<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subaru Forester wins US Sport Utility of the Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenno</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98586</link>
		<dc:creator>Fenno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98586</guid>
		<description>Sports utility?
Wouldnt that mean it has to be a ute...? LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sports utility?<br />
Wouldnt that mean it has to be a ute&#8230;? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dazza76</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98528</link>
		<dc:creator>dazza76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98528</guid>
		<description>Having an XS Premium, I couldn&#039;t be more happier with mine. Love it, punchy, comfy and great on fuel.  Only thing i hate is the radio, the reception is shocking, it changes channels around cbd!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having an XS Premium, I couldn&#8217;t be more happier with mine. Love it, punchy, comfy and great on fuel.  Only thing i hate is the radio, the reception is shocking, it changes channels around cbd!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98518</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98518</guid>
		<description>Make it a &#039;small stone trail&#039; Spitfire, whatever makes you sleep at night mate..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make it a &#8216;small stone trail&#8217; Spitfire, whatever makes you sleep at night mate..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spitfire</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98499</link>
		<dc:creator>Spitfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98499</guid>
		<description>Genie, it was not my intention to criticise the Forester per se, in fact I agree with you that it is one of the best soft roaders on the market. I was merely taking Tim to task for saying it had off road capability. I am sure you will agree that there is a lot of difference between all road and off road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Genie, it was not my intention to criticise the Forester per se, in fact I agree with you that it is one of the best soft roaders on the market. I was merely taking Tim to task for saying it had off road capability. I am sure you will agree that there is a lot of difference between all road and off road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genie</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98490</link>
		<dc:creator>Genie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98490</guid>
		<description>Tim&#039;s point is the same Spitfire, yes, its no landcruiser 70 series, but 99% of Australians don&#039;t need that level of capability. I&#039;d say 95% don&#039;t need a 4WD, but the Forester does blend the versatility of the 4WD body shape (large interior, high driving position that people like for some unfathomable reason) with car-like dynamics. This is one of the best soft-roaders you can get, so congrats to Subaru.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim&#8217;s point is the same Spitfire, yes, its no landcruiser 70 series, but 99% of Australians don&#8217;t need that level of capability. I&#8217;d say 95% don&#8217;t need a 4WD, but the Forester does blend the versatility of the 4WD body shape (large interior, high driving position that people like for some unfathomable reason) with car-like dynamics. This is one of the best soft-roaders you can get, so congrats to Subaru.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spitfire</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98478</link>
		<dc:creator>Spitfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98478</guid>
		<description>Do you mean a rocky trail or a small stone trail Tim, I suspect the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean a rocky trail or a small stone trail Tim, I suspect the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98470</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98470</guid>
		<description>And you think 99% if people will actually take these things further than a rocky trail? No, don&#039;t think so.

I have, and it has enough off road capability for most situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you think 99% if people will actually take these things further than a rocky trail? No, don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>I have, and it has enough off road capability for most situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spitfire</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98465</link>
		<dc:creator>Spitfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98465</guid>
		<description>Has more than enough off road capability, I don&#039;t think so Tim. It is only a SOFT roader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has more than enough off road capability, I don&#8217;t think so Tim. It is only a SOFT roader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSU811</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98454</link>
		<dc:creator>OSU811</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98454</guid>
		<description>at last america is starting to realise that big engine, large heavy suv,s are not the way to go!, good work subaru on another great car..I agree with Tim the boxer diesel will be a good addition to the range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at last america is starting to realise that big engine, large heavy suv,s are not the way to go!, good work subaru on another great car..I agree with Tim the boxer diesel will be a good addition to the range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98386</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17787/subaru-forester-wins-us-sport-utility-of-the-year/#comment-98386</guid>
		<description>Fantastic news for Subaru. I agree, the Forester is an outstanding vehicle. It will last forever, looks quite good, has more than enough off road capability, yet still handles like a car and has an option of a turbo option. Great overall package which will be made even better when we get the new Boxer Diesel and new auto/manual combo in a year or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic news for Subaru. I agree, the Forester is an outstanding vehicle. It will last forever, looks quite good, has more than enough off road capability, yet still handles like a car and has an option of a turbo option. Great overall package which will be made even better when we get the new Boxer Diesel and new auto/manual combo in a year or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/5 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 298/301 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-12 05:29:12 -->
