<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW X5 M Sport Package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheapest Car Parts</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-279379</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheapest Car Parts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-279379</guid>
		<description>The BMW sports package is very good overall however I do not think that it matches the practicality of the Mercedes range of cars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BMW sports package is very good overall however I do not think that it matches the practicality of the Mercedes range of cars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99411</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99411</guid>
		<description>Not my cup of tea but they popular in my neck of the woods,got to say better than Mercs equivalent though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not my cup of tea but they popular in my neck of the woods,got to say better than Mercs equivalent though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iz</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99410</link>
		<dc:creator>Iz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99410</guid>
		<description>The M-Sport pack cheapens the look of the X5. Its a fine looker as is. It really begs the question though; the previous gen X5 with its 4.8is (or even 4.6is) model looked really tough and aggressive and what have you with the &quot;sports&quot; bodykit/package on it, why have they failed with this generation&#039;s sports pack? They must&#039;ve hired a 12y/o that spends too much time in Halfords (or Autobarn/Super Cheap =p) to do the new bodykits. 

(For further example, look at the additional items that customers can option for the 5 series; a stupid looking little rear spoiler that ruins the look of the car utterly and completely. A knob that doesnt live too far from me drives one with it, every time I drive past I want to rip it off because its such an abomination)

And I still cant stand the naming sequence of BMW&#039;s cars equipped with &quot;xDrive&quot;.

If they so must put an X in the name, whats wrong with just x48i or x30d or whatever.. -_-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The M-Sport pack cheapens the look of the X5. Its a fine looker as is. It really begs the question though; the previous gen X5 with its 4.8is (or even 4.6is) model looked really tough and aggressive and what have you with the &#8220;sports&#8221; bodykit/package on it, why have they failed with this generation&#8217;s sports pack? They must&#8217;ve hired a 12y/o that spends too much time in Halfords (or Autobarn/Super Cheap =p) to do the new bodykits. </p>
<p>(For further example, look at the additional items that customers can option for the 5 series; a stupid looking little rear spoiler that ruins the look of the car utterly and completely. A knob that doesnt live too far from me drives one with it, every time I drive past I want to rip it off because its such an abomination)</p>
<p>And I still cant stand the naming sequence of BMW&#8217;s cars equipped with &#8220;xDrive&#8221;.</p>
<p>If they so must put an X in the name, whats wrong with just x48i or x30d or whatever.. -_-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarenCaren</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99409</link>
		<dc:creator>KarenCaren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99409</guid>
		<description>So good to look at. BMW still doing great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So good to look at. BMW still doing great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smokin'R32</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99401</link>
		<dc:creator>smokin'R32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99401</guid>
		<description>The lack of airmatic suspension and 22inch spinners is a deal breaker for me.
/sarcasm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of airmatic suspension and 22inch spinners is a deal breaker for me.<br />
/sarcasm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victory</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99373</link>
		<dc:creator>Victory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99373</guid>
		<description>and stop calling it an M X5 when it&#039;s clearly an X5 M Sport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and stop calling it an M X5 when it&#8217;s clearly an X5 M Sport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victory</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99372</link>
		<dc:creator>Victory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99372</guid>
		<description>I am a big fan of the X5 4.8i with 20inch wheels.
Not a fan of this M sport packs paint work. I like how the lower part of the body is unpainted in the normal X5.
And I get that most people don&#039;t see the point of these suv&#039;s, but when you have a big dog, these cars can be a bit desirable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a big fan of the X5 4.8i with 20inch wheels.<br />
Not a fan of this M sport packs paint work. I like how the lower part of the body is unpainted in the normal X5.<br />
And I get that most people don&#8217;t see the point of these suv&#8217;s, but when you have a big dog, these cars can be a bit desirable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Juraj</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99368</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Juraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99368</guid>
		<description>Dammit just chuck in the M5&#039;s V10!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dammit just chuck in the M5&#8242;s V10!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GTRmon</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99362</link>
		<dc:creator>GTRmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99362</guid>
		<description>No, they can&#039;t call it an &quot;M X5&quot; because BMW has rules on how they name cars. M cars get the M in front, cars that have a sports package get an M after the model designation. The only exception is the Z4 M which is a M car, but being called an M4 would be misleading.

I really don&#039;t like X5s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they can&#8217;t call it an &#8220;M X5&#8243; because BMW has rules on how they name cars. M cars get the M in front, cars that have a sports package get an M after the model designation. The only exception is the Z4 M which is a M car, but being called an M4 would be misleading.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t like X5s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotTheStig</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99339</link>
		<dc:creator>NotTheStig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/18068/bmw-x5-m-sport-package/#comment-99339</guid>
		<description>Geez, looks riced out to me...  I just don&#039;t get the colour coded everything look. Some sections of black help break up the look in lighter colours.

If I was ordering a new X5, the only things I would want from the whole M Sports package would be the steering wheel and the anthracite roof lining.

What a anti-bargain at $11k on the base model. I reckon you would lose every cent of that in extra depreciation too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, looks riced out to me&#8230;  I just don&#8217;t get the colour coded everything look. Some sections of black help break up the look in lighter colours.</p>
<p>If I was ordering a new X5, the only things I would want from the whole M Sports package would be the steering wheel and the anthracite roof lining.</p>
<p>What a anti-bargain at $11k on the base model. I reckon you would lose every cent of that in extra depreciation too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/300 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-11 19:16:19 -->
