Car Advice

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback First Steer

By Alborz Fallah |

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

Mitsubishi’s all-new Lancer Sportback could be the car to take the Japanese car-maker to a sales position in front of local manufacturer Ford’s Falcon large sedans.

- by David Twomey

That’s the contention of Mitsubishi Motors Australia Limited (MMAL) product planning manager, Chris Maxted, who says adding the hatchback version – Sportback in MMAL lingo – to the Lancer range should push the small car into a number three or four sales position in Australia.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

Having spent several hours driving the VRX version of the Sportback, with the upgraded 2.4-litre engine, around some challenging roads between Orange and the Blue Mountains in New South Wales, CarAdvice can say this is an excellent car and one we believe will have strong market appeal.

It’s also been priced at exactly the same figures as the sedan models, offering buyers a choice, but not a price hike!

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

Leaving aside the new engine in the VRX the Sportback is, up to a point, a case of “nothing’s changed” as the car is identical to the already strong selling sedan version up to the back doors.

From there it drops two millimetres in headroom and adds an attractively styled sloping back that MMAL says will ultimately double the sales of Lancer in Australia.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

MMAL president and CEO Robert McEniry says the Lancer Sportback completes the wide-ranging and award winning Lancer range in Australia.

According to Mr McEniry Mitsubishi has experienced solid success with sales of the Lancer sedan, last month 1404 left showrooms, and with a versatile hatch style body, he told CarAdvice that the Sportback would pen up additional sales opportunities.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

He says that the European designed Lancer Sportback will appeal to all small-car consumers who seek stunning style, pert performance, five star safety and the versatility of a hatch-style body.

Next page…

Pages: 1 2 3 4

He said that in the current economic environment Australians were turning to the small car to meet their driving needs and the success of the Lancer sedan was testament to that fact.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

Mitsubishi has not had a hatch style small car for 13 years and sales figures show that sales of hatchbacks have been growing at a greater rate than the strongly increasing small car sales over the past 12 months.

MMAL believes it has been playing in that market with one hand tied behind its back by not having the Sportback to offer buyers.

The Sportback range will mirror the Lancer sedan range, being offered in entry-level ES, mid-range VR and sporty VRX.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

The Lancer Ralliart sedan and Sportback will also join the range and expect a CarAdvice First Steer on those within a few hours.

Three engines are available in the Lancer Sportback line-up, with the ES and VR receiving the 2.0-litre, DOHC, MIVEC four-cylinder engine that delivers 113kW at 6000rpm and 198Nm at 4250rpm.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

The VRX Sportback is powered by the new 2.4-litre engine, also just released in the premium Lancer Aspire sedan, which generates 125kW at 6000rpm and 225Nm at 4100rpm.
ES, VR and VRX Lancer Sportbacks offer a standard five-speed manual transmission or optional Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) with Sport Mode and INVECS III software, which means it gets the same fixed paddle-shift as the Evolution X and Ralliart.

Because the Sportback is essentially the Lancer sedan with a dfferent back all the safety equipment in the sedan, including ATSC is standard across the range, as is ABS, EBD and Brake Assist.

Next page…

A total of seven airbags are available, with the entry level ES Sportback offering side and curtain airbags as an affordable option.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

It also means the ANCAP five-star safety rating for the seven airbag euipped Lancer sedan is carried over to the Sportback.

ES and VR models get 16-inch wheels, alloy on the VR, and 206/60 R16 tyres, while the VRX adds a special sport-tuned suspension package and 18-inch alloy wheels with 215/45 R18 tyres. The VRX also has 16inch ventilated front and solid rear disc brakes.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

Mr Maxted said it was a key to the Australian small car hatch segment buyer that the vehicle be flexible and meet the demands of an active lifestyle and to this end the Lancer Sportback left nothing to chance.

In addition to numerous bins, door and seat pockets, consoles and stowage boxes, the Lancer Sportback offers a large rear cargo area, with the added benefit that the cargo floor height is adjustable to increase the available space behind the rear seats to 344 litres.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

Rear seats are also able to be released by a handy lever located near the tailgate and the 60/40 split seats have an auto fold function.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

In line with the sedan there is the usual array of audio equipment, which offers iPod and MP3 compatibility, Bluetooth phone connectivity and cruise control with steering wheel mounted controls for both this and the audio system.

Next page…

The VRX model we drove also featured the optional Rockford Fosgate audio system and some vehicles were also fitted with the Mitsubishi Multi-Communication System, offering satellite navigation and a range of computerised controls for various functions within the car.

 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback2009mitsubishilancersportback20.jpg

From the rear the Sportback offers a clean and neat view, with restyled rear lights and on the VR and VRX models a high-mounted spoiler.

Driving the Lancer Sportback VRX is very much like driving the Lancer sedan, the same responsive steering, the same taut handling and the same excellent build quality.

The downside would still have to be the hard plastic finish to the dashboard and the interior trimming, although on the VRX model Mitsubishi has now tried to soften this with a little more chrome trimming and providing extra touches such as the lidded cup-holders in the centre console, small things but they do improve the ambience inside the cabin.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

The big change is the engine, the 2.0-litre was a good solid performer that needed to be revved hard to really get the best from it, the new 2.4-litre engine is just a whole lot better experience.

It does the job with out having to work as hard, as you would expect with extra power and torque on hand, and it also works much better with the CVT that our test cars came equipped with.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

Pushing through some twisty roads it had a poise and punch that was lacking in the previous VRX, while still having nicely weighted steering, although a little dead on centre, and reassuring handling that kept the car on line no matter what the, within sensibilities, corner speed.

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback

Overall the Sportback, certainly in VRX form as that’s all we’ve driven do far, is an excellent addition to the Lancer range and one that is certain to appeal strongly to Australian car buyers looking for a versatile and sporty drive.

Pricing

  • Lancer Sportback ES – $20,990 (M) / $23,490 (A)
  • Lancer Sportback VR – $25,590 (M) / $28,090 (A)
  • Lancer Sportback VRX – $29,790 (M) / $32,290 (A)

 
  • Fenno

    No Evo or Ralliart in the Hatch…Bummer. The Hatch’s design is much more coherent than the sedan. (Kinda like the Imprezais over it’s sedan sibling)

  • Fenno

    Much better looking than the sedan. Pity no Evo or Ralliart version yet. Same opinion on the Impreza (pity about the sedan)

  • absi

    Fenno – there is a ralliart sportback in the lancer range… check out the MMAL website and u can see all the specs…

  • Kirst

    That is hideous, Ill stick with my 08 sedan thanks

    Looks kind of like a holden viva in the ass end, or as my colleague just said, Hot chick with a fat ass

  • http://Mini Ben Larden

    The ugliest rear end in the motoring industry at the moment. It is disgraceful. I cant believe someone signed off on this. The sedan is much nicer, and so is the ugly duckling Impreza hatch

  • http://caradvice.com.au OSU811

    That is one ugly hatch rear end!, looks like a blown up viva hatch!!, impreza hatch looks heaps better than this..
    If you must buy a lancer, stick with the sedan I say…

  • http://skyline The Salesman

    Looks like Mr. Squiggle now works for Mitsubishi.
    “Its upside down and inside out Miss. Pat”

  • http://www.geardiary.com Mitchell Oke

    Kirst that’s the exact thought I had, looks like a Viva at the back.

  • George

    Anyone who says the impreza looks better than this needs to take themselves to the hospital and see if they’ve mental problems.
    The clustering of the rear lights could be better but overall this kills the impreza

  • milobob

    I think its personal taste. I’m not a fan of Hatchbacks – even more so for the super-slanted ones – which is prolly why I find the impreza easier on the eye. Yes, it does look like a viva which is sad :(

    Anyone noticed that the CVT has better fuel consumption than the manual :o

  • Kirst

    i own a 2008 es lancer with the cvt automatic, i get 620 klms out of a tank of fuel – wich is alot more impressive than the 450 klms i used to get out of my old automatic CH lancer

  • Aleks

    Say what you want, but there will be more people that don’t like the styling then people that do like the styling. Mitsubishi had a great chance here and I think they shot themselves in the foot. Give me the corolla hatchback anyday.

  • Peter

    Maybe it’s just me, but this generation of mainstream Japanese hatchbacks all have ugly rear ends – Corolla, Impreza, Lancer, Mazda3, SX4, Tiida.

    Notice that there are many more of the current generation Corolla sedans compared to the hatch!!! This was the opposite with the previous generation model.

  • smokin’R32

    They shouldve stuck closer to the Concept-Sportsback, that thing looked great. Just like the Jag XF, they were so close and then they rationalised it

  • Realcars

    I reckon it looks good.

    This must be the buy in this class especially with the opt 2.4 litre.

    Gee, looks better than a Corolla hatch come on.LOL.

  • Falcodore

    Wedge-shaped front end; Big bulbous rear end. That thing is fugly, it just doesnt gell.
    Plus they pinched the rear seat fold down mechanism straight out of the Mazda6,how original.

  • Richo

    the only thing i don’t like about my 07 VRX is the 2.0ltr doesn’t have enough punch down low (although it sings quite nicely above 4,000)

    So this 2.4ltr version would fix that perfectly, so a good car becomes even better, nice.

  • riceboy

    very fugly rear end… prefer sedan much better…

  • Martin

    Unlike a few of the others, I actually prefer the look of the hatches back over the sedan, the sedans rear is just rectangular box, terrible. Still not feeling for the flat front though.

  • GTRmon

    I think it’s fantastic, a good looking car.

    Seriously, if you’re comparing a Lancer to a Corolla you’re on the wrong website. The Lancer is better looking, has a better engine, better safety, better handling, nicer interior, more features and is better value. Might need to do some research on this one eh.

    I think it’s more futuristic design that is in touch with the future direction of the car industry. Have a look at the concept cars and design studies and you’ll know what I mean.

    I like that Mitsubishi is applying the same general styling, like the nose, to most of its range, gradually. It gives the range of cars a sense of belonging to the brand. Merc, BMW, Audi, Pug for example already do this. Much better than Holden who have a random collection of cars from Aus, US and Europe; there’s no cohesiveness to the range.

    Caradvice was what the comment, “Mitsubishi’s first hatchback in 13 years”? The Mirage? The current Colt? The CH Lancer wagon?

    George: a CVT should theoretically always get better fuel consumption. Technically speaking they should be better too. I don’t like them though, drove an ES Lancer with a CVT and really didn’t like it. The VRX in man. though is quite nice.

  • http://www.ihatemycar.com.au ihatemycardotcomdotau

    Looks OK …rear end takes getting used to it.

  • Dlr1

    The worst rear end in the class. Worse than even the Megane. Spoils what could have been the best hatch on the market.

  • Mark Greenburg

    113 kW is INCREDIBLE for a 2.0L four. That almost rivals the Mazda3 SP23′s 115 kW.

  • Dlr1

    Hey Lancer, Daewoo just called and they want their rear end back!

  • Forza M

    Nissan Tiida smashes this thing for looks

  • http://deleted Alex

    Well its just a bit ugly isn’t it? At least the sedan is neat at the back. That just sticks out like a Megane arse except the Megane carries it off much better. I dont think this will ever be the best hatch on the market, I think thats the Ford Focus (hardly beautiful but practical, well built and fun to drive).

  • Tim

    Hmm, doesn’t look too good – but I think I have to see it in flesh to judge. Although there is so much criticism of the Impreza rear, I really like it – the LED lights look different and I like it overall.

    This just doesn’t ‘flow’ as well as it should.

  • Jamie

    If anyone buys the VRX, please take off the ‘spoiler’ it’s what ruins it even more. Looks 100 times better without it

    I’ve got an 08 ES Lancer and love the looks, still prefer it over this sportback. 2.4L would have been nice tho

  • Frenchie

    Agree with you Peter. I like hatchbacks but this thing does not do anything for me or many people commenting here.
    Maybe Mitsy knew this and that is why there is no price difference between hatchback and sedan.

  • zahmad

    $32,990 Automatic?…get a Golf…

  • Andrew

    The Japanese amaze me, just when you think they understand what a good looking car is they come out with something like this. Trying to out do the current WRX in the ugly stakes Mitsubishi?

  • maximark

    It doesn’t look that bad really. I agree with ihatemycardotcomdotau, it might take a while to get uset to. When the Lancer sedan first came out, I thought it looked very ugly, now I think it’s the best looking small car in the market.IMO this hatch would look better with the rear skirt look more aggressive,split exhaust pipes and LED tail lights. However, for the price of the VR-X, I would take the Mazda SP23 for better quality,reliability and handling (even I havent had a test drive on the VR-X :) )

  • James

    nah, the side profile looks “decent”.

    The back styling is offensive I think.

    The rear combi lamps for instance looks skewed and lost between cheap and korean (no offense to koreans)

    from an angle, primarily front (30 degrees) looks okay.

    They need to re-design the rear luggage.. style wise anyways.

    A re-style of the rear lamp and rear luggage door, a few tweaking will improve it HEAPS. My 2 cents.

  • SteveH

    I am glad to see Mitsubishi go with the proper hatchback shape, rather than the mini station wagon look that seems to pass for a hatchback nowadays. I don’t think that it is the best looking thing around, but really, worse than a Tiida? I want what you are on.

  • Joober

    “the only thing i don’t like about my 07 VRX is the 2.0ltr doesn’t have enough punch down low” – that and its sounding constipated when you floor it from standstill. Although nothing an Hi quality muffler upgrade cant fix, give it that evo note…

    “113 kW is INCREDIBLE for a 2.0L four. That almost rivals the Mazda3 SP23’s 115 kW.” Err – isnt the sp23 a 2.3ltr hence 300cc displacement advantage? same engine as whats in the 6? You should research some of the Honda’s engines, you’d probably be more impressed. You’ll find 1.8ltr engines hitting the 130 – 140kw mark.

  • Sam

    Yeah, I’m not a big fan of the rear view of this car either, but at least it is distinctive. The Nissan Tiida has never been appealing where as this one might grow on me a bit. It does look distinctively Korean however.
    They are selling new Hyundai Getz for 12,490 at the moment. Id rather 2 of those, hehe.

  • Korean appetite?

    I would rather buy the new Kia Cerato for the money ! Its a fantastic looking car, what a surprise from a Korean Company!

  • FRUGAL_ONE

    Back end in a Impreza hatch clone.

    BEST value hatch ATM is the Hyundai i30.I am not so easily impressed, yet the i30 impressed me.

    Value for money, features, quality, warranty, safety features, price etc, all top class.

    Cheers

    F-0

  • kiwimark

    It reminds me of the Ferrari daytona rip off with the Austin Princess, in that it made me think of an Alfa brera

  • Steve

    Falcodore:

    “Plus they pinched the rear seat fold down mechanism straight out of the Mazda6,how original”.

    That system is acutally carried over from their Colt Plus model (not available in Aus) which has been around a long, long time.

    They haven’t stolen anything.

  • http://faster DanMan

    And to think everyone argued with me a while back when i said style was the no1 thing people look for when purchasing a car…

    Anyone care how this thing you know, drives?

  • Joober

    Thats right Danman, The majority of people (This significant market) wouldnt know and care about the engineeering aspects of a car to impress themselves in, they just want something they feel comfortable driving, beeing seen in and suiting their lifestyle… 99% of people do not or plan not to take a car to its limits and/or wish to learn what makes a good car…

  • http://skyline The Salesman

    FRUGAL_ONE
    BEST value hatch ATM is the Hyundai i30.I am not so easily impressed, yet the i30 impressed me.

    So you bag Kia a few reports back BUT WAIT, you endorse the Hyundai i30 (same as Kia Ceed)
    HMMMMM, and you tell me to grow up?

  • http://skyline The Salesman

    I even went back and found it, as follows….

    On drugs guys, Hyunkia is a bargain basement brand, always was always will be

    Cheers

    F-0

    FRUGAL_ONE,
    Are you just making this up as you go along? Do mum and dad know you are on the computer????

  • Arthur

    worst design ever.
    A great front look, and a disastrous rear.

  • adam

    The rear end is hideous and those lights? They look very 90′s in their detailing. That smokey plastic look is so dated.

  • Scoobs

    That really is a special kind of ugly….

  • wlee

    the rear end is ok looking on it’s own.

    but it doesn’t match with the front for some reasons.

    with a fierce looking front, it needs the frown eyebrow lights similar to the sedan. maybe a steeper angle rear glass panel would be better.

    i guess they are trying to extend the luggage space.

  • LN

    its pretty ugly from behind but very sweet to drive.

    the sedans look like a rip off version of the alfa romeo

  • Not on Drugs

    You guys must be just plain silly. Ugly backend…you must be joking. Have you looked at the specs for this car? Have you even seen it in the flesh?

    Bloody tuggers…what is a beautiful backend then?

  • FrugalOne

    Mitsu., website has then on special and claiming *runout* is a newie on the way?

    Cheers

    F-0