<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Holden VE &amp; WM specification changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-213029</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-213029</guid>
		<description>By alot do you mean not a lot like atheist means not a theist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By alot do you mean not a lot like atheist means not a theist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-213026</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 08:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-213026</guid>
		<description>By alot do you mean not a lot, like atheist means not a theist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By alot do you mean not a lot, like atheist means not a theist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAPH8R</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-122357</link>
		<dc:creator>JAPH8R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-122357</guid>
		<description>Hey Manly, talk about fuel ecocnomy, the 6.0 litre V8 Calais V went from Melbourne to Sydney on one tank. Not bad for a car that when you put your foot down it will pass anything insight. 270 kw and fuel economy like a Camry, you can&#039;t beat that. And as for the ugly XT, Ford just wait till Holden takes a step for them to follow. Holden took out alloys for the Omega, Ford did the same with the XT. Holden took out the Sportwagon, Ford will NOW do the same and take out a version of the FG. Yeah Ford really knows how to call its new model the FG GT, fancy putting that on your plates, everyone will think that your a FAGGET. 


And hey THE SALESMEN, what dealership do you work for, &quot;JOES ROCKETS&quot; that sells 2 cars a month, obviously you dont work for someone big, because if you did you will know that V6&#039;s are still selling. And you think that Toyota will get Holden and Fords share of the market, what with its 4 cylinder Camry thats louder than a 6litre SS. Or with its electric car the Prius, which looks like a bar of soap on wheels and costs just as much as an SS. Or maybe with its &#039;very safe&#039; Yaris, which is designed by someone smoking pot, its the ugliest thing out there. Dream On.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Manly, talk about fuel ecocnomy, the 6.0 litre V8 Calais V went from Melbourne to Sydney on one tank. Not bad for a car that when you put your foot down it will pass anything insight. 270 kw and fuel economy like a Camry, you can&#8217;t beat that. And as for the ugly XT, Ford just wait till Holden takes a step for them to follow. Holden took out alloys for the Omega, Ford did the same with the XT. Holden took out the Sportwagon, Ford will NOW do the same and take out a version of the FG. Yeah Ford really knows how to call its new model the FG GT, fancy putting that on your plates, everyone will think that your a FAGGET. </p>
<p>And hey THE SALESMEN, what dealership do you work for, &#8220;JOES ROCKETS&#8221; that sells 2 cars a month, obviously you dont work for someone big, because if you did you will know that V6&#8242;s are still selling. And you think that Toyota will get Holden and Fords share of the market, what with its 4 cylinder Camry thats louder than a 6litre SS. Or with its electric car the Prius, which looks like a bar of soap on wheels and costs just as much as an SS. Or maybe with its &#8216;very safe&#8217; Yaris, which is designed by someone smoking pot, its the ugliest thing out there. Dream On.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99391</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99391</guid>
		<description>Richo,
i think we have both arrived at the same route, except one of us took the country road, and the other the coast road.

Everything is only as good as its weakest link.
whats the point of having a more balanced chassis, if you arent going give it the suspension it deserves??

and on the flip side, whats the point of great suspension if its not on the ultimate platform.

the reviews i have read place the 6cyl Falcon range as the better steerer, but its the V8 models where the Commodore is rated as the better steerer.
the commodore obviously deals with the extra weight of a V8 up front better due to having a lesser over hang and hence keeping the weight back further.

for ford to tune a chassis that was designed some 15 years ago and have it more than competitive with a newly designed one is a fair effort i reckon.

and on a side note,
its not just the monotube dampers that have made the BF-FG transition better, its also the new steering rack and pivot front suspension taken front the territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richo,<br />
i think we have both arrived at the same route, except one of us took the country road, and the other the coast road.</p>
<p>Everything is only as good as its weakest link.<br />
whats the point of having a more balanced chassis, if you arent going give it the suspension it deserves??</p>
<p>and on the flip side, whats the point of great suspension if its not on the ultimate platform.</p>
<p>the reviews i have read place the 6cyl Falcon range as the better steerer, but its the V8 models where the Commodore is rated as the better steerer.<br />
the commodore obviously deals with the extra weight of a V8 up front better due to having a lesser over hang and hence keeping the weight back further.</p>
<p>for ford to tune a chassis that was designed some 15 years ago and have it more than competitive with a newly designed one is a fair effort i reckon.</p>
<p>and on a side note,<br />
its not just the monotube dampers that have made the BF-FG transition better, its also the new steering rack and pivot front suspension taken front the territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEYKL &#38; HYDE</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99188</link>
		<dc:creator>JEYKL &#38; HYDE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99188</guid>
		<description>gee andrew m,your mindset..richo is spot on with this stuff.holdens shocks are rubbish,1/2 the early ones have been replaced under warrenty,ditto the front sway bar bushes...have you driven a 50k ve...clunk,clunk,clunk.but please be fair,if you&#039;ve got a fg and love it,great,but the ve&#039;s steering is great,alot better than vz.the weight distribution makes the car handle great,the esp works great,the suspension if easily adjusted,front and rear,and now those expensive bridgestones wear flat as..oh,and front brake wear is outstanding(can&#039;t say that about ANY big ford).my fearless predictions for vf.well how about hinged door pockets,glovebox light,centre console light,radiator cowling cover(all the stuff gm&#039;s taken out of the early models),to make the next models look good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gee andrew m,your mindset..richo is spot on with this stuff.holdens shocks are rubbish,1/2 the early ones have been replaced under warrenty,ditto the front sway bar bushes&#8230;have you driven a 50k ve&#8230;clunk,clunk,clunk.but please be fair,if you&#8217;ve got a fg and love it,great,but the ve&#8217;s steering is great,alot better than vz.the weight distribution makes the car handle great,the esp works great,the suspension if easily adjusted,front and rear,and now those expensive bridgestones wear flat as..oh,and front brake wear is outstanding(can&#8217;t say that about ANY big ford).my fearless predictions for vf.well how about hinged door pockets,glovebox light,centre console light,radiator cowling cover(all the stuff gm&#8217;s taken out of the early models),to make the next models look good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99184</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99184</guid>
		<description>yeah but my main point Andrew is that the archetecture of the VE is superior then the FG, but the FG is better due to a) its monotube dampers and b) superior tuning.

That point remains. Also maybe the FG gets through the cones better, i don&#039;t know, but everything i have read says the VE &quot;feels&quot; better in the steering. As we all know the car that &quot;feels&quot; the best isn&#039;t necessarily the fastest. Perfect example is how the current STI is actually quicker round a race track then an EVO X, even though the EVO X feels a million times better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah but my main point Andrew is that the archetecture of the VE is superior then the FG, but the FG is better due to a) its monotube dampers and b) superior tuning.</p>
<p>That point remains. Also maybe the FG gets through the cones better, i don&#8217;t know, but everything i have read says the VE &#8220;feels&#8221; better in the steering. As we all know the car that &#8220;feels&#8221; the best isn&#8217;t necessarily the fastest. Perfect example is how the current STI is actually quicker round a race track then an EVO X, even though the EVO X feels a million times better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forza M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99174</link>
		<dc:creator>Forza M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99174</guid>
		<description>Richo and andy dont waste your breath lads both cars have limited life spans and won&#039;t last the journey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richo and andy dont waste your breath lads both cars have limited life spans and won&#8217;t last the journey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99172</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99172</guid>
		<description>Ok,
lets go back to square 1.

you said the VE has better handling and thats the point i am disputing.

in the cone test which asseses steering directness and turn in etc, the FG came out on top.

then i went on to say you may be right as far as the XR8 V SS models go as i have read reports that the XR8 tends to dip a bit on turn in due to the extra weight. 

this doesnt affect the 6cyl models.
the 6cyl models have been proven to be superior in steering directness.
i havent seen a cone/manouver test on the V8 models, but from reading reviews, the SS would prob come out on top.

now ill have to try and remember where i saw the test. perhaps it was on drive because i also remember seeing the video to acompany the review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok,<br />
lets go back to square 1.</p>
<p>you said the VE has better handling and thats the point i am disputing.</p>
<p>in the cone test which asseses steering directness and turn in etc, the FG came out on top.</p>
<p>then i went on to say you may be right as far as the XR8 V SS models go as i have read reports that the XR8 tends to dip a bit on turn in due to the extra weight. </p>
<p>this doesnt affect the 6cyl models.<br />
the 6cyl models have been proven to be superior in steering directness.<br />
i havent seen a cone/manouver test on the V8 models, but from reading reviews, the SS would prob come out on top.</p>
<p>now ill have to try and remember where i saw the test. perhaps it was on drive because i also remember seeing the video to acompany the review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99153</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99153</guid>
		<description>Geezus Andrew, i can&#039;t even PRAISE the FG falcon without you bloody jumping down my throat! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geezus Andrew, i can&#8217;t even PRAISE the FG falcon without you bloody jumping down my throat! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99152</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17922/2009-holden-ve-wm-specification-changes/#comment-99152</guid>
		<description>Andrew M - i said that the VE has superior steering then the FG, absolutely, but that doesn&#039;t mean that its better dynamically then the FG. The FG is more composed, better ride control, is more predictable, doesn&#039;t have rear axle tramp under heavy breaking (which the VE does) and also has more lateral grip. It is a superior car to punt down a country road, it just happens that the steering on the VE is slightly better, but the rest of the handling package is better then the VE.

So theres no contradiction at all there mate, and i think you know that. If your gonna suggest that because a car has better steering then another car then it automatically makes it dyanmically superior then your having a laugh and you know it. There is so much more to a cars dynamics then just the steering directness. 

To summaries just to make sure you cannot possibly miss-understand me

steering in the VE is better then the FG

ride control, composure, grip, brakes, and basically everything else about the dynamic experience with the possible exception of power down/drive out of slow corners, the FG is better then the VE

Therefore, the FG is dynamically superior in all aspects other then steering, which supports what i was saying before 100%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew M &#8211; i said that the VE has superior steering then the FG, absolutely, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that its better dynamically then the FG. The FG is more composed, better ride control, is more predictable, doesn&#8217;t have rear axle tramp under heavy breaking (which the VE does) and also has more lateral grip. It is a superior car to punt down a country road, it just happens that the steering on the VE is slightly better, but the rest of the handling package is better then the VE.</p>
<p>So theres no contradiction at all there mate, and i think you know that. If your gonna suggest that because a car has better steering then another car then it automatically makes it dyanmically superior then your having a laugh and you know it. There is so much more to a cars dynamics then just the steering directness. </p>
<p>To summaries just to make sure you cannot possibly miss-understand me</p>
<p>steering in the VE is better then the FG</p>
<p>ride control, composure, grip, brakes, and basically everything else about the dynamic experience with the possible exception of power down/drive out of slow corners, the FG is better then the VE</p>
<p>Therefore, the FG is dynamically superior in all aspects other then steering, which supports what i was saying before 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/300 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-12 01:01:17 -->
