year (drivetrain)
  • Weight: 1817kg
  • Wheels: 16-inch steel

 
  • Reckless1

    That reads like a Mahindra review.

    Mitsubishi cheapening down even more?

  • Dlr1

    Reckless, as bad as this review reads this model is still a huge improvement on their past models. If fuel consumption came in under the claimed amount shouldn’t that be a positive, not a negative?

  • Andrew M

    they really need a better back end.

    when you throw an alloy tray on it, it looks totally wrong.

    the SSB curves under the car totry and marry in the body, but when you put an alloy tray on it, it looks totally unfinished (like something is missing)

    much better interior on previous models though, and same can be said for entire Jap range

  • Carl

    I sat in one a few weeks ago when they first came out and was so shocked by the cheapness, the strong smell of cheap contact cement and the hard, small and totally inadequate bucket seats that i just got out and told the salesman sorry mate I’m not going for that test drive after all!!!!

    Granted that at 6 foot 4 I’m slightly taller than the average Japanese car executive BUT I’m not that much bigger than the average tradie.

    Sorry Mitsubishi i won’t consider this one!!

  • timmy201

    So scores of 2, 2.5, and 3 gives an average score of 3.5?

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Paul Maric

    Timmy201:

    Obviously not Timmy201.

    Those scores are not the sole deciding factors in the overall score.

  • Realcars

    Good value.

  • http://deleted Alex

    I don’t see how this car deserves 3.5 stars. I mean, in your negatives it lists coarse engine which isn’t going to make driving all that enjoyable or even relaxed and you list stiff suspension which will mean that it will be unpleasant to be in for a long trip and plasticky interior which means it won’t be a nice place to spend time. Over all, sounds pretty horrible. When I heard Volkswagen were making a car like this, I really hated the idea but now, I think it’s time somebody stepped in with a car like this that has a good quality interior, (hopefully) a good ride and of course, much better engines. It would be nice to see one that wasn’t so ugly as well.

  • Reckless1

    0-100 in 13.4, what’s the time with a load? Can only get to 100 on a long downhill straight?

    I’m not sure what it is with the Japs, this and the Nissan have gone down in engine size and/or power in their “cheapies”, and are dumbing down the interiors as well.

    For the price of this you can get a Kia 2700, and you can definitely fit a 6ft ladder in that, and it doesn’t look shocking either.

    I was keenly interested in the upcoming Challenger, which is rumoured to feature the 2.5 diesel engine. But if it’s the same as this 2.5 engine, I will have no interest at all.

    I agree with Timmy – (2+2.5+3)/3 = 2.5
    If there is one more factor, the score for that would have to be 6.5/5, 2 more factors each 5/5, and so on.

  • Dlr1

    There are any number of singlecabs for this price or less that will accommodate a 6 foot ladder, but they wont carry five people.

    I think perhaps most reviewers need to realise that all dualcabs are compromises between cargo capacity and occupant comfort and safety. They will never be as comfortable as any wagon/sedan, nor will they carry a load as big as a singlecab of the same make and model.

    While the 0-100 time isn’t outstanding by any means it certainly will smoke a K2700. The last one of those I drove had trouble reaching 100kmh. The new K2900 Turbo may be better, but they redefine ugly.

  • Marc

    The score must be based on the price. Even in the last paragraph he says its good value.

    But for me, if the engine is that rough, I wouldn’t consider it. It does look pretty cheap though, and there aren’t too many one-tonners for that price.

  • Marc

    Dual cab one tonners.

  • Reckless1

    Haha, don’t you just love the journalistic approach – when you get called for a silly rating of the car, rather than explain how the rating is arrived at, you just remove the individual ratings from the story.

    Now we just have the overall score shown – is this to assuage Mitsubishi’s wrath?

  • Scotty

    If it only achieved 2 to 3 stars in the tests, why did it get an overall rating of 3 1/2 Stars???

  • Mick

    I have to admit I had one of these last weekend as a hire car, and we gave it a fair bit of punishment as expected with a hire car and it wasn’t all that bad.
    We had a Dual-cab 4×4 model but it was the 2.5 diesel. The engine was very noisy and the ride was quite firm as mentioned in the review but compared to some of the other light commercials around the place I have driven which handle like boats the Triton was quite refreshing.
    0-100 times are pretty insignificant in a review of a commercial I think as they are not designed to be traffic light racers.

  • Tyson

    thety are what they are, good features a little cheap, but hey they get the job done.

    Well bodys will be lengthened on the triton next year to accomodate more room as well along with a new motor. Also rumored to be the first ute on the Australian market to hav stability control and traction control next year some time.

    The current 3.2 Diesel is set to be replaced next year (hopefully) with a revised motor for Triton, Challenger and Pajero

  • XCHRIS

    I have had a glxr dualcab 3.2 diesel for just under two years. Good ride on the highway, excellent ride on the dirt, no complaints thus far. It was far better than the comparable vehicles at the time. Only problem was the cowboys out west thought I was a show pony…