Chrysler 300 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Chrysler 300 Review

CHRYSLER 300

Pros: Strong engines including ripper V8; still looks cool; generally high level of standard equipment; rear view camera fitted to all models

Cons: Cumbersome handling; busy ride; no leather seats in base model; diesel carries $5000 premium

By James Stanford |
FIND DEALS

Price: $43,000 to $66,000

Our Rating:  

Can the Chrysler 300 be more than just a fad car?

That’s the challenge facing the US brand’s most important model as it arrives in Australia in new-generation form.

Chrysler has a history of producing cars with huge novelty appeal that have struggled for market durability. Think Prowler, PT Cruiser and Crossfire coupe.

They all caused a salesroom stampede thanks to awesome styling but then sank without trace when the styling aged and became passé.

The Chrysler 300C – there’s less emphasis on the capital C this time around – had such an incredible visual impact in 2005 that it was an instant hit (in salesrooms and in music videos) before sales started to fade away.

Chrysler is fighting hard to ensure the 300C doesn’t follow the other fad cars into oblivion, building a second-generation model that is a significant improvement on the original car.

It is still based on the original platform, which can be traced back to the mid-1990s Mercedes-Benz E-Class, though Chrysler says only 23 per cent of it remains.

Significant work has been made on the body, with new high-tensile steel, fresh panels, different windscreen rake, taller windows, and far more attention has been paid to reducing cabin noise. The interior is all-new and none of the engines has been carried over.

The model line-up has changed, with the introduction of a more basic entry-level car for $43,000 (some $10,000 less than the original cheapest 300C).

The range-topping Chrysler 300 SRT8 (above) is also significantly cheaper at $66,000, posing a serious threat to HSV and FPV.

Then there is the styling.

Chrysler was never going to have the same impact with this car as it did the first 300C. It just wasn’t going to happen. So, it decided to move the design on a little, give it sleek new headlights (making the most of LEDs for a wedge shape), alter the grille, play with the proportions a little, but produce what looks like an evolution of the last model.

Like the last one, the new Chrysler 300 has real presence. It looks a little more upmarket but retains the trademark muscular stance.

The SRT version looks particularly mean and sounds monstrous, too.

Its 6.4-litre V8 is a fantastic engine and delivers the kind of large-displacement thunder akin to the Mercedes AMG 6.2-litre V8, which is being phased out.

It also has all the mumbo you could ever require with 347kW of power and 631Nm of torque at your disposal.

We tested the SRT8 300C in the worst possible conditions, in the wet at Phillip Island, and were told to leave the electronic stability control on. Even worse, there was a nanny pace car in front to make sure we didn’t end up in the barriers.

Chrysler’s concern was fair enough. The SRT8 weighs about 2000kg and it feels like it is never going to stop once it gets up to speed.

We’ll have to wait to test it in the dry, but first impressions suggest this is more of a straight-line hero with a great big engine than a handling special. No surprise there really given the nature of the last car and not really a big deal given that most owners will probably just enjoy the straight-line fun that comes with such a cracking engine.

The other Chrysler 300 models we drove on a road loop didn’t inspire cornering enthusiasm, either.
You can really feel the vehicle’s heft, especially in greasy conditions, and it feels generally cumbersome.

The car does give you a little more feel through the steering than the last-generation model, which also had overly light power steering.

It does ride better than before but is still not as composed on bumpy roads as a Ford Falcon or Holden Commodore. Despite the revisions, the 300 feels like it’s riding on an old chassis.

Chrysler has hit the mark with the 300’s engine range at least.

The SRT 6.4 V8 is stunning, and one member of the motoring media managed to record a 0-100km/h sprint of 5 seconds flat in the wet. It is a seriously sweet engine, although that grunt is wasted in the wet.

The other engine that stands out is the base V6 petrol unit, the 3.6-litre they call the Pentastar, which generates a handy 210kW and 340Nm. This is a strong powerplant that spins quickly and propels this bus at an impressive rate. It is remarkably smooth and quiet, too.

If anything it could do with a touch more torque given the weight of the Chrysler 300. The automatic is generally excellent, although it does have to work to keep the engine singing when pressed.

In most conditions you just don’t notice that it’s there, which is the mark of a good automatic transmission.

The 3.0-litre V6 turbo diesel, from VM Motori, is also a competent engine and makes 176kW and 550Nm. There are no issues with torque here and it pulls hard when you get stuck in. The diesel is well suited to a big heavy car like this and it is generally smooth and quiet in most conditions.

However, it was a little coarse in our car at idle and low speed. While it only has five gears, the automatic works well, possibly because it doesn’t need to hunt around given the vast over-supply of torque.

Some diesel converts will want to pick this engine, which is also the most efficient, but it does cost a hefty $5000 more than the petrol V6 that is perfectly good.

Chrysler spent a fair amount of time and effort working to improve the cabin serenity of the 300 and it has paid off. The changes, which included the automotive equivalent of expanding foam to fill cavities, have reduced wind and road noise to a level you expect from a premium large sedan.

The interior quality has been improved and the general impression far superior to the last car. We found a couple of quality glitches, but the fit, finish and feel of the surfaces is very good if still a little off BMW and Audi.

The base 300 Limited does give the impression of cheapness due to its cloth seats that really stand out given that the doors and centre console lid are lined in what looks like leather. These entry-level cars don’t miss out on much, but the lack of leather in a car like this is so jarring that most customers will likely try and stretch to the 300C, which costs $3500 more.

Apart from this omission, the base 300 has all the comfort gear you need and is fully loaded with safety gear including seven airbags, stability control and (importantly) a rear view camera as well as parking sensors.

We like the multi-function centre screen, although at 8.4-inches it actually looks a bit too big and dominates the dashboard.

There is enough room in back, with adequate legroom, although there is not as much space as you might expect given the external dimensions.

It is the same with the boot, which should be cavernous but is actually quite narrow given the space taken up by the wheel guards, which have to be tall and wide given the big wheels (20 inches on some models) that fill them.

One nice touch is the way the boot pops up slowly. And generally there is a lot to like about the new Chrysler 300 range.

It’s a bit of a barge when it comes to corners and the ride is disappointingly busy, but strong engines, high equipment levels and stand-out styling means the 300 has a good chance of avoiding Chrysler’s long list of one-hit wonders.


 

Owner reviews of the CHRYSLER 300

Write a review for the CHRYSLER 300

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

  • Legnab

    Just diluting the big car sales, less to go around in a seriously declining category, death for the falcoon and sub 2000  a month for the crummer .

    • Rocket

      Big Cars are for Big Men. Small Cars are for…………

      • Legnab

        Big cars are for ugly fat men .

        • Oziking

          What are u like 4 years old…..well with your train of thought, you must drive a suzuki alto.

        • Smart US

          maybe you should spend some time w $cient@logy to help you  with your anxiety… its not cheap so you maybe need to sell your old golf and collection of spider man comic books but you can change to be a better man

        • Smart US

          maybe you should spend some time w $cient@logy to help you  with your anxiety… its not cheap so you maybe need to sell your old golf and collection of spider man comic books but you can change to be a better man

    • nickdl

      Maybe people like the size of large sedans, they just don’t like the mediocrity in the segment. You’d be mad to buy a Calais over one of these.

      • JooberJCW

        Agree, especially an SRT8 at 66K,
        Is that leather interior lining too? 

  • twincharger

    Nise looking sedan,perhaps a bit large.Very classy finished allround.

    • Legnab

      Noice , yer right like a crummer , classy no .

      • twincharger

        Every car these days look the same have the same functions.Good on Fiat/Chrysler for doing something different,like the Ram.Stop being so negative Legnad..

        • Legnab

          Yep , looks classy , so bland , even the pimps will give this a miss .

          • Robin_Graves

            Because your 8 year old Golf is sooooo avant garde hey bunghole?

          • Legnab

            Actually you should have gone to spec savers grave robber it just had its 1st birthday , and like the mk4 and mk5 before it , no explosions , just fun blasting down B roads passing old worn out falcoons driven by hoodie wearing bogans off to centre link .

            Saw your mates barry and nemo in the old tray top dragging an AU up the ramp yesterday , aint life fun .

          • Robin_Graves

            Bwahaha, you and your mate GolfScheiße couldnt even afford a Mk1 let alone a Mk6.  Maybe you should give up that failing saucepan shop and head off to centrelink, or just give up and go and flip burgers, its about all you could handle.

          • Legnab

            Golfie knows how bad falccons are compared to golfs , he speaks with credability , i really wonder how you cope peering under the roof rail in the old worn out AU .

            Keep grinding on with your mates barry/nemo/fung/twin charger , no one listens to your fables of VW woes , sales just keep going up ,it wont win you another falcoon sale so just give up , get a fiesta , DAS AUTO ist gut .

          • ricky

            sounds like we another clown that thinks VWs are a premium car…..they are about as premium as hyundais accept hyundais are way more reliable… i guess u cant expect much from a guy that drives a front wheel drive car and thinks its sporty

          • Garrywhopper

            The thing about trying to be funny is you carnt just keep saying something unfunny over and over again, change the record, try harder to be be funny vw boy

          • Blueberry

            Who the frig is Legnab???

          • Yaaaawn

            who the frig care.
            feeding trolls just makes them bigger

          • Yaaaawn

            who the frig care.
            feeding trolls just makes them bigger

          • Phunken

            Some Troll

      • ricky

        hey legnoodle last time i checked year on year golf sales were going down…why?? Das Crappy

        • JooberJCW

          Isn’t that normal until a new version comes out, 1st year peak sales, then gradually sales slow down as the model becomes older, and then up again when the new model comes out…

    • moonie

      Until it falls off.

      This is a Chrysler remember, even if it looks like an early 90s Hyundai.

  • Bass

    I actually think it looks really classy and the interior in a huge improvement. Props to Fiat/Chrysler for producing a car that looks this good! It’s just a pity the VM Motori/Fiat diesel doesnt come with the 8 speed transmission

    • nickdl

      For an extra $5000, why would you bother?

    • Iuog

      If you have driven it. You would of noticed it doesn’t need a 8speed.

  • DAVIDZ

    23% still to much benz…..;

    • theillestlife

      more like, 77% still not enough benz…

  • Daniel

    I’d rather have one of these than a Commodore or a Falcon! At least this is interesting.

  • FanBoi

    Well… the base model is 10K cheaper. Your average bogans that roll in a Falcodore can upgrade to a Chrysler. That is classy.

    //  

  • FanBoi

    Well… the base model is 10K cheaper. Your average bogans that roll in a Falcodore can upgrade to a Chrysler. That is classy.

    //  

  • MisterZed

    Cloth seats were a ‘delete option’ in the original 300C in Australia.  You could swap for the leather for cloth and reduce the price of the car by $1500.

  • Golfschwein

    Well, it’s a big like from me. Tortoiseshell interior finishes, wherefore art thou?

  • 42 = The Answer

    Good to see that they’re moving forward and keeping an entrant in the segment.

  • Freebies24

    “The other engine that stands out is the base V6 petrol unit, the 3.6-litre they call the Pentastar, which generates a handy 210kW and 340Nm. This is a strong powerplant that spins quickly and propels this bus at an impressive rate. It is remarkably smooth and quiet, too.”

    Holden Commodore SV6 3.6Ltr SiDi 210kW @ 6700rpm 350Nm @ 2800rpm

    Lift your game Chrysler

    • Projet L

       Except this one spins up like a honey and is always in the right gear with 8 to choose from.
      That boat anchor in the Crummer is like gargling a gravel milkshake.

    • Iuog

      0-100 is quicker in the 300 to the commodore.

      • MisterZed

        Get real.  Commodore weighs 1665kg while 300 weighs 2171kg.  You think a vehicle that’s 506kg heavier but has the same outputs can be faster?  The Chrysler Pentastar engine doesn’t even have direct injection.

        • Blueberry

          Why are you comparing the SRT8 V8 weight with the V6 Commodore?

        • Rick

          I think you’ll find the v6 does

        • Projet L

           Its all in the gearing.
          And I would check the weights you are comparing.
          1813kgs is what I’ve read.

    • Hemi hammered

       This is only the spec they are using here at the moment. This same engine is available at nearly 230kw.

  • Freebies24

    “The other engine that stands out is the base V6 petrol unit, the 3.6-litre they call the Pentastar, which generates a handy 210kW and 340Nm. This is a strong powerplant that spins quickly and propels this bus at an impressive rate. It is remarkably smooth and quiet, too.”

    Holden Commodore SV6 3.6Ltr SiDi 210kW @ 6700rpm 350Nm @ 2800rpm

    Lift your game Chrysler

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Pete-Petrass/1299968544 Pete Petrass

    It may be a better car b ut it just doesn’t look gangsta anymore.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Pete-Petrass/1299968544 Pete Petrass

    It may be a better car b ut it just doesn’t look gangsta anymore.

    • Homer

      Agree. I think it’s just the grille. Very average, smiley face….. Rip it off and put in the SRT mesh version and suddenly it looks pretty good again.

  • Aus_poppa

    Is it possible to have favourable or unfavourable contributions without the personal abuse?

    As to the car, the new pricing must put pressure on the existing entrants in the large car field – possibly more on the Falcon which, for better or worse seems mortally wounded because Ford, unfortunately but as usual, misread the trends so the Ecoboost Falcon is more than a year too late just as the Ecoboost Focus may suffer the same fate.

    Quite a few people might like the 300 – if one wants a big car at a non premium price it is worth thinking about.

  • Aus_poppa

    Is it possible to have favourable or unfavourable contributions without the personal abuse?

    As to the car, the new pricing must put pressure on the existing entrants in the large car field – possibly more on the Falcon which, for better or worse seems mortally wounded because Ford, unfortunately but as usual, misread the trends so the Ecoboost Falcon is more than a year too late just as the Ecoboost Focus may suffer the same fate.

    Quite a few people might like the 300 – if one wants a big car at a non premium price it is worth thinking about.

  • Homer

    Hey Poppa. Wonder if there is any correlation between blog rage and road rage? Good chance I’d say.

    • Blueberry

      Shut up Homer before I run you off the road ;)

  • Spvd02

    Interesting comments on styling. To me the styling doesn’t seem to geld too well. It looks like a bit of a mis-match compared to the old model, and seems a bit 1990′s esp. the front end.

    Just my opinion…

  • Spvd02

    Interesting comments on styling. To me the styling doesn’t seem to geld too well. It looks like a bit of a mis-match compared to the old model, and seems a bit 1990′s esp. the front end.

    Just my opinion…

  • Spvd02

    Interesting comments on styling. To me the styling doesn’t seem to geld too well. It looks like a bit of a mis-match compared to the old model, and seems a bit 1990′s esp. the front end.

    Just my opinion…

  • nugsdad

    The options and technology are a big wake up call to Falcodore. Adaptive Cruise, heated cooled seats etc, Aussie technology now lagging- VF will be interesting

    • Mick Dunn

      Agreed.  VF needs a big freshen up – outside AND inside.  People will wanting gadgets all the way across the range.  IQ was a good starting point but they’ll need to do more to really sell people considering what’s on offer in a lot of other cars from $40 to $60k.

  • Mick

    With the launch of this car I can see the death of the Falcon. I think Commodore will be able to keep up with all the technology. Having said that, I doubt you would use all this new technology much!

  • Mick

    With the launch of this car I can see the death of the Falcon. I think Commodore will be able to keep up with all the technology. Having said that, I doubt you would use all this new technology much!

  • Mick

    With the launch of this car I can see the death of the Falcon. I think Commodore will be able to keep up with all the technology. Having said that, I doubt you would use all this new technology much!

  • ChopsstaR87

    Damn it… this makes my decision alot harder next year when it comes to upgrading… Was going with G6E turbo for sure, but this isn’t as expensive as i originally thought it would be so now this will be on the list to consider again. good problem to have.. but a problem all the same.

  • Leighh

    G6E Turbo is way sweeter than this yanky barge……..that Turbo 6 is a gem and a credit to Ford. its a shame more people havent driven one. 

    • Axnweb

      i own G6E Turbo
      for three years now, it’s a good car fun to drive and has a reasonable equipment,
      but Ford together with the media absolutely destroyed it for the owners.

      The resell
      value is the worst I’ve ever seen, and so is the Ford after sale service. I can’t
      sell it for more than $26K!!!!!!! with all of the extras ticked, that is less

      never again

      • Legnab

        ROFL  tell that to the grave robber , not good news when the old falcoon pluments down the drain .

        • Robin_Graves

          Tell me something I don’t know bunghole.  Falcon and commodore (and Camry / Aurion) and Magna / 380 have always had poor resale.  Your point?  Like Mick said, great second hand purchase when only one or two years old.  Unfortunately that doesn’t help new car sales volumes, hence the current issues.  I guess with your meagre income every cent counts, after all, who buys saucepans from some ginger beer golf driver in Adelaide when the reject shop has a better range and better price?

      • Mick

        G6E Turbo is definitely a very nice second hand buy at those prices!

        • Axnweb

          you want it?

    • Phunken

      Problem with the G6E is its another Falcon on the road next to a taxi while the 300 is a standalone car with a more purposeful impact.

  • gt86.com.au

    WOW how big is that back seat!

    • MisterZed

      I’ve checked the article a few times now and I don’t see any photos of the back seat?

      • UMWHAT

        you’re clearly blind. I see it

        • MisterZed

          Still don’t see it.  First 3 photos = exterior.  4th photo = engine.  Photos 5-8 are exterior again.  Photo 9 = front seat.  10 = instrument guages.  11 = front seat again.  So where’s the rear seat?

  • Guest

    A very classy alternative to the Commalcon – those two are boganville look-alike identical twins separated after birth in comparison. On the other hand, SRT V8 looks like a pseudo-Bentley with its cross-wire grille and overall shape. “Jeeves, take me to the airport, I got a flight to catch”. So Pommy upper class, old chap! If I don’t say so.
    If I had the moolah, I wouldn’t mind the SRT V8. Particularly love the Optitron 3-D instrumentation gauges and cabin features. It would even be a value proposition to those stale Krautwagons from Stuttgart and Munich. Wouldn’t even feel inferior to those Stuttgart AMGees and Munich M-Technik guys either. HSvees or FPVees, c’mon – those are hoon vehicles by comparison!

    • Kaiju

      Bogans drive BMW’s…

  • Andrew

    The new generation 300 will sell better then the last one, because chrysler are targeting any one who likes big rwd cars, not just plastic gangsters & how good has the previous model kept it’s value, my falcon is only 4 years old & it is hardly worth anything & it is a perfectly reliable car, no more falcons & commodores for me, the 300 is the go.

    • Legnab

      Dont you go upsetting the grave robber he loves his old falcoon , another lost sale .

      • Robin_Graves

        Got another alias hey bunghole?  You da man.

  • MisterZed

    According to the Chrysler website, the kerb weight of the new 300 is 2171 kg, which is 371 kg heavier than the old model (which was 1820 kg).  I don’t think 210 kW is nearly enough power for such a heavy vehicle.  I also question the 9.4L/100km fuel consumption figure.

    • Iuog

      the 3 v6 models all tip in under 1900. the entry 300 is 1800. 
      Have the aussie spec sheet here in front of me.

    • James Cortez

      It’s a cadilac’ engine in Holden’s engine bay!! Since when can Holden make an engine?

      • ricky

        i love people like u that have big mouths and fail to do any research before they open them and make them selves sound like complete idiots….

      • Amlohac

        lol Wut?

    • Amlohac

      Which engine has the same torque figure?

      The 6.4 is more powerful than the 6.1 v8, the 3.6 is more powerful than the old 3.8, and the TDI is more powerful than the outgoing model?

      Are you sure about that?

      • MisterZed

        The new 3.6L Pentastar V6 has the exact same torque output as the 20-year-old 3.5L V6 it replaces!

        • Amlohac

          Hmmm it would appear you are correct. How very annoying.

          Yet with the 8 speed transmission 0-100 times and fuel consumption are much lower i’d hope?

          • JooberJCW

            Agree, if it more fuel efficient and smoother then jobs done. 350Nm is plentiful of torque for the average joe.

  • Save It For The Track

    Everyone lording the the merit of the new 300 over Commodores and falcons seem to be ignoring the story comments about the handling. If the handling is as described, that alone would put it last on my list if it ever included Falcon, Commodore and 300C, never having driven a 300 I can’t comment personally though. As for Falcons and Commodores, have driven a few in various conditions, and the FG and VE variants are well set-up handling wise (ESc calibration etc included) for Australian conditions including dirt roads. (though dust sealing can sadly be less than stellar). I also find that xr6 turbos are very nervous on tarred country roads with uneven surfaces as compared to an SS. The issues with Falcon I find are the mistake they made in the steering wheel height from BFII into FG (seriously who signed off on that!!), along with vehicles such as Mondeo and Focus having superior interior features such as voice control and the like even when compared to G6E etc. I believe that an ecoboost Falcon with Titanium Mondeo interior spec would be a very good vehicle. But as many of us always say, Ford always seems a step or two behind when it comes to marketing and/or reading the market. A 3 way (or 4 way if on must throw in an Aurion/Camry) comparison would be in order for this segment, over a varied drive program including country dirt roads, to better define which is best. Of course as we all know that doesn’t really reflect in sales figures, but at least the journos could have fun doing it, and all of us the fun in commenting.

    • Dave

      Good informed comment!

    • Smart Us

       great write up

    • Robin_Graves

      I agree with everything you said except for the comment regarding the steering wheel height in the FG.  I found that it fixed the horrible set up in the BA/BF where the wheel sat in your lap.  I cant stand BA/BF at all because of that.  As for the suspension tunes, I find the ‘luxury sport’ suspension in the G6E turbo better than the XR6T for ride on bumpy roads yet the tradeoff in cornering is not that great a loss.

      • Legnab

        What a melon head  , raves about his boggo falcoon and then admits its got  steering height problem . no its a seat problem , to high made for 5ft turban head taxi boys .

        The taxi drivers all complain about peering under the roof rail , G6E turbo is a grandpa car , luxury sport tralalal

        • Robin_Graves

          Maybe you need to wipe the jiz out of your eyes for a second and learn to read bunghole.  I said the steering/seat height issue was FIXED with the FG.  I’m 6’3″ and have no issues with the seat height / steering height.  

          An 11 sec grandpa’s car, not bad.  The taxi driver’s complain about BA/BF’s seat height, as they do about VE’s pillar thickness, as they do in Brisbane about the Pus-sat wagons they have that are a never ending problem after problem.  Try lining up your roller skate against one of these ‘grandpa cars’ and see who comes off second best, that’s if your buzz bomb doesn’t break before it gets off the line.

          • Legnab

            So all the journo’s who complain about the dumb seat height in the FG are wrong , oh you probably drive with the seat back at a 45 degree angle , good look , still you get to see under the roof rail .

            Nothing like sitting on the car not in it , not sporty at all , try 13secs .

  • Mick

    I do wonder about the handling. 
    It wasn’t mentioned as an issue in other launch reviews. Agree about the very good handling of the Commodore though (SS-V is my only experience).

    • Amlohac

      Thinking the same thing. Other reviews dont mention handling as an issue. Although they do say its much better than the outgoing model… havent read a comparo between the local gear (holden ford)

  • john

    I like it.  In SRT8 guise it looks good. The interior has been improved and the power and torque figures are now very healthy. I don’t like how the weight has balooned to over 2 tonnes and a 5 speed auto is just so yesteryear. Come on Chrysler. Get with the programme. A 6 speed auto is now considered behind the times yet you still persist with one ratio less than what you should be. The 6.4l hemi will be fine with 630nm of torque able to fill any ratio gaps, but it should’nt have to should it?

  • Amlohac

    Having now driven one, i cant honestly say the handling is bad in any way at all. Its 100 times better than the last one.

    • Amlohac

      *can honestly say.

      Its damn good actually

  • Rick

    I’d have to drive one before I’d comment on how it handles especially given the reviews out of the US one of which says the Srt handles as well as an M5 which is a big call . In my opinion if it drives well I’d buy one over the commodore of falcon however the commodore and falcon are still 2 of the best cars on the market and hugely better to drive than the front drive mid sizers

    • Amlohac

      BETTER than an M5?

      Holy crap thats a rather large statement.

  • LOL

    The front lights look a bit japanese to me and I don’t like that look.
    It has a great engine with so so handling.
    Comparison to an M5 is like comparing  corvette to a ferrari
    There is a price difference for a reason
    Some of the people who drive these cars and HSV and Falcon Turbos etc  from my experience are financially challenged with bad road manners and I am guessing from their behaviour have small genitals. 
    My god I have come across some pigs.
    Interesting market segment this.

    • Rick

      Try reading the review on car showroom’s website they paint a fairly different view of its handling . As for you comments about the Aussie cars and this one , maybe next time you should have a look at the way the euro snobs drive their cars , holding up overtaking lanes everywhere, not knowing how to use indicators , stop at stop signs etc . There are bad drivers everywhere and what sort of car they drive is irrelevant , I thi you’ve been watching to much A current affair

      • LOL

        Your reference to ” Euro snobs” says it all.
        Your are the personification of this segment.
        Go ahead you teach em how to drive.
        In your Prius…not

          

        • Rick

          I’m guessing given you opinions on rear drive v8s you’d be the one driving a Prius , probably the 7seat one . As I said best you drive you before deciding that it is a bad car . It still looks better than any VW ever built and will probably last longer

          • LOL

            You’d be guessing wrong 
            I never said I had a problem with rear drive v8s -just many of their  drivers e.g. the smart arse tradie at knock off time. I did not say the 300 was a bad car and I don’t drive or like the Prius And I don’t care about VW ‘s .Not one point guessed  right.Now let me guess you drive a V8 , hate Euros especially VW, hate  the big end of town and hate Toyota.Bet I got more right than you did  

          • Rick

            Ok fair call you don’t have a problem with v8s just the people that own them . And you’re right again you didn’t say the 300 is a bad car “just has so so handling” . As for your assumptions of me they are almost correct . However, I don’t own a v8 , I have a turbo six and a current model diesel Santa fe . I quite like euros and have owned 3 in the last few years including a VW ( however after numerous problems , you’re correct in saying I don’t like them . Why would I ? ). we did enjoy owning the BMW and the Audi . As for toyotas the only cars they build that are any good are the aurion and corolla. ( however not class leaders) And their 4wd and SUVs are barely better than a great wall and are only bought by people who ” have to have a Toyota ” they certainly didn’t test drive anything else . So if you don’t own a Prius what do you own?

    • Legnab

      Correct LOL ,mentally challenged as well, all about speed and lane hogging in their fat cars,daddy drove one so it must be good , dinosaurs , doomed .

      • twincharger

        Legnoddy
        Does it annoy you that veedud dont make cool cars like the Chrysler 300.Rather than thoes dime a dozen cars they do make???zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

        • Robin_Graves

          He thinks a broomster is cool, show’s what his opinion matters.

        • Legnab

          I fail so see whats cool about an overweight , bad handling uneconomical piece of ancient history .

          Sure a few bogans with borderline low IQ’S  will love it , but the rest of the world has moved on , its a bit like the falcoon desined for the dustbin of history .

          • Ricky

            Go back to your front wheel drive hair dressers cars, your the one with the narrow minded low iq….

          • Schah7

             Legnab COMMODORE is as much on THAT  “destined for the dustbin of history” as the Falcon.
            Speaking of HISTORY the v8 in the Holden is already there.! lol.!

          • Amlohac

            What are you talking about, Pushrod is the way of the future damn it!…. :-P

          • Dave S

            ‘overweight, bad handling and uneconomical’ that could describe most of the popular SUV segment.

  • JooberJCW

    Just handles, just handles, not too worry mate.

  • Dave S

    It looks like a great car. a nice evolution of the earlier model. This is what the market needs. Something a bit different. Nice to see a review that is not a small hatch or another SUV.

  • HEMI-for-me

    does anyone know what fuel does SRT8 run on? US websides indicate Premium gasoline which is rated at 91 – 93 RON. will it run on our regular unleaded? let me know.

  • Martin

    Did the article happen to mention when it is going on sale? I may have missed it. I think it looks really appealing.

    It is general consensus around the office and on site that the declining sales of the commodore are due to the same shape still being for sale 6 or 7 years later. Their 3, 4, and 5 year leases are up and while they would like to replace and upgrade their commodores (and variants) with newer versions, the current one on sale looks almost identical (excusing the various revisions and upgrades) to the one they own now so they are opting for SUV’s that do exactly the same job for the same money.

    Wholeheartedly understand that this is not the only reason but it’s one that I keep hearing over and over for why they aren’t taking out new leases on commodores (can’t speak for Falcon because no one seems to own one here) and it makes complete sense to me. 

    Not sure what we are going to do when the lease on our commodore runs out at the end of next year.

    • Amlohac

      On sale now.

  • Psshhhht

    is there there a mid range v8 option or is it only the SRT now?

  • Northstar

    I was all primed to buy one of these – a black luxury model with panoramic sunroof, cream and brown interior for $58k. The only car i’ve found interesting in some time and i’ve looked at and driven quite a few in the past 6 months. Spent months looking over the web until it arrived here and I went to have a look. Devastated! I haven’t seen a car this poorly finished for more than 10 years (mind you I haven’t looked closely at some of the Chinese cars). The exterior fit and finish on the 300 was appalling. Door panels significantly over or under-flush. The edges on the bonnet weren’t even sprayed to the end. The panel fit around the boot has such massive gaps i’ll be amazed if it doesn’t leak. But I love the idea of this care so I start thinking to myself, hang on it’s only $58k, I love how this car looks. I love the interior. It’s a really interesting car. Can I overlook those things? Who am I kidding. What worries me is what these shortcomings might represent. How can I believe the transmission will be well built, the engine, the electrics etc reliable if all evidence that I can see tells me – screams at me – be afraid, be very afraid. So I google. Now you’ve always got to be cautious of what you read on the net. But check out some of the forums on respected websites like Edmunds. Suffice to say my fears may be well founded. All kinds of issues it seems. Frightening. Let the buyer beware. Something else for me I’m afraid. Really devastated.

  • MainOz

    If you comment about a car with a +3000mm wheelbase having a  lack of handling you are a knob. Thats longer than a WM statesman. And I know first hand that driving a Stato it is like riding two bicycles at the same time through a pond of raspberry jelly.