Volvo details future safety systems | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Volvo details future safety systems

By Tim Beissmann
FIND DEALS

Volvo has lifted the lid on its next generation of vehicle safety systems designed to protect drivers from stray animals and red-light runners, and take full control of the car in congested city traffic.

The trio of safety projects – autonomous driving support, intersection support and animal detection – are the Swedish brand’s latest efforts to realise its ambition that nobody is killed or seriously injured in a new Volvo by 2020.

Volvo’s autonomous driving technology aims to liberate drivers from motoring monotony by taking total control of accelerating, braking and steering function in traffic queues. Relying on data from a camera and radar sensors, the system perceives the vehicle in front and follows behind in the same lane. If the vehicle in front swerves sharply to avoid an obstacle, the Volvo will veer in the same direction.

“This function has considerable scope for making the driver’s life easier,” said Volvo safety function developer Fredrik Lundholm. “However, it is always the driver who decides. He or she can take control at any time.”

Intersection support is designed to prevent crashes caused by vehicles that run red lights and stop signs. The sensors take a broader view to assess the entire traffic scenario and the system applies the Volvo’s brakes automatically if it perceives immediate danger.

Volvo is testing the technology over hundreds of thousands of kilometres in a range of traffic conditions around the world, as the system needs to be calibrated specifically for different markets – such as the busy streets of Bangkok – to suit traffic intensity and driving styles.

Volvo is also focusing on improving safety in rural areas, evolving its pedestrian detection technology to detect and automatically brake when animals are perceived in the vehicle’s path.

Drivers in Sweden reported 7000 collisions with elk in 2010 – roughly the same number of drivers in New South Wales that reported a collision with a kangaroo in the same year. A study by the University of Umea found that 23 per cent of road deaths in Sweden between 2003 and 2010 occurred after the driver swerved off the road to avoid elk, while around 200 people are killed in the US every year in collisions with animals, mostly deer.

Volvo is not initially aiming to avoid collisions completely with animals, but rather reduce the speed of impact from cruising pace (100-110km/h), where most animal incidents take place, to less than 80km/h, where the car’s safety systems can work effectively and reduce the risk of serious injury to the occupants.

The system is currently being developed to recognise large animals like elk, stags, horses and cattle, but in the future will be refined to detect smaller animals such as deer, wild boar, and potentially even kangaroos.

Volvo Vision 2020 – Autonomous Driving B-Roll

Volvo Vision 2020 – Intersection Support B-Roll

Volvo Vision 2020 – Animal Detection B-Roll


 

  • Gerhard Schreiber

    I would like to advise CarAdvice and its readers, Volvo’s 2020 vision went up in smoke on Saturday evening. Remember Volvo said ‘No one should be killed or seriously injured in a Volvo’? It just occurred in the USA on Saturday. The following is an extract of the news article: “A teenage boy has died after a Saturday evening car crash on Trickum Road near Netherstone Drive, Cobb Police said.

    Ryan
    Aschenbach, 18, died Sunday. Cobb Police said he was driving a 2006
    Volvo S40 with two other teens in the car about 6:30 p.m. Saturday, when
    the Volvo crossed over the double yellow lines on Trickum Road and
    collided with a 1998 Lexus GS400 driven by Joanne Green, 52, of Roswell.
    Read more: The Marietta Daily Journal – Teen dies after crash on Trickum Road “So as you can see the Volvo goal is now officially over. It is sad for the family of the teenager involved but this demonstrates you can die in a Volvo. And it wasn’t an old model it was a 2006. If he was driving a Mercedes he might have been alive but regardless there will never be such ridiculous claims coming from top that no-one will be killed or injured in a Mercedes. Mercedes is a far superior product to any other car brand but that’s a discussion for another time.

    • Noel

      Really……this is the exact comment taken from the Volvo website “the aim is that by 2020 no one should be killed or injured in a new Volvo.” The comment is very subtle and difficult to understand, so I can see where you went wrong.  You will notice it says “the aim” and “by 2020″ this means Volvo are aiming to sell cars in 2020 that people do not get killed or seriously injured in, I don’t think they are talking about Volvo’s from 2006.  Also to make a claim like “If he was driving a Mercedes he might have been alive” is absolute nonsense.  You have very much taken the Volvo mission statement out of context.

      If you were in any way related to the young man killed, I am sincerely sorry for your loss, no need to take it out on the manufacturer though.

      • Steve

        To add to Noel’s comments, Volvo is already moving towards their “Volvo 2020″ goal. Euro NCAP awarded the V60 the 2011 title of Safest Large Family Car.

    • CCD

      Check the real life accident stats from Monash uni. A Camry is safer than a Volvo and it would not have a chance against a large Lexus.

      • Shak

        How do you figure that? I’d wager the active and passive safety systems in any modern Volvo are much more advanced than whatever you could get in a Toyota, not to mention the engineering behind a Volvo, as opposed to a Camry.

        • CCD

          Go and check out the real life accident stats from Monash uni. Look out for Camry and any Volvo.

          • Candart3

            Toyota (and Lexus IS a Toyota in a suit) produces cars that it copies from other manufactures. It has never produced an original. Hence it will always be behind the competition. All Lexus cars (Except the large Landcruiser based 4×4) are rip-offs of BMWs and Mercs. Even down to dimensions and angles.
            As for the crash comparison data…. like all statistical information it is geared to an answer.
            Volvo wants the 5 star rating to increase to separate the field a bit….what does that tell you. 
            When it comes to safety Volvo still leads the industry.
            City Safe is now on all prestige manufacturers agenda. As was BLIS, ROPS, SIPS, Lamdasond, particulate filters, 3 point seat belt, built in roll cages etc etc.
            Sure making sports cars is testing their skill.
            But safety isn’t.

    • guest

      What an embarrassing, biased comment Gerhard, you would have to be German.
      A very diplomatic response by Noel.

  • Save It For The Track

    ” Relying on data from a camera and radar sensors, the system perceives the vehicle in front and follows behind in the same lane. If the vehicle in front swerves sharply to avoid an obstacle, the Volvo will veer in the same direction”. A couple of intersting points and scenarios rasied by this statement. First off all of these new systems being developed to bring cars to a stop and maintain a safe distance are mentioning radar. Many manufacturers are jumping on the radar bandwagon. Radar must be very reliable and accurate. Why then does everyone bleat when talking about speed detection using radar????.
    .
    Next point. What if the car in front blows a tyre, is being driven by a drunk or the driver passes out or similar and that is why it “…swerves sharply…”? Sounds like too much automation and too many gadgets to further dumb down and desensitise the driving experience. If people really need these gadgets to drive, catch a bus.

  • Freebies24

    Good luck spotting the roo behind the bush that is about to jump in front of your car want animal protection use your eyes and invest in a bull bar

    • Smart US

       a proper driving instructions… and not to over do your speed… volvo reminds me development in Golf equipment – the amateur handicap dropped over last 40 years or so by 3 strokes.. with all the R&D involved… its driving technique not an equipment

  • Peter

    I love volvos, but if they are investing in R & D, it should be for a way to reduce their semi trailer comparable turning circles.  Just shy of 12m for the current s60 is obscene for a medium sized car, the old s60R was 13m.  Perhaps a further ambition should be “by 2020 all volvos will be capable of a u-turn”