Skoda Fabia RS Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Skoda Fabia RS Review

By James Stanford |
FIND DEALS

The Skoda Fabia RS has the same problem as Danni Minogue; it’s over-shadowed by a stunning sibling.

Skoda Australia’s launch for the sporty version of its city car included presentation slides featuring the hot-hatch’s competitors. These included the Suzuki Swift Sport and the Mini Cooper S. But Skoda made no mention of the small but significant elephant in the room – the Volkswagen Polo GTI.

The sporty Polo and the Skoda Fabia RS are twins – not identical twins thanks to some different sheet metal and interior – but they do share the same engines, transmissions, platform and suspension architecture.

Skoda Fabia RS - 1

VW offers the Polo GTI as three-door and five-door hatches, while Skoda sells a five-door hatch and four-door wagon. So, the different models could attract different people, but ultimately the five-door hatches will go head to head.

The Fabia RS is a fun little car to get about it in, with plenty of performance and agile handling and it should help Skoda raise its profile. Its problem is that it doesn’t have a Volkswagen badge and doesn’t look anywhere near as good as the new Polo GTI.

People say style is subjective but finding someone, not employed by Skoda, who thinks the Fabia RS looks better than the Polo GTI is likely to be quite a challenge. The photos Skoda released are actually flattering and it looks more awkward in the metal, especially the elongated wagon.

Skoda Fabia RS Wagon - 3

But surely the RS is cheaper than the GTI? Well, yes, a bit. A five-door Skoda Fabia RS is $27,990, which is a reasonable asking price given it has five doors and a dual-clutch DSG automatic as standard. The five-door Polo GTI, which also comes standard with the DSG gearbox, is just $1000 more.

CarAdvice would take the GTI (it is quite clearly the Kylie in this example) every time, even if we had to hock a kidney to get the extra grand. But that’s our opinion and some people will prefer the Fabia and could possibly be lured by the ability to create a quasi-custom car with a different-coloured roof and alternative wheels. Yes, Skoda is doing a Mini, offering customers the ability to make a statement with their cars, and more choice is always welcome even though some people consider white wheels a crime against humanity.

Then there is the wagon version of the Skoda Fabia RS, which costs $29,990 and is very practical, if goofy looking. It is so sensible that a switched-on driving enthusiast should be able to convince his or her partner that this is an entirely appropriate family-friendly vehicle. This task should be made easier thank to the considerable 480 litres of boot space.

Skoda Fabia RS Wagon - 5

It doesn’t matter which of the Polo GTI/Fabia RS family you pick, you are going to have a good time.

The key elements are the small body and the perky engine, which happens to have a both a supercharger and turbocharger. The Skoda Fabia RS weighs in at a reasonably lean 1253kg, while the 1.4-litre ‘Twincharger’ four-pot under the bonnet manages a healthy 132kW and a peak torque number of 250Nm, which is delivered all the way from 2000rpm to 4500rpm.

The result is a 7.3-second 0-100km/h sprint time, which is admittedly unlikely to scare any of your buddies who own sports cars. However, the Fabia RS can go quick enough to make things very interesting.

 

CarAdvice tested the Fabia RS models at the Holden Performance Driving Centre near Queensland’s Norwell on a twisting track with a mixture of tight bends and a fourth gear (140km/h plus) right-hander and also took it out for a road loop. The track time revealed this little machine is capable of getting around corners in a hurry and is able to get up to speed rapidly.

The RS’s engine pulls hard from very low down and doesn’t let up until it nudges past 6200rpm. The supercharger passes the baton to the turbocharger half way through the rev range, so there are no peaks or troughs in the powerband. There is enough power to make putting the power down something to think about.

Jab the accelerator and the electronic nanny will likely kick in, along with an electronic differential system that is supposed to help (there is no mechanical limited slip differential). The best option, when you are feeling sporty, is to turn off the stability control and feed on the power carefully. This engine has enough torque that selecting a gear higher than you might think works better and means the inside front wheel is less likely to spin up.

Skoda Fabia RS - 11

There is very little torque steer on the track, and although you do notice it a bit more on uneven road surfaces it’s not much of an issue.

The engine has a slightly sporty note; you certainly get the idea this is not the base model powerplant, but it is nothing to get excited about either. There is no crackling or popping or sound tubes to make the most of the induction and that’s a pity.

The Skoda Fabia RS’s engine was developed with efficiency in mind and it uses just 6.2L/100km (148g/km), which is impressive for a hot-hatch.

Something that could infuriate some customers is the automatic’s tendency to change up by itself when in manual mode. While it might be safe to assume that manual mode means manual, the Skoda’s transmission decides to change up when it gets close to the redline.

This can be immensely frustrating when a driver approaches a corner and watches in horror as the DSG decides to change up even through the driver is half a second away from applying the brakes and diving into a corner.

Skoda Fabia RS - 3

The seven-speed DSG is a good transmission even though it can get befuddled in stop-start conditions, but a car like this cries out for a nice crisp manual gearbox. It doesn’t make sense not to offer one (you can’t get one for the Polo GTI, either).

As you might imagine, the Fabia RS handles well. The suspension, which runs firmer springs and dampers than the standard models, ensures good body control and very little body roll. Even hooking through fast bends holding the accelerator flat on extremely worn tyres doesn’t do anything to unsettle this hot hatch.

The ride doesn’t suffer a lot and the Fabia RS is comfortable enough over the rougher surfaces. Its steering is well weighted and provides enough assistance so anyone can drive but still feels substantial.

Interestingly, the RS comes with either Continental Sport or Dunlops depending on what turned up to the factory that day (the Dunlops lasted longer at the track). They sit on 17-inch alloy wheels, which do the trick but still look too small for the Fabia’s body.

Skoda Fabia RS - 5

A body kit with front spoiler and rear wing help make this Fabia look more muscular than the standard model and there are also some nice little touches such as red-painted brake calipers, chrome-tipped dual exhaust, chrome grille elements and shiny black B-pillars and wing mirrors as well as halogen lights with LED daytime running lights.

Customers can stick with the regular body-coloured roof and normal alloy wheels or choose to have the roof painted white, silver or black, or opt for white, black or black and silver alternate wheels. A white car with black roof and black wheels is probably the CarAdvice favourite.

Skoda Fabia RS - 2

Inside, there are wrap-around sports cloth seats that do a good job of supporting the driver and passenger, even around a race track, as well as alloy-look pedals, chrome elements around the gear lever and vent controls and RS badging on seats and door sills. Still, it looks and feels like a fairly plain compact car interior that is built to a budget.

There is all the standard gear you need, including cruise control, climate control air-conditioning and Bluetooth phone connectivity as well as six airbags and Electronic Stability Control. Whether you pick the hatch or the wagon, which handle so similarly that it really comes down to what suits you best, there will be ample interior space.

Skoda Fabia RS Hatch and Wagon - 1

There was a degree of wind noise on the road loop, although not terrible, and the tyre noise was intrusive on coarse chip surfaces. Even so, the Fabia RS is an easy car to live with if you don’t mind the design. It’s sensible and fun and the wagon version is unique in this class.

There’s no doubt the hatch is a great drive and is relatively good value if you are after a practical car with decent performance, but make sure you check out its more stylish sibling over at VW before signing on the dotted line.


 

  • Pom

    Who wouldn’t pay you the extra 1k for the Polo. 
    The GTI looks better, is better equipped (now the comfort package is standard), resale will be better (your 1k + back in your pocket come time to sell), the interior of the GTI is more upmarket. Skoda and VW cost the same to service so no advantage there, VW has a better service network not to mention image and the extra bling in the GTI interior and better performance, economy and emissions in the GTI.The only advantage is that they have immediate stock, however Skoda won’t be doing any deal (especially the guys at Skoda Richmond who think they are selling Bentley’s). So with the 30 GTI’s for sale on carsales I’m sure you will be able to get one.If you read the reviews in the UK, the common theme is that the GTI is better than either the Seat or Skoda equivalents, but the Skoda offers the best value for money being some 2.5k sterling cheaper. That pricing difference justify’s some of the Fabia’s shortcomings but not $1k

    • Dominique Vøn Hütch

      Yes agree totally – they’re obviously trying to position them as a different offering from VW and no worse, which they aren’t necessarily.  They do,however, need to price them significantly better, especially on these models such as the Fabia and upcoming Rapid.  The Roomster looks like it is reasonably priced and needs to be, and I suppose they can carve out there own niche more on models like the Yeti and RS Octavia Models.  I still believe the best and best value vehicle they make is the Superb.

      • FanBoi

        Upon ordering, you just have to wait 2 years for a Polo GTI and 2 days for Fabia RS.

        That’s the difference.

        //

        • Redskies

          And it would seem that Skoda owners have less issues than VW owners even though they are so similar under the skin.  May be the Czechs build their cars better?  Having said this, I have no idea where the Fabia is made.

    • Able

      I certainly wouldn’t pay more for a Polo as I really dislike them. Everyone says the Polo looks better than the Fabia and that maybe so (it’s really dependent on the person, one aspect I don’t get with this review of the Fabia RS) but to be honest they’re both ugly and really, they should look more like the Kia Rio. There is a 12-month waiting list for a Polo GTI at the moment… What a joke! 12-months for a Volkswagen hatchback. 

      To all the people saying get a Polo GTI (despite the almost year wait) because ‘the $1k difference isn’t enough to justify’ getting a (superior) Fabia RS did you ever consider that I would like the wagon with its practical body? The wagon looks better to me. That’s another thing about this website and the twats that comment on it, they comment without actually thinking about someone else’s situation…

      • Pom

        As one of those “twats” I have owned 2 Skoda’s here in Australia. I have been an advocate of the brand since 2008. 

        I didn’t actually comment of the value of the wagon as it is a niche product and will sell itself as it has no competitors. 

        The comments were about the hatch where the average punter will shop like for like. My comments were made as an observation on what the average “punter” will see in the two products and that if the costing of the Fabia was slightly better then the product will sell better. 

        It has nothing to do with your “situation” as you are only one buyer when Skoda Australia has 300 Fabia VRS’s landed and ready to sell.

        • Pom

          should have read “landing” and ready to sell.

      • Captain Nemo

         Able if dated styling & wagons float your boat why don’t you save some serious coin and just buy a 12yo 323/Laser.   Side profile of this baby screams 323 hatch circa 2000, Okay Okay i know the poor little 323 is only 3stars ANCAP that might be an issue for you. 
        Find a mint SP20 & you’re laughing plus the bonus of never having DSG problems, spend a few grand modding the motor and Bob’s your uncle a Fabia wagon for less than half the price. 

    • Purist

      Why wouldn’t you pay more 10k and get the best Hot-Hatch available to man?The Renault Clio RS 200!Ahhhhhhh that’s right  the VW group cars are sports shopping trolley’s and Automatic you don’t want to get a sore left leg and bad back, I forgot that the RS200 is for purist’s only…But I would take this Fabia before I ever took the crappy Polo.:P

    • AJeans

      try going to Trivett.  They are doing deals. Just bought one for 4k off the RRP

      • AJeans

        BTW also tried the Polo GTI and they move very very little (a few hundred)

  • Dominique Vøn Hütch

    Can we get some shots of the wagon’s loadspace?

    • 3D4

      Hope this helps..

    • 3D4

      I tried to load the picture for you, but it needs to be approved by admin. who knows why they don’t add a picture of the boot. CA -> amateurs

      • Dominique Vøn Hütch

        Lol, cheers – looks to be a fair bit of room back there going off that diagram.  Skoda always seem to provide good boot space/access what is that?

  • Kampfer

    With only $1k different I just can’t see why pick this over VW…

    I think Skoda OZ should just sell the RS Wagon @ hatch price and don’t bother with the hatch.

    • Dominique Vøn Hütch

      Hmmm interesting point, the wagon looks pretty weird in the flesh apparently, and the roof colour customisation thingy is a hatch only prospect.  I would probably get the wagon still though in green with some black wheels – it would certainly stand out, and be pretty practical.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=737660467 Kit Ho

    the black lights and grille on the Monte Carlo actually looks more sporty than the RS styling

  • okokok

    This car looks like a tarted up washing machine. No RS version needed. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

    Both these cars (especially the wagon) really need a lower body kit. It looks like they’re sitting on top of the wheels rather than that ground hugging sports car look. Much like an ix35.

    • Dominique Vøn Hütch

      That’s because of the height of the roof line – but therein lies the good headroom, superior to the Polo in the front and back I’m told.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

        I’m not having a go at the roof line, I’m just saying it needs a body kit lol.
        No doubt it’ll be roomy for it’s size.

  • JML

    Stunningly bland.

  • Ihvhb

    Caradvice what’s the curb weight of this car?

  • Rightindicator

    wrap around tailights would make this veedub cousin looks more friendly and suave.

  • Alpha101

    “The sporty Polo and the Skoda Fabia RS are twins – not identical twins
    thanks to some different sheet metal and interior – but they do share
    the same engines, transmissions, platform and suspension architecture.”

    I believe the Fabia is using the old Polo platform as this model has been in Europe for 3 years already.

  • horsie

    I would take the Skodo over the polo just because there is no way i will ever drive a car called a Polo. They really should make a manual option. Its going to cost people to get that auto tuned properly.

    • JooberJCW

      The thing is the auto is selling like hot cakes and they probably don’t need to waste money on providing a manual version because they can’t keep up with the demand for the automatic.

  • BrisVegas

    I think I’ll just wait for the quicker, better handling and more reliable Fiesta ST with 1.6litre ecoboost engine.

    • Johnson

      You are clearly a clairvoyant to know that an un-released car is quicker, more reliable and a better handler.

      • Milsie

        Couldn’t have said it better myself. They should make you sit an intelligence test before being able to comment on here.

  • Pom

    Just been to 2 dealers and I was advised in terms of supply that A) each dealer had been allocated 2 cars each. B) that supply into Australia would be similar to the Polo GTI due to international supply constraints!!!!!!!  

  • Tassie Devil

    These vehicles fill an important niche, is the Polo GTI coming out in a wagon?

  • Jerrycan

    I don’t mind the Fabia hatch styling but I do mind that it only has 4 Star safety and this review does not mention it once. Car Advice should be pulling Skoda over the coals for bringing a 4 star car here in this day and age.
    I would like to know whether it failed either structurally or administratively (forgot to put the airbag warning labels on, or the passenger seat belt light in). I could perhaps forgive the latter.

    I do not usually mind quirky looking cars (excluding Stavic) but this Fabia wagon is pretty ugly! a worse version of the old Daihatsu Pyzar…and didn’t that sell well.

  • save it for the track

    Simple answer really. Skodas are not crash tested by ANCAP. They are tested in Europe by NCAP. Those tests are only done on the base European model, which in the case of the Fabia does not have all the airbags that it comes with in Australia and as such is not eligible for a side pole test as an example. Check ANCAP with the appropriate dots etc. where it is clearly explained when looking at the avaiable data on the Fabia. It clearly states that vehicles available in Australasia come with more airbags and intelligent seatbelt reminders, which the EuroNCAP tested model does not have.
    .
    As a side comment, I have noticed the advertised prices of used Octavia’s seemingly holding up quite well on various .com.au vehicle sale websites.

  • Simonvw

    VW has huge quality issues at the moment.  I heard that 1 in 4 GTI get an engine replacement.  They got hammered by JD Power.  Skoda by comparison is an entirely different picture with the Octavia having the highest owner satisfaction in Europe.  I think that’s good reason to get a Skoda.

    • josh

      This Skoda and the Polo GTI share the same engine. If the GTI is getting hammered by JD Power, then why would the Skoda be any different?

      • F1MotoGP

         Engines supplied from different countries. VW Mexico does not get engines from Europe. Skoda, VW and Audi engines (except 1.2) supplied from Hungary.

    • Legnab

      Funny how they both use the same motors built in the same factory , please explain .

      I had better watch out 1 in 4 , actually i think you need to stop listening to robin’s tales of woe and truth bending .

  • davo

    Hit by the ugly stick – like all Skodas!

    Looks like an early 90′s Daewoo or Kia.

  • Norm

    The roof lining is black. It’s all a bit dark ‘n gloomy.

    • AJeans

      Your missing the point buddy.  I pay extra for that – looks so much more spoty then the ugly beige/grey colours

  • dub man

    the platform is different to the polo the skoda acutally uses the older generarion fabia platform with slight alterations to make it a bigger car it was seat who first used the new platform used by the ibiza,polo and A1

  • gt86.com.au

    for that money I would get a toyota 86 and actually enjoy driving. This thing is just horribly ugly, and I like VWs.

    • Purist

      Don’t get me wrong but the 86 GT looks very cheap.

      • gt86.com.au

         not compared to this match box :)

  • http://www.egarages.com.au/ garages plans

    Nice post! It is indeed a very informative article.

  • Tell It As It Is

    Czech express.

  • Veedudly

    Good oppotunity for Skoda with all of Vw”s reliability problems

  • Golfschwein

    ouu

  • elle

    The difference between Skoda Fabia RS and
    Sporty Polo is unnoticeable. The former would be appealing to some because of a
    bit image of being a boy racer type while the latter gives a classic demeanor that
    looks modern. Regardless if it is a modest fast hatchback or something wild, for
    me still has the performance prowess and if it does fit to my single garage who cares if I own either? 

  • snifflepuss

    Just using the term “RS” will be enough to promote sales as well as the short time frame for supply. Basically, both the GTi and RS are even in the performance stats and other cosmetic interior/exterior features. Only thought at this time is if the current Polo duco has improved over the previous versions. If I choose to purchase a Fabia RS it would be in a manual transmission mode.

    • Johnson

      Good choice considering it only comes with a DSG….Pointless post is pointless