<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fresh details on Nissan 200SX replacement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:22:17 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: victory</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97923</link>
		<dc:creator>victory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97923</guid>
		<description>In the end, I reckon Nissan will bring it out with a 1.8 or 2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, I reckon Nissan will bring it out with a 1.8 or 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97913</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97913</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have a problem with the 1.6ltr engine but it just seems so tiny for a car like this... then again 180 odd kw is pretty good but i can bet my last dollar that will only be for the jap spec, for us around 160kw would probably be more realistic. But anyway lets all hope it still has plenty of tuning potential like the sr20det</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with the 1.6ltr engine but it just seems so tiny for a car like this&#8230; then again 180 odd kw is pretty good but i can bet my last dollar that will only be for the jap spec, for us around 160kw would probably be more realistic. But anyway lets all hope it still has plenty of tuning potential like the sr20det</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cupid Stunt aka No Name</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97880</link>
		<dc:creator>Cupid Stunt aka No Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97880</guid>
		<description>1.6 litres, gonne be like my wife a screamer.
Don&#039;t mind the looks personally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.6 litres, gonne be like my wife a screamer.<br />
Don&#8217;t mind the looks personally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joober</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97857</link>
		<dc:creator>Joober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97857</guid>
		<description>180kw from a 1.6 nice, Im guessing around the 220-240Nm, But agree how it makes the SR20 like prehistoric, thanks to technology. But then again its Anticipated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>180kw from a 1.6 nice, Im guessing around the 220-240Nm, But agree how it makes the SR20 like prehistoric, thanks to technology. But then again its Anticipated&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Red</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97819</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97819</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have no worries about Nissan producing torque from small displacement. The VQ25DET in the NM35 Stagea produces 410nM, with decent economy...all from 2.5 litres. If Nissan use the same recipe then thats 260ish newton metres from 1.6 litres. Makes the 202 from the S15 SR seem a bit lame huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have no worries about Nissan producing torque from small displacement. The VQ25DET in the NM35 Stagea produces 410nM, with decent economy&#8230;all from 2.5 litres. If Nissan use the same recipe then thats 260ish newton metres from 1.6 litres. Makes the 202 from the S15 SR seem a bit lame huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cracker Barrel</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97809</link>
		<dc:creator>Cracker Barrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97809</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind the look of it. Sure its not the hottest looking thing out but i would still prefer this over the WRX hatch &amp; Astra VXR. Id even take this over the Hyundai Genesis due to fact it doesn&#039;t have a H badge :)

A 1.6L does sound a bit small. Any idea toruqe figures ? and im guessing its not going to be the most fuel efficient thing either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the look of it. Sure its not the hottest looking thing out but i would still prefer this over the WRX hatch &amp; Astra VXR. Id even take this over the Hyundai Genesis due to fact it doesn&#8217;t have a H badge :)</p>
<p>A 1.6L does sound a bit small. Any idea toruqe figures ? and im guessing its not going to be the most fuel efficient thing either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Original Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97798</link>
		<dc:creator>The Original Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97798</guid>
		<description>Not pretty. I do hope it looks nothing like these artist&#039;s impressions, otherwise I&#039;d agree with Supercujo: Hyundai should outsell this (except for diehard Nissan/Silvia fans).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not pretty. I do hope it looks nothing like these artist&#8217;s impressions, otherwise I&#8217;d agree with Supercujo: Hyundai should outsell this (except for diehard Nissan/Silvia fans).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97784</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97784</guid>
		<description>gotta like Nissan&#039;s sporty niche commitment. everyone else is backing off sports coupe, but nissan is taking huge advantage by releasing or planning to cover all 3 markets.

High - GTR
Medium - 370R
Low - S16


Just wish it was like the 90s, where Toyota, Honda, Mitsubishi had entries in all 3 sporty segments..


although, Nissan is still lacking significantly in terms of sales in the high production vehicles... well thats what happens when most resources are used for the &quot;medium-low&quot; production vehicles like sports coupes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gotta like Nissan&#8217;s sporty niche commitment. everyone else is backing off sports coupe, but nissan is taking huge advantage by releasing or planning to cover all 3 markets.</p>
<p>High &#8211; GTR<br />
Medium &#8211; 370R<br />
Low &#8211; S16</p>
<p>Just wish it was like the 90s, where Toyota, Honda, Mitsubishi had entries in all 3 sporty segments..</p>
<p>although, Nissan is still lacking significantly in terms of sales in the high production vehicles&#8230; well thats what happens when most resources are used for the &#8220;medium-low&#8221; production vehicles like sports coupes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Red</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97775</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97775</guid>
		<description>Do you have anything constructive to say on any subject Frugal?
Learn to spell too also.
Jash
PS Summoned enough guts to tell me what you drive yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have anything constructive to say on any subject Frugal?<br />
Learn to spell too also.<br />
Jash<br />
PS Summoned enough guts to tell me what you drive yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Red</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97774</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97774</guid>
		<description>Its a bodge up using all sorts of current Nissan design elements, they put Fuga tail lights on it ffs.
I&#039;m just happy they are making it, and I&#039;m sure when they do trot it out, that it will be *PRIMO* - much better than a Boxster...
Jash</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a bodge up using all sorts of current Nissan design elements, they put Fuga tail lights on it ffs.<br />
I&#8217;m just happy they are making it, and I&#8217;m sure when they do trot it out, that it will be *PRIMO* &#8211; much better than a Boxster&#8230;<br />
Jash</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FRUGAL_ONE</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97766</link>
		<dc:creator>FRUGAL_ONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97766</guid>
		<description>Needs to be $35k AT THE BEGINNING, not 6 months latter when its reduced from $39,990 when it has not sold in the volume needed.

$40k is to much, *they* will just buy GTi&#039;s. WRX&#039;s [doofdoof] and EVO base for that much.

Cheers

F-0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Needs to be $35k AT THE BEGINNING, not 6 months latter when its reduced from $39,990 when it has not sold in the volume needed.</p>
<p>$40k is to much, *they* will just buy GTi&#8217;s. WRX&#8217;s [doofdoof] and EVO base for that much.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>F-0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B///M3</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97750</link>
		<dc:creator>B///M3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97750</guid>
		<description>Side view looks ok but not sure about the fron though...1.6L boasting 180kW hmmm must be running at 20psi lol, bigger engine would have been a better choice IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Side view looks ok but not sure about the fron though&#8230;1.6L boasting 180kW hmmm must be running at 20psi lol, bigger engine would have been a better choice IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperCujo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97700</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperCujo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97700</guid>
		<description>Looks like Hyundai will be getting a few extra sales of the new Genesis Coupe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Hyundai will be getting a few extra sales of the new Genesis Coupe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reckless1</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97695</link>
		<dc:creator>Reckless1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97695</guid>
		<description>The engine is too small at 1.6l.  Yes it might be tuned for 180kw, but it would be better with a 2.0l instead.  

That would be more appealing as it would leave plenty of headroom for tuning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The engine is too small at 1.6l.  Yes it might be tuned for 180kw, but it would be better with a 2.0l instead.  </p>
<p>That would be more appealing as it would leave plenty of headroom for tuning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemesis</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97691</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97691</guid>
		<description>Geez, talk about ugly! With the S13, 14 &amp; 15 you could tell they were related (same dna), but this thing looks like their fat distant cousin! I&#039;m not too keen on this odd-ball styling direction Nissan seems to be taking with the 370Z and now the new 200SX... Why couldn&#039;t they make something that looks like a baby R35 Skyline...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez, talk about ugly! With the S13, 14 &amp; 15 you could tell they were related (same dna), but this thing looks like their fat distant cousin! I&#8217;m not too keen on this odd-ball styling direction Nissan seems to be taking with the 370Z and now the new 200SX&#8230; Why couldn&#8217;t they make something that looks like a baby R35 Skyline&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twilight</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/comment-page-1/#comment-97686</link>
		<dc:creator>Twilight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/17688/fresh-details-on-nissan-200sx-replacement/#comment-97686</guid>
		<description>looks like one of those imported skylines - aka. Infiniti g35 Coupe&#039; (from side-on/profile view)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like one of those imported skylines &#8211; aka. Infiniti g35 Coupe&#8217; (from side-on/profile view)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
