Kia Sportage Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Kia Sportage Review

KIA SPORTAGE

Pros: Looks; infotainment & satnav; engine + transmission; power & torque;

Cons: Outward visibility, a little more road noise than we were expecting

By Alborz Fallah
FIND DEALS

Price: $40,990

Our Rating:  

The current-generation Kia Sportage has been a standout car for the South Korean manufacturer since it launched in 2010. It has established itself as one of the company’s most popular models in Australia, and with Kia’s latest updates to the Platinum variant it now has a fresh story to tell.

The Kia Sportage was designed by a now former Kia designer, Massimo Frascella (in the brand’s Californian design centre), and is about as Korean-looking as an Audi. Frascella, who has been involved in designing cars for Ford, Land Rover, Jaguar and even Aston Martin, worked under Kia’s head of design, Peter Schreyer (himself a former Audi designer), continuing the current Kia family look that made its first big splash on the striking Kia Optima.

One of Kia’s greatest strengths has been its ability to marry high-end European design and engineering with Korean manufacturing processes. This results in a car that is European at heart but with the affordability and value-packed features of a Korean car.

This is what differs between the Japanese and Korean approach to car manufacturing as the Japanese are more likely to stick with their own engineering and design ideals.

You can pick between five different Kia Sportage models, with the range consisting of three grades, three engine choices and the option for a manual on the base model.

Prices start from $26,740 for the 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol Sportage Si with a five-speed manual transmission and go all the way to $40,990 for the Sportage Platinum diesel, which is the model we are reviewing here.

Powered by a smaller version of the Kia Sorento’s 2.2-litre turbo diesel, the Sportage’s 2.0-litre turbocharged engine delivers 135kW of power and 392Nm of torque, which is actually better than similar engines from the likes of Volkswagen and Audi.

For example, if you compare it to the 2.0-litre turbo diesel engine found in the comparably sized Audi Q3 SUV, the Kia engine (which was developed at the company’s European R&D centre in Rüsselsheim, Germany) beats its luxury German rival with an extra 5kW and 12Nm.

It also compares more favourably to the two petrol engines – 122kW 2.0-litre and 130kW 2.4-litre four-cylinders – that both feel relatively underpowered in comparison.

While providing usefully more torque (195Nm and 165Nm advantages respectively over the 2.0 and 2.4), the 2.0-litre diesel also sips less fuel: 7.5 litres of diesel per 100km versus 8.8L/100km (2.0L auto) and 9.2L/100km (2.4L auto).

The diesel carries a $3000 premium over the mid-range 2.4L that will deter some buyers even if this variant delivers the better all-round performance.

On the road the Kia Sportage is similar to many of its Japanese rivals: smooth, easy to live with day-to-day, and with reasonable ride quality over poorly surfaced roads. Perhaps the only major criticism is the road noise generated by the 235/55 R18 tyres that can also make the ride a little harder than it ought to be for a car of its purpose. At least the bigger chrome wheels add some interest to the external aesthetics.

Inside, the high-spec Platinum variant now addresses a previous criticism of lacking a proper infotainment system with satellite navigation. Kia has now introduced a 7-inch high resolution LG screen with mapping provided by Navteq, and live traffic service from SUNA, as standard equipment (and as a $1500 option for the SLi).

This means the navigation system is able to help you avoid traffic jams, road works and even accidents by receiving live updates from SUNA at all times. This is the same traffic avoidance system that Mercedes-Benz uses in its cars.

Bettering that, though, Kia Australia will offer free map updates to the satellite navigation system for the first two years (a nice addition, given some manufacturers charge in excess of $500 for the yearly update). You don’t have to update the maps once the two-year free service is finished but it guarantees updates up until that point.

The screen itself is the nicest-looking interface to an infotainment system we’ve seen in any current car. That includes the luxury marques. It’s positioned high up and angled in such a way that makes it easy to glance at when driving. The quality of the screen is similar (but not as good) as Apple’s retina displays on the iPad and iPhone, in the sense that it’s almost impossible to see individual pixels on the screen. Boasting an 800 by 480 pixel resolution, it’s slick, smooth and easy to operate. It can be a tad slow to start up, but once you get it going it’s simple to use and even simpler to understand.

Apart from the new party piece, the Sportage’s interior is otherwise rather dark. It’s trying its best to be a Volkswagen inside, in the sense that the designers have got an eye only for the colour black. Unlike the Volkswagens, though, the Sportage’s interior makes do with a lot more hard plastics.

To be fair, the actual contact points for where you’re likely to touch the doors are soft but the dashboard is as hard as it gets. It shouldn’t bother you unless you’re pedantically obsessed with attention to detail.

The Platinum variants get a ventilated driver’s seat that pumps air through little holes in the seat to keep you cool (heavenly in Queensland’s scorching summer) and heated driver and front passenger seats for those cold nights.

Both front and rear seats are comfortable even for long journeys and the car can accommodate five average-sized adults without much hassle.

The rear seats are compromised for headroom, though, if you’re above average height.

Our biggest criticism of the Kia Sportage concerns outward visibility. The Platinum variant gets a reversing camera and sensors that make parking a breeze but they still don’t sufficiently compensate for the giant A-pillars that combine with oversized side mirrors to make it hard to see oncoming traffic as you approach a roundabout. It’s a problem that reminds us of the Range Rover Evoque, another SUV that prioritises looks over vision.

Overall, though, the Kia Sportage Platinum diesel is one of the better SUVs in its category. And with the inclusion of satellite navigation now as standard kit, it becomes an even stronger recommendation. Wait times for the diesel Sportage, which were getting past six months at one stage last year, are now just a few weeks.


 

Owner reviews of the KIA SPORTAGE Add a New Review

  • Dirty Harry

    I test drove one of these recently. Seat comfort was disappointing rear legroom footwell disappointing as was cargo space. Drivetrain great.
    Bought Outlander for its fantasic space and comfort. Happy with my purchase. I believe Outlander is underrated in the SUV market.

  • Robin_Graves

    The interior is a tad low rent but I think the rest of the package more than makes up for it.  Very nice.  Doesnt the Sportage also get a different AWD system than the ix35 that can push 90% of the torque to the rear whereas the ix35 can send no more than 50% to the rear?

    • Sumpguard

       

           I prefered the interior in my ix35 to the one on my sportage but it has since grown on me. It needs one similar to the Optima at the next update though.I also wish the backlighting was blue as it’s easier to read.

            I tested the outlander mentioned above and it was no comparison. Each to their own but mitsubishis interiors really are cheap and the varying shades of grey make it dreary  . Also  the car felt lethargic by comparison and the one I tested had an indecisive auto. It was still better than the rav4 I tested though.  

          Certainly was no roomier than the Sportage either. Styling is average to my eyes also with mitsubishi seemingly losing their way recently.

               I’m 183cms and over 100 kg and the seats are fine for me.

         ….and yeah it has a more advanced AWD system than the ix35.

          The niggles I have a minor. A pillars could be a tad narrower and you need to look a little longer over your left shoulder before changing lanes.  Cairns has some truly woeful roads and for the most part the ride is fine. Sometimes the steering feels a tad lighter than desired too.

          However when it comes to standard features it murders everything else for the money and over a year on it still looks fantastic.  I love my sportage and am not woried about the sat nav to be honest as it’s on my galaxy S3. Cargo space seemed no worse than outlander and there is sufficient legroom for a 183cm passanger to sit behind a 183cm driver (yes I have done it).

           I agree on the roundabout issue CA. A little extra care is needed there.
        

      • Hung Low

        The ride and steering is miles better over the IX35 and agree about the Outlander interior, but it is a much roomier beast.

  • Jerrycan

    A quite reasonable review of a quite reasonable vehicle but I  have a couple of suggestions.
    If you are going to criticise the headroom then do as Sumpguard did and put an indicative figure in.
    Secondly if you are going to quote comparative power outputs with the Q3 then at least question why it is significantly slower accelerating than the Q3. Maybe the Kia doesn’t quite achieve the claimed outputs? 
    It is commendable that you pick up on the A-pillar problem though. Holden’s Commodore has rightly been criticised for the same problem and it is significant issue for this car glossed over by other reviewers who seem more impressed by the fruit than the compromised view outside.
    I’m sorry but I drive a car with the intention of avoiding accidents. Pity it is not incorporated as part of the testing in ANZCAP

    • Guw2

      I’m no sure if you’ve noticed, but all Korean cars fall short of their paper-performance..

      The real world performance (0-60mph etc) & their MPG are sub-par..

      • Sumpguard

        You clearly haven’t driven the diesel. The performance is anything but sub-par!

      • bd

        Really?

        The Genesis coupe (prior to the refresh) is faster than the V6 Mustang and the 5.0 Genesis sedan has the same 0-60 time as the BMW 550i.

        As for fuel economy, the Elantra has gotten better fuel economy than the Ford Focus on a no. of tests.

      • Robin_Graves

        They are all tested to a standard, SAE, DIN etc.  As Alborz says below, misquoting power figures is crazy.  I put forward a reason that Hyundai / Kia are sometimes slower than what they should be.  Tight tolerances.  They take about 10K to loosen up and still keep getting better as more K’s clock on.  Also a peak power / torque figure doesnt tell the whole story, its all about the area under the curve, gear ratios etc.  As for economy figures, I think there is a little more room there for manufacturers to play games if they can tune their cars to do well in the simulations.  Holden’s 3.0 SIDI is a good example of this as a low torque small V6 has to work extra hard to pull a larger car.

        • Sumpguard

             All very true Robin. My car has just clicked over 11,000 k’s and I am just starting to see a better overall consumption from when new.  I think gearing may have part to do with KIA’s subdued accelration figures also?

              Some things are in the hands of owners Lead foot, aircon (mine’s always on) correct tyre pressure are likely to affect driving and if you’re stuck in a traffic jams all day then the manufacturer’s quotes are useless.

               Due to the delivery of power in my diesel (Alborz knows what I mean) it is hard to plod around in it. So my economy suffers as a result. Out on the open road the economy is brilliant for such a heavy vehicle.

             

    • Alborz Fallah

      I don’t believe it is significantly slower accelerating. In fact, I would happily dispute that. The 2.0R diesel makes for a very quick car. It certainly feels as though it has the quoted kw and nm – car companies are not in the business of misquoting engine figures, that goes for everyone. 

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      To add further to my comment. We’ve heard the feel in acceleration has got to do with the gearing in the Korean cars, they are geared more towards fuel economy than off the line acceleration. 

      • Jerrycan

        A valid argument if we were talking about a 4 speed box, but surely not with a 6 speed box?
        An Audi q5 2litre turbo diesel, only good for 125kw and 348 Nm and weighing about 180 kg more and apparently can get to 100kph in 9.5 seconds (and is marginally more economical to boot).
        I would be surprised if the Kia matched or bettered that performance.
        Don’t get me wrong, the Kia has ample power and torque for day to day driving and is substantially cheaper than the Audis and quite reasonable value for money and I have bought many Korean vehicles myself, My purchases were largely pragmatic decisions, not expecting much in the way of performance or handling but the biggest attractions being low purchase price and the 5 year warranty.

        It is just that many reviews of recent Kia/Hyundai vehicles quote class leading figures(direct injectionpetrol) and yet the reviewers have been a little disappointed with performance (especially low down torque)
        So assuming that the laws of physics are the same in Korea as elsewhere we have to assume they either gild the lily regarding figures or some other manufacturers under-claim for some reason.

        The only two instances I know of where a stock showroom vehicle has been put on a dyno were a Ford Xr6 turbo, which produced 25% better power at the wheel than expected and a Skoda Roomster 1.9D (of all things) that achieved the stipulated 77kw but at the wheel and not the flywheel which is a massive overachievement…. and makes you wonder why they bother quoting figures anyway.

        • Blueberry

          The truth is Mr Can that no matter what is said you will continue regurgitating the same argument. The responses that Robin, Sumpgard and Alborz gave make a lot of sense and actual research has gone into their answers. What you are saying is based on perception not so much reality. BUT everyone is entitled to their opinion so I wont knock you for that :)

          • Sumpguard

             

                I think CA and all of these websites need to take ALL cars for a retest once they’ve done 20,000 km’s and test the economy again!

  • bd

    The Sportage needs an updated/improved interior like the Optima, Rio and upcoming Cerato/Forte; maybe Kia will address it for the Sportage’s refresh.

  • Norm

    It’s a good lookin’ thing – if a little hunched in the flesh. But vision. Vision?!

    With so much emphasis on safety these days what has happened to the basics like good visibility? It’s not like a decent size glass house doesn’t look good?

    Super hi hip lines and tiny rear windows are style over substance. A trend that can’t end soon enough.

    • AndrewF

       Don’t you know, speed is the only factor affecting safety – visibility has nothing to do with it. In fact by following TAC’s ‘logic’, having good visibility would only encourage drivers to take risks…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=737660467 Kit Ho

    I can’t understand why the side windows can’t go further back? That D pillar is ridiculous

  • terri7

    The door mirrors do seem to be a bit of a problem, hindering important vision areas.
    I just checked on my Ford Territory to compare. The mirrors on the Kia are much higher, and the A pillars thicker also.
    I find with the T that on a winding road you do have to peer carefully around the A pillar and mirror, so the Kia would be more of a problem, especially if you sit a bit lower.
    The Sportage is on our consider list. The forward and rearward vision restrictions would be evident when driving the car, but it’s good that the reviewer made note of it, and not so much about speed and acceleration as most tend to do.

  • Hung Low

    Still one of the nicer looking SUVs out there. If I had to fault it, seats too small for long distance comfort and dash plastics a bit under par.

  • lozza

    I just recently traded a Subaru Outback in on a diesel Platinum and it has been a great decision. It drives great, gets great fuel economy, has heaps of features and looks great.
    My gripe with it is the headrest- they tilt too far forward for mine and my wifes liking. The US version gets adjustable head rest but the Oz model doesn’t.
    You get used to the visibility issue. It seems all new cares are getting thicker pillars making visibility harder.
    We recently did a trip from Sutherland to Newcastle with the kids and luggage and the average fuel economy was 6.4l per km. Hard not to like.
    I don’t understand how reviewers get uptight about hard plastics used in the interiors. As longs as the seats aren’t made of hard plastic it is not a concern for me buying a car. Fit and finish is more important.

  • Martin

    The thick pillars are due to roll over protection. I remember reading that it can support something like 4 times it’s own weight on the roof. To achieve a maximum roll over safety rating in the US a vehicle must withstand a force of at least 3 times it’s own weight.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      That’s correct, Martin. Thanks for pointing this out

  • Ray

    I have had my diesel platinum for 5 months now after nearly 7 months wait. Very happy with its performance and gadgets that normally you find in expensive cars only. I find the poor visibility actually makes me take extra care when turning, reversing etc. I think one just needs to adjust their driving habits to their car’s limitations in order to enjoy all its other capabilities.

  • Bradkane

    Can anyone tell me if there is any difference between the MY12 Platinum diesel and the MY13 Platinum diesel other than the year dates,I heard the MY13 Platinum diesel comes with Satnav as standard where as the MY12 Platinum diesel you have to pay an extra $990 for it,I am looking at buying one or the other and KIA wouldnt tell me and brushed me off and told me to ask my local dealer who either doesnt have a clue or wont say and wants to clear out any MY12s to make way for the newer model,I like the car but I found it a pretty poor service from Kias customer service team

    • Kia

      I curently sell KIA’s in the central west town of Orange and would be more than happy to discuss the differences with you.Disappointed to hear about your poor customer service experience.Out here in the country we depend on providing good customer service to ensure repeat business.Flick me an email if you like kia@autocentralorange.com.au or call 0263627169 and asked for Shelly

    • Michael Evola

      come see me at Ipswich Central Motors, Ipswich QLD 4301 :)

  • http://www.ooyyo.com.au/ Brian L. Gilman

    One of the better looking SUV’s out there at the moment. And the interior looks cool enough for me to consider driving one. Have only heard of good feedback from most of the people I’ve talked to that drive it. And most of all it comes with one of the best diesel engines available in an SUV as mentioned above when compared to the Q3. Maybe they’ll do something regarding those hard plastics when they come out with a new revamped version. We can only hope and see…

  • Vjs

    Purchased Sportage Platinum MY13 Petrol end of October and have driven about 2000 kms since purchase. Really pleased with performance so far. Nothing has bothered me so far and is going gr8. Agreed that it’s difficult to view oncoming traffic from right side on roundabouts, I am always careful with that and perhaps it’s just a way of driving. Impressed with the dealer too – got a good price, sales person has called me twice in 2 months to check if everything is ok with the new car and to book a first 3 months car inspection (free) – that’s pretty good – in car sales and real estate – who care about clients after sales is occurred ?

  • KAKA

    EU TENHO UMA LINDA D+